On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
> Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs
> ... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am
> curious as to
On 10/26/10 21:17, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs ...
the post has to do with how fsync works on the
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
> Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs
> ... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am
> curious as to
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:33:52 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
>
> Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning
> fsync on Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on
> any of the BSDs ... the post has to do with how fsync works on the
> various OSs, and a
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs
... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am
curious as to whether or not this is something that also afflicts us:
h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/10 2:43 AM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 5 June 2010 00:58, Adam PAPAI wrote:
>
>> How can I tune my disk to make it faster? Is it possible? What is the
>> reason of the really slow I/O with more than 4 threads? What do you
>> recommend me to d
On Saturday 05 June 2010 01:58:35 Adam PAPAI wrote:
> Why FreeBSD is supreme with 1 and 2 thread. And why is it 2 and 3 times
> slower with 4-8-16-32 threads compared to Debian? The first two tests (1
> thread and 2 thread) showed me that FreeBSD is supreme in I/O, but later
> tests showed me, that
/usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
/usr/src : 386.3MB/s
>>> Do I understand it well? It seems that zfs with compression enabled on
>>> /usr/src with 8KB block size and 16 threads performs 386.3MB/s which
>>> is about 6 times better than debian5? I am thinking about this image
>>> ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/10 1:04 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:50:15 +0200
> Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
>
>>> /var : ufs with softupdates
>>> /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
>>> /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
>>> /home : zfs with compre
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:50:15 +0200
Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
> > /var : ufs with softupdates
> > /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
> > /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
> > /home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled
> >
> > I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 t
> /var : ufs with softupdates
> /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
> /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
> /home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled
>
> I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 threads.
>
> /var : 25.2MB/s
> /usr/obj : 64.8MB/s
> /usr/src : 386.
On 6/5/10 3:36 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> Some quick tests show that ufs does do rather poorly on my system too. I have
> the following filesystems setup:
>
> /var : ufs with softupdates
> /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
> /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
> /home : zfs with compressi
On Saturday 05 June 2010 00:58:35 Adam PAPAI wrote:
> Why FreeBSD is supreme with 1 and 2 thread. And why is it 2 and 3 times
> slower with 4-8-16-32 threads compared to Debian? The first two tests (1
> thread and 2 thread) showed me that FreeBSD is supreme in I/O, but later
> tests showed me, tha
On 5 June 2010 00:58, Adam PAPAI wrote:
> How can I tune my disk to make it faster? Is it possible? What is the
> reason of the really slow I/O with more than 4 threads? What do you
> recommend me to do? Why is it damn slow with 8K blocksize?
Does linux still have async disk writes by default?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
A week ago I started to benchmark Linux vs. FreeBSD on a Dell Poweredge
1850.
CPU: 2 x 3.4Ghz Xeon (Dual Core)
Memory: 8GB (4x2)
Disk: 1 x SEAGATE ST373454LC D404 (SCSI)
FreeBSD kazoku 8.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue May 25
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:01:26 +0200
"Florian Hengstberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
> still in trouble with finding a proper wlan-card.
> The hardware "database" on the freebsd-site did not help me:
> most cards are either no
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Hengstberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:01 PM
> To: FreeBSD mailinglist
> Subject: Linux vs FreeBSD: wlan-cards
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I know I posted a similar question two days ago, s
ive been looking for this too im about to order netgear wg511t and
wg311t cards
from the google searches ive done they look to be supported
Arden
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 20:01, Florian Hengstberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
> still in trouble
Hi!
I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
still in trouble with finding a proper wlan-card.
The hardware "database" on the freebsd-site did not help me:
most cards are either not avaiable in Austria or simply to expensive.
So my question is:
Has anybody found a cheap wlan-c
We're still plugging away at getting this to work ... I haven't given up
on FreeBSD for this yet ...
Have a Linux guy here that's been helping to debug this, and one of the
question that he had was whether or not our ncplogin supports NDS ...
apparently, the ncplib we have in ports doesn't suppor
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
> An upgrade consists of the following commands:
> 'cvsup -g -L2 stable-supfile && cd /usr/src/ && make buildworld &&
> make buildkernel KERNCONF=whatever && make installkernel
> KERNCONF=whatever && make installworld && reboot'
> Theoretically
D]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD
>
> --- Derrick Ryalls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't want to start a Linux/FreeBSD flamewar, but I do need some info
> >
> > I have an associate who wil
--- Derrick Ryalls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to start a Linux/FreeBSD flamewar, but I do need some info
>
> I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
> and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something like this:
>
>
W. D. writes:
> At 20:39 10/23/2002, Dan Pelleg, wrote:
> >FreeBSD systems are easy to maintain. You can do a source upgrade,
> >or a binary upgrade, and the system will go through it and boot
> >to the new version without a hitch. On one system I have I've gone from
> >FreeBSD 4.1 to 4.7, inc
W. D. wrote:
At 20:39 10/23/2002, Dan Pelleg, wrote:
FreeBSD systems are easy to maintain. You can do a source upgrade,
or a binary upgrade, and the system will go through it and boot
to the new version without a hitch. On one system I have I've gone from
FreeBSD 4.1 to 4.7, including every rele
"Derrick Ryalls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
> and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something like this:
>
> Web server (Public IP)
> inet - router( Public IP) --- /
>
At 20:39 10/23/2002, Dan Pelleg, wrote:
>FreeBSD systems are easy to maintain. You can do a source upgrade,
>or a binary upgrade, and the system will go through it and boot
>to the new version without a hitch. On one system I have I've gone from
>FreeBSD 4.1 to 4.7, including every release in betwe
From: "Dan Pelleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: RE: Linux vs. FreeBSD
>
> As has been said, the clients don't care much what the router is
> running as long as it
As has been said, the clients don't care much what the router is
running as long as it handles the packets correctly.
I would strongly recommend FreeBSD for this and this is based on my
experience in a mixed FreeBSD/Linux shop.
FreeBSD has excellent support for intelligent and traditional
packet
Hi Derrick,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:17:10PM -0700, Derrick Ryalls wrote:
> I don't want to start a Linux/FreeBSD flamewar, but I do need some info
>
> I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
> and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something like this:
>
I don't want to start a Linux/FreeBSD flamewar, but I do need some info
I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something like this:
Web server (Public IP)
inet - router( Publ
31 matches
Mail list logo
