On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
>> is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
>> computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet o
etc, but keep the NICs running?
Hope that this question was understandable. Thanks.
Regards,
Ronny Mandal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new system but I
haven't purchased the guts for the server yet.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&IsNodeId=1&Subcategory=27&d
Ryan Coleman writes:
> Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new
> system but I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet.
>
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Con
internet line through
Telephone line. But I am just in doubt that my webserver might not be able
to server the documents with good serving speed due to 1 Mbps upstream...
So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10
Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24
Hello,
I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like em does)?
I heard that the re is way better than
resses configured on the bge1 NICs. I cannot ping the other machine
when using the IP addresses configured on the bge5 NICs as ARP entries
remain incomplete. I can then configure bge5 to promiscous mode on one
machine, and after about 10 seconds the ping starts working.
Here's what ipconfig
"Len Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a host on my local 192.168.0 / 24 subnet that works fine in getting
> to the Internet via a default route.via a wireless connection.
> I want to develop some custom link protocols and I have placed two Ethernet
> NIC
; getting
> > to the Internet via a default route.via a wireless connection.
> > I want to develop some custom link protocols and I have placed two
> Ethernet
> > NICs in the box.
> > I want to be able to send packets from one NIC to the other and maintain
> the
> >
"Len Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, thanks for the response; It's nice to see some community support.
>
> Here is what I am trying to do:
>
> I am building a custom MAC protocol for a wireless system that has different
> software on
> the "head end" and the "clients." It is not peer-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Does FreeBSD support any TOE cards from say Adaptec or Intel? Can
DUMMYNET use the TCP offloading part to do its job more efficiently?
Thanks,
Siddhartha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thu
David Bear wrote:
I was wondering what opinions there are regarding the type of NICs to
using in a multihomed machine. Will be using fbsd 4.9-rel. Is it a
good idea to use NIC's from different manufacturers? Same manufacture?
Non-3com? ... As far as performance issues are concerned, is one
Hello List,
I am having some difficulty in getting my xl0 and xl1 3com cards to work
the way I'd like. I'm running 5.1 Release and I'm basically trying to
have one interface with no IP address(specifying it as such in
/etc/rc.conf as ifconfig_xl1="up") And I'd like to have the other(xl0)
to have
lee slaughter disturbed my sleep to write:
> so can i get a 5.2 sk(4) driver and recompile into 5.1?
Maybe. I've done something similar (grab code from later versions and
recompile into earlier versions), but it's not really kosher and I don't
know that I'd recommend it.
There's a few options op
Hi list,
I need help on this problem:
I have 2 nics. The first has about 30 ips assigned to it and working
correctly. The other was a backup nic for the ISP backup network, but its
now I was asked to assign ips and a default gateway specification to
it,because we ran out of usable ips on the 1st
Steven N. Fettig wrote:
Travis Troyer wrote:
I have a FreeBSD system that acts as a NAT Gateway, currently
providing on LAN with access to the Internet. I have added a third
NIC, connected to a second LAN. The second LAN does not need internet
access, but I would like it to be able to commun
From: "Steven N. Fettig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Travis Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, FreeBSD - questions
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3 Nics - Dual (Tripe) Homed Host
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 09:55:46 -0500
Travis Troyer wrote:
I have a FreeBSD system that acts
> I'm not sure if you were aware of aliasing, as I was not, or if this fits
> your situation as well as it did mine. I'm curious now as to whether or
not
> my gateway/router machine could still provide connectivity between the two
> networks, via the virtual hosted interface, for clients on bot
Travis Troyer wrote:
I have a FreeBSD system that acts as a NAT Gateway, currently
providing on LAN with access to the Internet. I have added a third
NIC, connected to a second LAN. The second LAN does not need internet
access, but I would like it to be able to communicate with the first
LAN
Redirected to -questions.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Vescovi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:06 PM
> I finally got cable modem access here in the backwoods of west-central
> PA.
