On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:38:15PM +, Chuck Robey wrote:
: I honestly keep on switching back and forth, between thinking that the
: best make is bmake, or gmake. They both have key items that make them
: uniquely better.
Other than parallel build tasks (-j2) what does bmake do that is
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm setting up a build system for a small project and I want to use included
makefiles. I have a base.mk that looks like this:
I will answer here, but be aware that you're getting all of my
prejudices too, so take things with a grain of salt.
First item deals
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:38:15PM +, Chuck Robey wrote:
: 1) relative addressing means you have to be forever translating paths in
: listings, and very often the number of include paths gets to be rather long.
Okay, I can fix that easily.
: The Make(1) man page doesn't show include, the
Hi all,
I'm setting up a build system for a small project and I want to use included
makefiles. I have a base.mk that looks like this:
.PATH.h : ../ ../include
.INCLUDES : .h
CFLAGS = -O -pipe -Wall -g
CFLAGS += $(.INCLUDES)
OBJS = ${SRCS:R:S/$/.o/g}
and a bin.mk that looks like
