On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Ruben de Groot wrote:
>
> Try
>
> arp -ad
>
Hi
Thanks for you all. arp -d IP and arp -ad work fine
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:38:54PM +0200, Cos typed:
>> Hi all
>>
>> The background is I have around 100pcs router-like products. they all
>> have a fixed IP add
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Cos wrote:
Hi all
The background is I have around 100pcs router-like products. they all
have a fixed IP address 192.168.1.100 and of course different MAC
address.
I need to connect them one by one to configure.
The trouble is while I disconnect one unit and change to a
Try
arp -ad
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:38:54PM +0200, Cos typed:
> Hi all
>
> The background is I have around 100pcs router-like products. they all
> have a fixed IP address 192.168.1.100 and of course different MAC
> address.
>
> I need to connect them one by one to configure.
>
> The troub
Hi all
The background is I have around 100pcs router-like products. they all
have a fixed IP address 192.168.1.100 and of course different MAC
address.
I need to connect them one by one to configure.
The trouble is while I disconnect one unit and change to another unit,
the FreeBSD can not recog
On 07/29/2012 22:23, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 07/29/2012 21:31, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:35:06 +0530
Manish Jain articulated:
Thanks for your inputs. I have finally got FreeBSD to speak to the
internet. Now I have one more problem before I can live in peace. I
am fond of a game hosted
On 07/29/2012 21:31, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:35:06 +0530
Manish Jain articulated:
Thanks for your inputs. I have finally got FreeBSD to speak to the
internet. Now I have one more problem before I can live in peace. I
am fond of a game hosted via the Discovery channel's website :
ht
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:35:06 +0530
Manish Jain articulated:
> Thanks for your inputs. I have finally got FreeBSD to speak to the
> internet. Now I have one more problem before I can live in peace. I
> am fond of a game hosted via the Discovery channel's website :
>
> http://news.discovery.com/hu
Hi,
Thanks for your inputs. I have finally got FreeBSD to speak to the
internet. Now I have one more problem before I can live in peace. I am
fond of a game hosted via the Discovery channel's website :
http://news.discovery.com/human/games-lumosity-word-bubbles.html
The game needs Adobe fla
On Friday, 27 July 2012 09:22:52 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
> >> FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
> >> MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4
> >
> > I'm not sure this is supported on a _single_ core Pentium 4 CPU
> > (or will gain speed if it was "emulated").
>
> MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER
A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4
I'm not sure this is supported on a _single_ core Pentium 4 CPU
(or will gain speed if it was "emulated").
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=2 make sense - one process I/O may overlap with other
compute
_
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Ryan Noll wrote:
Does anyone else remember "The Complete FreeBSD"?
I'm looking right at it on the shelf here. "Second Edition - over 1750
pages!". It is *bristling* with post-it notes used as bookmarks.
--
Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
**
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:36:18 +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 17:02:37 Mr U wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > is it possible to speed up port make ??
> > i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> > compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
>
> A few things you could try
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:04:27PM -0700, Ryan Noll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> > You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> > of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
> > pieces of metal stuck
El día Thursday, July 26, 2012 a las 07:10:00AM -0500, Robert Bonomi escribió:
> [[ sneck logfile entries ]]
>
> > Could it be that I am using the wrong AT commands ? C
>
> "Best guess" possibilities --
> 1) wrong serial port
> 2) wrong speed.
>
> Recommend using a simple teminal program,
> From: Manish Jain
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:37:23 +0530
> Subject: Re: How to get Huawei EC1561 USB modem working under FreeBSD 8.2?
>
> On 25-Jul-12 21:06, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
> I did some tinkering to make _some_ progress. My APC UPS is working fine
> now un
On 25-Jul-12 21:06, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:21:04 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:
On 25-Jul-12 18:53, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:29:07 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:
On 23-Jul-12 16:07, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 17:02:37 Mr U wrote:
> hi
>
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4
Also, you
On 24.07.2012 10:59, Manish Jain wrote:
Jul 23 22:36:15 bourne kernel: ugen0.2: at
usbus0
Jul 23 22:36:15 bourne kernel: ugen1.2: at usbus1
Jul 23 22:36:15 bourne kernel: umass0: Mobile, class 0/0, rev 1.10/0.00, addr 2> on usbus1
Jul 23 22:36:15 bourne kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; qu
-Original Message-
From: Reko Turja
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:12 PM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar
> 2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and
> compi
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and
compilation
this is simply not true.
