On Aug 15, 2009, at 22:58, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Thomas Backman wrote:
Thanks, guys!
However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something
about
portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing
this
is related? Maybe not, though (see
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable=YES to /etc/periodic.conf.local
and youll be informed of packages that need updating.
Sorry to pick on your response,
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Files in ports tree and INDEX are out of sync, because of the -I in
portsnap command. The -I updates INDEX only!
I sort of suspected that, but thanks for confirming. That would
definitely do it. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I
won't see your answers! :)
Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab:
0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update
So, long story short:
[r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF
--- Checking the package registry database
[r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l
In message b787d58e-9157-48e7-adf3-e8d54f8af...@exscape.org,
Thomas Backman (seren...@exscape.org) wrote:
First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I
won't see your answers! :)
Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab:
0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update
So,
N.J. Mann wrote:
Some years ago I tried using portupgrade, but had all sorts of problems
with its database getting corrupted. In desparation I tried portmaster
and have been a very happy since. (Thanks Doug!).
Well I don't know about the desperation part, but you're welcome in
any case. :)
Thomas Backman wrote:
First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I
won't see your answers! :)
Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab:
0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update
So, long story short:
[r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF
--- Checking the package registry database
Thomas Backman wrote:
[...]
[r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF
--- Checking the package registry database
[r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l ''
dnsmasq
ezm3
libtool
python26
[r...@chaos ~]# pkg_version | awk '$2 !~ /=/'
On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Thomas Backman wrote:
[...]
[r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF
--- Checking the package registry database
[r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l ''
dnsmasq
ezm3
libtool
python26
In message 6b5b7698-ccd8-48ff-a5fb-0349d4cc1...@exscape.org,
Thomas Backman (seren...@exscape.org) wrote:
On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Thomas Backman wrote:
[...]
[r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF
--- Checking the package registry database
[r...@chaos ~]#
Thomas Backman wrote:
However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about
portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this
is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail).
libtool-1.5.26 ! Comparison failed
This is
Thomas Backman wrote:
Thanks, guys!
However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about
portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this
is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail).
[r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]# portsnap -I fetch
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:48:53 +0200
Thomas Backman seren...@exscape.org wrote:
On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Thomas Backman wrote:
[...]
[r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF
--- Checking the package registry database
[r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l ''
dnsmasq
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable=YES to /etc/periodic.conf.local
and youll be informed of packages that need updating.
Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good time to
remind people of some basic mailing list etiquette:
1. Read the whole
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:06:56 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
Why not just add weekly_status_pkg_enable=YES to /etc/periodic.conf.local
and youll be informed of packages that need updating.
Sorry to pick on your response, but this thread is a good
Doug Barton wrote:
Thomas Backman wrote:
Thanks, guys!
However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about
portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this
is related? Maybe not, though (see later in the mail).
[r...@chaos /usr/ports/ports-mgmt]#
16 matches
Mail list logo