>
> I want to set up my Dell Latitude running 4.8 as a gateway doing PAT and
>
I think I can handle the dhcp config, it's just a matter of solving the first
problem.
There are no errors in dmesg,but they are both using irq11 as follows:
pcic0 irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0
pcic1 irq 11 at device 3.1 on pci0
Memory allocation is different for each.
0x8800
0x88001000
Ken
- Original Message -
> From: Ken Vescovi
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 9:31 PM
> I think I can handle the dhcp config, it's just a matter of solving the
first problem.
> There are no errors in dmesg,but they are both using irq11 as follows:
> pcic0 irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0
> pcic
Based on my reading thus far, that's the problem as I see it too. I'm trying
to find out
how to set the interrupts. Not sure where to set them though. Looking
through my
current kernel config (LINT and default too) and pccard.conf doesn't seem to
give me the info I need or I'm
missing somethin
Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Intel Pro100S
> 3COM OfficeConnect (3CSOHO100B)
>
> At installation, I had the Intel (fxp0) connected to the switch, and it
> was configured during the sysinstall stage. However, the 3COM nic never
> showed up after installation in dmesg (as far as I
Quoting Daxbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Intel Pro100S
> > 3COM OfficeConnect (3CSOHO100B)
> >
> > At installation, I had the Intel (fxp0) connected to the switch, and it
> > was configured during the sysinstall stage. However, the 3COM nic never
>
t, you will have an
> unknown 'card', and it won't use the driver.
>
I was just doing a search around FreeBSD tech sites and actually, this
*specific* nic - 3CSOHO100B-TX isn't actually listed. What *is* listed
in the Handbook is:
3Com Etherlink XL-based NICs ( xl(4) d
Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:35, Daxbert wrote:
> > Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Intel Pro100S
> > > 3COM OfficeConnect (3CSOHO100B)
> > >
> > > At installation, I had the Intel (fxp0) connected to the switch, and it
> > > was co
Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:35, Daxbert wrote:
> > Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Intel Pro100S
> > > 3COM OfficeConnect (3CSOHO100B)
> > >
> > > At installation, I had the Intel (fxp0) connected to the switch, and it
> > > was co
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 00:07, Daxbert wrote:
> Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
>
> >
> > I was just doing a search around FreeBSD tech sites and actually, this
> > *specific* nic - 3CSOHO100B-TX isn't actually listed. What *is* listed
> > in the Handbook is:
> >
> > 3cS
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 00:07, Daxbert wrote:
> Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:35, Daxbert wrote:
> > > Quoting Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > Intel Pro100S
> > > > 3COM OfficeConnect (3CSOHO100B)
> > > >
> > > > At installation,
m as everything (presumably) is running at full throttle.
Is there any way to disable the ACPI partially, i.e. allow spin-down
for disks etc, but keep the NICs running?
This is IMHO not about FreeBSD support of ACPI but possible BIOS settings
that turn on some kind of hibernation.
Hope that th
s.
Furthermore, when ACPI is disabled, no network problem arises. This
suggests, at least to me, that ACPI is somehow involved.
gets very warm as everything (presumably) is running at full throttle.
Is there any way to disable the ACPI partially, i.e. allow spin-down
for disks etc, but keep t
arm as everything (presumably) is running at full throttle.
>>> Is there any way to disable the ACPI partially, i.e. allow spin-down
>>> for disks etc, but keep the NICs running?
>>
>>
>> This is IMHO not about FreeBSD support of ACPI but possible BIOS
settings
I have several Intel multi-port, (2 port, 4 port and even some 2 port
fibre-optic), cards in use. All have been rock-solid, stable performers, and
have hardware VLAN tagging and trunking capability. I have some 4 port cards
in use with LACP+VLAN Trunking, and then use vlan interfaces in FreeBSD
con
ntel cards. Intel is
a safe choice of NIC -- basically you can be sure that it will not only
be supported, but it will work very well.
