Many thanks for the responses!
On 01/10/2010 02:52, Paul Wootton wrote:
On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk
will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp
Hi,
I'm planning on using FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE edition for a small
primary/secondary DNS server setup.
The system will run Bind9 and have some zone files and views for the few
people I host for.
I am considering using a dual Atom system board with 2GB RAM and for
storage was thinking
On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use
compact flash as storage??
For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these
days) systems with CF images off of flash, keep a shadow copy of /etc
around
Thanks very much Brian:
On 30/09/2010 17:02, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use
compact flash as storage??
For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these
days
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk
will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get
written to all the time.
You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will
have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written
to all the time.
You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like Brian
mentioned for other high write
MFS == memory filesystem; aka ram-disk. The problem being that on reboot,
MFS looses all its contents, therefore practices like storing the 'startup'
state for a filesystem in an archive (tar file works well) and
mounting/copying on startup works well. Conversely, if you need to modify
that
On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk
will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get
written to all the time.
You can skip swap altogether
Hi,
I'm just reading through a thread right now on a discussion or debate
whether to ports Solaris Zones to FreeBSD. My main Google search
criteria was basically that I wanted to know if FreeBSD had something
similar.
In this discussion it was mentioned that FreeBSD Jails where the sudo
The only bit I'm not certain on is dedicating a nic to a jail (more
because I havent tried than because I believe it cant be done, I'd
expect that the network stack virtualization in 8+ should allow this.)
You can most definately run seperate instances of applications in jails.
I'd recomend
Vince Hoffman wrote:
The only bit I'm not certain on is dedicating a nic to a jail (more
because I havent tried than because I believe it cant be done, I'd
expect that the network stack virtualization in 8+ should allow this.)
You can most definately run seperate instances of applications in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
Hi,
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
That is somewhat different to what
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on
how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is
no
command for it?
You might like to try
# rndc reload
Cheers
Thanks in advanced
On Monday 14 April 2008 11:02:43 Ruel Luchavez wrote:
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
If you start reading here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc
Hi,
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
Thanks in advanced..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
/etc/rc.d/named restart
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
Thanks in advanced..
___
freebsd-questions
Luke Dean wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, David Duong wrote:
I'm planning to redoing my home network. I currently have one server
(Opteron 170) that is currently a NAS, Email, and DNS server (btw, the
main OS is FreeBSD). I was thinking of purchasing an Alix2c3/Soekris
5501 and use
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, David Duong wrote:
I'm planning to redoing my home network. I currently have one server
(Opteron 170) that is currently a NAS, Email, and DNS server (btw, the main
OS is FreeBSD). I was thinking of purchasing an Alix2c3/Soekris 5501 and use
it as a Email + DNS server
Hello everyone!
I'm planning to redoing my home network. I currently have one server
(Opteron 170) that is currently a NAS, Email, and DNS server (btw, the
main OS is FreeBSD). I was thinking of purchasing an Alix2c3/Soekris
5501 and use it as a Email + DNS server. Then dedicate my main
On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:04 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
With some delay, several answers together.
Very good. :-)
For the example I gave, I am of course authoritative.
Are you? Depending on which servers I query, I either get an
NXDOMAIN, an answer with no authoritative nameservers listed, or
Hi Chuck,
With some delay, several answers together.
For the example I gave, I am of course authoritative.
Are you? Depending on which servers I query, I either get an
NXDOMAIN, an answer with no authoritative nameservers listed, or the
results you've shown. That implies that there is
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
Yes.
No, nobody else is going to see the results your local nameserver
sends since it isn't authoritative for the domains, and the
delegation for the IP block isn't going to point to your server but
On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
No, nobody else is going to see the results your local nameserver
sends since it isn't authoritative for the domains, and the
delegation for the IP block isn't going to point to your server but
to the actual nameserver. Take a look at what
. You cannot have dynamic
DNS working alone (well I think so).
Plus the DNS server that holds dynamic reccords should be at a fixed
IP address (I never heard of a DNS server on a machine with dynamic
IP, that sounds way to unstable to me).
