Now that Java is opensource, I have looked for a Java package to install
on 64-bit FreeBSD 7.0, but so far without success. Is there a simple and
quick-to-install Java package for FreeBSD?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:54:02PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that Java is opensource, I have looked for a Java package to install
on 64-bit FreeBSD 7.0, but so far without success. Is there a simple and
quick-to-install Java package for FreeBSD?
It's not completely done yet. Some
Hi,
I am trying to use a usb modem (sony ericsson w810i) (gprs).
The dmesg log shows up that the new device has been detected, but I don't
seem to find that in /dev.
I also tried using /dev/cuad0 in ppp configuration file in /etc/ppp but i am
unable to dial
What can be the problem ? ( I
Hi,
I am trying to use a usb modem (sony ericsson w810i) (gprs).
The dmesg log shows up that the new device has been detected, but I don't
seem to find that in /dev.
ttyU*, cuaU*
What can be the problem ? ( I already have done kldload ucmodem )
is it recognized as umodem?
Abhinav Lele wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use a usb modem (sony ericsson w810i) (gprs).
The dmesg log shows up that the new device has been detected, but I don't
seem to find that in /dev.
I also tried using /dev/cuad0 in ppp configuration file in /etc/ppp but i am
unable to dial
What can be
I can recommend you reading the lots of FAQ of samba in their site at
samba.org.
Theres plenty of solution out there...
Cheers..
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:41 AM, white list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello ALL,
I want to install Samba on FreeBSD 7.0 from ports collection.
when i cd to /usr
Hello ALL,
I want to install Samba on FreeBSD 7.0 from ports collection.
when i cd to /usr/ports/net/samba3
make config
LDAP
ADS
and many more options to enable with samba with ADS server 2008
What would like to know which options will best work with ADS Windows
Server 2008? suggestions
Hi guys
I am going to install a Web Server (apache+mysql+php) at my work place. To
boost performance, I am just thinking that should I configure and rebuild
FreeBSD KERNEL for this hardware? And if so, what paramters I should
follow? Any help would be highly appreciated.
Server's hardware
Written by cp on 05/28/08 17:28
I'd really appreciate if someone can shed some light on this for me. I'm
attempting to build a layer2 sniffer using dummynet and ipfw but I'm
having some problems building the new kernel with options BRIDGE. It
errors out with the message below. Any suggestions?
I'd really appreciate if someone can shed some light on this for me. I'm
attempting to build a layer2 sniffer using dummynet and ipfw but I'm
having some problems building the new kernel with options BRIDGE. It
errors out with the message below. Any suggestions?
-cp
lois# /usr/sbin/config LOIS
It's been a long time since I have tried to get dummynet working. I have a
FreeBSD 7.0 box ready to go. Do I still need to recompile the kernel and
all that stuff or is there any easier way to do this now?
--
Ray Seals
-
Office: 314-594-0150 (St. Louis
Ray Seals wrote:
It's been a long time since I have tried to get dummynet working. I have a
FreeBSD 7.0 box ready to go. Do I still need to recompile the kernel and
all that stuff or is there any easier way to do this now?
I tend to use pf/altq but dummynet and ipfw seem to exist as modules
Vince Hoffman wrote:
Ray Seals wrote:
It's been a long time since I have tried to get dummynet working. I
have a
FreeBSD 7.0 box ready to go. Do I still need to recompile the kernel and
all that stuff or is there any easier way to do this now?
I tend to use pf/altq but dummynet and ipfw
Hi,
I currently have a webserver running Apache 2.2.8 inside of a FreeBSD
7.0 jail. It's running several virtualhosts, and it's doing great! My
problem is that I need to run an SSL enabled virtual host, and that
requires me to use an IP based virtual host. Most documentation
indicates
-config /root/xorg.conf.new
what is going on? What else can cause such behavior. As I mentioned previously
Debian works great on this computer. Maybe it is a bug in Xorg?
Maybe someone else had or have such problems with Xorg?
I want to work on FreeBSD 7.0, but this problem is very strange. When I
Nevermind :) I think I solved the issue.