Of the other branded NICs there, unfortunately it is impossible to say
much about them based on the manufacturers name. The important thing is
the chipset. If
based on 10+ exprience and working with a dozen models,
I recommend intel cards:
- Intel explicitly supports freebsd.
- the cards are highly stable
- have best performance among all other cards on freebsd
and if you look for best performance, buy a card
based on 82575 or 82576 controllers.
On
I have a tyan k8wd with dual bge nics but they are painfully slow on transfer
rates.
Is there something I need to put in the hints file to fix this??
Thanks!
dmesg output
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993
Hi,
I have a short and surely straightforward question: I want to set-up two
NICs on two of my FBSD 5.x servers. Each server will have a dedicated
NIC for all "outside world" traffic, and between the two machines I want
to set-up a 192.168.1.x local network via a cross-wire cable,
Fixed-IP, I am getting a 24/1 Mbps internet line through
> Telephone line. But I am just in doubt that my webserver might not be
able
> to server the documents with good serving speed due to 1 Mbps
upstream...
>
> So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to
100/10
>
WITH
fixed IP. But basicly you can only pull/push 1mbit, since there is a
300GB traffic limit imposed. :)
So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10
Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24/1 Mbps
connection with Fixed-IP to litsen the req
Hey all, I have a Transport GT24 (B3992 Motherboard), and while it has one
intel nic which works well, I'd like to be able to use the onboard
broadcom network cards. Is there a known way of making them work? I seem
to recall some dealy where you could use a windows driver?
-Dan
--
"I love
On 2005-08-31 00:46, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other GigaBit
> NICs (1000baseTX only). AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which
> doesn't saturate a [EMAIL PROTECT
On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
> GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
> AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 10:51 CEST schrieb Dmitry Mityugov:
> On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
> > GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
> > AFA
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Thank you for the offer, but I thought people had some simple test results
in mind. If you next time use rdump or large NFS transfers to another GbE
connected (and fast enough) box just watch the system load (I use systat
-vm 1) and see what card causes what interrupt lo
I'm posting this for documentary purposes in case someone has this problem
and wants to find the answer.
Under the 6.1 RELEASE, with all sources cvsup'd to current, both world and
kernel rebuilt, the Broadcommm NetExtreme 5708 NICs will fall over under
very light load when usin
Hi,
I have further news on this problem. It really seems to be a
driver/hardware issue.
As I said, the two servers have 6 NICs each. These are:
bge0, bge1: BCM5750, integrated on the motherboard
bge2, bge3: BCM5704, PCIX card
bge4, bge5: BCM5704, PCIX card
I have now greatly simplified the
On Friday 31 August 2007 21:55, Tobias Ernst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have further news on this problem. It really seems to be a
> driver/hardware issue.
>
> As I said, the two servers have 6 NICs each. These are:
>
> bge0, bge1: BCM5750, integrated on the motherboard
> bge
On Friday 31 August 2007 22:30, I correctly wrote:
> Did you try without forcing a link speed(check ifconfig -m)
s/without //
anything useful in dmesg?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques
Nikos Vassiliadis schrieb:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 22:30, I correctly wrote:
>> Did you try without forcing a link speed(check ifconfig -m)
> s/without //
>
> anything useful in dmesg?
No, nothing at all in dmesg.
I don't think this is an auto negotiation issue. How can a Windows
machine that
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:48:35 +0200, Tobias Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this is an auto negotiation issue. How can a Windows
> machine that is connected to the same switch as my two FreeBSD machines
> and does not even talk to them explicitly influence the autonegotation
> of t
Nikos Vassiliadis schrieb:
>> I don't think this is an auto negotiation issue. How can a Windows
>> machine that is connected to the same switch as my two FreeBSD machines
>> and does not even talk to them explicitly influence the autonegotation
>> of the FreeBSD NIC?
