On 10/02/2013 6:35 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
01.10.2013 21:12, dweimer wrote:
On 10/01/2013 11:09 am, dweimer wrote:
I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being
able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able
to
determine that its looking for th
01.10.2013 21:12, dweimer wrote:
On 10/01/2013 11:09 am, dweimer wrote:
I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being
able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to
determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64,
the file is l
01.10.2013 19:09, dweimer wrote:
I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being
able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to
determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64,
the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/am
On 10/01/2013 11:09 am, dweimer wrote:
I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being
able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to
determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64,
the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/
I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being
able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to
determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64,
the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able to
work around
Hi,
I am trying to create a virtual machine of PC-BSD release 9.1 64 bit in VMware
Workstation Version 98.02 build-1031769 based on PCBSD9.1-x64-DVD.iso
downloaded from ftp://mirrors.isc.org/pub/pcbsd/9.1/amd64/PCBSD9.1-x64-DVD.iso
in Windows 7 64 bits system. The screen resolution is
ndows 7 x64.
I tried on 32 bit Windows 7 and works good.
If it should work on 64 bit Windoows 7, can you let me know the install
procedure.
Or do you have a digitally signed ipfw.sys ?
Thanks
Rama
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I was interested in knowing if Dummynet is supported on Windows 7 x64.
I tried on 32 bit Windows 7 and works good.
If it should work on 64 bit Windoows 7, can you let me know the install
procedure.
Or do you have a digitally signed ipfw.sys ?
Thanks
Rama
On 2013-02-07 5:55 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-01-27 7:58 PM:
I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd
fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user
from 192.168.1.51"
These are logins which previously on 9.0 w
Jim Pazarena wrote:
Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-01-27 7:58 PM:
I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd
fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user
from 192.168.1.51"
These are logins which previously on 9.0 worked as expected, and
Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-01-27 7:58 PM:
I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd
fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user
from 192.168.1.51"
These are logins which previously on 9.0 worked as expected, and now
fail on 9.1.
Has
I have found that on the two machines which I installed 9.1 on, NcFTPd
fails system logins for non-root attempts with "Password wrong for user
from 192.168.1.51"
These are logins which previously on 9.0 worked as expected, and now
fail on 9.1.
Has anyone else experienced this? Any sugge
-pure-amd64-64-bit-system-only-tp5762993.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
d
then did make install from the port and things are now perking
along nicely.
If there is a better place to send this message, I will
certainly be glad to send it. All somebody needs to do is create
the mhonarc.tbz package from the most current port for both 32
and 64-bit systems. Who knows
Bruce Cran writes I should try truss. I would just quote the
text, but I need to first find out what is broken in the reply
sequence and truss may point out what is failing.
Martin McCormick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Is there anything like strace for AMD64 FreeBSD?
Thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_
On 08/09/2012 18:14, Martin McCormick wrote:
Is there anything like strace for AMD64 FreeBSD?
See truss(1) - "trace system calls".
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
Is there anything like strace for AMD64 FreeBSD?
Thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
4) when done, store the old disk in a safe, known spot for a
year.
to learn then that cosnumer grade disk do not start anymore after a one year
break?
just as "enterprise" disks, which are usually the same :)
PS. Off Topic
__
0:33:03 Robert Huff wrote:
> >
> > Odhiambo Washington writes:
> >
> > > > Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO64 allow a 32 bit
> > > > installation to build a 64 bit kernel? I'd like to upgrade this
> > > > machine to 64
Hi,
On Thursday 28 June 2012 00:33:03 Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Odhiambo Washington writes:
>
> > > Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO64 allow a 32 bit
> > > installation to build a 64 bit kernel? I'd like to upgrade this
> > > machi
adjust partition size/layout)
3) mount the old disk externally, and copy as needed.
4) when done, store the old disk in a safe, known spot for a
year.
ten years!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Please just don't do it.