Thanks anywho :)
Best,
--Glenn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn Sieb a écrit :
Nevermind :) I think I solved the issue.
Thanks anywho :)
Best,
--Glenn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL
, i already put:
pf_load=YES
pflog_load=YES
pfsync_load=YES
inside /boot/loader.conf
and my previous message, i already compile the kernel with pf and put
appropriate line inside /etc/rc.conf
and the pf still do not loading when freebsd 7.0 boot up.
thank you
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2
:
pf_load=YES
pflog_load=YES
pfsync_load=YES
inside /boot/loader.conf
and my previous message, i already compile the kernel with pf and put
appropriate line inside /etc/rc.conf
and the pf still do not loading when freebsd 7.0 boot up.
thank you
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM
On Wed, 14 May 2008 09:24:52 +0800
CyberSans AirBort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and guess what? pf is not loading when startup. i have to manually
restarted the pf using /etc/rc.d/pf restart
What exactly do you mean by not loading? Do you mean not working?
Are there any pf related error
Take a look in /etc/defaults/rc.conf The bits for PF are already
there. All you should need is to set pf_enable=YES
A quick guess would be that that /etc/defaults/rc.conf is loaded after
/etc/rc.conf, and pf_enable is reset to NO, but that is just a guess.
Here is my pf section from
On Wed, 14 May 2008 11:07:03 -0700
xSAPPYx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look in /etc/defaults/rc.conf The bits for PF are already
there. All you should need is to set pf_enable=YES
A quick guess would be that that /etc/defaults/rc.conf is loaded after
/etc/rc.conf, and pf_enable is
put:
pf_load=YES
pflog_load=YES
pfsync_load=YES
inside /boot/loader.conf
and my previous message, i already compile the kernel with pf and put
appropriate line inside /etc/rc.conf
and the pf still do not loading when freebsd 7.0 boot up.
thank you
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Doug
Greetings!
Running:
7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #27: Thu Apr 10 02:51:13 EDT 2008 amd64
DenyHosts 2.6_1
The suggested setup of using this stanza in /etc/hosts.allow does not
seem to work:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd
On Monday 12 of May 2008 22:22:12 Roland Smith wrote:
It might also be a hardware problem. Testing the RAM would be a good
place to start.
Yes. You are right. I tested my memory with 'memtest' and got one error:
Tst Pass Failing AddressGood BadErr-Bits Count
50
hello there. sorry if this similar question been asked before in this forum.
my problem is, i install freebsd 7.0 and after that compile the kernel to
enable pf (using the same method like freebsd's handbook said):
device pf
device pflog
device pfsync
options ALTQ
options ALTQ_CBQ
options
Hello!
I decide to go on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. Before I used 6.3-RELEASE.
But now I cannot get working Xorg. I almost get the kernel panic.
I install fresh 7.0-RELEASE and update ports by portsnam and everything
compiled by ports system. After instalign 'xorg' ports I do the following
steps
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:51:26PM +0200, Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
Hello!
I decide to go on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. Before I used 6.3-RELEASE.
But now I cannot get working Xorg. I almost get the kernel panic.
I install fresh 7.0-RELEASE and update ports by portsnam and everything
compiled
On Monday 12 of May 2008 16:24:44 Roland Smith wrote:
How *exactly* did you upgrade your ports? Sometimes old libraries hang
around causing trouble.
I simply download the iso file for boot only:
7.0-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso
Then burn on CD and then install fresh 7.0-RELEASE on hard disk -
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:34:17PM +0200, Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
On Monday 12 of May 2008 16:24:44 Roland Smith wrote:
How *exactly* did you upgrade your ports? Sometimes old libraries hang
around causing trouble.
I simply download the iso file for boot only:
On Monday 12 May 2008 22:22:12 Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:34:17PM +0200, Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
On Monday 12 of May 2008 16:24:44 Roland Smith wrote:
In file: /var/log/dmesg.today I found at the end of file the following
entries:
pid 23201 (conftest), uid 0:
On Monday 12 of May 2008 22:22:12 Roland Smith wrote:
How *exactly* did you upgrade your ports? Sometimes old libraries hang
around causing trouble.
