Re: I'm stubborn or stupid (and that's not xor) (Was: CVS Import Permissions)

2006-01-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2006-01-31 00:44, Duane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, On the CVS server machine should our CVS repository directory belong to the cvs group, i.e. user==root, group==cvs? It's usually a good idea. And as for the umask, as it appears to be 027, if we give the cvs group write

Re: I'm stubborn or stupid (and that's not xor) (Was: CVS Import Permissions)

2006-01-31 Thread Duane Whitty
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-01-31 00:44, Duane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, On the CVS server machine should our CVS repository directory belong to the cvs group, i.e. user==root, group==cvs? It's usually a good idea. And as for the umask, as it appears to be 027, if we

I'm stubborn or stupid (and that's not xor) (Was: CVS Import Permissions)

2006-01-30 Thread Duane
david bryce wrote: n 2006-01-30 15:52, david bryce davidbryce at fastmail.fm wrote: Hi All, I am having some confusion regarding the way CVS works with permissions under unix when importing a new project. Currently, when I import a project, I get this sort of permissions on the project