On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:04:35PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > > > Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
> > > > implemented in some form long ago. For exa
Da Rock herveybayaustralia.com.au> writes:
> ...
> > What I found is you start by right clicking on the application menu
> > and show properties where you can change from default to custom file
> > menu - ~/.config/menus/xfce-applications.menu matches the default and
> > is an xml file.
> > .
On 03/08/12 12:41, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 04/03/2012 17:37, jb wrote:
Hi,
I find it annoying having same items listed in multiple menus, e.g.
- Accessories - Bulk Rename
Orage Globaltime
Terminal
Thunar File Manager
Help
- Off
On 3/6/12 11:41 PM, bo wang wrote:
Hello:
Recently I want to do Link Aggregation for increasing the
speed. I use a Cisco 3750 Switche and two IBM Server R with BSD
9.0 .I do link aggregation According to this page.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-aggregat
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:04:35PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > > > Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
> > > > implemented in some form long ago. For e
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 22:04:35 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > > > Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
> > > > implemented in some form long ago. For example, u
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > > Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
> > > implemented in some form long ago. For example, updated applications
> > > are compiled and available online. You
bo wang wrote:
Thank your for reply.
First,I think the Link Aggregation can't support too much ports
aggregation.So I change the configure, just get together two
ports.Below are configuration information of c3750:
??? > Switch#show eth 1 sum Check your eth discriptor this is for Linux
is n
On 04/03/2012 17:37, jb wrote:
Hi,
I find it annoying having same items listed in multiple menus, e.g.
- Accessories - Bulk Rename
Orage Globaltime
Terminal
Thunar File Manager
Help
- Office - Orage Globaltime
- System - Bulk
I see in the tar(1) man-page on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE two options that I would
like to use:
--uid #
--gid #
Naturally, these are used to override the on-disk credentials while creating (or
extracting) an archive.
Problem?
They don't seem to be supported.
% tar cf some_archive.tar --gid 0 --uid 0
---
LoadModule fastcgi_module libexec/apache22/mod_fastcgi.so
AddHandler php5-fastcgi .php
FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/data/php -socket
/var/run/spawn_fcgi.sock
---
this works for my apache for default virtualhost, yet if i use same
thing under a virtualhos
Thank your for reply.
First,I think the Link Aggregation can't support too much ports
aggregation.So I change the configure, just get together two
ports.Below are configuration information of c3750:
Switch#show eth 1 sum
Flags: D - downP - bundled in port-channel
I - stand-alone s
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:05:37 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
> > implemented in some form long ago. For example, updated applications
> > are compiled and available online. You can use "pkg_add -r" to
> > install the newest binary packag
FreeBSD-8.2 STABLE
samba34-3.4.14
A recent update os samba is now forcing me to enable "winbindd" or else
samba will not start. I have no idea why I need it enabled or how to
eliminate it and yet still get samba to start.
Now, when booting up "ntp" reports this error:
Updating motd:.
Starting nt
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:28 AM, David Jackson wrote:
> For now I have totally given up on FreeBSD
>
When was this going to occur exactly?
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On 07/03/2012 18:56, David Jackson wrote:
> You have just now declared complete indifference to and alienated about 99%
> of the potential user base and their needs, those who could care less about
> compiling source and messing with compiler options.
You're forgetting that one size does *not* fit
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:53:13AM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
> All this works just fine on i386. However, when I compile everything on
> AMD64 I get an error message that says the lower level library needs to be
> compiled with fPIC. If I add that to the Makefile for the lower level
> library an
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:27 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Jackson
> wrote:
> > You have just now declared complete indifference to and alienated about
> 99%
> > of the potential user base and their needs, those who could care less
> about
> > compiling source
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:42:52 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > > As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature
>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:35:47PM -0500, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> People have not had a chance to get their hands on to even start on it yet.
> The few boards out in public before last week were developer boards that
> were really hard to get a hold of. Most current devel is based on linux due
> to
People have not had a chance to get their hands on to even start on it yet.
The few boards out in public before last week were developer boards that
were really hard to get a hold of. Most current devel is based on linux due
to the binary blob.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Jackson wrote:
> You have just now declared complete indifference to and alienated about 99%
> of the potential user base and their needs, those who could care less about
> compiling source and messing with compiler options.