> I didn't say that a Windo
On Friday 31 August 2007 20:55:13 Tobias Ernst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have further news on this problem. It really seems to be a
> driver/hardware issue.
>
> As I said, the two servers have 6 NICs each. These are:
>
> bge0, bge1: BCM5750, integrated on the motherboard
> bge
ote that when you do this while booting on install, the
script recognizes your selection and prompts you to choose whether
you'd like to disable ACPI permanently.
Regarding the onboard and wireless NICs: the solution seems to be an
implementation of NDIS by Bill Paul that interprets Windows .
Scott Renna wrote:
Hello List,
I am having some difficulty in getting my xl0 and xl1 3com cards to work
the way I'd like. I'm running 5.1 Release and I'm basically trying to
have one interface with no IP address(specifying it as such in
/etc/rc.conf as ifconfig_xl1="up") And I'd like to have the
"Scott Renna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello List,
>
> I am having some difficulty in getting my xl0 and xl1 3com cards to work
> the way I'd like. I'm running 5.1 Release and I'm basically trying to
> have one interface with no IP address(specifying it as such in
> /etc/rc.conf as ifconfig
rday, January 03, 2004 12:27 PM
To: Scott Renna
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with 2 nics in same box
Scott Renna wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am having some difficulty in getting my xl0 and xl1 3com cards to
work
> the way I'd like. I'm running 5.1 Release and I&
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:27:33PM -0500, Scott Renna wrote:
> I am using Snort and a few other tools to decide which I'd like best.
> Here's the thing about Lowell's comment on Bridging. Is this necessary
> in this case? I don't want the interface without an IP to EVER transmit
> outbound. If I
Hi Scott,
> I am using Snort and a few other tools to decide which I'd like best.
> Here's the thing about Lowell's comment on Bridging. Is this necessary
> in this case?
It certainly isn't necessary...it is an option.
> I don't want the interface without an IP to EVER transmit
> outbound.
A f
> > I don't want the interface without an IP to EVER transmit
> > outbound.
> A firewall could accomplish this...
Or simply do not assign an IP address at all. And if you want to go below
IP; check out the -arp option in the ifconfig man page.
Dw
___
[
f MP3s from the site and they are pretty good :)
Not sure if their music ever makes it to Scotland though, which is where
I am!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Boothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 12:27 PM
To: Scott Renna
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, SixthSense Server Admin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I need help on this problem:
>
> I have 2 nics. The first has about 30 ips assigned to it and working
> correctly. The other was a backup nic for the ISP backup network, but its
> now I was asked to ass
You wrote:
>I have 2 nics. The first has about 30 ips assigned to it and working
> correctly. The other was a backup nic for the ISP backup network, but its
> now I was asked to assign ips and a default gateway specification to
> it,because we ran out of usable ips on the 1st nic, so w
I got a few responses regarding this post, but I'm really looking for
some positive, "yes, I'm using it" or "I tried and failed":
Having a little trouble ensuring hardware compatibility.
Some of the units we're considering have one of the following NIC chipsets:
VIA 6103
VIA 6303
VIA 6306
Realte
2618382342 1448
Are those normal for ed0 and de0? Compared to the ep0 nic of rate of 1
(although the ep0 nic is not used as much as the other two nics obviously).
Thanks.
Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want
to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in it,
one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How can
I bind the connections together without any other sort of router?
I've used i
Hello!
I'm building an interesting configuration and came up with some problems. Me and
my roommate both have our own 10mb internet connection through the same ISP. The
connection works over ethernet and IPs are assigned with DHCP and everyone in
the building receives IPs from the same subnet.
I'
Hi all,
I am about to move our 2 servers, and add a third, to a new colo.
On each of the three servers there will be two NICs.
1 NIC on each box is to be dedicated to the internet.
1 1 NIC in each box is to be dedicated to local. (192.168.0.1-3).
Can I plug all three NIC s into one switch
Busby
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: dual bge nics slow transfer - no transfer
I have a tyan k8wd with dual bge nics but they are painfully slow on
transfer rates.