Backup, Install new, restore configs and data!
i see no problems doing this!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO64 allow a 32 bit
installation to build a 64 bit kernel? I'd like to upgrade this machine to
TARGET=amd64
64 bit AMD and I'd prefer not to do it from a DVD if I can do it from source.
Has anyone tried this and succeed
At 08:37 AM 6/27/2012, Tim Kellers wrote:
I'm upgrading a 7.3 -STABLE installation to 8.x, then 9- Stable over the
next few days. The hardware is a Dell 2950 that is capable of running 64
bit FreeBSD. The original installation was i386 32 bit and that is what
it is running now.
Wil
Odhiambo Washington writes:
> > Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO64 allow a 32 bit
> > installation to build a 64 bit kernel? I'd like to upgrade this
> > machine to 64 bit AMD and I'd prefer not to do it from a DVD if
> > I can do it
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Tim Kellers wrote:
> I'm upgrading a 7.3 -STABLE installation to 8.x, then 9- Stable over the
> next few days. The hardware is a Dell 2950 that is capable of running 64
> bit FreeBSD. The original installation was i386 32 bit and that is what it
&g
On 6/27/2012 9:37 AM, Tim Kellers wrote:
> Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCONF=FOO64 allow a 32 bit
> installation to build a 64 bit kernel? I'd like to upgrade this machine
> to 64 bit AMD and I'd prefer not to do it from a DVD if I can do it from
> source.
It has been done, it's just rally not recommended.
Sorry, don't know what was exact procedure/
if it works currently.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/32-bit-to-64-bit-tp5722481p5722485.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at
I'm upgrading a 7.3 -STABLE installation to 8.x, then 9- Stable over the
next few days. The hardware is a Dell 2950 that is capable of running
64 bit FreeBSD. The original installation was i386 32 bit and that is
what it is running now.
Will the buildworld ---> buildkernel KERNCO
On 06/30/11 10:06, John Dakos wrote:
My questions is .is FreeBSD 64 Bit stable and Rock such as 32 bit ?
Yes, go for it.
These standard applications are working well on 64 bit or not ?
Apache , Bind, Webmin , Mysql ,Postfix ,Dovecot, Spamassasin, PHP, Squid, PF
I can personally
Em Qui, 2011-06-30 às 11:06 +0300, John Dakos escreveu:
For me I am very satisfied with the 8.2R P2 64bit.
I run about 50-60 servers 24/7 in mission critic applications
using ZFS, with a mix of ISP, databases (postgresql, firebird...),
large asterisk IP centrals, vpn servers (400 vpns...), and t
On 30 June 2011 09:06, John Dakos wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello all.
>
>
>
> I have a question about FreeBSD 64Bit Applications
>
>
>
> I want to install FreeBSD 64 Bit to have most memory10 GB ram or up ,
> and to make more stable.
>
>
Hello all.
I have a question about FreeBSD 64Bit Applications
I want to install FreeBSD 64 Bit to have most memory10 GB ram or up ,
and to make more stable.
My questions is .is FreeBSD 64 Bit stable and Rock such as 32 bit ?
These standard applications are
On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Rob wrote:
> When 8.3 comes out, what do I need to do to update the src tree? This may be
> documented in the UPDATING docs, but having never messed with the source tree
> I haven't had cause to look. If so just tell me to go read the respective
> doc. :)
Read the
On 6/14/11 4:52 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Also, do you know the difference between pre-built packages on the
freebsd ftp server in packages-8.2-release vs packages-8-stable?
Well, IF you installed the source tree from the SAME cd which you installed
the FreeBSD you have now, there won't be any pr
On 6/14/11 8:06 AM, Ondrej Majerech wrote:
On 06/09/2011 15:49, Rob wrote:
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
You need to rebuild your kernel with
options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries
included.
I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have
anythi
On Monday 13 June 2011 21:14:05 Rob wrote:
> On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote:
> >> On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> >>> On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> >>>> I was attempting to
On 06/09/2011 15:49, Rob wrote:
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
You need to rebuild your kernel with
options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries
included.
