On 08 Mar 2021, at 01:49, Serpent7776 wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:44:29 +1300
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
>> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library: libBox2D.so - not
>> found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/Box2D-2.4.1.txz
>> Installing Box2D-2.4.1...
>> Extra
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:44:29 +1300
Jonathan Chen wrote:
> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library: libBox2D.so - not
> found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/Box2D-2.4.1.txz
> Installing Box2D-2.4.1...
> Extracting Box2D-2.4.1: .. done
> ===> libreoffice-
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 14:44, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> editors/libreoffice is currently failing to build with:
> ===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library:
> libboost_date_time.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libboost_date_time.so)
> ===> Return
Hi,
editors/libreoffice is currently failing to build with:
===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on shared library:
libboost_date_time.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libboost_date_time.so)
===> Returning to build of libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2
===> libreoffice-7.1.0.3_2 depends on share
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:36 AM Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> On 12/3/20 9:34 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Ideas welcome how to solve this, a week ago or so it built fine on r367678.
> >
> > FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #0 r368189M
> >
> > libreoffice-7.0.3.1_2 trying to build from port
On 12/3/20 9:34 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi all,
Ideas welcome how to solve this, a week ago or so it built fine on r367678.
FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #0 r368189M
libreoffice-7.0.3.1_2 trying to build from ports
X CUPS
X Kf5
X QT5
X TEST
X WEBDAV
Stops at
configure: WARNING: unrecognized opt
Hi all,
Ideas welcome how to solve this, a week ago or so it built fine on r367678.
FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE #0 r368189M
libreoffice-7.0.3.1_2 trying to build from ports
X CUPS
X Kf5
X QT5
X TEST
X WEBDAV
Stops at
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-build-version
Thank you in advanc
Solved after poppler update.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Executable/concat-deps
reference to `HASH_GetHashTypeByOidTag@NSS_3.8'
c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
gmake[3]: ***
[/ram/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-5.0.6.3/sdext/Executable_xpdfimport.mk:10:
/ram/usr/ports/editors/libre
On 2015-12-16 03:15, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, December 15, 2015 a las 05:31:39PM -0500, Michael Jung
escribió:
> I still have a copy of the failed workspace.
>
>matthias
FWIW
# $FreeBSD: head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile 403436 2015-12-09
23:43:30Z jbeich $
buil
El día Tuesday, December 15, 2015 a las 05:31:39PM -0500, Michael Jung escribió:
> > I still have a copy of the failed workspace.
> >
> > matthias
>
> FWIW
>
> # $FreeBSD: head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile 403436 2015-12-09
> 23:43:30Z jbeich $
>
>
ort ...' with this the make cores
at
some earlier point.
I've built it again the port within podriere mit more verbosity; the
failing part is this:
...
[build LNK] Executable/gengal.bin
S=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-5.0.3.2 &&
I=$S/instdir &&
El día Sunday, December 13, 2015 a las 03:10:27PM -0800, Don Lewis escribió:
> > I will give it a try with
> >
> > # poudriere bulk -j freebsd-head -p ports-20151208 -w editors/libreoffice
> >
> > There is also the flag -i for poudriere, but I have never used
al.sh is not used;
I was unable to use 'poudriere testport ...' with this the make cores at
some earlier point.
I've built it again the port within podriere mit more verbosity; the
failing part is this:
...
[build LNK] Executable/gengal.bin
S=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/wo
he result.
> In your case the command would be:
>
> poudriere testport -j freebsd-head -p ports-20151208 -i -o editors/libreoffice
Seems to be a moving target; now with the 'poudriere testport ...' some
make component crashes somewhere before getting to the point of the
problem w
d GAL] arrows
> >> Work on gallery
> >> 'file:///wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-5.0.3.2/workdir/Gallery/arrows'
> >> Existing themes: 0
> >> Existing themes: 1
> >> Failed to acquire theme
> >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/ed
On 13 Dec, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +,
> bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió:
>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242
>>
>> Bug ID: 205242
>> Summary: editors/
freebsd-head -p ports-20151208 -w editors/libreoffice
There is also the flag -i for poudriere, but I have never used this
before. Is there any guiding doc how to debug failing ports in
poudriere?