This is simply not the point. Let's not start it again. The question was
clearly about compilation speed where clang
2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and compilation
this is simply not true.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
Mr U wrote:
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
1. You can use devel/ccache to cache compiled data. This way when you
are compiling anything for a second time you'll get a big speed boost.
Co
On 25 July 2012, at 23:04, Ryan Noll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
>> You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
>> of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
>> pieces of metal stuck in it as a powe
Hello,
On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
> pieces of metal stuck in it as a power source.
Ha-ha... Ah those were the days..., but does
let me tell you how we used to have to do our regexing. . . .
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscri
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:41:15PM -0400, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:06:33AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> > > Got you beat. Compiled world on a 100MHz Pentium with 40 MB of RAM.
> >
> > I think I can: FreeBSD 4 o
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jul 25 16:34:22 2012
> From: Robert Huff
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:31:14 -0400
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
>
>
> Anton Shterenlikht writes:
>
> > >>
26.07.2012 1:55, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 +0300, Владислав Продан wrote:
>>
>>
>> CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
>> CPU)
>> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping =
>> 2
>>
>> # kldstat -v |
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> Got you beat. Compiled world on a 100MHz Pentium with 40 MB of RAM.
I think I can: FreeBSD 4 on a Pentium 1 with 64 MB EDO RAM.
The make buildworld took 24 hours. The kernel itself, if I
remember correctly, required 3-5 hours, of course w
25, 2012 6:54 PM
To: Mr U
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd org
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Mr U wrote:
>
> hi
>
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> co
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 +0300, Владислав Продан wrote:
>
>
> CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping = 2
>
> # kldstat -v | grep temp
> 319 cpu/coretemp
>
ime make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=*
18992.839u 2569.146s 9:12:00.28 65.1% 927+762k 25593+6358io 2506pf+0w
(No idea how I got _that_ time!)
# time make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=*
17272.243u 2294.595s 6:01:33.44 90.1% 24+204k 34888+6367io 2911pf+0w
18541.285u 2596.192s 6:19:33.
Robert Huff writes:
> Mr U writes:
>
>> is it possible to speed up port make ??
>> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
>> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
>
> Humorous answer:
> Yes - get a more powerful computer.
or even just build on a more powerful
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
> >> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> >> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
>
> 2 hours only??
>
> Try lang/gcc46 or 47
> or science/paraview
I beiieve the winner is OpenOffice and its kindred;
still compili
25.07.2012 18:16, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 07:55, Владислав Продан wrote:
>>
>>
>> CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
>> CPU)
>> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping =
>> 2
>>
>> # kldstat -v | grep te
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:11:50PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> >> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> >> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> >> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
>
> 2 hours only??
>
> Try lang/gcc46 or 47
> or sci
>> is it possible to speed up port make ??
>> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
>> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
2 hours only??
Try lang/gcc46 or 47
or science/paraview
This will keep your electronic helper busy
for a day.
___
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
Humorous answer:
Yes - get a more powerful computer.
Robert Huff
real answer - get binary packages.
___
You could use pkg_add -r xorg to get it and all of its dependencies
installed. I usually use that, in combination with ccache to speed up
compiles called by portupgrade.
Brian
On Jul 25, 2012 8:38 AM, "Mr U" wrote:
>
> hi
>
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox an
Mr U writes:
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
Humorous answer:
Yes - get a more powerful computer.
Robert Huff
hi
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
thank you all
mru
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
Hi
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:21:04 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:
> On 25-Jul-12 18:53, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:29:07 +0530
> > Manish Jain wrote:
> >> On 23-Jul-12 16:07, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >>> On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote:
> On 21-Jul-12 19:06,
On 25 July 2012 07:55, Владислав Продан wrote:
>
>
> CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping = 2
>
> # kldstat -v | grep temp
> 319 cpu/coretemp
>
On 25-Jul-12 18:53, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:29:07 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:
On 23-Jul-12 16:07, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote:
On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM
El día Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 08:23:57PM +0700, Erich Dollansky
escribió:
> You enter then
>
> usbconfig -u 0 -a 4 dump_device_desc
>
> and you should get something like this:
>
> ugen0.4: at usbus0,
> cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON
>
> bLength = 0x0012
> bDescriptorType
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:29:07 +0530
Manish Jain wrote:
> On 23-Jul-12 16:07, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote:
> >> On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >>> El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish
> >>> Jain
On 23-Jul-12 16:07, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote:
On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
I am still stuck because I can't know the syntax to run usbdump. usbdump
Hi,
On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote:
> On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
> >
> I am still stuck because I can't know the syntax to run usbdump. usbdump
man usbdump
usbconfig gives you the
On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
Hello Erich/Matthias,
Thanks for your responses.