I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have
anything in /usr/src and no information was given
On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote:
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote:
> On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> >> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> >> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The p
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
ports
On Monday 06 June 2011 22:31:30 Rob wrote:
> On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> >> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> >> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The p
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
> of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
> ports/amd64/packages-8.2-relea
On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
ports
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
> of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
> ports/amd64/packages-8.2-relea
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I
see that packages
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Gautham Ganapathy
> Would these changes be available in 8.2-release?
They should be already in 8.2 RC3 (dunno about loader bug).
Anyway you always can track FreeBSD STABLE and stable branch of
https://github.com/richardpl/NDISulator .
_
;> download Windows XP drivers seperately. However, after I generate the kernel
>> module (I am using the 64-bit WinXP driver and freebsd amd64), I get errors
>> when I try to load it. It says that the following symbols are missing
>>
>> ZwQueryInformationFile
>>
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Devin" == Devin Teske writes:
>
> Devin> sudo cd /usr/repos
>
> This is pretty useless. :)
I'd say it's _absolutely_ useless ^_^
Yes, indeed, the `sudo' should be omitted.
--
Cheers,
Devin Teske
-> CONTACT INFORMATION <-
Business
> "Devin" == Devin Teske writes:
Devin> sudo cd /usr/repos
This is pretty useless. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsan
t/download/jail_build.txt
mv jail_build.txt jail_build
chmod +x jail_build
Step 4: Build your jail(s)...
./jail_build
--
Devin
(full sig at bottom)
P.S. Feedback welcome.
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
> How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then?
>
> http:/
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
> How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then?
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3744 did not tell me much.
>
> Thanks!
>
Use this as a start:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbo
How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then?
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3744 did not tell me much.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
2010/12/6 Redd Vinylene :
> Greetings!
>
> Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some
> software that only works on 32-bit.
>
> Thanks!
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
&g
Thanks a lot guys - I really appreciate it.
Redd
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit
FreeBSD without even using a jail.
Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for
example if you rebuild world/kernel following this:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld
Yes, I believe this has been possible since 7.2.
Mike
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use
> some
> software that only works on 32-
>> I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit
>> FreeBSD without even using a jail.
>> Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for
>> example if you rebuild world/kernel following this:
>> http://www.freebsd.org
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Nerius Landys wrote:
> I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit
> FreeBSD without even using a jail.
> Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for
> example if you rebuild world/kernel follo
Greetings!
Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some
software that only works on 32-bit.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:00:36 -0500
Bill Moran wrote:
> Of course, things are always changing, and at this point in time, my
> advice would be "only go 32 bit if you _know_ there's something that
> won't work in 64 bit."
The only other time I'd recommend instal
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> It was only a few years ago that my advice was "Don't got 64 bit unless
> you know you need it."
>
> Of course, things are always changing, and at this point in time, my
> advice would be "only go 32 bi
myself
> > whether it would matter if I choose 32 of 64 bit ?
>
> I have all three running on an 8.1/64 amd system successfully.
It was only a few years ago that my advice was "Don't got 64 bit unless
you know you need it."
Of course, things are always changing, and
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:52:33 +0100
Eva Kukulies articulated:
> I'm thinking of renting a hosting server and I have an offer of
> getting a FreeBSD 8.1 server. I want to run MySQL 5.x, PHP5,
> apache2.2 on it and I'm asking myself
> whether it would matter if I choose 32 o
On 23 November 2010 09:52, Eva Kukulies wrote:
> I'm thinking of renting a hosting server and I have an offer of getting a
> FreeBSD 8.1 server. I want to run MySQL 5.x, PHP5, apache2.2 on it and I'm
> asking myself
> whether it would matter if I choose 32 of 64 bi
r it would matter if I choose 32 of 64 bit ?
depends on ram amount, and if you plan to use ZFS. probably not really an issue
though. Take 64 if you can however.
>
> --
> Christoph
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> h
I'm thinking of renting a hosting server and I have an offer of getting a
FreeBSD 8.1 server. I want to run MySQL 5.x, PHP5, apache2.2 on it and
I'm asking myself
whether it would matter if I choose 32 of 64 bit ?