There is a way to archive the complete $port/work directory in
case the build failed.
# poudriere.conf
On 2015-12-13 17:20, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +,
> bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió:
>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242
>>
>> Bug ID: 205242
>> Summary: ed
El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +,
bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242
>
> Bug ID: 205242
> Summary: editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in
>
I think the issue is simply that you have the DEBUG options enabled for
your ports building (most likely in /etc/make.conf).
According to editors/libreoffice/Makefile, building libreoffice with DEBUG
enabled is broken.
Try building without DEBUG and see how you go.
Regards,
Ben
On Monday
Updating and installig of port editors/libreoffice[-i18n] fails with
the strange error shown below. Port
databases/postgresql94-[server|client] is installed on the system in
question, running
11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r279201: Mon Feb 23 10:00:43 CET
2015 amd64
What is wrong with
n:
>
>
> Since I need LibreOffice, I'd like to appreciate some solutions. pkg fetch
> editors/libreoffice reels in a binary package on both systems which isn't
> capable of
> installation via pkg add -f PATH_TO_BINARY_PACKAGE, since the binary package
> l
/RELEASE_34/final 197956) 20140216
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2
Thread model: posix
Selected GCC installation:
Since I need LibreOffice, I'd like to appreciate some solutions. pkg fetch
editors/libreoffice reels in a binary package on both systems which isn't
capable of
installati
Hi Matthias, cc list
Re your
> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-4.0.5.2/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/callvirtualmethod.cxx:
...
> but it dumps core on start; gdb bt is attached;
>
> matthias
By chance I just built libreoffice & mine starts
El día Monday, October 21, 2013 a las 04:49:54PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> [build CXX] bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/cpp2uno.cxx
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-4.0.5.2/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/callvirtualmethod.cxx:
> 62:53: error:
ion: '-Wshadow'
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation:
'-fno-strict-aliasing'
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-D LDAP_DEPRECATED'
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation:
'-fno-strict-aliasing'
clang: warning: argu
g: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are
> > unresolved dependencies:
> > editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf,
> > x11-fonts/gentium-basic
> >
>
> That is normal, both missing deps were declaring themself as restricted
> meaning
> th
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:13:12PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote:
> # pkg upgrade
> Updating repository catalogue
> pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf'
> pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are
> unresolved dependencies:
&
ependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf'
>>>> pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are
>>>> unresolved dependencies:
>>>> editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf,
>>>> x11-fonts/gentium-bas
ror while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are
>>> unresolved dependencies:
>>> editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, x11-fonts/gentium-basic
>>>
>>
>> Can you please give more information? Which repository do you use?
>> Also Fr
there are
>> unresolved dependencies:
>> editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, x11-fonts/gentium-basic
>>
>
> Can you please give more information? Which repository do you use?
> Also FreeBSD does not currently provide official repository for pkgng.
> -
2013/7/29 CeDeROM :
> # pkg upgrade
> Updating repository catalogue
> pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf'
> pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are
> unresolved dependencies:
> editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/lib
# pkg upgrade
Updating repository catalogue
pkg: Missing dependency matching 'x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf'
pkg: Error while trying to install/upgrade packages, as there are
unresolved dependencies:
editors/libreoffice: x11-fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf, x11-fonts/gentium-basic
-
Hello :-)
I have nonticed that editors/libreoffice binary packageng from
exonetric has some missing dependencies to install. Those dependencies
are fonts that needs to be installed by hand from ports with prior
make.conf modification which is not default:
WITH_PKGNG=yes
One of the ports are
/Development
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.7.2/xmloff/prj
it seems that the error is inside 'xmloff', please re-run build
inside this module to isolate the error and/or tes
Daniel Nebdal gmail.com> writes:
>
> Out of disk space (in whatever location it decompresses to)?