Maybe FreeBSD isn't right for the
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:20:19PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> I think that your statement here is fundamentally flawed and wrong, because
> you have assumed that it is impossible for the OS to be able to be user
> friendly and geek friendly at the same time. This is wrong. In fact, I have
> outl
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
> One faulty argument I heard was that it is often not a good idea to
> upgrade to new software release.
This is an argument that you appear to have completely misunderstood.
The point of suggesting that you use release package is that it's
Has there been any movement toward getting BSD Unix systems running on
the Raspberry Pi platform? I've been searching for information along
those lines, but so far have seen nothing.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
On 7 March 2012, at 01:40, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have encountered something that I do not understand. Everything works
>> fine. Basically I have a bunch of user modules (low level) that are built
>> into a dynamic library. If I write top level code that calls mo
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Benjamin Tovar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> >
> > So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
> > and us newbies and other users who really dont want the extra
> > trouble of compiling will get o
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Gould wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Tovar wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> >>
> >> So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
> >> and us newbies and other users who rea
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Tovar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
>>
>> So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
>> and us newbies and other users who really dont want the extra
>> trouble of compiling will get our bi
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Gould wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, David Jackson
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> This is irrelevant. FreeBSD has these options because most of its
> >> users are system administrators, developers or other types of geeks.
> >> Serving these needs is a ma
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:46PM -0500, David Jackson wrote:
>
> So it seems like a happy compromise here. You will get what you need
> and us newbies and other users who really dont want the extra
> trouble of compiling will get our binaries. Everyone gets what they
> want and is happy, it seem
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, George Hartzell wrote:
> Carsten Mattner writes:
> > Has anyone successfully installed FreeBSD as a single boot system
> > on an EFI Mac?
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by a single boot system.
>
> I have Mac Pro that runs Mac OS on on disk (actually a pai
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, David Jackson wrote:
>
>>
>> This is irrelevant. FreeBSD has these options because most of its
>> users are system administrators, developers or other types of geeks.
>> Serving these needs is a major part of what FreeBSD does. That's why
>> we have the long stan
> This is irrelevant. FreeBSD has these options because most of its
> users are system administrators, developers or other types of geeks.
> Serving these needs is a major part of what FreeBSD does. That's why
> we have the long standing motto: "FreeBSD - The power to serve".
> People who don't w
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:42 AM, David Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Polytropon wrote:
>
>> David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
>>
>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
>> > As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature
>> > opt
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Rob wrote:
> I ran into problems with pkg-upgrade when I upgraded from
> 8.2p6->9.0-RELEASE, and part of the problem ended up being a tool
> pkg_upgrade used (uma). That was the reason portupgrade didn't work as
> well. I ended up hacking the support tool and pk
I ran into problems with pkg-upgrade when I upgraded from
8.2p6->9.0-RELEASE, and part of the problem ended up being a tool
pkg_upgrade used (uma). That was the reason portupgrade didn't work as
well. I ended up hacking the support tool and pkg_upgrade to do what I
needed, but they are both d
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:42 PM, David Jackson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Especially on systems low on resources, compiling from
>> source is _the_ way to squeeze every required (!) bit
>> of performance out of code. Even if compiling may require
>> some time (due to optimization flags), the result can
>>
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature
> > options and the most commonly used settings into the binary packag
Carsten Mattner writes:
> Has anyone successfully installed FreeBSD as a single boot system
> on an EFI Mac?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by a single boot system.
I have Mac Pro that runs Mac OS on on disk (actually a pair in a
software RAID) and FreeBSD from another pair (gmirror RAID).
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:28 AM, David Jackson wrote:
> I still have yet to find a resolution to the problems I have had with
> binary packages and upgrades on FreeBSD. Binary upgrading is broken with
> every tool I have tried.
>
> There is no real reason why FreeBSD should not provide a facility
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
> Hiya
>
> I would like to ask.
>
> Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
> aliasing.
>
> I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
> another process to vr0:1.
>
setfib(1)
--
Adam
> Many of your issues are non-issues, as your suggestions were
> implemented in some form long ago. For example, updated applications
> are compiled and available online. You can use "pkg_add -r" to
> install the newest binary package that is available, or you can update
> your an installed appli
On Mar 7, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 03/07/2012 04:24 PM, Mikel King wrote:
>> On 3/7/12 9:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
>>> Hiya
>>>
>>> I would like to ask.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
>>> aliasing.
