Hi,
I'm installing a BSD, and by documentation what provided, on the beginning of
installation I should see "Kernel Configuration" screen. But after the system
buts from my CD, it bring me to the "Sysinstall Main Menu". It skip "Kernel
Conf."
Should I conf
% grep NFS /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MEITSIN
#optionsNFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client
#optionsNFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server
#optionsNFS_ROOT# NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT
% ls /boot/kernel/nfs*
/boot/kernel/nfsclie
Hi guys,
I just switched from linux to freebsd (noob) and trying to configure the kernel. My PC
is Dell Lattitude CSxH PIII 500, 256MB RAM. Now problems:
o According to LINT the CONF_FLAGS "inhibit use of non-optimal function" does this
mean that my kernel will be "optimized"?
o I increased
Okay, just to make sure this is correct (my first use of the newer more
current kernel config)..
The only steps involved are those listed in the handbook:
Change to the /usr/src directory.
# cd /usr/src
Compile the kernel.
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL
Install the new kernel.
#
hello,
i am going through the kernel configuration file to build a custom
kernel and am not quite sure i understand this part correctly.
my cpu is an athlon 64 x2 but i am running i386, so i am assuming that
in the config file i state that my cpu is i386, not athlon 64.
i ran frebsd
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:42:02 -0500, Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing a BSD, and by documentation what provided, on the beginning of
> installation I should see "Kernel Configuration" screen. But after the system
> buts from my CD, it b
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:42:02AM -0500, Leon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing a BSD, and by documentation what provided, on the beginning of
> installation I should see "Kernel Configuration" screen. But after the system
> buts from my CD, it bring me to the &
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html
where do i put this ?
device sound
i am using freebsd 5.3b7
Can you please at to the manual the path of the kernel configuration file thx
Do i need to recompile the kernel
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:20:42PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote:
> % grep NFS /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MEITSIN
> #optionsNFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client
> #optionsNFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server
> #optionsNFS_ROOT# NFS usab
* Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-26 10:56]:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:20:42PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote:
> >
> > I didn't give options NFSCLIENT or NFSSERVER yet it seems to have compiled
> > support. What gives?
>
> What you don't compile into your kernel (by eg. 'options NFSCL
[ kernel modules ]
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:03:49AM -0800, Joshua Lokken wrote:
> * Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-26 10:56]:
> > What you don't compile into your kernel (by eg. 'options NFSCLIENT')
> > will generally be compiled as a loadable module instead -- here
> > nfsclient.k
* Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-26 11:57]:
> [ kernel modules ]
>
> If you put NO_MODULES=true into /etc/make.conf, then you'll only get
> the kernel build. You won't get any extra loadable modules.
Got it. Thank you. On my workstations, where resources are
plentiful, I suppose i
> o According to LINT the CONF_FLAGS "inhibit use of non-optimal function"
> does this mean that my kernel will be "optimized"?
If you don't know what a kernel variable or flag does, then don't use it.
FreeBSD performs really well without configuring every last option.
> o I increased the process
> o options like: KTRACE, INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT,
> DIAGNOSTIC are for kernel debugging, am I right? I also read
> in LINT that it will make my kernel size larger. Does large
> kernels means worse performance? Do I really need to debug my kernel?
No, you don't need to debug your kernel,
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, charles pelletier wrote:
> Okay, just to make sure this is correct (my first use of the newer more
> current kernel config)..
>
> The only steps involved are those listed in the handbook:
> Change to the /usr/src directory.
> # cd /usr/src
> Compile the kernel.
> # make
On Saturday 08 March 2003 04:26 pm, charles pelletier wrote:
> Okay, just to make sure this is correct (my first use of the newer more
> current kernel config)..
>
> The only steps involved are those listed in the handbook:
> Change to the /usr/src directory.
> # cd /usr/src
> Compile the kerne
thanks for the help !
Charles Pelletier
Tech Coordinator
St Luke's School
Irving, TX
-Original Message-
From: taxman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'freebsd'
Subject: Re: kernel configuration
On Saturday 08 Marc
In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
# Floppy drives
device fdc
Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a
floppy drive?
Also, according the th
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote:
>
> this i386 version has
>
> cpu I486_CPU
> cpu I586_CPU
> cpu I686_CPU
>
Basically you can comment all but I686_CPU since the others are for
earlier x86 architectures.
