Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-31 Thread Randy Bush
i think this whole thing is worth a few days to settle in our heads. essentially, if we believe that freebsd is used extensively in headless server deployments, we should make that easy and smooth. But even a headless server can run X clients with the display being on some other (presumably

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-31 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 31.05.2009 at 21:25:33 +0900, Randy Bush wrote: i think this whole thing is worth a few days to settle in our heads. essentially, if we believe that freebsd is used extensively in headless server deployments, we should make that easy and smooth. But even a headless server can run X

make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Randy Bush
as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever option to tell ports that you just do not want an x server or any of it's 500kg friends. but i can not seem to find it. i do cvsup-without-gui, emacs-nox11, etc. but one mistake with some port, and you get the whole

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:32:50PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever option to tell ports that you just do not want an x server or any of it's 500kg friends. but i can not seem to find it. i do cvsup-without-gui, emacs-nox11,

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:32:50PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever option to tell ports that you just do not want an x server or any of it's 500kg friends.  

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Florent Thoumie wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever option to tell ports that you just do not want an x

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Randy Bush
Something like the following would work as a safety net. --- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk.orig2009-05-26 13:42:52.0 +0100 +++ /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk 2009-05-26 13:42:58.0 +0100 @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ # xserver - there's only one atm, I guess everything can fit into the

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:52:53AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: Something like the following would work as a safety net. --- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk.orig 2009-05-26 13:42:52.0 +0100 +++ /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk 2009-05-26 13:42:58.0 +0100 @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ #

Re: make.conf no x option

2009-05-26 Thread Randy Bush
i think this whole thing is worth a few days to settle in our heads. essentially, if we believe that freebsd is used extensively in headless server deployments, we should make that easy and smooth. But even a headless server can run X clients with the display being on some other (presumably