Olivier
I understand your problem.
dyndns.com is taking care of the forward dynamic DNS for you.
Now who is in charge of the reverse DNS for 58.187.106.120 (your
current IP)? I beleive it is FPT.
So FPT should upgrade its own reverse DNS every time it gives an IP to
your server.
Right now if I make a
But my postfix only can receive mails from freebsd-questions mailing
list, it can not send mail to this.
There is another thing you have to consider. As it is explained in
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=265093#post265093
your dynamic IP has been black listed (the IP was used
On 7/13/07, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand your problem.
dyndns.com is taking care of the forward dynamic DNS for you.
Now who is in charge of the reverse DNS for 58.187.106.120 (your
current IP)? I beleive it is FPT.
So FPT should upgrade its own reverse DNS every time
Olivier Nicole wrote:
But my postfix only can receive mails from freebsd-questions mailing
list, it can not send mail to this.
There is another thing you have to consider. As it is explained in
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=265093#post265093
your dynamic IP has been
vuthecuong wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
But my postfix only can receive mails from freebsd-questions mailing
list, it can not send mail to this.
There is another thing you have to consider. As it is explained in
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=265093#post265093
your
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:09 PM, vuthecuong wrote:
I just confirm only:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
No. Reverse lookups are controlled by whoever owns the IP delegation
for the netblock in question, and they are not going to configure
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
Yes.
No, nobody else is going to see the results your local nameserver
sends since it isn't authoritative for the domains, and the
delegation for the IP
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:09 PM, vuthecuong wrote:
I just confirm only:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
No. Reverse lookups are controlled by whoever owns the IP delegation
for the netblock in question, and they are not
On Jul 13, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Dan Casey wrote:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
No. Reverse lookups are controlled by whoever owns the IP delegation
for the netblock in question, and they are not going to configure PTR
records for dynamic IPs.
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Dan Casey wrote:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
No. Reverse lookups are controlled by whoever owns the IP delegation
for the netblock in question, and they are not going to configure PTR
I just confirm only:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
Tnx
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
the dynamic IP ?
Dynamic DNS only works with DHCP: DCHP gives and IP to a machine and
then it informes DNS that it has given that IP and that now the DNS
should update its synamic tables accordingly. You cannot have dynamic
DNS working alone (well I think so).
Plus the DNS server that holds dynamic
Hi Olivier Nicole
Tnx for ur quick response.
I'm very very new to both DNS and Freebsd.
Maybe I'm stupid because I already spent 3 days creating my zone file
and reverse file
but I still can not sussefull.
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2, I have DynamicIP: www.thecuong.gotdns.com.
Could you help me to
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
Yes.
Forward DNS lookup: (alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th is dynamic DNS)
banyanon57: dig alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th
; DiG 9.3.1 alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;;
On 10/28/06, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On recent FreeBSD, the resolver actually iterates through the listed
nameserver lines in order, sending the query out to each in turn until
it gets a response. It used to be that the resolver would wait for the
full 30s DNS timeout before
In the last episode (Jan 22), patrick said:
On 10/28/06, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On recent FreeBSD, the resolver actually iterates through the listed
nameserver lines in order, sending the query out to each in turn
until it gets a response. It used to be that the resolver
patrick wrote:
On 10/28/06, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On recent FreeBSD, the resolver actually iterates through the listed
nameserver lines in order, sending the query out to each in turn until
it gets a response. It used to be that the resolver would wait for the
full 30s
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
On my registrars site I have two DNS servers listing. How would
I know that 1) both are working. 2) which one is being used.
For #2, do you mean by the world at large? Which one is being
used when people look up your domain and hosts in your
from all of the queried servers. Means that if
your first listed DNS server is down, users don't notice the delay before
the second server is queried.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On my registrars site I have two DNS servers listing. How
would I know that 1) both are working. 2) which one is being used.
