Hello,
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:25 +0200, Nicolas Raspail wrote:
> ejabberd 2.0.2 is out, and we still don't see any news about a new port
> version.
> Is Shaun still maintening the port actively ?
It doesn't seem to be the case, but it's easy to install ejabberd 2.0.2
by
yourself "manually" if
Olivier Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:37 +0200, Bogdan Ćulibrk wrote:
Shaun Amott wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0)
version? Latest release was about 1 month ago
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:37 +0200, Bogdan Ćulibrk wrote:
> Shaun Amott wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0)
> >> ve
Shaun Amott wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0)
version? Latest release was about 1 month ago:
http://www.process-one.net/en/news/article/ejabberd_200_has_been_released
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0)
> version? Latest release was about 1 month ago:
> http://www.process-one.net/en/news/article/ejabberd_200_has_been_rel
Hello,
Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0)
version? Latest release was about 1 month ago:
http://www.process-one.net/en/news/article/ejabberd_200_has_been_released/
Otherwise I'll just try to install it "by hand" :)
Thanks &am
