Sorry for the boring question, but is the default configuration file
/sys/amd64/conf/DEFAULTS anywhere include in a regular configuration
file for the kernel while building the kernel?
I looked for include statements in GENERIC, but didn't find one. I use
custom kernel config files and adapt most
On Monday 07 November 2011 18:34:16 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:19 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > I ahve a problem that computer freeze when I compailing ports without
> > error. Sometimes freeze (hard reset help) and sometimes reboot.
> > I did ran memtest 24 hours and there were no errors, I
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:20:12 +1100
David Morton wrote:
> I'm very new to BSD, and had a career that left me mostly doing
> commercial IT help desk in Windows, but am hoping to finally learn
> and do something of interest to me: get deep knowledge of one
> platform.
>
> A local magazine, Silicon
On 11/08/11 12:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
Sorry for the boring question, but is the default configuration file
/sys/amd64/conf/DEFAULTS anywhere include in a regular configuration
file for the kernel while building the kernel?
I looked for include statements in GENERIC, but didn't find one. I use
cu
Am 11/08/11 14:12, schrieb Niclas Zeising:
> On 11/08/11 12:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Sorry for the boring question, but is the default configuration file
>> /sys/amd64/conf/DEFAULTS anywhere include in a regular configuration
>> file for the kernel while building the kernel?
>>
>> I looked for inc
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Samuel Magnusson wrote:
1. I can?t zap the server with Ctrl-Alt-Backspace. Nothing at all happens. I
have checked that it isn't disabled in xorg.conf, and even tried to put in
the reverse boolean value there. Not that I couldn't live without zapping,
but...when I know abo
On 05/11/2011 19:47, Chris wrote:
I'm having difficulty copying a directory tree from my FreeBSD server to
USB storage. The problem is that the tree contains file and folder names
which have spaces, similar to the following:
./foo bar/some name.tar.gz
./foo bar/child dir/some other name.tar.gz
We FOUND IT.
We did do the procedure that Michael recommended, but unfortunately none of the
nfs mount labels /var /usr /tmp contained any data after booting into single
user mode.
What we did find was a NFS folder that contained a huge 300 meg .tar.gz file
that wasn't finished downloading.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Martin von Gagern
wrote:
> Thought the same, and gave it a try. zpool claims there is no pool of
> that name. "zpool -f" doesn't help. Looking at the device nodes, it
> appears as though OI would only recognize 3 of my 4 HDDs, which seems
> really strange, given th
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:14:48 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Samuel Magnusson wrote:
>
> > 1. I can?t zap the server with Ctrl-Alt-Backspace. Nothing at all happens.
> > I
> > have checked that it isn't disabled in xorg.conf, and even tried to put in
> > the reverse boole
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Polytropon wrote:
And according to the handbook, this does _not_ remove the
need for a X configuration file (usually /etc/X11/xorg.conf)
including ``Option "DontZap" "off"'' in the "ServerFlags"
section.
For at least the most recent Xorg, it's not needed. Can't recall
whe
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Polytropon wrote:
And according to the handbook, this does _not_ remove the
need for a X configuration file (usually /etc/X11/xorg.conf)
including ``Option "DontZap" "off"'' in the "ServerFlags"
section.
For at least the most recent
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:55 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Warren Block wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> >> And according to the handbook, this does _not_ remove the
> >> need for a X configuration file (usually /etc/X11/xorg.conf)
> >> including ``O
Hi!
On my FreeBSD 8.2 Release I use KDE 4 and Opera 11.52.
Everytime when I start (use) Opera I have operapluginwraper..core in the /home
directory..
In the /var/log/mesages I got also:
Nov 8 15:15:20 athena console-kit-daemon[1395]: WARNING: kvm_getenvv failed:
cannot open /proc/4679/mem
N
Pardon me if this may seem like a stupid question, but this is
something that's been bugging me for a long time, and none of my
research has turned up anything useful yet.
I've been trying to understand what the deal is with regards to the
displaying of the "extended" 8-bit character set, i.e., 8-
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:33:01 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> I don't have /proc on my system and I don't know why I should have it?
You'll need it in case you're using Linux ABI stuff, and
if I remember correctly, this is required for the Opera
"Flash" plugin.
I'm using such a combination here. That's why I
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, ajtiM wrote:
On my FreeBSD 8.2 Release I use KDE 4 and Opera 11.52.
Everytime when I start (use) Opera I have operapluginwraper..core in the
/home directory..
In the /var/log/mesages I got also:
Nov 8 15:15:20 athena console-kit-daemon[1395]: WARNING: kvm_getenvv
failed:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:42:36 -0600, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
> I've been trying to understand what the deal is with regards to the
> displaying of the "extended" 8-bit character set, i.e., 8-bit characters
> with the MSB set.
Quite simply Unix dates from the days where the 8th bit was used as
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:55 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Polytropon wrote:
And according to the handbook, this does _not_ remove the
need for a X configuration file (usually /etc/X11/xorg.c
Am 09.11.2011, 01:42 Uhr, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier :
Pardon me if this may seem like a stupid question, but this is
something that's been bugging me for a long time, and none of my
research has turned up anything useful yet.
I've been trying to understand what the deal is with regards to the
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:17:27 -0600 (CST)
Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:42:36 -0600, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> >
> > I've been trying to understand what the deal is with regards to the
> > displaying of the "extended" 8-bit character set, i.e., 8-bit
> > characters with the MS
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:17:27 -0600 (CST)
Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:42:36 -0600, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> >
> > I've been trying to understand what the deal is with regards to the
> > displaying of the "extended" 8-bit character set, i.e., 8-bit
> > characters with the MS
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:51:31 +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
> Am 09.11.2011, 01:42 Uhr, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier :
>
> > Pardon me if this may seem like a stupid question, but this is
> > something that's been bugging me for a long time, and none of my
> > research has turned up anything useful yet.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:58:04 -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> So, what would be the safest bet as far as the most "universal"
> representation for these characters? Something I've long wondered
> about when I've e-mailed people and copied/pasted these characters (are
> they really seeing what I'm
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:51:31 +0100
"Michael Ross" wrote:
> Am 09.11.2011, 01:42 Uhr, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier
> :
>
> > Pardon me if this may seem like a stupid question, but this is
> > something that's been bugging me for a long time, and none of my
> > research has turned up anything useful
--As of November 8, 2011 7:58:04 PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier is alleged to
have said:
So, what would be the safest bet as far as the most "universal"
representation for these characters? Something I've long wondered
about when I've e-mailed people and copied/pasted these characters (are
they
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 03:10:24 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:51:31 +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
> > Am 09.11.2011, 01:42 Uhr, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier
> > :
[snip]
> > > I've been trying to understand what the deal is with regards to
> > > the displaying of the "extended" 8-bit
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:27:16 -0400
Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of November 8, 2011 7:58:04 PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier is
> alleged to have said:
>
> > So, what would be the safest bet as far as the most "universal"
> > representation for these characters? Something I've long wondered
> > about
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:24:18 -0600
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> Even more confusing, selecting the character and copying it to the
> clipboard, the UTF-16 representation (0xfc) is what actually gets
> used. Pasting this single-byte version into an X terminal (any of
> them: xterm, gnome-terminal
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
>
>
> Yes, and this is one area where the labels are more than a little
> misleading as well. My natural inclination is think of UTF-8 as being a
> single-byte representation for each character in the set, whereas
> UTF-16, as the name implies, would be the "wide",
30 matches
Mail list logo
