On 12/07/2013 11:19 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code
jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'`
The first line output by jls is a title line which the cut command is
suppose to cut out so the first field on line 2 gets select
On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code
>
> jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'`
>
Looks a little over complicated... why not just..
jls -j jailname jid
--
Devin
> The first line output by jls is
In a .sh script I'm trying to get the jid for a single jail using this code
jid=`jls -j jailname | cut -f 1- | awk '{print $1}'`
The first line output by jls is a title line which the cut command is
suppose to cut out so the first field on line 2 gets selected by the awk
command. This is not w
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 14:37, David Noel wrote:
>
> If this is the case replacing the kernel should have no effect. But
> what then? Any thoughts?
I'd contact freebsd-fs@ and see what they have to say
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On 7/11/13, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras
> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a
>>
>> buggy kernel.
>
> This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with
>
> -j>1 we'd not allow you
In the last episode (Jul 11), Radek Krejca said:
> Hello,
>
> I have problem with heavy load of my nfsd server. There is connected about 70
> diskless machines, but in readonly mode. I catched traffic and get this:
>
> 21:00:39.715337 IP diskless-1.3297435097 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh
> Unk
what is normal though these days? A lot of the fibre vhdsl lines do use
dhcp on the wan link in the uk as they are just presented as ethernet,
whilst other providers pppoe.
On 11 July 2013 13:47, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> This all sounds like a very strange thing to be doing! But I hate it when
This all sounds like a very strange thing to be doing! But I hate it
when people answer my questions with "Why would you want to do that", so
I won't.
Binding an IPv4 address using a MAC address, which is the answer to a
lot of DHCP problems. But your explanation "my client acts like a
router
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Eduardo Morras wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500
David Noel wrote:
I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake
of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and
installkernel.
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1
Hi Sam,
The idea that for the internal networks you should use so-called private
address space (unless you are a big organization that need and can get a
public address block of its own). You can read about it in more detail here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network
So, for your ups
ops %s/rand/range/
On 11 July 2013 12:42, krad wrote:
> alter the pool rand on the network to use say, x.x.x.1-199 on a /24, and
> then allocate your statics >200 but <= 254 or add something similar to your
> isc-dhcp config
>
> host host.intranet {
> hardware ethernet c8:60:33:1d:f3:57;
>
alter the pool rand on the network to use say, x.x.x.1-199 on a /24, and
then allocate your statics >200 but <= 254 or add something similar to your
isc-dhcp config
host host.intranet {
hardware ethernet c8:60:33:1d:f3:57;
fixed-address 192.168.210.81;
option host-name "host.intranet";
}
A
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras
wrote:
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a
buggy kernel.
This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with
-j>1 we'd not allow you to do that without jumping through hoops.
_
thanks Eugene,
you're right but i forgot to say that my client acts like a router. i mean
none of interfaces should have ip address in same range (this is conflict
for me). i can manage each interface to get ip address from DHCP or
manually. so one interface may get ip address from dhcp server wher
Hi Sam,
Actually I think this is wrong approach. Correctly configured networks
should be consistent and should not need such 'fixes'. Also you should
observe the IP provided by upstream DHCP server otherwise it is an
invitation for trouble (both technical and possibly legal).
Are the 'other' i
hello all
i have a question about dhcp client. i want to know if there is any way to
understand the ip address which is offered by server before it assigned to
the interface.
i have a freebsd system which one of its interfaces should get ip address
from dhcp server whereas other interfaces have ip
Ah. That very well might be it. I did call buildkernel with j > 1.
I'll boot an 8.4 memstick and replace the kernel.
Thanks,
-David
On 7/11/13, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500
> David Noel wrote:
>>
>> I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500
David Noel wrote:
>
> I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake
> of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and
> installkernel.
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a buggy
kernel.
On 7/11/13, Alexandre wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Noel
> wrote:
>
>> I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went
>> without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference
>> between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror an
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Noel wrote:
> I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went
> without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference
> between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and
> the ones that didn't have a 4-disk
I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went
without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference
between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and
the ones that didn't have a 4-disk ZFS striped mirror configuration
(RAID10). They both use the
On 11/07/2013 06:47, Radek Krejc(a wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with heavy load of my nfsd server. There is connected about 70
diskless machines, but in readonly mode. I catched traffic and get this:
21:00:39.715337 IP diskless-1.3297435097 > storage.nfs: 112 getattr fh
Unknown/A27801CEDE115FA
22 matches
Mail list logo