I used portsnap to download ports:
portsnap fetch
[...]
Did you do a 'portsnap extract' as well? Fetching alone isn't enough.
Yes of
Hi list,
i have a new FreeBSD 7.0 installation with a HighPoint RocketRAID 2310
with 4 Disks.
is there a way to check the raidstatus for the raid and/or is there a
way to let smartmontools check the disks?
thanks
Thomas
___
freebsd-questions
What does your ifconfig line read from /etc/rc.conf (the alias line)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
What does your ifconfig line read from /etc/rc.conf (the alias line)
ifconfig_rl0=192.168.15.198 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_rl0_alias0=192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.15.1
jail_enable=YES
jail_sysvipc_allow=YES
jail_socket_unixiproute_only=NO
Hey,
ifconfig_rl0_alias0=192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0
the mask of an alias ipadres needs to be 32 bits.
I do not now if this solves your problem but it needs to be 32 bits.
ifconfig_rl0_alias0=192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.255
I tried with 24 bits - it doesn't work one way or
Hey,
ifconfig_rl0_alias0=192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0
the mask of an alias ipadres needs to be 32 bits.
I do not now if this solves your problem but it needs to be 32 bits.
ifconfig_rl0_alias0=192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.255
Can you explain why it needs to be 32 bits?
I
Today, I find the bug that made cmucl/sbcl crash. The problem was caused by
a hand tuning parameter kern.maxdsiz in loader.conf. In practice, some
programs need very large memory footprint. To make them happy, I increased
the max data segment size by hand. Sadly, this made cmucl/sbcl crash.
If I
Hey,
OK.. if it is running inside your jail it doesnt respond to WINS
broadcasts (request for NETBIOS Names.. oi, who is Machine on this
subnet???), if it is not running in your jail, it is.
I wouldn't say WINS broadcasts but NetBIOS broadcasts, yes. Machine
is jailed Samba 3 server - I want
OK.. if it is running inside your jail it doesnt respond to WINS
broadcasts (request for NETBIOS Names.. oi, who is Machine on this
subnet???), if it is not running in your jail, it is.
I wouldn't say WINS broadcasts but NetBIOS broadcasts, yes. Machine
is jailed Samba 3 server - I want it to
Hi,
This is nota n issue with samba it is a name resolve issue.
Then why is Samba replying to NetBIOS broadcasts very nicely when I put
it outside jail (with the same configuration)? As far as I understand
Samba also provides resolving - NetBIOS resolving via its nmbd.
If you add in
Hi,
I'm not sending this message to the list as I've not been following the
discussion; I just skimmed thru it.
I hope you don't mind that I sent it to the list too.
I would check too things, a) a firewall (sorry if this has been talked
about, as I said I didn't read it all) or b) enable
Nejc Škoberne wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sending this message to the list as I've not been following
the discussion; I just skimmed thru it.
I hope you don't mind that I sent it to the list too.
I would check too things, a) a firewall (sorry if this has been talked
about, as I said I didn't read
On Wed, April 23, 2008 18:16, Nejc Å koberne wrote:
Hi,
This is nota n issue with samba it is a name resolve issue.
Then why is Samba replying to NetBIOS broadcasts very nicely when I put
it outside jail (with the same configuration)? As far as I understand
Samba also provides resolving -
Hey Johan,
I think you will need to remove 127.0.0.1
Just use 192.168.1.2/24
There is no 127.0.0.1 on a jailed system
I have done so - I still can't do smbclient //machine from another box to
the jailed Samba. If I put the Samba out of the jail (same version, same config)
it works as it
On Tue, April 22, 2008 17:33, Nejc ©koberne wrote:
Hey Johan,
I think you will need to remove 127.0.0.1
Just use 192.168.1.2/24
There is no 127.0.0.1 on a jailed system
I have done so - I still can't do smbclient //machine from another box
to
the jailed Samba. If I put the Samba out of
Hey Johan,
Well i use ezjail for my jails, i leave everything else standard, but have the
same sysctl value's
This is my smb.conf (it is a fileserver as member of a domain for my domain).
