Re: upgrade 5.3 to 5.4

2005-03-16 Thread Nick Pavlica
I believe that this would do it, but I don't think they have created the 5_4 branch yet. Of course I haven't looked today :) Please keep in mind that the 5_4 final is still a few weeks out. --Nick On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:29:35 +0200, Perttu Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! If I want

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

2005-03-16 Thread Jim Pazarena
Jean Lagarde wrote: I have been troubleshooting reboots over the last weekend, I think I might have enough clues now to get some useful hints from an expert. FreeBSD 5.3-release (see dmesg below for details) The problem seems to be with trying to run with 1.5GB vice 512MB of RAM. The system has

Re: Makefiles compatible with both BSD and GNU make?

2005-03-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 16), David Kelly said: I got the silly idea that I want one Makefile to work with both BSD and GNU makes. Silly me. Fairly simple Makefiles work but when expanding my Makefile to include .depend generation I get tripped. BSD make automagically uses .depend if one is

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

2005-03-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:45:07PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: I too have a similar problem. I have 7 identical systems. all with identical MoBo's SCSI hard drives and RAM. One machine reboots frequently with 5.3 where with 4.9 it never rebooted. 6 machines are fine. 1 reboots. I changed

FTP server on 5.3

2005-03-16 Thread Joshua Lewis
I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using the handbook and was instructed to make a new user ftp. So that worked fine and I was able to upload to ftp's home dirrectory but wanted to know if I can safley delete the .* files in his home dirrectory. I was also

Re: FTP server on 5.3

2005-03-16 Thread Jeff Wirth
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:56:12 -0800 (PST), Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using the handbook and was instructed to make a new user ftp. So that worked fine and I was able to upload to ftp's home dirrectory but wanted

Re: Install squirrelmail

2005-03-16 Thread W. D.
Please see comments below: At 10:55 3/16/2005, Martin Schweizer wrote: Hello I want to install squirrelmail from ports (cvsuped today). Make runs without problems but after make install the following error occurs: Build complete. (It is safe to ignore warnings about tempnam and tmpnam).

Re: FTP server on 5.3

2005-03-16 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 16, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote: I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using the handbook and was instructed to make a new user ftp. So that worked fine and I was able to upload to ftp's home dirrectory but wanted to know if I can safley delete the

Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum

2005-03-16 Thread Nick Pavlica
Andrea, I have started testing with gstripe and have had good results to this point. I'm still a little unclear about how to make my stripe persistent after a reboot? My server consists of three drives. A 40GB drive that has the operating system and two 200Gb drives that I'm using for the

Re: Install squirrelmail

2005-03-16 Thread Martin Schweizer
Thanks. I will try it asap. Am Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:28:46PM -0600 W. D. schrieb: Please see comments below: At 10:55 3/16/2005, Martin Schweizer wrote: Hello I want to install squirrelmail from ports (cvsuped today). Make runs without problems but after make install the following

Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters

2005-03-16 Thread kalin mintchev
thanks Charles... You were exceeding the amount of socket buffer memory available there. i'm aware of that. the question is why? huge difference. so i think about 260 lines of netstat -p tcp output like: tcp4 0 33580 server.http c68.112.166.214..3307 FIN_WAIT_1 has

Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum

2005-03-16 Thread John Pettitt
Nick Pavlica wrote: Andrea, I have started testing with gstripe and have had good results to this point. I'm still a little unclear about how to make my stripe persistent after a reboot? My server consists of three drives. A 40GB drive that has the operating system and two 200Gb drives

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

2005-03-16 Thread RW
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 03:10, Jean Lagarde wrote: I have been troubleshooting reboots over the last weekend, I think I might have enough clues now to get some useful hints from an expert. FreeBSD 5.3-release (see dmesg below for details) The problem seems to be with trying to run with

Spare local IP address - not physical alias

2005-03-16 Thread Andrew P.
Hello! I have people connecting to my server via ppp. When they establish connection the server gets 172.18.0.1 and they get 172.18.0.x. A dns server is running on 172.18.0.1. The problem is that sometimes there are no ppp connections, and the server does not have the 172.18.0.1 address. But I

Re: /bin/sh, php mysql

2005-03-16 Thread Tofik Suleymanov
George Dew wrote: After upgrading to BSD 4.11, I've been having all sorts of problems. Please help! - The shell no longer supports the up cursor key, which gives a history of commands that you type. Which shell you were using before upgrade ? And which one do u use now ? Just change it to one,that

Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters

2005-03-16 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:44 PM, kalin mintchev wrote: You were exceeding the amount of socket buffer memory available there. i'm aware of that. the question is why? The literal answer is that this pool of open connections with lots of unsent data is clogging things up. Why those connections are not

Re: flash plugin?