-ewald
___
On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote:
this i386 version has
cpu I486_CPU
cpu I586_CPU
cpu I686_CPU
Basically you can comment all but I686_CPU since the others are for
earlier x86 archit
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:37:53PM +0100, icemaca wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> this i386 version has
>>>
>>> cpu I486_CPU
>>> cpu I586_CPU
>>> cpu I686_CPU
>>>
>
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, t-u-t wrote:
While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a
working
kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are a
number of
low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s such as
i586_bcopy)
that are conditionalized off
Chuck Swiger wrote:
[snip]
>
> While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a
> working kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are a
> number of low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s such
> as i586_bcopy) that are conditionalized off of I586_CP
In the last episode (Jan 15), Michael Powell said:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > While it is true that you can comment out all but i686 and get a
> > working kernel, you will experience reduced performance. There are
> > a number of low-level assembly routines (cf sys/i386/i386/support.s
> > such as i
On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
Actually, those functions are only enabled if the CPU is truly a
586-class processor. See /sys/i386/isa/npx.c , the npx_attach()
function. There is a test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586, while most
modern CPUs are CPUCLASS_686.
Thanks for the addi
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:09:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html
>
> where do i put this ?
>
> device sound
>
> i am using freebsd 5.3b7
The easier option is to put:
snd_driver_load="YES"
in /boot/loader.conf.
--
did that doesnt work for me ?
asus SK8N onboard sound acl850 if i am not mistaken.
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:21:30 +1300, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:09:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/soun
[Don't remove Cc: freebsd-questions]
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:24:31AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> did that doesnt work for me ?
>
> asus SK8N onboard sound acl850 if i am not mistaken.
Ah. That's the tricky part; you need to find out whether it's
supported by FreeBSD. There's a list of sound
i dont have any snd_*.ko files and the sound chip is suported by freebsd
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:44:11 +1300, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Don't remove Cc: freebsd-questions]
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:24:31AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > did that doesnt work for me ?
> >
> >
[Please don't top post, it's really hard to read]
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:52:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> i dont have any snd_*.ko files and the sound chip is suported by freebsd
If you're running 5.3b7, they should be there; it comes with the
default install.
--
Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PR
i did custom install :P
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:12:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Please don't top post, it's really hard to read]
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:52:56AM +0200, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > i dont have any snd_*.ko files and the sound chip is suported by freebsd
>
So i guess this mean kernel compilation from src ? Or can i install
them separately ?
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 07:13:47 +0200, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i did custom install :P
>
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:12:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Please don't top
Carmel wrote;
>
> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
>
> # Floppy drives
> device fdc
Definitely, "yes".
>
> Are there any other entri
On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi articulated:
>Carmel wrote;
>>
>> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
>> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry?
>>
>> # Floppy drives
On Sunday 06 May 2012 10:34:12 Carmel wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
>
> Robert Bonomi articulated:
> >Carmel wrote;
> >
> >> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do
> >> not have a f
On 06/05/2012 14:34, Carmel wrote:
>>> Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a:
>>>
>>> device cuse4bsd# Required by webcamd
>>>
>>> entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on
>>> that.
cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that th
On Sun, 06 May 2012 14:58:39 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
>cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't
>available as part of the base system, so making work as compiled-in
>code in the kernel will require you to create patches for your kernel
>source tree. Not impos
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400
> From: Carmel
> To: FreeBSD
> Subject: Re: kernel configuration file
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT)
> Robert Bonomi articulated:
> >
> >
On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012
> > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400
> > From: Carmel
> > To: FreeBSD
> > Subject: Re: kernel configuration file
> >
> &
Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2012-05-06 20:23, Robert Bonomi skrev:
>
> > Including *every* loadable module, whether or not you actually use it.
>
> That's not really true, at least not for me, and I have not made any
> changes to the build environment. The loadable module that I actually
> use is bktr
oot/loader.conf with those entry
bktr_load="YES"
Works for my Haupauge WinTV PCI video + tuner card, even
the options (PAL) seem to magically work! :-)
> I found that every loadable kernel module in the base system is, or at least
> "was", rebuilt.
That'
> Actually, that's not the problem.
> The file which is not found is the compiler itself:
>
> gcc34:No such file or directory
>
> Maybe you've installed gcc 4.3 from ports, linked /usr/bin/cc to
> /usr/local/bin/gcc43 and then upgrade gcc?
