how would i go about fixing the shell so that it will always start with
"bash"? thanks in advance.
- i'm using FBSD 4.7 with KDE.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 12:47, Naydoe Maung wrote:
> how would i go about fixing the shell so that it will always start with
> "bash"? thanks in advance.
>
> - i'm using FBSD 4.7 with KDE.
Read "Changing Your Shell" topic in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/shells.html
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Naydoe Maung wrote:
> how would i go about fixing the shell so that it will always start with
> "bash"? thanks in advance.
>
> - i'm using FBSD 4.7 with KDE.
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the messag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Naydoe Maung wrote:
how would i go about fixing the shell so that it will always start with
"bash"? thanks in advance.
if bash is installed
chsh -s /usr/local/bin/bash
else install it from
/usr/ports/shells/bash2
or
/usr/ports/shells/bash1
O
Hello list,
I am looking to configure FreeBSD's Bash
can anyone post a config file that would make FreeBSD's Bash shell
color code like the default gentoo bash shell
or if you have a config that you like and feel like posting it I will
take a look at it.
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourma
In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the default
shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
Thanks,
Adam
___
[EMAIL PRO
I just discovered a knowledge deficiency on my part that
I can't seem to resolve.
If one writes a loop of the following form:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
ls -LF |grep \/ >/tmp/files
while read dirname; do
cd $dirname
#Do whatever commands to be repeated in each directory.
done < /tmp/f
the exact codes for ANSI color escape
sequences.
Anselm
On Sep 18, 2008, at 07:08 , Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Hello list,
I am looking to configure FreeBSD's Bash
can anyone post a config file that would make FreeBSD's Bash shell
color code like the default gentoo bash shell
or if you h
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:56:09AM +0200, Anselm Strauss wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I use something like this (heavily inspired by Gentoo):
>
> if [[ ${EUID} == 0 ]] ; then
> PS1='\[\033[01;31m\]\h\[\033[01;34m\] \W \$\[\033[00m\] '
> else
> PS1='\[\033[01;[EMAIL PROTECTED];34m\] \w \$\[\033[00m\] '
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> I am looking to configure FreeBSD's Bash
> can anyone post a config file that would make FreeBSD's Bash shell
> color code like the default gentoo bash shell
>
> or if you have a config that you like and feel like posting it I will
> take
ect: Why reccomend Bash shell?
>
> In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the
> default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
>
> What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
>
> Thanks,
> A
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004, Adam wrote:
>In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the default
>shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
>
>What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
That's largely a religious
In the immortal words of "Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the
> default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
Because that is his shell of choice. I prefer to use TCSH for the same
reason.
Adam wrote:
In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing
the default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
Thanks,
Adam
I like a .30-06 for deer, antelope, etc, .762[mm] f
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004, Adam wrote:
In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the default
shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
That's largely
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004, Nikolas Britton wrote:
>Bill Campbell wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Dec 15, 2004, Adam wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the
>>>default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
&g
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
I like a .30-06 for deer, antelope, etc, .762[mm] for terrorists, and a
.340 Weatherby magnum for big game (cape buffalo, elephant, etc,
where legal). The Weatherby is also great for moose and elk with a
Nosler 210 gg. partition bullet and a good high-velocity p
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> (...)
> What are the main differences between tcsh and csh?, currently I use
> csh, this is because it was the first shell that FreeBSD presented me
> when I started using it and the fact that I didn't like bash (bash is
> trash, hmm? lol) from linux
Adam wrote:
In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the default
shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
On point that no one has mentioned on this list yet is that it is a
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Adam wrote:
In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the
default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
On point that no one has mentioned on this list
On 12/16/04 11:11 AM, Matthew Seaman sat at the `puter and typed:
> Adam wrote:
> > In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing
> > the default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
> >
> > What are the Pro's/Con's of us
--On Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:11:03 AM + Matthew Seaman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On point that no one has mentioned on this list yet is that it is a good
idea to have root's shell be entirely contained on the root partition of
the system -- ie. not just the executable, but any shlibs i
At 9:11 PM -0600 12/15/04, Adam wrote:
In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing
the default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other
shells?
Personal preferences, mostly. In my case, my
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:11:03 AM + Matthew Seaman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, I take the view that the less done by the super user
the better, and discourage myself to use sudo(1) preferentially and to
keep su(1) sessions as short as possible
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Matthew Seaman thusly...
>
> That's why there is a 'toor' account -- you can use whatever shell you
> like with that a/c and not fear mucking up important bits of the system.
^ ^
^ ^
What does "a/c" mean?
- Parv
--
___
Parv wrote:
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Matthew Seaman thusly...
That's why there is a 'toor' account -- you can use whatever shell you
like with that a/c and not fear mucking up important bits of the system.
^ ^
^ ^
What does "a/c" mean?
account
>
> In Greg Lehey's book "The Complete FreeBSD" he reccomends changing the
> default shell for users to bash shell. -p. 94
>
> What are the Pro's/Con's of using bash as opposed to the other shells?
Because he likes it for some reason. He probab
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:03:11 -0500 Martin McCormick wrote:
> #!/usr/local/bin/bash
> ls -LF |grep \/ >/tmp/files
> while read dirname; do
> cd $dirname
> #Do whatever commands to be repeated in each directory.
> done < /tmp/files
>
How about:
ls -LF | grep \/ | while read dirname; do
cd $
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:03:11 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> I just discovered a knowledge deficiency on my part that
> I can't seem to resolve.
>
> If one writes a loop of the following form:
>
> #!/usr/local/bin/bash
Just a sidenote: If you're not using bash-specific functionalit
Many thanks! The for loop was what was needed.
Polytropon writes:
> Just a sidenote: If you're not using bash-specific functionality
> and intend to make your script portable, use #!/bin/sh instead.
I always start out that way for that very reason. I needed some
random number functions and arithm
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:16:40 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 04:29, Polytropon wrote:
> > Correct. You could use different approaches which may or may
> > not fail due to the directory names you will encounter (like
> > directories with spaces or special characters).
> >
> >
On 09/20/2012 04:29, Polytropon wrote:
Correct. You could use different approaches which may or may
not fail due to the directory names you will encounter (like
directories with spaces or special characters).
#!/bin/sh
for DIR in `ls -LF | grep \/`; do
cd ${DIR}
is there any script or package in ports, that make a
colorful bash.
thanks
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
marlon corleone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is there any script or package in ports, that make a
> colorful bash.
That depends on what you want to add color to.
If you want a colorful prompt, you just add ANSI
color sequences to your prompt definition.
If you want ls output to be colored, just
On 28 Jul 2003, at 14:02, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> marlon corleone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > is there any script or package in ports, that make a
> > colorful bash.
>
> That depends on what you want to add color to.
> If you want a colorful prompt, you just add ANSI
> color sequences to
35 matches
Mail list logo