2005-03-16 Thread RW
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 01:49, Tom Vilot wrote: I have the port flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.12 installed (using firefox-1.0.1_2,1). I find that it crashes firefox pretty consistently. However, a quick grep of flash in the ports reveals these: flash-0.9.5 flashplugin-0.4.3

RE: Connection refused

2005-03-16 Thread Vince
This is strange; I just allowed telnet in /etc/inetd.conf and reinitialized; from here on sage/ns1, this. No need to enable telnet in inetd.conf if you're just using it to test a tcp connection to another host, that's only if you want to be able to log on to the host from

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

2005-03-16 Thread Boris Spirialitious
--- Stas Myasnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:43:33 -0800 (PST), Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED] ïèñàë(à): When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have 4.9. is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x. AFAIK FreeBSD4 isn't run on amd64 in 64-bit mode.

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

2005-03-16 Thread Boris Spirialitious
--- cyb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html Looks like you will need to use 5.3-release (or 5.3-stable/5.4-prerelease if you have more than 4GB). Why can you not use 5.3? 5.3 is too slow, and we have custom code. Why use faster hardware just to use

Re: Makefiles compatible with both BSD and GNU make?

2005-03-16 Thread David Kelly
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:50:17PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: FreeBSD's make understands the gnu-style include syntax with no leading dot, even though it's undocumented (grep for SYSVINCLUDE in the source). Automake is the usual way around compatibility issues; it has its own conditional

Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

2005-03-16 Thread Danny
With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD guru's refuse to use CVSup, or is this overkill? Thank you, ...D ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum

2005-03-16 Thread Nick Pavlica
John, That did the trick. I built a new kernel with the GEOM_STRIPE option and added an entry to my fstab to mount the volume(stripe) and everything worked like a charm. In the end this turned out to be much simpler than I had anticipated. I wish this information would have been available in

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

2005-03-16 Thread Nick Pavlica
Boris, I would agree that my initial impression of 5.3 was that it was slow compared to 4.x. After some tuning, I now have 5.3 running at an acceptable performance level. You may want to start testing the newer versions of 5 current. I have noticed improved performance on my test servers and

Failure with php4 and libgd support

2005-03-16 Thread Alexander Chamandy
Hello, I'm having some problems with php4 and libgd support. I'm running FreeBSD/i386 5.3 which was upgraded from the 4.x STABLE branch a long time ago, but I think a portion of the upgrade may've gone horribly wrong with regards to the compiler or include files. Most things compile fine

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

2005-03-16 Thread RW
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 22:49, Boris Spirialitious wrote: No, we have product that run on intel machine. It would be nice if we could use same image for both intel and operton platforms. You can, provided you use the i386 version of FreeBSD and don't optimize the build for anything above

NFS and rc.conf options (statd lockd, necessary?)

2005-03-16 Thread Benjamin Keating
Im running FreeBSD 5.2.1 and 5.3 machines The server is 5.2.1 and has the following in it's rc.conf: nfs_client_enable=YES # This host is an NFS client (YES/NO). nfs_reserved_port_only=YES # Provide NFS only on secure port (YES/NO). nfs_server_enable=YES # This host

Re: NFS and rc.conf options (statd lockd, necessary?)

2005-03-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:29:57PM -0800, Benjamin Keating wrote: rpc_lockd_enable=NO # Run NFS rpc.lockd needed for client/server. rpc_statd_enable=NO # Run NFS rpc.statd needed for client/server. Are these to be used or are they obsolete? I don't understand why

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

2005-03-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD guru's refuse to use CVSup, or is this overkill? Depends on your threat model, i.e. what are you afraid of? If

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

2005-03-16 Thread Danny
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD guru's refuse to use CVSup, or is

sendmail is reaching tao once more...

2005-03-16 Thread Gary Kline
The reason that mail (and other connections) were refused from my primary nameserver to here had to do with a missing line in /etc/rc.conf. Could it be this??: defaultrouter=10.0.0.1 I had the DHCP ifconfig line set correctly. If it isn't the

Re: Connection refused

2005-03-16 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:33:10PM -, Vince wrote: This is strange; I just allowed telnet in /etc/inetd.conf and reinitialized; from here on sage/ns1, this. No need to enable telnet in inetd.conf if you're just using it to test a tcp connection to another host,

Question

2005-03-16 Thread Jonathan Farrugia
Hi, My Name is Jonathan Farrugia and In Just Downloaded FreeBSD v5.3 from the following server: ftp://ftp2.ru.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.3/; and i downloaded disc1 and disc2, and then i got confused cause the name of disc1 was fbsd_miniinst and the name of disc2 was fbsd_livefs.