I repeated once again:
# pkg_add -n -v -r libreoffice
...
x lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/libucppkg1.so
x lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/libunopkgapp.so: bzip decompression failed
I had to ki
Out of disk space (in whatever location it decompresses to)?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:41 AM, jb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is this error about ?
>
> # pkg_add -r libreoffice
> Fetching
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest
> /libreoffice.tbz...lib/libreoffice/ba
Broken archive?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/editors-libreoffice-pkg-add-error-tp5765455p5765507.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
what is this error about ?
# pkg_add -r libreoffice
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest
/libreoffice.tbz...lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/libunopkgapp.so:
bzip decompression failed
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
Done.
#
ctl-c to a
Marking current, as observed with newer revision of pkg: libreoffice-3.5.6_1
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
i'm running freebsd-9.0
the update libreoffice from ports to 3.5.6.2 hangs here:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.6.2/vcl/prj
after:
/usr/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-19 15:36:54 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> Btw, does anybody know *why* the LibreOffice port attempts to
>> compile everything as C++0x or C++11? Is it really using those
>> features?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 20:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
>> Since when Clang started mimicking GCC 4.7?
>
> Most likely since somebody attempted to get t
On 2012-07-19 20:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
> Since when Clang started mimicking GCC 4.7?
Most likely since somebody attempted to get the latest GNU libstdc++
building with clang, and bumped into precisely this issue: if
__cplusplus has the sim
On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 01:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something
>> interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++
>> compilers may have different __cplusplus definitions and it may
>> caus
On 2012-07-19 01:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something
> interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may
> have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some
> strangeness. Clang, for example, used to set it to 1
2012-07-19 01:49, Jung-uk Kim skrev:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jung-uk Kim writes:
It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix.
Please stay tuned.
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Jung-uk Kim writes:
>
>>> It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix.
>>> Please stay tuned.
>
>> One issue is that different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something
interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may
have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some
strangeness. Clang, for example, used to set it to 1 b
.freebsd.org/~jkim/libreoffice-clang3.2.diff
cd /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/files
fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/libreoffice-clang3.2.diff
patch -p0 < libreoffice-clang3.2.diff
rm *.diff *.orig
cd ..
make clean
make
Let me know if it does not work.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
ging build errors, please see the section in:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development
>
> internal build errors:
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/testtools/source/bridgetest
>
> it seems that
Jung-uk Kim writes:
> It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please
> stay tuned.
One issue is that different problems have been presenting with very
similar symptoms, so that it's hard to help people who need technical
assistance. I don't see anything we can do about that,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 10:57:58 -0400, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to
> install devel-clang 3.2
I found that it does not build with clang-devel, yet. :-(
It is not clang's fault actually and I am work
I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to install
devel-clang 3.2
Lowell Gilbert skrev:Leslie Jensen
writes:
> I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure
> to fix the problem does not work for me.
What version of clang do you have insta
Leslie Jensen writes:
> I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure
> to fix the problem does not work for me.
What version of clang do you have installed?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
le making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/testtools/source/bridgetest
it seems that the error is inside 'testtools', please re-run build
inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix:
--
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:03:06PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> CC-ing the libreoffice maintainer.
>
> 2012/7/16 Olivier Smedts :
> > I changed the LIB_DEPENDS in editors/libreoffice to match the library
> > installed by libexttextcat-3.3.1, but didn't post it here bec
CC-ing the libreoffice maintainer.
2012/7/16 Olivier Smedts :
> I changed the LIB_DEPENDS in editors/libreoffice to match the library
> installed by libexttextcat-3.3.1, but didn't post it here because I'm
> not sure what I changed is *the* good fix :
> exttextcat-1.0.