1) http://dnsreport.com
2) # tcpdump -n -i iface | grep .53 | grep domain.com
(where domain.com == the domain I want to find out if the server is
answering for)
On my registrars site I have two DNS servers listing. How would
I know that 1) both are working. 2) which one is being used.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On Friday 27 October 2006 21:56, David Banning wrote:
On my registrars site I have two DNS servers listing. How would
I know that 1) both are working. 2) which one is being used.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:56:26PM -0400, David Banning wrote:
On my registrars site I have two DNS servers listing. How would
I know that 1) both are working. 2) which one is being used.
1) dig @dns.server your.host.name
2) Dunno.
--
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 27, 2006, at 8:56 PM, David Banning wrote:
On my registrars site I have two DNS servers listing. How would
I know that 1) both are working. 2) which one is being used.
For #2, do you mean by the world at large? Which one is being used
when people look up your domain and hosts in
.
These are my questions:
1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain?
2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1
to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in
my main domain provider?
3) Provided that I already
with my Apache virtual hosting in one single
FreeBSD machine.
These are my questions:
1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain?
Yep.
2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1
to sub3) without anymore registering those sub
in conjunction with a web hosting package or something
(123-reg.co.uk will definitely work as I use them for a similar setup to
the one you describe).
2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1
to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in
my
in one single
FreeBSD machine.
These are my questions:
1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain?
2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1
to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in
my main domain
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow
YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use.
That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen
different domains off an IP address for which I
Paul Waring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow
YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use.
That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen
different domains off
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote:
It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to have
mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional looking
as a whole.
I like to have my IPs resolve both ways too, but try finding an ISP who
will either
On Nov 6, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Paul Waring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote:
It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to
have
mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional
looking
as a whole.
I like to have my IPs resolve
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:22:58PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
Actually, my ISP, ipHouse.net is one who's willing to configure
reverse DNS for you. Qwest Communications is another one who'll
setup DNS for you, and they're HUGE. If you choose to go with
ipHouse, tell them I sent you --
Whenever I need to test a mail/ssh/web server, I usually just telnet or nc
into the appropriate port, i.e.:
$ echo GET / |nc -v yahoo.com 80
$ nc -v localhost 22
Connection to localhost 22 port [tcp/ssh] succeeded!
SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2
How would I connect to a nameserver and talk
Mohan Singh wrote:
Whenever I need to test a mail/ssh/web server, I usually just telnet or nc
into the appropriate port, i.e.:
$ echo GET / |nc -v yahoo.com 80
$ nc -v localhost 22
Connection to localhost 22 port [tcp/ssh] succeeded!
SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_4.2
How would I connect to a
Mohan Singh wrote:
How would I connect to a nameserver and talk to it so I can know it is
working? I get as far as connecting to the port, but I don't know how to
make it send back anything meaningful.
You could use the 'dig' command:
dig @ip a yahoo.com
Or you could use 'nmap' with a -sV
On 10/25/05, Mohan Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever I need to test a mail/ssh/web server, I usually just telnet or nc
into the appropriate port, i.e.:
$ echo GET / |nc -v yahoo.com 80
$ nc -v localhost 22
Connection to localhost 22 port [tcp/ssh] succeeded!
On 10/25/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/05, Mohan Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever I need to test a mail/ssh/web server, I usually just telnet or nc
into the appropriate port, i.e.:
$ echo GET / |nc -v yahoo.com 80
$ nc -v localhost 22
Connection to
On 10/25/05, Mohan Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would I connect to a nameserver and talk to it so I can know it is
working? I get as far as connecting to the port, but I don't know how to
make it send back anything meaningful.
Thanks to all who replied. The best answer I got came from
on
the firewall, but I'm thinking since the DNS is going to be chrooted,
it would be ok, no ?
What do you think ?
Thank you !
You're better off not installing and running a DNS server on your
firewall. I would recommend you simply turn your new machine into
your primary DNS server and ask/pay someone
Hi,
I'm getting a second machine next week and was wondering if the
following settup would be ok:
1st machine pf + NAT and also primary DNS
2nd machine as a secondary DNS
Now I know that its not the smartest thing to do, have primary DNS on
the firewall, but I'm thinking since the DNS is going
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 02:00:50PM -0800, John Pettitt wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 04:42:46 PM -0500 Ean Kingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I belive Bind is still included with the base FreeBSD OS. I've used
it in
the past and never had any problems
Oh, and c) djbdns isn't Free or Open Source by any definition of
either phrase. That's not important to some people, but others consider it
kind of important.
