d) Are there any good reasons not to do it this way (remember, this
> is not a mission critical setup, and its main purpose is to tinker)
>
>
> Regards,
> Martin McCann
>
Thanks for all the input - I decided to go with the suggested registrar
gandi.net, I picked my domain, and paid the
Hi,
I've been trying to get my ldap authentication working, something I
have done
before with little issue, but this time around it is causing real pain.
Pretty much the same problems Jan HREHO was having back in Febuary -
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 18:32, Doug Poland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm stuck... I need a bootable DOS floppy (for BIOS upgrade) to fix a
> broken Windows box.
>
> I have no problem formatting and putting an msdosfs on a floppy but it
> appears I cannot make it bootable with native tools.
>
> I tr
Hi all,
I've recently updated to 64 bit (spending way to much money in the process!)
and want to get freebsd 6.0 64 bit installed. I am running windows 64 on it
(the main reason for the upgrade was games) so it will be dual boot. I have
freebsd on a 32 bit system on a kvm switch, so it is n
On Thursday 08 September 2005 22:12, Eric Murphy wrote:
> Hey guys heres a quick question for you...
>
> I am trying to ping a certain website with the following command . ping
> yahoo.com
>
> I would like to log all requests that come back higher then 100 or any #
> i specify.
>
> I figured I cou
In a final effort to resolve this issue -
It is widely agreed that anthony's issue lies in a custom chipset for
his hardware.
It is widely agreed that anthony is not willing to put any effort into
trying to verify this.
If is widely belivied that the person who could answer these queries
conc
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:25 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim writes:
>
> > Um...because it took an adapter that generically had worked, but after
> > modifying it didn't?
>
> It was referenced by an OS that generically worked, but then did not
> after the modification of the ada
> No, I was referring to the additional modularity and stability made
> possible by the additional abstraction of a HAL.
>
Please explain this to me - I have had a lot of experience in OS design,
and would like you, who obviously from you remarks, have extensive OS
design knowledge, point out to
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:13 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim writes:
>
> > That's nice. I wasn't talking about NT there. I was talking about
> > DOS.
>
> I'm not running anything named DOS.
>
> > Command line, popular before Windows but after CP/M...maybe
> > you've heard of
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:03 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim writes:
>
> > It's deduction.
>
> It can't be. There's nothing to deduct from.
Exactly, because you have time and time again refused to put any effort
into deducing anything. It, as you have said, is the fault of the
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:00 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim writes:
>
> > From the way you were complaining, I had the impression that MS was
> > bending backwards to help in issues while the FreeBSD people were
> > immature children.
>
> They do a much better job than the Fre
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:20 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Thats because you seem unable to grasp modern concepts.
>
> None were under discussion.
As far as you can see, which shows the limit of your percption.
>
> > If you think that performance criteria
> >
> I'm not that interested in running Linux. Linux is for kids.
>
This pretty much sums up your attitute. Most people on this list use the
right tool for the right job, they are not interested in labeling a
piece of code for 'adults' or for 'children'. I am sure IBM, SUN, and
plently of other hi
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:16 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Martin McCann writes:
>
> > And how do you write software that will be able to communicate with
> > hardware, irrelevent of what changes have been made to that hardware?
>
> The hardware and software must a
> > Or had whatever extra code was needed for the microcode mods.
>
> Yes, or approached the hardware in a way that made the modifications
> irrelevant.
And how do you write software that will be able to communicate with
hardware, irrelevent of what changes have been made to that hardware?
_
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 20:50 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Chris writes:
>
> > No - NOT the PC - the hardware that's in question. The Adaptec WITH the
> > modified code. I'm willing to bet, it's not.
>
> Should I check for restrictions on chipset temperature, relative
> humidity, and atmospher
>
> No, I'll be told that as long as I'm dealing with children instead of
> adults.
this is around the fith time recently you have either insinuated or
outright claimed that the participants of this mailing list are all
immature children. And yet you return time and time again asking for
help. W
In an effort to try to stop this list from becoming Antony personal
anger outlet forum, I would like to put in my 2p worth.
Antony is displaying typical bully boy tactics - aggressively attacking
any response that does not coincide with what he want to hear while
throwing out and endless stream
18 matches
Mail list logo
