Darren Spruell wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:49 AM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the absence of egress filtering on the firewall, that
would definitely be an advantage. Does anyone use BIND
for filtering in a small to medium business environment
then? How does it perform?
Performs
Hi,
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007 12:31 PM, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I then installed dnsmasq, which is able to read domain info from the
hosts file. Just for the fun of it, I loaded domains from all th
On Dec 30, 2007 12:31 PM, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was trying to do something similar. I didn't research too hard, but
> > > figured the only way to use Bind would be to make my server authoritative
> >
On Dec 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was trying to do something similar. I didn't research too hard, but
> > figured the only way to use Bind would be to make my server authoritative
> > for all those domains, which meant a huge config file and potential
> > o
On Dec 28, 2007 11:28 AM, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> > Just a question, and I'm not trying to cast doubt on your plan; I'm
> > curious why using BIND for this purpose instead of a proxy, which is
> > a more typical application as I understand it?
>
> I was trying to do s
Hi,
the guys seem to have some humour:
Linux/Unix/Mac OSX
Remove the extension and save this to your /etc directory. Considering
unix is a server-based OS with a complex permission structure you'll
probably want to just append your hosts file instead of overwriting it.
OSX can use the host
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Just a question, and I'm not trying to cast doubt on your plan; I'm
curious why using BIND for this purpose instead of a proxy, which is
a more typical application as I understand it?
I was trying to do something similar. I didn't research too hard, but figured the only wa
On Dec 28, 2007 8:49 AM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olivier Nicole wrote:
> >> Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using
> >> BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use
> >> Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using
BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use
Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead?
I think another issue is that Squid will only filter HTTP/FTP
connections, w
> Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using
> BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use
> Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead?
I think another issue is that Squid will only filter HTTP/FTP
connections, while DNS would allo
On Dec 27, 2007 4:27 PM, Schiz0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 3:46 PM, Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
> > FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
> > (authoritative
On Dec 27, 2007 7:16 PM, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
> > FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
> > (authoritative for the local domain, and caching for ev
Hi,
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Has bind a visible advantage in the response time?
Maybe not in response time, but certainly in centralisation: you only
maintain one DNS instead of every machine.
this is obvious to me too.
I would not like to use bind for filtering except in larger organisations.
> Has bind a visible advantage in the response time?
Maybe not in response time, but certainly in centralisation: you only
maintain one DNS instead of every machine.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hi,
I use hosts to block unwanted content but on per machine base.
I use currentlu this as a starting point and add private preferences to
hosts.
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.txt
Has bind a visible advantage in the response time?
Erich
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently s
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
(authoritative for the local domain, and caching for everything else).
One of the things I'd like to do with it is use BIND to block variou
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> into a BIND config file myself. Just need good sources. What are your
> recommendations?
>
I keep a small but potent list of undesirables as described here...
http://mark.foster.cc/wiki/index.php/Trackers
--
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between th
On Dec 27, 2007 1:46 PM, Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
> FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
> (authoritative for the local domain, and caching for everything else).
> One of the thi
On Dec 27, 2007 3:46 PM, Maxim Khitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
> FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
> (authoritative for the local domain, and caching for everything else).
> One of the thi
Hello,
I'm currently setting up a new firewall for my home network using
FreeBSD 7. The firewall will also act as our local name server
(authoritative for the local domain, and caching for everything else).
One of the things I'd like to do with it is use BIND to block various
undesirable domains (
20 matches
Mail list logo