Dan has given explicit permission to read, compile, modify and use
the source code of djbdns. The only restriction is that you may
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 22:22, you wrote:
Dan has given explicit permission to read, compile, modify and use
the source code of djbdns.
From http://www.qmail.org/not-open-source.html:
For a program to be open source, you must be able to, among other
things, change the source and
Dan has given explicit permission to read, compile, modify and use
the source code of djbdns.
From http://www.qmail.org/not-open-source.html:
For a program to be open source, you must be able to, among other
things, change the source and redistribute it. DJB prohibits
sn1tch writes:
I am looking into setting up a DNS server on our network using an
existing FreeBSD box. I have been looking around and reading comments
on different DNS servers out their but everyone has mixed feelings. I
know someone who uses BIND and is happy with it .. is their any reason
I am looking into setting up a DNS server on our network using an
existing FreeBSD box. I have been looking around and reading comments
on different DNS servers out their but everyone has mixed feelings. I
know someone who uses BIND and is happy with it .. is their any reason
why BIND wouldn't
I am looking into setting up a DNS server on our network using an
existing FreeBSD box. I have been looking around and reading comments
on different DNS servers out their but everyone has mixed feelings. I
know someone who uses BIND and is happy with it .. is their any reason
why BIND
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 04:42:46 PM -0500 Ean Kingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into setting up a DNS server on our network using an
existing FreeBSD box. I have been looking around and reading comments
on different DNS servers out their but everyone has mixed feelings. I
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 04:42:46 PM -0500 Ean Kingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into setting up a DNS server on our network using an
existing FreeBSD box. I have been looking around and reading comments
on different DNS servers out
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 04:00 pm, John Pettitt wrote:
The argument against DJBDNS comes down to a) DJB annoys a lot of people
and b) some of those people thinkg DJBDNS is not standards compliant.
Erm, b is definitely true. It doesn't support IXFR or NOTIFY, so if you
plan on slaving
* Andrew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1104 17:04]:
I want to setup a Caching DNS server for my network using FreeBSD 5.3.
Can someone point me in the right direction with what port I need to install
and any links to installation guides?
You can use bind as others have suggested , though I found
I want to setup a Caching DNS server for my network using FreeBSD 5.3. Can
someone point me in the right direction with what port I need to install and
any links to installation guides?
Thanks in Advance!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
AS I want to setup a Caching DNS server for my network using FreeBSD 5.3. Can
someone point me in the right direction with what port I need to install and
any links to installation guides?
AS Thanks in Advance!
AS ___
AS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
Hi
This might help:
http://www.de.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dns.html
You don't need to install any ports. BIND9 is part of the FreeBSD.
Ben
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 16:56, Andrew Smith wrote:
I want to setup a Caching DNS server for my network using FreeBSD
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:56:42AM -0700, Andrew Smith wrote:
I want to setup a Caching DNS server for my network using FreeBSD 5.3.
Can someone point me in the right direction with what port I need to
install and any links to installation guides?
No doubt BIND can do this ... but I find
, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Caching DNS Server?
Hi
This might help:
http://www.de.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dns.html
You don't need to install any ports. BIND9 is part of the FreeBSD.
Ben
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 16:56, Andrew Smith wrote:
I want to setup a Caching DNS
Danny MacMillan wrote:
No doubt BIND can do this ... but I find djbdns much easier to configure.
I have never tried out djbdns, so I cannot say for myself, and I also
understand that apparently
djbdns has caused similarly intense discussions as KDE-vs-GNOME or
vi-vs-emacs; so I want to
make
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:06:14PM -0700, Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote:
Danny MacMillan wrote:
No doubt BIND can do this ... but I find djbdns much easier
to configure.