2012/7/16 Doug Barton :
> On 07/16/2012 01:55, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> editors/libreoffice doesn't detect libreoffice any more since the
>> library name change. It tries to install it even if it's already
>> installed. It wants "
On 07/16/2012 01:55, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> editors/libreoffice doesn't detect libreoffice any more since the
> library name change. It tries to install it even if it's already
> installed. It wants "exttextcat.0" but :
> # ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep
Hello,
editors/libreoffice doesn't detect libreoffice any more since the
library name change. It tries to install it even if it's already
installed. It wants "exttextcat.0" but :
# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep exttextcat
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 8 16 jul 10:34 libexttextcat-
On 07/13/2012 03:39, Warren Block wrote:
> With the patch and base clang/llvm on two amd64 systems here,
> 'libreoffice --calc' shows the startup screen, then exits with status
> 139. No core dump or anything, it just quits. Other modules all seem
> to work.
I previously had this problem, but ca
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move
${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g.,
mv ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep /tmp
At least, it worked for me. :-)
I'll do a prope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 19:26:21 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-13 18:46:09 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:46:09 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:36:37 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dimitry Andric
> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ...
>>> It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try
>>> move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/lib
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ...
>>> It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try
>>> move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ...
>> It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try
>> move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and
>> try again, e.g.,
>>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> ...
>> It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move
>> ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g.,
>>
>> mv ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/prog
On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
...
> It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try move
> ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and try again, e.g.,
>
> mv ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep /tmp
>
> At least, it worked for me. :-)
FWIW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 06:39:08 -0400, Warren Block wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>> 2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric :
On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote: ...
On 07/13/2012 12:39, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
Yes, this works. Libreoffice 3.5.4 builds and installs at the first
try with the clang assert patch and WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG.
Now Calc core dum
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric :
On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was
fixed by upstream now. I have a patch r
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric :
> > On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > ...
> >> It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was
> >> fixed by upstream now. I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if anyone
2012/7/13 Dimitry Andric :
> On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
>> It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was
>> fixed by upstream now. I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if anyone
>> can try it out, and confirm it now allows you to build LibreOffice
>> w
On 2012-07-10 09:18, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
> It turned out this particular bug was yet another issue, but it was
> fixed by upstream now. I have a patch ready for -CURRENT, but if anyone
> can try it out, and confirm it now allows you to build LibreOffice
> without this particular assertion, t
On 2012-07-10 09:21, Doug Barton wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. Did you see my message where I reported
> that clang from ports works fine for LO on -current, but the base clang
> fails?
The lang/clang port is the same version as clang in base (3.1 release,
minus a few patches needed for b
Dimitry,
Thanks for looking into this. Did you see my message where I reported
that clang from ports works fine for LO on -current, but the base clang
fails? How does this change compare to the code that's already in the
clang port?
Doug
On 07/10/2012 00:18, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-0
On 2012-07-04 21:53, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-04 21:13, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2012-Jul-03 14:19:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>>> ...
Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed && EST != EST_Uninstantiated),
function isNothrow, fi
Hi,
yes, removing the offending 'case' was just a "it compiles" solution,
not the correct way to fix it.
Thanks for taking care of it
Best regards,
Luca
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Luca Pizzamiglio ha scritto:
>> I'm Luca and my system is a 8.3-STABLE system (then with
Luca Pizzamiglio ha scritto:
> I'm Luca and my system is a 8.3-STABLE system (then with clang derived
> from ports) on a i386 architecture.
> I had problem to build the latest libreoffice (3.5.4), so I tried to
> solve issues I met and I developed this easy patches.
>
> Are they acceptable? Are th
s I met and I developed this easy patches.
>
for me the patches seems to be already in the system
libreoffice 3.5.4_2 in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--savin
Hi all.
I'm Luca and my system is a 8.3-STABLE system (then with clang derived
from ports) on a i386 architecture.
I had problem to build the latest libreoffice (3.5.4), so I tried to
solve issues I met and I developed this easy patches.