>>>
>>> I basically want to
Hmm what is the problem ? Is there a log or something that you can share ?
Usually portsnap, freebsd-update, pkg_add -r or portupgrade that do binary
update should be enough
Regards
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Sinyal Bagus XL, Nyambung Teruuusss...!
-Original Message-
From:
David, allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:28:47 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> As for compile options, the solution is simple, compile in all feature
> options and the most commonly used settings into the binary packages, for
> the standard i386 CPU.
I think this can develop int
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:50 AM, wrote:
> Hmm what is the problem ? Is there a log or something that you can share ?
> Usually portsnap, freebsd-update, pkg_add -r or portupgrade that do binary
> update should be enough
>
>
Ive tried them all. I will work on getting some logs to post here shortly
I still have yet to find a resolution to the problems I have had with
binary packages and upgrades on FreeBSD. Binary upgrading is broken with
every tool I have tried.
There is no real reason why FreeBSD should not provide a facility for users
to be able to binary upgrade to the most recent versio
On 03/07/2012 04:24 PM, Mikel King wrote:
> On 3/7/12 9:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
>> Hiya
>>
>> I would like to ask.
>>
>> Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
>> aliasing.
>>
>> I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
>> another proc
On 3/7/12 9:39 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about
ip aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
another process to vr0:1.
Thanks
Brent
Brent,
You can rename an interf
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 13:33 +0100, J B wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> > ...
> >> I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
> >> the following is a true state
On 03/07/2012 03:39 PM, Brent Clark wrote:
> Hiya
>
> I would like to ask.
>
> Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
> aliasing.
>
> I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
> another process to vr0:1.
What do you want to accomplish?
P
On 07/03/2012 14:39, Brent Clark wrote:
> I would like to ask.
>
> Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about
> ip aliasing.
>
> I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and
> another process to vr0:1.
Yes, you can have alias addresses very easi
Hiya
I would like to ask.
Is it possible to, do network interface aliasing. Im not talking about ip
aliasing.
I basically want to bind one process to network interface vr0:0 and another
process to vr0:1.
Thanks
Brent
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.
On 3/6/12 12:30 PM, krad wrote:
>
> apart from a major bump in the version of pf.
Still the old syntax though, what I'm eager for is 10.0 with the upgrade
to 4.8 openbsd PF.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Has anyone successfully installed FreeBSD as a single boot system
on an EFI Mac?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@fre
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> ...
>> I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
>> the following is a true statement:
>>
>> a page is accounted for in active + in
Hello,
Intel AMT "Serial over LAN" does not work in FreeBSD.
PCI Serial Port device -> no driver attached -> ttyuX not added to system.
# pciconf
Current:
none1@pci0:0:3:3: class=0x070002 card=0x10048086 chip=0x2e178086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
But should be:
uart0@pci0:0:3:3: class=0x07000
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:23 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
> > I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
> > the following is a true statement:
> >
> > a page is accounted for in active + inact
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have encountered something that I do not understand. Everything works fine.
Basically I have a bunch of user modules (low level) that are built into a
dynamic library. If I write top level code that calls modules in that library,
everything works just fine on i386 and A
I have encountered something that I do not understand. Everything works fine.
Basically I have a bunch of user modules (low level) that are built into a
dynamic library. If I write top level code that calls modules in that library,
everything works just fine on i386 and AMD64. However, the a
Good morning,
Have just sent to freebsd-hackers mailing list the way of doing this.
I say this because perhaps could be useful for someone...
Best regards.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On 07/03/2012 01:39, Da Rock wrote:
> On 03/07/12 04:13, Adam Vande More wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bernt Hansson
>> wrote:
>>> Again, a "problem" is that packages can only be generated
if the port has been installed
>>> Why is that. I hope you can educate me on that.
>> B
Sorry top post, not so smartphone.
Do this on your c3750, in privileged mode:
Show ether 1 sum
On 7 Mar 2012, at 05:41, bo wang wrote:
> Hello:
> Recently I want to do Link Aggregation for increasing the
> speed. I use a Cisco 3750 Switche and two IBM Server R with BSD
> 9.0 .I d
64 matches
Mail list logo