I have never tried out djbdns, so I cannot say for myself, and
I also understand that apparently djbdns has caused
Andrew Smith wrote:
Ok I think I've got bind working correctly, in resolve.conf I've only
put 127.0.0.1 as the nameserver and I'm able to ping stuff on the
internet. Is there anyway I can test to see if it's actually caching my
requests? Where is the cache stored?
The size of the cache you
to the router
for time services.
I plan to add a caching web proxy, and a private DNS server - which is where
my question comes in.
I want to run a private DNS server which is visible internally only. Comcast
doesn't like servers, so I don't want to broadcast any DNS information
upstream
Seth Henry writes:
I have seen a large number of HOWTO's on the web, but all seem to
assume that you want to propogate internal DNS info back
upstream.
Install Bind 9. (It's now the default for 5.x, don't know
about 4.x)
In the ARM (/usr/share/doc/bind9/arm), read section
Hello,
Seth Henry wrote:
I want to run a private DNS server which is visible internally only.
Comcast doesn't like servers, so I don't want to broadcast any DNS
information upstream. (this would also be kind of dumb, as the entries
would point to non-routable addresses)
I also want to create
, and have pointed all of my internal machines to the router for
time services.
I plan to add a caching web proxy, and a private DNS server - which is where
my question comes in.
I want to run a private DNS server which is visible internally only. Comcast
doesn't like servers, so I don't want
have a FreeBSD 4.10 system acting as a gateway
router. It runs ipf/ipnat for filtering, and acts as a dhcp server to
the internal network. I also run ntpd, and have pointed all of my
internal machines to the router for time services.
I plan to add a caching web proxy, and a private DNS server
your server's local IP is)
This way it will only listen on those interfaces.
Also, there's allow-query and blackhole... _Plus_ you can just use a
packet filter
to protect your DNS-server from the internet. Possibilities are
endless... =)
Kind regards,
Benjamin
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:34:45AM -0600, Seth Henry wrote:
...
I also want to create a private, internal zone so that I can stop passing
hosts files around. (i.e. 192.168.1.1 - internal_host1, etc) IOW - I
would like internal machines to point to my DNS server for internal
external
I can ping both NS servers but when it comes to pinging my domain it
doesn't ping. Ideas on what could be wrong?
Sean
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Sean Dicks wrote:
I can ping both NS servers but when it comes to pinging my domain it
doesn't ping. Ideas on what could be wrong?
You probably didn't configure the resolver library correctly.
In /etc/resolv.conf, you need to add the name server entries:
/etc/resolv.conf:
domain example.com
I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in
/etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete
the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain
today when I whois rimouski-undernet.org I see right nameservers on
it. Doesn't that mean it
On Sunday 11 July 2004 12:35, Sean Dicks wrote:
I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in
/etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete
the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain
today when I whois rimouski-undernet.org
on
it. Doesn't that mean it has propagated?
The WHOIS and DNS databases are distinct,
and not necessarily synchronized. You need
to wait until your domain is added to the .ORG
zone file of the master .ORG DNS Server
(that normally happens every 12 hours from the
PIR registry, IIRC [I can be wrong here
No, it doesn't. I can successfully perform a whois from here on your domain,
but an nslookup/dig both fail. Give it 72 hours to propagate across the net.
propagation is a bogus idea when applied to DNS. Like WMD and immediate
threat when applied to Iraq.
As soon as the delegation and glue
about at my last reply, are you sure your DNS server
is set up correctly? Does it resolve it's own domains correctly, and is it
able to answer queries about other domains? I would check that while you
were waiting for propagation.
--
Eric F Crist
Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry
Perhaps you need to do some research on the subject.
perhaps you need to clarify your vagary
There are a series of DNS systems
???
For a public domain.tld, the only two servers involved are :
1. the servers authoritative for .tld to publish the delegation and glue
records for domain.tld.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:53:22PM -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
a domain needs to be added to before it will function correctly.
This is known as propagation.
the misnomer propagation is used by people who think DNS data needs time to
be available, to propagate, over several days or a week,
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
