On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, lveax wrote:
who are the people that works in apple and also a freebsd developer
now?
Jordan Hubbard and Wilfredo Sanchez come to mind, and maybe Garance
Drosihn would also qualify, as I think he was part of Apple's darwin-
developers, IIRC. There are others.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
lveax wrote:
> On 11/6/06, David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0500, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
>> > Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to
>> > me that perhaps this question had bee
On 11/6/06, David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0500, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to
> me that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but
> unfortunately it occurred to me af
David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:56:17PM -0600, Chuck Remes wrote:
Also, please recall I said "most software" and not 100% of software.
I am certain there are outliers that don't compile cleanly on OSX,
but that hardly proves that OSX is not a good UNIX target. The vast
major
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:56:17PM -0600, Chuck Remes wrote:
>
> Also, please recall I said "most software" and not 100% of software.
> I am certain there are outliers that don't compile cleanly on OSX,
> but that hardly proves that OSX is not a good UNIX target. The vast
> majority of softwar
On Nov 13, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Lorin Lund wrote:
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly
darwinport
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Lorin Lund wrote:
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
>>> This is completely wrong.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorin Lund wrote:
>
>>
>>> The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
>>> runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
>>> difficult to compile on MacOSX.
>>
>> This is completely wrong. Take a look at mac
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly
darwinports) for a large repository of UNIX software that com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> I really appreciate all of the feedback and reply posts regaring my
> inquiry about Darwin and FreeBSD.
>
> I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
> think is VERY good and
David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:03:20AM -0600, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
think is VERY good and have also recently been able to boot up the
OpenDarwin 7.2.1 as well, but never could get the Darwin 8.1 cdrom
On Nov 13, 2006, at 01:28, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Apple also doesen't use the UNIX security model. As near as I can
tell their core security model is an ACL model not a user/group model.
Once again this is something that's handled elsewhere.
The user-group security model is alive and the h
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:03:20AM -0600, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
>
> I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
> think is VERY good and have also recently been able to boot up the
> OpenDarwin 7.2.1 as well, but never could get the Darwin 8.1 cdrom to
> install.
If
Greetings All,
I really appreciate all of the feedback and reply posts regaring my
inquiry about Darwin and FreeBSD.
I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
think is VERY good and have also recently been able to boot up the
OpenDarwin 7.2.1 as well, but never could
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:28:16AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> No, they used it all as the Darwin core. Then they took Darwin and
> added their own GUI (used to be called Aqua) and that is MacOSX.
X11 also comes on the MacOS X DVD, but is not installed by default.
> Bear in mind that the
ovember 06, 2006 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD?
Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur
to me
that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but
unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took
- Original Message -
From: "Lonnie Cumberland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD?
> Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did
On 11/06/2006 05:48, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to me
that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but
unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the CM micro-k
On Nov 6, 2006, at 3:48 AM, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur
to me that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing
list, but unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:41:28AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> David Kelly writes:
>
> > Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple
> > took. Steve Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach,
> > so they took from there also too. A good number of well known
> > FreeBSD
David Kelly writes:
> Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple
> took. Steve Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach,
> so they took from there also too. A good number of well known
> FreeBSD people now work for Apple, there are a number of FreeBSD
> device drivers
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0500, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to
> me that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but
> unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
>
> So, basically the Apple team took
Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur to me
that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but
unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the CM micro-kernel,
combined them, made some improvements a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorin Lund wrote:
> Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
>> Greetings All,
>>
>> Being a long time Linux user and now looking into moving over to
>> FreeBSD, I decided to so some research on the web to try and get a
>> better idea as to the strengths and weaknesse
Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
Greetings All,
Being a long time Linux user and now looking into moving over to
FreeBSD, I decided to so some research on the web to try and get a
better idea as to the strengths and weaknesses as compared to other
operating systems like Linux (Fedora, Gentoo, etc..),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> Being a long time Linux user and now looking into moving over to
> FreeBSD, I decided to so some research on the web to try and get a
> better idea as to the strengths and weaknesses as compared to other
>
Greetings All,
Being a long time Linux user and now looking into moving over to
FreeBSD, I decided to so some research on the web to try and get a
better idea as to the strengths and weaknesses as compared to other
operating systems like Linux (Fedora, Gentoo, etc..), OpenBSD, NetBSD,
and Ope
27 matches
Mail list logo