Re: Question

2005-03-16 Thread Bnonn
Actually, I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this either. What is CD2 for? I've never had occasion to use it. Jonathan Farrugia wrote: Hi, My Name is Jonathan Farrugia and In Just Downloaded FreeBSD v5.3 from the following server:

Re: Question

2005-03-16 Thread Chris
Bnonn wrote: Actually, I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this either. What is CD2 for? I've never had occasion to use it. Jonathan Farrugia wrote: Hi, My Name is Jonathan Farrugia and In Just Downloaded FreeBSD v5.3 from the following server:

RE: Question

2005-03-16 Thread Marco Greene (ML)
From the handbook version-bootonly.iso - Everything you need to boot into a FreeBSD kernel and start the installation interface. The installable files have to be pulled over FTP or some other supported source. version-mini.iso - Everything you need to install FreeBSD. version-disc1.iso -

Re: FTP server on 5.3

2005-03-16 Thread Aperez
try to look into pure-ftpd. You might find your solutions with it On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:30:19 -0500 Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 16, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote: I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using the handbook and was

Re: inode

2005-03-16 Thread Jason Henson
On 03/16/05 08:06:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2005-03-16 13:49, Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:27:21 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Show us the output of: # df -ik $ df -ik Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

2005-03-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:49:05PM -0500, Danny wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Should I be concerned about my servers that use

Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?

2005-03-16 Thread RW
On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:05, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote: If I just do: cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u Do I need portupgrade at all then? I think you do, as I understand the situation, portmanager lacks two significant features. 1. All ports have an implicit dependence on

Re: Serial console

2005-03-16 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Dienstag, 15. März 2005 12:37 schrieb Daniel Bye: [...] The machine boots - you see the BIOS POST, the SATA controller comes up, then you see FreeBSD's boot messages on the console. As soon as the kernel launches, we get the login: prompt and then nothing. So, we know the hardware works;

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

2005-03-16 Thread Danny
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:59:27 +, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: When is the last time a FreeBSD CVSup server was compromised - if ever? I don't know that it's ever happened. I don't know that that's really the threat model

Re: FTP server on 5.3

2005-03-16 Thread Christopher Nehren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-03-17, Aperez scribbled these curious markings: try to look into pure-ftpd. You might find your solutions with it As much as I've been tempted to recommend pure-ftpd in the course of reading this thread, I've restrained from doing so for one

Re: Illogical usage of swap

2005-03-16 Thread Bob Johnson
Colin J. Raven wrote: Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in the handbook and elsewhere. In fact I did read that exerpt you quoted the URL for above sometime previously, when it was quoted in another thread on the list. Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue

No rebuild on make buildworld

2005-03-16 Thread Frank de Bot
Hi, When I do make buildworld, the whole world is build from scratch again. But I've noticed that some changes of my own will let it fail and when I change it, the process starts over again!! How can I build the world, without everything to be rebuild? Thanks in advanced, Frank de Bot

Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 91, Issue 41

2005-03-16 Thread Christopher Kelley
Brian John wrote: Hello, When I try to build openoffice I get the following error: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/FREEBSDGCCIruntime/libprldap50.so \ echo /dev/null cp: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/mozilla/dist/bin/libnss3.so: No such file or directory dmake: Error code 1, while making

Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?

2005-03-16 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 05:03 pm, you wrote: On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:05, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote: If I just do: cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u Do I need portupgrade at all then? I think you do, as I understand the situation, portmanager lacks two significant

Re: No rebuild on make buildworld

2005-03-16 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 05:21 pm, Frank de Bot wrote: Hi, When I do make buildworld, the whole world is build from scratch again. But I've noticed that some changes of my own will let it fail and when I change it, the process starts over again!! How can I build the world, without

Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 91, Issue 41

2005-03-16 Thread Jason Henson
On 03/16/05 20:23:13, Christopher Kelley wrote: Brian John wrote: Hello, When I try to build openoffice I get the following error: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/FREEBSDGCCIruntime/libprldap50.so \ echo / dev/null cp: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/mozilla/dist/bin/libnss3.so: No such file or directory dmake:

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

2005-03-16 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:49:05PM -0500, Danny wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Should I be concerned about my servers that use

RE: $100 SATA RAID Card 5.3 compatible

2005-03-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Danny Howard mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:37:24PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: I tried following the instructions at: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ and couldn't make it work. I ended up installing a

Ethernet issue: works one way but not another

2005-03-16 Thread John Allesee
This one has got me stumped. Been working on it for 3 days now with no resolution. Please help. I have a 686 system that I just installed 5.3 on through ftp. So I know that my network setup works. I have 2 networks that I am trying to access through. One network is connected to a 100mb 3com

Re: $100 SATA RAID Card 5.3 compatible

2005-03-16 Thread Danny Howard
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:52:46PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: Is your solution better? You can deliver your own opinion, my resolution is at: http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/24/freebsd-howto-gmirror-system/ I was able to make the atacontrol method work flawlessly via a simulated

