Baptiste Daroussin [2016-11-05 12:14 +0100] :
> Actually having tested it, yes you are right it is way more simple, I have
> activated it in neomutt
Derek Schrock [2016-11-06 14:20 -0500] :
> I can't find any reason why it was off in mail/mutt, maybe because it
> was always off since 2006. Howe
> On 6 Nov, 2016, at 12:20, Derek Schrock wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:14:52AM EDT, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and
>>> security/gnu
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:14:52AM EDT, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and
> > security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use
> > securi
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and
> security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use
> security/gpgme with mutt. I haven't been using gpgme for a while,
> mainly because t
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and
> security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use
> security/gpgme with mutt. I haven't been using gpgme for a while,
> mainly because t
Hello,
While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and
security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use
security/gpgme with mutt. I haven't been using gpgme for a while,
mainly because the packaged versions of both mail/{neo,}mutt have
it disabled and I was too lazy to compil