[global]
...
wins server = hz2-serv.mydomain.local
This is why it works for you. You use external
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:59 AM, शंतनु महाजन (Shantanoo Mahajan)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dhoomketu.net.in/node/6
Thank you all for helping. Right now, I have the resolution fixed with
915resolution (http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/)
I will consider installing the Intel
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:34:01 -0500
Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm toying with the idea of setting up a raid 1+0 array using 4 500GB
sata drives. However, I can't seem to find any definitive answer as to
whether I should be using gvinum or gmirror+gstripe to accomplish that
goal.
Hi, there
After upgrade to FreeBSD 7.0, the cmucl and sbcl keep crash. Is there anyone
who can run cmucl or sbcl on FB7.0.
Following attempts have been tried, but all failed.
1. upgrade to RELNG_7_0_0, then completely remove old port tree and install
port packages from official ftp sites.
2
Sorry, my previous message should have a subject line of
Re: cmucl and sbcl crash on FreeBSD 7.0
--
Michel TALON
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
I'm toying with the idea of setting up a raid 1+0 array using 4 500GB
sata drives. However, I can't seem to find any definitive answer as to
whether I should be using gvinum or gmirror+gstripe to accomplish that
goal. Does anyone have any links to resources (or just personal
opinion) that
I would use gmirror + gstripe ... I'm not sure if gvinum is still
actively developped .. (?)
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 14:34 -0500, Shelby Cain wrote:
I'm toying with the idea of setting up a raid 1+0 array using 4 500GB
sata drives. However, I can't seem to find any definitive answer as to
On Saturday 19 April 2008 02:07:09 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Since I upgraded to 7.0, it seams that my /etc/rc.conf isn't read
anymore at startup. At least partly. Things that do not start anymore
are:
- oss
- dbus
- hald
- avahi
They are all gnome related. I have in my rc.conf:
: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #10: Sat Apr 12 22:54:51
CEST 2008
Apr 19 11:43:36 yokozuna kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/YOKOZUNA
Apr 19 11:43:36 yokozuna kernel: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz
quality 0
Apr 19 11:43:36 yokozuna kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
(2793.02-MHz 686
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:07:09 +0200
Marco Beishuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since I upgraded to 7.0, it seams that my /etc/rc.conf isn't read
anymore at startup. At least partly. Things that do not start anymore
are:
- oss
- dbus
- hald
- avahi
They are all gnome related. I have
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:07:09 +0200
Marco Beishuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since I upgraded to 7.0, it seams that my /etc/rc.conf isn't read
anymore at startup. At least partly. Things that do not start anymore
are:
- oss
- dbus
- hald
- avahi
They are all
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:44:59 -0600
Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you changing the kernel security level in your rc.conf file? if
so, comment it out and reboot. that was an issue i had on a 6.x box
recently and commenting out the security level change fixed it
No, I didn't change that.
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:44:59 -0600
Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you changing the kernel security level in your rc.conf file? if
so, comment it out and reboot. that was an issue i had on a 6.x box
recently and commenting out the security level change fixed it
When I do a sysctl -a | grep
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:44:59 -0600
Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you changing the kernel security level in your rc.conf file? if
so, comment it out and reboot. that was an issue i had on a 6.x box
recently and commenting out the security level change fixed it
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:20:36 +0300
Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
securelevel -1 is fine. This is the default:
quote from init(8):
-1Permanently insecure mode - always run the system in level 0
mode. This is the default initial value.
Your problem lies elsewhere. I've
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:20:36 +0300
Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
securelevel -1 is fine. This is the default:
quote from init(8):
-1Permanently insecure mode - always run the system in level 0
mode. This is the default initial value.
Your problem
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:40:13 +0300
Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah!!! It just clicked! You got a lot of _enable=NO
This is rather unusual - you usually override something from
/etc/defaults/rc.conf with a YES
Your /etc/defaults/rc.conf has missing entries. It probably was not
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:44:59 -0600
Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you changing the kernel security level in your rc.conf file? if
so, comment it out and reboot. that was an issue i had on a 6.x box
recently and commenting out the security level change fixed it
No,
Hi Friends,
Am installing FreeBSD 7.0 on an AMD Athlon XP 2000 | 256MB RAM | 80GB HDD
Am not able to enter Install mode using FreeBSD 7.0 Disk1-i368
The Error message is :
acd0: FAILURE READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x05
...