--
Christoph
___
freebsd
Dan Nelson writes:
> Does gnupg (ports/security/gnupg) work? I think you'll have a hard time
> trying to get people to fix bugs in pgp; the source tree that the pgp port
> uses is 14 years old.
Wow! I thought that was just the first copywrite date.
gnugp installs gpg-2 which is almost the right
l's Pretty Good Software. 1996-03-04
> International version - not for use in the USA. Does not use RSAREF.
>
> A test file that had been encrypted earlier was used on both systems. It
> works fine on the 32-bit system and always fails on the 64-bit system.
> Trust me. As m
r use in the USA. Does not use RSAREF.
A test file that had been encrypted earlier was used on both
systems. It works fine on the 32-bit system and always fails on
the 64-bit system. Trust me. As many times as I tried it, I
couldn't possibly be mistyping the pass phrase every time on the
64-
should be addressed with fpu_kern KPI available on CURRENT - not done
yet...
Feel free to send patches.
I feel his pain. I need 64 bit drivers for cards that FBSD does not
support, mostly 'N' protocol wireless cards. The inability to secure
and use perfectly good drivers that are available
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:35:12 +0200
Albin Vega articulated:
> Hello
>
> Trying to install bacula client on win 2008 64 bit server. After
> installation the bacula client should start automatically but it
> dont. I then tried to start the bacula windows service manually but
&g
Hello
Trying to install bacula client on win 2008 64 bit server. After
installation the bacula client should start automatically but it dont. I
then tried to start the bacula windows service manually but are getting the
following (and pointless) error message: Error 1067. The prosess terminated
c when trying to use ndis0
> > >> device on amd64), present only on amd64 is still not yet fixed - this
> > >> should be addressed with fpu_kern KPI available on CURRENT - not done
> > >> yet...
> > >> Feel free to send patches.
> > >
> > &g
s
> >> should be addressed with fpu_kern KPI available on CURRENT - not done
> >> yet...
> >> Feel free to send patches.
> >
> > I feel his pain. I need 64 bit drivers for cards that FBSD does not
> > support, mostly 'N' protocol wireless cards. The
"fpudna in kernel mode" (my
>> understanding is that it is source of panic when trying to use ndis0
>> device on amd64), present only on amd64 is still not yet fixed - this
>> should be addressed with fpu_kern KPI available on CURRENT - not done
>> yet...
>> Feel f
s that it is source of panic when trying to use ndis0
> device on amd64), present only on amd64 is still not yet fixed - this
> should be addressed with fpu_kern KPI available on CURRENT - not done
> yet...
> Feel free to send patches.
I feel his pain. I need 64 bit drivers for cards tha
rate the kernel
> module (I am using the 64-bit WinXP driver and freebsd amd64), I get errors
> when I try to load it. It says that the following symbols are missing
>
> ZwQueryInformationFile
> ZwCreateFile
> ZwReadFile
> IoUnregisterPlugPlayNotification
> ExFreePoolWithTag
>
Hi
I have an Alienware m11x with a Dell 1520 wireless minicard (Broadcom
BCM4353 chipset). It comes with only Windows 7 drivers, but I was able to
download Windows XP drivers seperately. However, after I generate the kernel
module (I am using the 64-bit WinXP driver and freebsd amd64), I get
Hi,
> I'm not all up on my Dell models, but I think the 1950 shouldn't
> have any troubles with AMD64.
If we go into the details, each model of PowerEdge supports several
different CPU :) So the OP would have to go to the details of his 1950
to know whether amd64 is supported.
Best regards,
ol
>
> Yes.
>
> For historical reason, because amd was the first on the market to
> produce 64 bit CPU, it is called amd64.
>
It went by x86-64 while in development which is why some Linux distro's use
that term. Sometimes you'll get a question like "Why don'
> Is it the AMD64 that works with Xeon processors?
Yes.
