On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this
and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
Mario, I couldn't agree more and it's a very
On Friday 18 November 2011 13:13:33 C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about
this and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root servers
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thursday 17 November 2011 06:08:05 Nomen Nescio wrote:
If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root
servers
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
I hope the coffee wasn't too hot. I was just trying to convey meaning, not to
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:24:54 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know
about this and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
If these rootless people get control of what goes
On Thursday 17 November 2011 09:05:32 Jerry wrote:
Sorry, but I totally disagree with you assessment of this bill. First of
all, because I have not fully read it and secondly because I think it
may in fact have merit.
There are all ready too many scumbags who are illegally ripping off the
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no universal
standard for copyright infringement, etcetera. The best
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:55:02 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:00:04 -0500
Rod Person articulated:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:55:02 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or
On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Rod Person wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:55:02 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly
On 2011-11-17 13:28, Mario Lobo wrote:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
There is and they need to be changed radically to reflect peoples actions.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:38:49 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:00:04 -0500
Rod Person articulated:
Theft is theft no matter how a socialist/fascist tries to color
it.
So what you are saying then is that there should be roadblocks on
ever street to
On 11/17/11 13:05, Jerry wrote:
First of all, because I have not fully read it...
it mean that you does *not* agree because *your* partial-ignorance?
and later you state Only a felon has a reason to fear such enforcement.
is there any better arguments to support that point of
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:02:39AM -0500, Rod Person wrote:
As someone that has been stop because of how I look and where I live, I
find the 'only those that break laws have reason to fear them argument'
extremely naive.
It is not just naive, it is not an argument. If we would pass anything
On 11/17/11 9:02 AM, Rod Person wrote:
As someone that has been stop because of how I look and where I live, I
find the 'only those that break laws have reason to fear them argument'
extremely naive.
To put it mildly. Before you know it, records of what you've been up to
on the Internet
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:16:50 -0500
Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 11/17/11 9:02 AM, Rod Person wrote:
As someone that has been stop because of how I look and where I
live, I find the 'only those that break laws have reason to fear
them argument' extremely naive.
To put it
On Thursday 17 November 2011 11:02:39 Rod Person wrote:
Then once a new law is on the books, the officials find ways to use the
laws in way the were not intended as in the case of the Patriot Act
were it's use is over 90 some percent of the time has nothing to to
with terrorism.
This is
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:09:59AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2011 06:08:05 Nomen Nescio wrote:
Thanks, I spewed coffee out of my nose when I read this.
Just in case you're not a totally alienated individual, this means that I
should not worry about the issue,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:55:02AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:57 -0300
Mario Lobo articulated:
Aren't there enough laws already to protect copyright?
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:55:02AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no universal
standard for copyright infringement, etcetera. The best way to
protect copyrighted material is stopping its
On Nov 17, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:55:02AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Laws to protect copyrighted or patented goods certainly exist.
Unfortunately, they are poorly enforced. There is no universal
standard for copyright infringement, etcetera. The best way
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act of copyright infringement if you want to, but
please do not conflate two
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:56:06 -0500
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:56:06PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act of copyright
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:56:06PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:17:50 -0700
Chad Perrin articulated:
Copyright infringement is copyright infringement -- and not theft --
no matter how hyperbolic your choice of phrasing. Castigate people
for the unlawful act of copyright
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:41:51PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
Oh, of course -- pirated, like the hundreds of CDs and audiocasettes
and DVDs I have, though I've stopped consuming new music in any form from
corporations that sue their own customers.
clarification: Those are hundreds of CDs and
Quoth Jerry on Thursday, 17 November 2011:
Only those who break laws have a reason to fear them.
That statement carries large assumptions about the wisdom and
benevolence of government.
--
.O. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com
..O | sterl...@camdensoftware.com |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
I'd exhort readers to not take Jerry's absurd accusations and hostile
attitude to anyone who doesn't just applaud his every effort as an
indication that they should ignore the rest of what he says; in theory,
some of it might
My assessment is still being built so thanks for sharing your thoughts on
this, Jerry
Not that I paid attention to the proposal, because I decided a few decades
ago governments were the root of all evil and nothing they do is for
anybody's good. There isn't enough time in the universe to read
On Thursday 17 November 2011 17:28:39 Dave U. Random wrote:
They already p0wned the root servers. Look at the Microsoft case. The
federales went into private server farms and set up their own boxes. You
think anything goes through American backbones and the guys in black suits
with no sense of
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this
and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
If these rootless people get control of what
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
Only those who break laws have a reason to fear them.
That is a catastrophically incorrect view. Ask an attorney how much is spent
by corporations and private citizens defending themselves against both
wrongful lawsuits and wrongful prosecution. It's enough
My apologies to all for this, specially to those who already know about this
and those who think too little of it.
I am really worried about this:
http://americancensorship.org/
If these rootless people get control of what goes through the root servers, we
will loose the last free medium of
33 matches
Mail list logo
