kernel panics

2010-07-16 Thread n dhert
Where is the best place to report problems with kernel panics in FreeBSD 8.0 and to get help? I posted a message in this mailing list freebsd-questions, but if acutally never was published (?) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists

Re: qmail under 8.0-STABLE

2010-07-16 Thread Peter
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:40:33 -0600 > "Peter" wrote: > >> > I have the following config: >> > >> > FreeBSD ppert-zone.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 14 >> > 01:44:13 UTC 2010 >> > r...@canopus.ispsystem.net:/root/src/sys/i386/compile/ISPSYSTEM >> > i386 >> > >> > it is a vps runnin

cannot install opera

2010-07-16 Thread zaxis
>sudo portsnap fetch update >cd /usr/ports/www/opera /usr/ports/www/opera>sudo make install clean Password: ===> opera-10.10.20091120_2 has known vulnerabilities: => opera -- Data URIs can be used to allow cross-site scripting. Reference:

Re : cannot install opera

2010-07-16 Thread Alexandre L.
Yesterday, I have written to the maintainer of the Opera port, and he gave me this link : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148294 The port update is in the pipes ;) Alexandre. --- En date de : Ven 16.7.10, zaxis a écrit : > De: zaxis > Objet: cannot install opera > À: freebsd-questi

Re: kernel panics

2010-07-16 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:03 AM, n dhert wrote: > Where is the best place to report  problems  with kernel panics in FreeBSD > 8.0 and to get help? Have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html Cheers > > I posted a message in this mailing list freebsd-questions, but if acutally > never wa

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Jens Rehsack writes: > 2010/7/16 Dan Nelson : [...] >> Try the following patch: Thanks, I'll try it when I'm on my FreeBSD box. > Can I do this without a full world rebuild? (I do not develop in FBSD > actively). > Otherwise I recommend (the test case was in OP) that someone with a > separate

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 07/16/10 08:36, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Jens Rehsack writes: 2010/7/16 Dan Nelson: [...] Try the following patch: Thanks, I'll try it when I'm on my FreeBSD box. Great \o/ [...] I had to develop a workaround for all other boxes anyway. As a workaround you can use setpwent(3). I c

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Jens Rehsack writes: [...] > I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous. dangerous ? why ? > You can take a look at > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/REHSACK/DBD-Sys-0.01_01/lib/DBD/Sys/Plugin/Unix/Users.pm > Jens -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 C

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Jens Rehsack writes: [...] I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous. dangerous ? why ? Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source. getpwent(3) delivers entries from yp, too (or LDAP) etc. - and when I call setpwent(

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Jens Rehsack writes: > On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> Jens Rehsack writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous. >> >> dangerous ? why ? > Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source. > getpwent(3) delivers entries from yp, to

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 07/16/10 09:59, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Jens Rehsack writes: On 07/16/10 09:12, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Jens Rehsack writes: [...] I cached the entires - I rate setpwent as to dangerous. dangerous ? why ? Because it modifies something - and I might not know the source. getpwent(3) delivers

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Jens Rehsack writes: [...] > You're absolutely right - I never took a deeper look, because I always > was only interested to read the (user|group) data and expected setpwent > to modify such an entry. Its UNIX :P > A quick look into Stevens "Advanced Programming in the UNIX environment" > coul

Re: GUI for ACL

2010-07-16 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:17:25 +0530 Ashish SHUKLA articulated: > I've not used KDE since they released KDE 4, but IIRC, KDE 3.5.x used to have > ACL support integrated in it[1] by default. Are you sure there isn't any such > setting you probably missing during compilation in KDE 4.x ? > > Refere

Sticky bit Change ??

2010-07-16 Thread bsd info
Hello all, Thank you for your response in advance. I am running i386 FreeBSD 7.2 p4 on an HP DL380 G2. I upgraded from 6.1 p23 in March but the machine was built last fall. I am not at liberty to upgrade the machine due to its purpose. However I agree it is time. I had been using sticky

OT 8.1 Release Status

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Moellering
I noticed that the 8.1 release status page hasn't been updated since the 4th. I know the team is very close to the release. The last indication is that the geom system needs work. Can someone update the page? I hate to send "Is it done yet?" sorts of e-mails so I keep checking the release

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said: > 2010/7/16 Dan Nelson : > > In the last episode (Jul 16), Ashish SHUKLA said: > >> Well, OP is also invoking 'endpwent()' after every 'getpwent()' > >> invocation which according to GNU/Linux's glibc and NetBSD's libc (as > >> OP mentioned) should r

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said: 2010/7/16 Dan Nelson: In the last episode (Jul 16), Ashish SHUKLA said: Well, OP is also invoking 'endpwent()' after every 'getpwent()' invocation which according to GNU/Linux's glibc and NetBSD's libc (as OP

Xchess?

2010-07-16 Thread Chris Maness
What ever happened to xchess the gnu-chess engine client? Did it merge into something else? Thanks, Chris Maness ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: OT 8.1 Release Status

2010-07-16 Thread Jason
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 09:47:12AM -0400, Mark Moellering thus spake: I noticed that the 8.1 release status page hasn't been updated since the 4th. I know the team is very close to the release. The last indication is that the geom system needs work. Can someone update the page? I hate to se

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said: > On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said: > >> Could you please take a look to my other mail (getgrent related) - there > >> seems another bug ... > > > > Do you have another one-liner that will repro

Re: FreeBSD vs YouTube

2010-07-16 Thread parv
in message <20100714192246.b4daa560.free...@edvax.de>, wrote Polytropon thusly... > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:06:14 +0300, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > > Is this the same way the Linux users have it?:-) > > I don't think so. The Linux "Flash" plugin seems to work better on > Linux than it does on

Re: getpwent bug?

2010-07-16 Thread Jens Rehsack
On 07/16/10 18:13, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said: On 07/16/10 15:07, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jul 16), Jens Rehsack said: Could you please take a look to my other mail (getgrent related) - there seems another bug ... Do you have another one-l

pf behavior question

2010-07-16 Thread Mario Lobo
Hi; System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010 i386 The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation. Supose I have the following rules: pass in log inet proto tcp from $int_if to any port 8021 flags S/SA keep state tag test rule 2 rule 3

pf behavior question (addendum)

2010-07-16 Thread Mario Lobo
Sorry. Forgot to ask: Will the packet be actually tagged on the first rule, even though rule parsing continues? will it reach the last rule already tagged? Thanks again. Hi; System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010 i386 The question is about how pf acts

pf behavior question (addendum)

2010-07-16 Thread Mario Lobo
Sorry. Forgot to ask: Will the packet be actually tagged on the first rule, even though rule parsing continues? will it reach the last rule already tagged? Thanks again. Hi; System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010 i386 The question is about how pf acts

Re: pf behavior question

2010-07-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote: > Hi; > > System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT > 2010 > i386 > > The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation. > > Supose I have the following rules: > > > pass in log inet proto tcp from $int_if to

Re: pf behavior question

2010-07-16 Thread Mario Lobo
On Friday 16 July 2010 20:58:31 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote: > > Hi; > > > > System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT > > 2010 i386 > > > > The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation. > > > > Supose I have the

Re: Re : cannot install opera

2010-07-16 Thread Franci Nabalanci
It is interesting why they are waiting for update if they found vulnerabilities on June 25th and version 10.11 was out long time ago. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Alexandre L. wrote: > Yesterday, I have written to the maintainer of the Opera port, and he gave > me this link : http://www.fr