For historical reason, because amd was the first on the market to
produce 64 bit CPU, it is called amd64.
If you plan to go for FreeBSD 7, you may have to
1) upgrade the firmware of your 1950
2) customize the kernel and remove what
Hello,
We want to install a 64 Bit FreeBSD version 6.4 on a Dell Power Edge 1950
with two dual core Xeon 5110 processors and 16GB RAM.
Which version are we supposed to download? Is it the AMD64 that works with
Xeon processors?
Please assist us.
Thank You,
Gary Aslanyan
Homepage Universe
type.
Leave this alone. If you change it, you will break your kernel. It's
not meant to be customized: it's just a name that was chosen because
it happened to be AMD's prototype 64-bit CPU at the time the amd64
port was being written.
>
>3. The instructions here:
>htt
I just installed FreeBSD 8.0 (amd64) onto my new Nehalem-based system.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5506 @ 2.13GHz (2128.00-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x106a5 Stepping = 5
Features=0xbfebfbff
Features2=0x9ce3bd
AMD Features=0x28100800
AMD Features2=0x1
We are upgrading our FreeBSD servers to FreeBSD8.0 and most of
the servers are 64-bit platforms. At one time, there was an
issue in which either bind or dhcpd actually ran a bit slower in
the 64-bit version of FreeBSD. Are there any similar issues
these days or should I use 64-bit where possible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
I have just completed the long awaited, first 64bit build of the
'Custom releases'
project hosted here:
http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com
You may download the ISO file immediately using the downloads page:
http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com
2009/7/2 Sam Fourman Jr. :
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Underwood wrote:
>> Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?
>
> amd64 supports both amd and intel 64bit CPU's
>
> right now the big limitation for me is you can not
> have a Nvidia bi
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Underwood wrote:
> Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?
amd64 supports both amd and intel 64bit CPU's
right now the big limitation for me is you can not
have a Nvidia binary graphics driver on amd64
progress has been made on this fron
> amd64
Ah-hah. Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Daniel Underwood wrote:
> Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?
>
> I've been here, but my knowledge of hardware terminology is too
> limited to confidently draw conclusions:
> <http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/>
Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems?
I've been here, but my knowledge of hardware terminology is too
limited to confidently draw conclusions:
<http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
ty useless for its intended function.
I have a 64bit intel processor, Dual core machine and I have installed 64
bit Linux as well as FreeBSD and thought of seeing the size of integer. On
both the platform my integer is showing 4 bytes which is 32 bit. I thought
integer are the most basic of the
nervous to ask for a silly question like this, but
> it intrigued my mind too much so thought to delve into it keeping aside my
> fear.
>
> I have a 64bit intel processor, Dual core machine and I have installed 64
> bit Linux as well as FreeBSD and thought of seeing the size of i
nervous to ask for a silly question like this, but it
> intrigued my mind too much so thought to delve into it keeping aside my
> fear.
>
> I have a 64bit intel processor, Dual core machine and I have installed 64
> bit Linux as well as FreeBSD and thought of seeing the size of i
it
intrigued my mind too much so thought to delve into it keeping aside my
fear.
I have a 64bit intel processor, Dual core machine and I have installed 64
bit Linux as well as FreeBSD and thought of seeing the size of integer. On
both the platform my integer is showing 4 bytes which is 32 bit. I
Konrad Heuer wrote:
Hello,
can I run 64 bit Linux applications on FreeBSD/amd64? Or is Linux
emulation 32 bit only?
Thanks and best regards
Konrad
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheu...@gwdg.de
___
freebsd-questions
Hello,
can I run 64 bit Linux applications on FreeBSD/amd64? Or is Linux
emulation 32 bit only?
Thanks and best regards
Konrad
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheu...@gwdg.de
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Gal Lis wrote:
> Hi everyone, I have a mixed update: I was able to get it running, but once
> it starts, it gets stuck. Here are the last two lines: isab0: bridge. at device 31.0 on pci0
> isa0: on isab0
>
> Please let me know if you need more info, or you have
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