Re: Ethernet issue: works one way but not another

2005-03-16 Thread abu khaled
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:06:32 -0500, John Allesee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This one has got me stumped. Been working on it for 3 days now with no resolution. Please help. I have a 686 system that I just installed 5.3 on through ftp. So I know that my network setup works. I have 2 networks

DSL LAN Sharing with FreeBSD-5.3+natd+ipfw

2005-03-16 Thread Edwin D. Vinas
hi, how do i permanently set the rules for ipfw? whenever i restart my FreeBSD server which has natd firewall enabled, the ipfw returns to default which is 65535 151 14646 deny ip from any to any. so i need to repeat ipfw -f flush and execute the commands below so that my LAN can access the

Ports and Packages: Updating problems

2005-03-16 Thread Gerry Freymann
I just upgraded from FreeBSD 4.9R to 4.11R (cvsup'd sources and ports, buildworld, buildkernel, etc). Then I went to work on upgrading my ports. Portupgrade and some manual intervention did a fairly decent job. I used the ports which compiled mostly everything (Xfree-4 went fine too) but it

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

2005-03-16 Thread Jean Lagarde
Thanks to all who replied. So it seems the consensus is a likely hardware issue, and I am leaning that way as well now. I will try the suggestion about disabling ACPI however. To address some of the other comments, that exact CPU-mobo-memory configuration worked fine running Win2000 for many

Re: Ports and Packages: Updating problems

2005-03-16 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 07:25 pm, Gerry Freymann wrote: I just upgraded from FreeBSD 4.9R to 4.11R (cvsup'd sources and ports, buildworld, buildkernel, etc). Then I went to work on upgrading my ports. Portupgrade and some manual intervention did a fairly decent job. I used the ports

Re: cannot build openoffice

2005-03-16 Thread Christopher Kelley
Jason Henson wrote: On 03/16/05 20:23:13, Christopher Kelley wrote: Brian John wrote: dmake: Error code 1, while making './unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/so_moz_runtime_files' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. Does anyone know why this might happen or what

Re: Which ports use C++?

2005-03-16 Thread Toomas Aas
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:53:05PM +0200, Toomas Aas wrote: Or should I more or less expect that I need to rebuild *all* the ports anyway? That's best; there are other incompatibilities that are there when you have old (compiled on 5.2) versions of a library and you try and

Question about install. (two hard drives, install freebsd on second)

2005-03-16 Thread CARRIE WUERFEL
I am currently stuck running Windows Me on a Dell Desktop Pentium 3 1ghrtz with 512mb ram. I recently dusted off a old hard drive that contains a whole 2 gigs of hard drive space. I have installed the hard disk drive and am wanting to install FreeBsd on it. Before I go about mucking things

Re: Question about install. (two hard drives, install freebsd on second)

2005-03-16 Thread Thomas Foster
You can install FreeBSD indepedently on its own drive while another OS coexists on a previous drive in your system. You would most likely want to use an alternate bootloader installed on the mater boot record of the first drive.. such as GAG or Grub.. but the FreeBSD bootloader works just as

no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Laszlo Zsolt Nagy
Hi All! I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line with ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself. This is a router, the other device is connected to a local network 172.16.0/20 messiasping 127.0.0.1 ping:sendto:no route to host messiasnetstat -nr Destination

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Luke Kearney
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:20:23 +0100 Laszlo Zsolt Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: Hi All! I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line with ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself. This is a router, the other device is connected to a local network

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote: Hi All! I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line with ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself. This is a router, the other device is connected to a local network 172.16.0/20 messiasping 127.0.0.1 ping:sendto:no route to host

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Laszlo Zsolt Nagy
Try to turn off your firewall first. ( pfctl -d or something similar if using ipfw ) I hope this helps. Vladimir Vladimir Dvorak I set firewall_enable=NO in /etc/rc.conf Did not work. Please also note that I did not change my configuration on this machine, I just compiled a new kernel. All

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladimir Dvorak
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote: Try to turn off your firewall first. ( pfctl -d or something similar if using ipfw ) I hope this helps. Vladimir Vladimir Dvorak I set firewall_enable=NO in /etc/rc.conf Did not work. Please also note that I did not change my configuration on this machine, I just

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

2005-03-16 Thread Laszlo Zsolt Nagy
What did you changed in kernel CONFIG ? My original kernel was the GENERIC kernel that was included on the distribution CD. I only added some options to that, did not remove anything. Added things were: NETGRAPH (all netgraph modules) HZ=1000 DUMMYNET BRIDGE (can it be the problem?) and some

xorg.conf

2005-03-16 Thread Gert Cuykens
This works but i still get a warning no matching device section for instance busid PCI:2:0:1 found How can i get rit of the warning ? Does somebody know how to tweak the xorg.conf for a radeon 9800xt so all features are enabled ? Does BusID PCI:2:0:0 need to be PCI:2:0:1 ? # #

<    1   2