Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?

2012-08-10 Thread HU Dong
I just submitted a patch ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170532 ) for devel/kdbg, updating it from 2.2.0 to 2.5.1. Since I'm not familiar with cmake, I didn't figure out how to make "DOCS" component optional. Hope someone could help. B.R. HU Dong On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Chri

Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?

2012-08-10 Thread Chris Rees
Reply from maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" wrote: > Hello, > > It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR. > > B.R. > Thomas > > 2012/8/10 Chris Rees > >> Copying in maintainer. >> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" wrote: >> >>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5

Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?

2012-08-10 Thread Chris Rees
Copying in maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" wrote: > kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port > devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a > little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it > should stay with the older ver

why kdbg hasn't been upgraded?

2012-08-10 Thread HU Dong
kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. B.R. HU Dong __