I do not have the usbdump command on my system. usbconfig gives the
following output :
...
ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
>
> Hello Erich/Matthias,
>
> Thanks for your responses.
>
> I do not have the usbdump command on my system. usbconfig gives the
> following output :
> ...
> ugen0.2: Conversion> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.
Hello Erich/Matthias,
Thanks for your responses.
I do not have the usbdump command on my system. usbconfig gives the
following output :
ugen0.1: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps)
pwr=SAVE
ugen1.1: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps)
pwr=SAVE
ugen2.1: at usbus2, cfg=0 md=
Hi,
On Friday 20 July 2012 19:25:21 Manish Jain wrote:
>
> I earlier had a Huawei EC1261-based USB modem which used to connect
> smoothly to the internet under FreeBSD 8.2 using the u3g module. For
> some reasons, I have had to switch to another provider (MTS) who swapped
> the Huawei EC1261-b
El día Friday, July 20, 2012 a las 05:55:21PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I earlier had a Huawei EC1261-based USB modem which used to connect
> smoothly to the internet under FreeBSD 8.2 using the u3g module. For
> some reasons, I have had to switch to another provider (MTS
Hello all,
I earlier had a Huawei EC1261-based USB modem which used to connect
smoothly to the internet under FreeBSD 8.2 using the u3g module. For
some reasons, I have had to switch to another provider (MTS) who swapped
the Huawei EC1261-based USB modem with a Huawei EC1561-based USB modem.
2012/7/19 Patrick Lamaiziere :
> Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:53:00 +0300,
> Виталий Туровец a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> > The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you
>> > don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't
>> > get lost. Be aware that the latency for
Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:53:00 +0300,
Виталий Туровец a écrit :
Hello,
> > The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you
> > don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't
> > get lost. Be aware that the latency for some patches could be
> > longer than you
2012/7/18 Eitan Adler :
> On 17 July 2012 02:16, Виталий Туровец wrote:
>> Hello, colleagues!
>> How would one propose some code to current branch?
>> I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
>> network masks in CIDR format instead
On 17 July 2012 02:16, Виталий Туровец wrote:
> Hello, colleagues!
> How would one propose some code to current branch?
> I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
> network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this
> change to Fre
Le Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:16:12 +0300,
Виталий Туровец a écrit :
Hello,
> Hello, colleagues!
> How would one propose some code to current branch?
> I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
> network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest
Hello, colleagues!
How would one propose some code to current branch?
I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this
change to FreeBSD project.
Also i've created a PR with my patch describing what i
I was getting
Tex capacity exceeded, sorry [main memory size 100]
error, so had to increase main_memory in
/usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
main_memory = 700 % words of inimemory available; also applies to inimf&mp
This works fine, but this file
will be overwritten if I update/re
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
sorry - possibly i missed something.
both method results in system bootable from both drives and proper
disklabels.
Yes, these are the same methods that can be used with MBR partit
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
T
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
THEN partition it, so partition sizes sums up to gmirror size which is 1
sector less disk size.
then bsdlabel -B
method 2) i make same disklab
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of partitioning scheme, the metadata should not b
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
not
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD
9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work i
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
2
On 07/12/2012 05:47 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a syst
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
> What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
> boot order.
> http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
>
> Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a system
> snapshot can be quickly restored
I have two SAS disks for the FreeBSD install. I want to install the freeBSD
on one disk and mirror to another disk. Just like the AIX Mirror.
man gmirror
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
ed.
>
> What should I do to make /deb/smb appear?
>
On an old box I have here this works, and is somewhat chipset specific as in
an 865PE with the ICH5 south bridge. I load kernel modules at boot: smb.ko,
smbus.ko, and ichsmb.ko. It's probably the last one you're missing, and I
I need to run decode-dimms from i2c-tools and it requires /dev/smb:
SMBus device not found
Googling the previous topics suggests that 'device smbios' in kernel
config should have helped, but it didn't. smbus.ko and smb.ko are both
loaded.
What should I do to make /deb/smb appear?
Thank you,
disk crashed or
disconnected, the OS could continue running on another disk.
Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
one disk crashed or
disconnected, the OS could continue running on another disk.
Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there
nother disk.
>
> Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send an
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:18:56 +0800
miles kuo wrote:
> Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
Hi,
take a look at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html
Andreas
--
GnuPG key : 0x2A573565|http://www.gnupg.org/howtos
ne disk crashed or
> disconnected, the OS could continue running on another disk.
>
> Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Tnx!
Worked like a charm, with skipped init and other checks, just the
control point parts:
<...>
int optval=1;
setsockopt(root_socket, IPPROTO_IP, IP_RECVDSTADDR,
&optval, sizeof(optval))
<...>
char t[200];
unsigned int sender_len;
On 4 July 2012 20:52, J B wrote:
> It is in ports:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
> jb
[10001 eitan@radar ~ ]%whereis xrestop
xrestop: /usr/ports/x11/xrestop
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
1083 root 1 210 99444K 11544K select 0 1:28 0.00% Xorg
doesn't take much, only 11.5MB is resident
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
It is in ports:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
.
> For this sort of thing, its good to put your image up on a pastebin site
> and include the link in your e-mail.
>
> > my question is how can I change this,
> >
> > and I cannot rebuild it ,because on my freebsd, I dont have src anymore .
>
> Well, the info that
9716K 660K select 0 0:05 0.00% moused
...
Of course, opera is a big customer of RAM which i cannot decrease its memory
usage. then can i descrease the xorg's resident memory ?
Sincerely!
-
e^(π.i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-
with read/recvfrom so we'v made that with libpcap. It
coul be done with directly bpf api without pcap wrapper but i'm not sure about
how big pcap overhead is.
The questions is if we have about 1Gb incoming traffic and using pcap filter
for specific port how big is impact of using pc
with read/recvfrom so we'v made that with libpcap. It
> coul be done with directly bpf api without pcap wrapper but i'm not sure
> about how big pcap overhead is.
>
> The questions is if we have about 1Gb incoming traffic and using pcap filter
> for specific port how big is
f api without pcap wrapper but
i'm not sure about how big pcap overhead is.
The questions is if we have about 1Gb incoming traffic and using pcap
filter for specific port how big is impact of using pcap in such
situation? Is it possbile to estimate? Target traffic is about 1Mbit and
whi
and include the link in your e-mail.
> my question is how can I change this,
>
> and I cannot rebuild it ,because on my freebsd, I dont have src anymore .
Well, the info that uname(1) prints out is generated from the source
code at compile time. Recompiling the kernel, or updating t
Hi All,
The blow information can be found when we boot up the system, also can use
command "uname -v"
my question is how can I change this,
and I cannot rebuild it ,because on my freebsd, I dont have src anymore .
[image: Inli
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:56:59 +0200, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
> port update?
> I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
If you don't mind the _time_ required for building those ports
(
Hi all,
How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
port update?
I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
*Sorry for my english*
Greetings
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
gt;
> Indeed, that's right Randal. But I got the impression from Bill's mails
> that this is more likely just something inside his internal network.
Filtering by MAC is not secure, I agree. but at least secure enough for a
internal network.
And I am quite sure what I want to archive.
s more likely just something inside his internal network.
> Please stop even trying.
Well I don't think learning how to use ipfw properly at layer2 is a bad
idea in itself, and I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from that.
For some years I ran a filtering transparent bridge wit
On Sunday 10 June 2012 23:14:57 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Well, nevermind about that. I get the general idea, i.e. that dumping
> at level N causes dumping of everything that has changed since the last
> dump at level N-1.
A point to be aware of is that if you restore from a full backup follo
> "Bill" == Bill Yuan writes:
Bill> I want to create a white list MAC address, Only the machine which it's
MAC
Bill> in the white list will be allowed, all others will be blocked.
Bad idea. Since (a) every MAC address that *is* allowed is transmitted
in the clear and (b) it's trivial to s
On Monday 11 June 2012 00:03:59 Daniel Feenberg wrote:
> It does occur to me that /etc is not a felicitous place to keep this
> information, but given the desirability of dumping filesystems in read
> only state, placing the dump dates in the filesystem itself isn't
> feasible.
Dumping with the -
On 10/06/2012 23:14, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Well, nevermind about that. I get the general idea, i.e. that dumping
> at level N causes dumping of everything that has changed since the last
> dump at level N-1.
Not quite. A dump at level N includes everything that changed since the
most rece
401 - 500 of 10972 matches
Mail list logo