...
Manual root filesystem specification
..
Am sure
Hi Friends,
Am installing FreeBSD 7.0 on an AMD Athlon XP 2000 | 256MB RAM | 80GB HDD
Am not able to enter Install mode using FreeBSD 7.0 Disk1-i368
The Error message is :
acd0: FAILURE READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x05
...
...
Manual root filesystem specification
..
Am sure
Hi,
Since I upgraded to 7.0, it seams that my /etc/rc.conf isn't read
anymore at startup. At least partly. Things that do not start anymore
are:
- oss
- dbus
- hald
- avahi
They are all gnome related. I have in my rc.conf: oss_enable=YES,
hald_enable=YES, avahi_daemon_enable=YES and
Hey again,
I am trying to get latest Samba running under FreeBSD 7.0 jail
environment. I happen
to have problems with visibility of the Samba server on the network -
I cannot connect
to it using its NetBIOS name. To be able to run nmbd, I have to use the
interfaces
parameter in smb.conf like
I am trying to get latest Samba running under FreeBSD 7.0 jail
environment. I happen
to have problems with visibility of the Samba server on the network -
I cannot connect
to it using its NetBIOS name. To be able to run nmbd, I have to use the
interfaces
parameter in smb.conf like
the ports, can you tell me how to do that?
Thanks,
Nishita
I just installed FreeBSD 7.0 on a Dell Inspirion 640m notebook and am
trying to get the screen resolution right. I need a 1280x800
wide-screen resolution and according to the Handbook, I should be able
[...]
I also found
On 17-Apr-08, at 12:16 AM, Nishita Desai wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
You are missing line DefaultDepth 24. Remove i810 and install Intel
driver
from ports instead. Adjust xorg.conf
accordingly. You my want to use xrandr to experiment with different
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 07:33:03 pm SourceForge.net wrote:
Read and respond to this message at:
https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=4907395
By: lexort
Your results are consistent with the problem reading from ulpt(4). I
expect that if you turn off your spooling systems and
Hello. I've installed FreeBSD 7.0 on one of my machines and I also went
through the buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld
procedures. Whenever my machine gets restarted the FreeBSD bootloader
doesn't start correctly, meaning that graphically the boot options don't
show up screen
at 8:28 AM, Andrei F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I've installed FreeBSD 7.0 on one of my machines and I also went
through the buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld procedures.
Whenever my machine gets restarted the FreeBSD bootloader doesn't start
correctly, meaning
Updating the port tree worked with no problems. Thanks
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Mel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 April 2008 21:29:18 Joseph Simmons wrote:
cougar# pwd
/usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6
cougar# make -n install-htdocs
echo Installing HTML
On Saturday 12 April 2008 02:13:40 Joseph Simmons wrote:
I have Apache 2.2.6 installed and running, I've tried to install PHP
several times, below is what the terminal gives me when I try to
install PHP5 from the port collection.
Thanks
cougar# pwd
/usr/ports/lang/php5
cougar# make
I installed apache from the port collection so wherever the default
location is httpd.conf is in /usr/local/etc/apache22, the log
files are in /var/log and at least some of the files that are used for
loading modules are in /usr/local/libexec/apache22. I'm not sure where
the other stuff is.
On Saturday 12 April 2008 19:59:12 Joseph Simmons wrote:
I installed apache from the port collection so wherever the default
location is httpd.conf is in /usr/local/etc/apache22, the log
files are in /var/log and at least some of the files that are used for
loading modules are in
/usr/local/include/apache22 does not exist.
Apache seems to work fine, though, when I install apache from
/usr/ports/www/apache22, at the end, I get some errors:
Installing configuration files
Installing HTML documents
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6.
*** Error
On Saturday 12 April 2008 20:59:48 Joseph Simmons wrote:
/usr/local/include/apache22 does not exist.