Are they acceptable? Are this problem known also on other s
On 2012-07-04 21:13, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jul-03 14:19:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>> ...
>>> Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed && EST != EST_Uninstantiated),
>>> function isNothrow, file
>>> /usr/ports/lang/clang/work/llvm-3.1.src/to
On 2012-Jul-03 14:19:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>...
>> Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed && EST != EST_Uninstantiated),
>> function isNothrow, file
>> /usr/ports/lang/clang/work/llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/../../include/clang/AST/Type
On 2012-07-02 10:23, Leslie Jensen wrote:
...
> Assertion failed: (EST != EST_Delayed && EST != EST_Uninstantiated),
> function isNothrow, file
> /usr/ports/lang/clang/work/llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/../../include/clang/AST/Type.h,
>
> line 2873.
...
> clang: note: diagnostic msg: Pre
On FreeBSD 9.0 Release I built without problems with Clang 3.0
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> 02.07.2012 12:23, Leslie Jensen пишет:
>
>> internal build errors:
>>
>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
>>
Hi All,
02.07.2012 12:23, Leslie Jensen пишет:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.4.2/canvas/prj
it seems that the error is inside 'canvas'
I've got the same error at FreeBSD-CURRENT a
Help Please.
Thanks
.2/solver/unxfbsd.pro/inc/vcl/msgbox.hxx:34:
In file included from
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.4.2/solver/unxfbsd.pro/inc/vcl/btndlg.hxx:32:
In file included from
/usr/local/include/boost/ptr_container/ptr_vector.hpp:20:
/usr/local/include
/usr/local/include/*
Solution:
remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the editors/libreoffice ...
and then choose the language: in my case : LOCALIZED_LANG=pt-BR
put it in the Makefile, (or /etc/make.conf)
than..
make install package,
in a 8 cores cpu, with 8 jobs in paralell
...
finally I track down the problem with libreoffice,
the problem is with the boost headers and files
You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
Solution:
remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the editors/libreoffice ...
and
the problem is with the boost headers and files
> >>
> >> You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
> >> but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
> >>
> >> Solution:
> >>
> >> remove (temporary) boost-
searches /usr/local/include/*
Solution:
remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the editors/libreoffice ...
and then choose the language: in my case : LOCALIZED_LANG=pt-BR
put it in the Makefile, (or /etc/make.conf)
than..
make install package,
in a 8 cores cpu, with 8 jobs in
(temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the editors/libreoffice ...
and then choose the language: in my case : LOCALIZED_LANG=pt-BR
put it in the Makefile, (or /etc/make.conf)
than..
make install package,
in a 8 cores cpu, with 8 jobs in paralell, libreoffice builds in 2
hours
after
earches /usr/local/include/*
>
> Solution:
>
> remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
> then go to the editors/libreoffice ...
> and then choose the language: in my case : LOCALIZED_LANG=pt-BR
> put it in the Makefile, (or /etc/make.conf)
> than..
> make instal
Hi
2012/6/6 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi :
> You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
> but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
Thank you for pointing out the problem.
To make the priority of /usr/local/include lower than those from libreoffice,
remove CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS
/usr/local/include/*
>
> Solution:
>
> remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
> then go to the editors/libreoffice ...
> and then choose the language: in my case : LOCALIZED_LANG=pt-BR
> put it in the Makefile, (or /etc/make.conf)
> than..
> make install package
Hello all...
finally I track down the problem with libreoffice,
the problem is with the boost headers and files
You MUST use the boost that comes with libreoffice,
but somehow the makefiles searches /usr/local/include/*
Solution:
remove (temporary) boost-lib, boost-jam,
then go to the editors
Em Ter, 2012-06-05 às 19:35 +0200, Heino Tiedemann escreveu:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:49:06AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >>
> >>Is it possible to disable parallel make jobs?
> >>If so, what is the correct way to do so?
> >>
in the Makefile
near the
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
