On 20.07.2013, at 18:34, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 20.07.2013, at 14:53, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>> On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>> I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
>>> how to monitor changes in inst
On 20.07.2013, at 14:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
>> how to monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am
>> looking for a functionality/port that
On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
> I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
> how to monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am
> looking for a functionality/port that works like 490.status-
> pkg-changes for my host.
>
> Ques
Hi --
I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious how to
monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am looking for a
functionality/port that works like 490.status-pkg-changes for my host.
Question: is there any functionality within the periodic system or a
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:35:16 -0600, Adam Vande More
wrote:
> Thanks for the tips, I may add some of your functionality to my own.
> I think I might add a couple more features like accepting a backup
> path from the command line and an auto create for the dir if it
> doesn't exist. One other thin
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> My own version groks an os.environ['EXTRA_PKG_CREATE_ARGS'] option too
> and inserts the extra options before the ["-b", "package"] arguments of
> pkg_create, so that I can run the script for example with:
>
>env EXTRA_PKG_CREATE_ARG
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:15:12 -0600, Adam Vande More
wrote:
> Sometimes you have need to backup installed packages. I realize most
> port management tools do this automatically, but if you're on a system
> with a lot of packages installed and one port management tool fails
> an
Sometimes you have need to backup installed packages. I realize most port
management tools do this automatically, but if you're on a system with a lot
of packages installed and one port management tool fails and you use another
to fix it, /usr/ports/packages can become jumbled. Anyways,
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:16:58 -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> In trying to upgrade CUPS on a new 7.2 installation (CUPS was installed
> via sysinstall) the upgrade choked, and then I saw in UPDATING that
> print/cups has been split into multiple ports, and that in order to
> upgrade you must first re
In trying to upgrade CUPS on a new 7.2 installation (CUPS was installed
via sysinstall) the upgrade choked, and then I saw in UPDATING that
print/cups has been split into multiple ports, and that in order to
upgrade you must first remove the installed version. What is the best
way to do that? Sho
On Friday 27 March 2009 10:12:57 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> Is there anything about build dependencies in cutleaves?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves/files/
>pkg_cutleaves?rev=1.2
>
> I do not see it at a quick glance.
No. Typically one knows the leaves
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:05:04 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to show a list of all installed packages that are not
> required by any other package?
>
> Some thing like "pkg_info -aR" where the Required by: field is empty.
>
> Ult
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:34:00AM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Is there a way to show a list of all installed packages that are not
required by any other package?
cd /var/db/pkg/ ; for i in *-* ; do if [ ! -e $i/+REQUIRED_BY ] ; then
echo $i
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:34:00AM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > Is there a way to show a list of all installed packages that are not
> > required by any other package?
>
> cd /var/db/pkg/ ; for i in *-* ; do if [ ! -e $i/+REQUIRED_BY ] ;
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Is there a way to show a list of all installed packages that are not
> required by any other package?
cd /var/db/pkg/ ; for i in *-* ; do if [ ! -e $i/+REQUIRED_BY ] ; then
echo $i ; fi ; done
> Ultimately, that would give a list of "software" versu
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to show a list of all installed packages that are not
> required by any other package?
>
> Some thing like "pkg_info -aR" where the Required by: field is empty.
>
> Ultimately, t
Hi,
Is there a way to show a list of all installed packages that are not
required by any other package?
Some thing like "pkg_info -aR" where the Required by: field is empty.
Ultimately, that would give a list of "software" versus "libraries".
The question arise b
On Friday 02 December 2005 03:51 am, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
> hi all.
> i tried to run #portupgrade -arR but got the error below:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] portupgrade -arR
> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 328
> packages found (-7 +128)
> (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.r
hi all.
i tried to run #portupgrade -arR but got the error below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portupgrade -arR
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 328 packages
found (-7 +128) (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG]
Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd5]
Abort
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:53:27AM -0400, Wolfgang Lausenbart wrote:
> I want to setup a FreeBSD 5.4 Server, which should have all
> packages, as an older 4.11 based Server. What is the best
> way of providing the same packages to as installed on the
> 4.11 based? Note that it must not be *exactly
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Hi List,
I want to setup a FreeBSD 5.4 Server, which should have all
packages, as an older 4.11 based Server. What is the best
way of providing the same packages to as installed on
Hi List,
I want to setup a FreeBSD 5.4 Server, which should have all
packages, as an older 4.11 based Server. What is the best
way of providing the same packages to as installed on the
4.11 based? Note that it must not be *exactly* the same :o)
Is there any option to sysinstall/pkg_* to import
cial FreeBSD documentation before following
third-party advice? Both the FreeBSD FAQ and FreeBSD Handbook have
advice on this.
> My question is: is there an easier way of updating my
> installed packages?
Several. You might try ctm(1). Fuller details are in the Handbook,
if I recall. Anon
move to FreeBSD due to its maturity,
stability and performance, not to mention that
extended releases are supported for two years from
their release, which is attractive in a
mission-critical environment.
I am trying to determine the best method of keeping my
installed packages up-to-date. My
On Friday 25 March 2005 20:49, RW wrote:
> On Friday 25 March 2005 14:25, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Unforunately "portupdate" does not have a simple functionality to gather
> > all tarballs from each installed
> > port and its friends it depends on.
> > Maybe someone of you has a similar limitation an
On Friday 25 March 2005 14:25, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
> I run into the follwoing problem.
> Using an internet connected at my lab makes me happy installing each
> package I need from source.
> At home I have only a very slow moem connection, but I need also the
> same packages (not precompiled
Chuck Swiger schrieb:
O. Hartmann wrote:
[ ... ]
Unforunately "portupdate" does not have a simple functionality to
gather all tarballs from each installed port and its friends it
depends on.
Maybe someone of you has a similar limitation and can help.
Try using "make fetch-recursive" from a port'
This one time, at band camp, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> O. Hartmann wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Unforunately "portupdate" does not have a simple functionality to gather
> > all tarballs from each installed port and its friends it depends on.
> > Maybe someone of you has a similar limitation and can help.
>
>
O. Hartmann wrote:
[ ... ]
Unforunately "portupdate" does not have a simple functionality to gather
all tarballs from each installed port and its friends it depends on.
Maybe someone of you has a similar limitation and can help.
Try using "make fetch-recursive" from a port's directory to fetch the
Hello.
I run into the follwoing problem.
Using an internet connected at my lab makes me happy installing each
package I need from source.
At home I have only a very slow moem connection, but I need also the
same packages (not precompiled,
the sources) there.
One idea was to "fetch" every source
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote parv thusly...
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Mark-Nathaniel Weisman thusly...
> >
> > Is there a command that I can check to see if a particular package was
> > installed ... the way it was supposed to?
...
> # given a package name, see if file
mes they do not. try (assuming bourne like shell)...
# given a package name, see if files exists
# if they do not, ls will complain; only errors will be
# shown
pkg_info -L | xargs ls -l > /dev/null
> Or maybe a list of all installed packages?
this can be accomplished by pkg_info.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:35:27PM -0900, Mark-Nathaniel Weisman wrote:
> Is there a command that I can check to see if a particular package was
> installed in the kernel the way it was supposed to? Or maybe a list of
> all installed packages? I've installed a module for my Perl, a
Is there a command that I can check to see if a particular package was
installed in the kernel the way it was supposed to? Or maybe a list of
all installed packages? I've installed a module for my Perl, and I want
to make sure I installed it correctly.
His Faithful Servant,
Mark
To Unsubs
34 matches
Mail list logo