Apache seems to work fine, though, when I install apache from
/usr/ports/www/apache22, at the end, I get some errors:
Installing configuration files
Installing HTML documents
*** Error code 1
cougar# pwd
/usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6
cougar# make -n install-htdocs
echo Installing HTML documents ;
/usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6/build/mkdir.sh
/usr/local/www/apache22/data ; test -d
/usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6/docs/docroot (cd
On Saturday 12 April 2008 21:29:18 Joseph Simmons wrote:
cougar# pwd
/usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6
cougar# make -n install-htdocs
echo Installing HTML documents ;
/usr/ports/www/apache22/work/httpd-2.2.6/build/mkdir.sh
/usr/local/www/apache22/data ; test -d
I can't seem to install PHP 4 or 5 from the port collection or PHP5
from PHP's website. I'm new to FreeBSD so I'm not sure I'm overlooking
something rather simple or if I'm missing some other program or
something like that
I have Apache 2.2.6 installed and running, I've tried to install PHP
From: Nishita Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Subject: Screen resolution on FreeBSD 7.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I just installed FreeBSD 7.0 on a Dell Inspirion 640m notebook and am
trying to get the screen resolution right. I need a 1280x800
wide-screen
Nishita Desai wrote:
From: Nishita Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Subject: Screen resolution on FreeBSD 7.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are missing line DefaultDepth 24. Remove i810 and install Intel
driver from ports instead. Adjust xorg.conf
accordingly. You my
Hello everybody,
I'm having trouble booting FreeBSD 7.0 on an HP Proliant ML115 server
using a compact flash stick. Here is my dmesg:
ums0: ServerEngines SE USB Device, class 0/0, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2 on
uhub0
ums0: 8 buttons and Z dir.
umass0: vendor 0x55aa UnoPlus CF, class 0/0, rev 1.10
Hello,
I am trying to get latest Samba running under FreeBSD 7.0 jail environment. I
happen
to have problems with visibility of the Samba server on the network - I
cannot connect
to it using its NetBIOS name. To be able to run nmbd, I have to use the
interfaces
parameter in smb.conf like
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:09:42 +1300 Brett Davidson wrote:
I have set up a Linux Boot DHCP server (for other reasons that
hopefully will become obvious later) which points to the BSD based
tftp server.
I did try to recompile the BSD pxeboot program to use TFTP as per the
following but this
In the instructions I can find on the Internet about the above subject,
one needs a file called cups.sh which should linked from cups.sh.sample.
None of the files exist on my newly installed 7.0-RELEASE system.
I can ofcourse copy this file from another system but I'm thinking that
maybe
cd /usr/ports/print/cups
make mke install make clean
then after done building, add
cupsd_enable=YES
to /etc/rc.conf
then /usr/local/etc/rc.d/cupsd start
point your browser at http://hostname-orip:631
and configure
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Leslie Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have set up a Linux Boot DHCP server (for other reasons that hopefully
will become obvious later) which points to the BSD based tftp server.
I did try to recompile the BSD pxeboot program to use TFTP as per the
following but this did not appear to work as booting it still prompted
for an
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
I would suggest linux_base-fc6 for Rel. 7.0 build, not linux_base-fc4. The
rel. 7.0's
Hi all,
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
Thanks for any support
Michael
___
Bernd-Michael Ruhe a écrit :
Hi all,
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
Hi,
I installed linux_base-fc4 yesterday, and it
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= writes:
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
I installed
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:56:45 + Bernd-Michael Ruhe wrote:
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
You should install none
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:56:45 +
Bernd-Michael Ruhe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different
versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid
Robert Huff a écrit :
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= writes:
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Derek Ragona
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it worthwhile to contact NVidia with bug reports? Does the FreeBSD
community amount to much of a blip on their radar? Do we have a direct
liaison in the community?
Never hurts to file a bug report. It seems to be
On Thursday 27 March 2008 16:38:20 Darren Spruell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Derek Ragona
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it worthwhile to contact NVidia with bug reports? Does the FreeBSD
community amount to much of a blip on their radar? Do we have a direct
liaison in the
301 - 400 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