That doesn't seem right:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]$ whic
coriolinus wrote:
Actually, that's not the problem.
The file which is not found is the compiler itself:
gcc34:No such file or directory
Maybe you've installed gcc 4.3 from ports, linked /usr/bin/cc to
/usr/local/bin/gcc43 and then upgrade gcc?
That doesn't seem right:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/s
sm/aicasm.c, is
> sitting in my filesystem exactly where it should be. I'm not even sure
> why exactly it's trying to build that, as I'm pretty sure that I
> disabled the modules in the kernel configuration file which use that
> source.
Actually, that's not the pr
I've been experimenting with kernel configurations and network
performance. I'm running a dual Xeon processor (500MHz) system with
10/100 ethernet (Intel). It's an Intel motherboard. The cable is CAT5
and I'm transferring between the FBSD box and an Apple G4 laptop with
10/100 ethernet. This is
buildkernel command (second way to build a
kernel), but it refuses to work with:
localhost# make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel
make: don't know how to make buildkernel. Stop
Thanks for your help, cheers
Stefan
My kernel configuration file follows:
#
# mykernel -- kernel configuration file for FreeBSD
I have upgrade src to Revision: 234068
# cd /usr/src
# make -j 8 buildkernel KERNCONF=KES_KERN_v10
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KES_KERN_v10).
*** Error code 1
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error
# cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf
# ls
.cvsignore GENERIC.hints
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 server i try to change iNMBCLUSTERS kernel
configuration option using sysctl nmbclusters but its giving me sysctl:
unknown oid 'nmbclusters', am i missed something ? or its no longer
available in FreeBSD 5 ??
--
Emam
El 3
l KERNCONF=KERNEL
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KERNEL)
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
#
Лидер бывает только один - UzNet
www
l KERNCONF=KERNEL
ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KERNEL)
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
#
Лидер бывает только один - UzNet
www
Hi I am sorry to ask this, but yesterday I was looking to see if there
is anyway to read the output of dmesg and automatically convert it to a
readable format to be used to compile the new kernel. In that way it
will be more specified based on that hardware and making sure I am not
removing stu
Sometimes when I want to install 4.10 I get a menu right after boot that
tells me if I want to configure kernel or not. But the problem is it doesn't
show up on some machines. Does anybody know why?
* The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use
of the intended a
On Monday 11 November 2002 21:24, Stefan Farrenkopf wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I hope anybody can help me.
> I followed the Handbook to make a new kernel. The main interest for
> doing so is: I need to mount Netware volumes, etc. and I want to use my
> onboard SoundMax sound device. By going through I
КЕ> I have upgrade src to Revision: 234068
КЕ> # cd /usr/src
КЕ> # make -j 8 buildkernel KERNCONF=KES_KERN_v10
КЕ> ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (KES_KERN_v10).
КЕ> *** Error code 1
КЕ> 1 error
КЕ> *** Error code 2
КЕ> 1 error
КЕ> # cd /usr/src
"XP 2600" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a FreeBSD 5.4 server i try to change iNMBCLUSTERS kernel
> configuration option using sysctl nmbclusters but its giving me sysctl:
> unknown oid 'nmbclusters', am i missed something ? or its no longer
> availab
On 13 Mar 2006 10:51:17 -0500, Lowell Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "XP 2600" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a FreeBSD 5.4 server i try to change iNMBCLUSTERS kernel
> > configuration option using sysctl nmbclusters but its giving me sys
Hi all!
I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 -> FreeBSD
8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
First of all I made a copy of the most configuration files. Then I made:
# freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
All went good, except the message, that because of MYKERNE
Hi
sorry if this might sound lazy but I am wondering if there is any way or
any program that reads your out put of dmesg and creates a kernel
configuration file based on what generic kernel has found so I can use
it to compile the new one which has only modules which I need
In that case it
neric kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386
#
# For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on
# Kernel Configuration Files:
#
#http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html
#
# The handbook is also available locally in /usr/shar
install version 5.1 but I could not configure
the kernel. I followed the kernel configuration procedure and the
linking process yielded the following lines:
BEGIN of inserted lines -
linking kernel
umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim':
umass.o(.text+0x17c7): unde
update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
> All went good, except the message, that because of MYKERNEL kernel
> configuration I should upgrade my kernel before "freebsd-upgrade
> install".
