Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Brooks Davis wrote on 07/07/2015 19:06: On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: [...] If consensus can't be achieved or there is a good reason not to enable this by default, then postfix-sasl as a slave port may be a desirabl

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-07-07 11:29, Carmel NY wrote: On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:06:05 +, Brooks Davis stated: We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with "build everything by hand" which makes us look bad. I'

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Carmel NY
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:06:05 +, Brooks Davis stated: >We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of >turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with "build >everything by hand" which makes us look bad. I've been somewhat tempted to >adding a

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 8/07/2015 3:06 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: >>> Hi Olli and ports@, >>> >>> I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to >>> request that SASL be enabled in the

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > > Hi Olli and ports@, > > > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > > mail/postfix.

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Roger Marquis
On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for mail/postfix. We don't use the upstream Postfix package but have noticed that sites serving IMAP use Dovecot more of

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Gregory Orange
On 07/07/15 13:45, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever possible,

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-06 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
On 7/07/2015 3:45 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: >> Hi Olli and ports@, >> >> I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to >> request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for >> mail/postfix. I am attempting to use bin

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-06 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > Hi Olli and ports@, > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever > possible, and so far

mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-06 Thread Gregory Orange
Hi Olli and ports@, I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever possible, and so far this is the first where I currently have to build