That message should probably be more strongly worded. It is absolutely
*imperative* that the custom ke
S4mmael
> Objet: freebsd-update with MYKERNEL kernel configuration
> À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Jeudi 26 Novembre 2009, 13h32
> Hi all!
>
> I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3
> -> FreeBSD
> 8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
>
om kernel. But I think that same thing as been
>> written in the handbook.
>> http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=30920&postcount=9
>>
>> --- En date de : Jeu 26.11.09, S4mmael a écrit :
>>
>>> De: S4mmael
>>> Objet: freebsd-update with MYKERNEL k
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 09:47:30 -0400
Ara Avvali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> sorry if this might sound lazy but I am wondering if there is any way or
> any program that reads your out put of dmesg and creates a kernel
> configuration file based on what generic kernel has
,
0xcc00-0xcc03,0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007
irq 9 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata4: at 0xc000 on atapci2
ata5: at 0xc800 on atapci2
The relevant part of my kernel configuration file currently says:
# ATA and ATAPI devices
device ata0
Jian Guang Xu wrote:
I've been trying to configure my first custom kernel according to the
Handbook and looks that I got error in my configuration file, Would
somebody please help me out?
Thank you in advance.
++
Here is my custom configuration file:
d
> 2)I used the iso disk1 to install version 5.1 but I could not configure
> the kernel. I followed the kernel configuration procedure and the
> linking process yielded the following lines:
> BEGIN of inserted lines -
> linking kernel
> umass.o: In function `um
Toomas Aas wrote:
2)I used the iso disk1 to install version 5.1 but I could not configure
the kernel. I followed the kernel configuration procedure and the
linking process yielded the following lines:
BEGIN of inserted lines -
linking kernel
umass.o: In function
Hello,
I am have a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0 i386 and need to install an amd64
kernel.
I have copied /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC to
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/JERRY
Then, I run "make buildkernel KERNCONF=JERRY" in /usr/src and get the
following error:
ERROR: Missing kernel con
I remember that in FreeBSD 4 there was a way to include configuration file
in the kernel being compiled, but I could not remember what it was and I
could not find it in the handbook. Is there such feature in FreeBSD 6 ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hello everyone!
First of all i would like to apologize to anyone who finds my appeal a lazy
man's choice, actually it's indeed lazy but it's the best way to get an
answer from a valid source. My problem is a potential DOS/DDOS... i know a
forever talked about issue... i've already searched the fre
Y" in /usr/src and get the
> following error:
> ERROR: Missing kernel configuration file(s) (JERRY).
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
>
>
> It seems to want JERRY to be in i386/conf. If I copy JERRY to i3
> I am have a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0 i386 and need to install an amd64
> kernel.
>
> I have copied /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC to
> /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/JERRY
Support for cross-building is limited in the FreeBSD base system.
/usr/src/Makefile states:
"# If TARGET=machine (e.g. ia64,
On Sat 31 Mar 2007 20:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I remember that in FreeBSD 4 there was a way to include configuration file
> in the kernel being compiled, but I could not remember what it was and I
> could not find it in the handbook. Is there such feature in FreeBSD 6 ?
>From /usr/src/sys/co
Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel changes
section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not sure if I am
reading this correctly, but does this mean that people who have Intel-based
processors (such as P4 and Celeron) should not use 6.0 and only use 5.4
>
Please break your lines at around 70 characters. It makes it much
easier for people with text based Email readers to read and respond
to your posts.
> Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel
> changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not
>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bogdan Webb wrote:
> i've already searched the freebsd's mailing
> lists and found some mitigation techniques, to bad that google ain't that
> familiar with FreeBSD, and searchin' for guides is a pain...
>
http://www.google.com/bsd
--
Adam Vande More
__
Bogdan Webb wrote:
Hello everyone!
First of all i would like to apologize to anyone who finds my appeal a lazy
man's choice, actually it's indeed lazy but it's the best way to get an
answer from a valid source. My problem is a potential DOS/DDOS... i know a
forever talked about issue... i've alr
On 2006-01-09 09:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel
> changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not
> sure if I am reading this correctly, but does this mean that people
> who have Intel-based processors (such as
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:58:20AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel changes
> section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not sure if I am
> reading this correctly, but does this mean that people who have
> Intel-based
80 matches
Mail list logo