Is there something I need to put in the hints file to fix this??
Thanks!
dm
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:55:29 -0800 (PST), in
sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote:
>I have a tyan k8wd with dual bge nics but they are painfully slow on transfer
>rates.
> Is there something I need to put in the hints file to fix this??
> Thanks!
Hi,
There are a lot
On 10/12/05, Olaf Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a short and surely straightforward question: I want to set-up two
> NICs on two of my FBSD 5.x servers. Each server will have a dedicated
> NIC for all "outside world" traffic, and between the tw
172.17.0.1 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_vge0="dhcp"
...to give you the general idea. It's enough to bring
the NICs up and running, but then consider DNS
and other issues that provide for a networking environment.
Yes, the main entry, i.e., the one for the outside world is set-up lik
hing like:
> > ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xff00"
> > ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 0x"
> > ifconfig_vge0="dhcp"
> > ...to give you the general idea. It's enough to bring
> > the NICs up and running, but t
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> Is the bge driver enabled by default?
>
> -Dan
>
> > I don't know what broadcom chip your MB has b
stem Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> Is the bge dr
loppy, you couldn't install freebsd on it.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom N
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
The question, is this the correct con
Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in 6.1
release is buggy.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:02 PM
Subject: Broadcom Nics in Tyan
river attached)
Also, I'm running 6.1-RELEASE, will the cvs drivers from CURRENT work?
-Dan
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:02 PM
Subject: Broadcom Nics in Ty
--On January 13, 2007 8:34:50 AM -0500 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in
6.1 release is buggy.
Which driver is that? My 6.1 install won't see them at all:
ED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in
6.1
> > release is buggy.
>
> Which driver is
IL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 09:21 am, Bill Moran wrote:
> I got a few responses regarding this post, but I'm really looking for
> some positive, "yes, I'm using it" or "I tried and failed":
>
> Having a little trouble ensuring hardware compatibility.
>
> Some of the units we're considering have one of
Hey Bill,
Some of the units we're considering have one of the following NIC chipsets:
VIA 6103
Which is on the Via EPIA-V series boards, which is what I'm using for a
project right now. I had that machine running 4.9 and 4.10, now it is
running OpenBSD 3.5-stable. I have succesfully used an EPIA
Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Bill,
>
> > Some of the units we're considering have one of the following NIC chipsets:
> > VIA 6103
>
> Which is on the Via EPIA-V series boards, which is what I'm using for a
> project right now. I had that machine running 4.9 and 4.10, now it is
>
On 6 Jul 2004 at 10:21, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> I got a few responses regarding this post, but I'm really looking for
> some positive, "yes, I'm using it" or "I tried and failed":
>
> Having a little trouble ensuring hardware compatibility.
>
> Some of the units we're considering have one of the
165
> irq10: de0 276544892152
>
> Are those normal for ed0 and de0? Compared to the ep0 nic of rate
> of 1 (although the ep0 nic is not used as much as the other two nics
> obviously).
Depends on what you mean by "normal". You'll g
1
irq11: ed0 298318862165
irq10: de0 276544892152
Are those normal for ed0 and de0? Compared to the ep0 nic of rate
of 1 (although the ep0 nic is not used as much as the other two nics
obviously).
Depends on what you mean by "normal". Yo
298318862165
irq10: de0 276544892152
Are those normal for ed0 and de0? Compared to the ep0 nic of rate
of 1 (although the ep0 nic is not used as much as the other two nics
obviously).
Depends on what you mean by "normal". You'll get one
Greg Donald wrote:
I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want
to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in it,
one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How can
I bind the connections together without any other sort of router
> I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want
> to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in it,
> one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How can
> I bind the connections together without any other sort of router?
At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote:
I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want to
plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in it, one
nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How can I bind
the connections together without any
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:06:39AM -0400, Tomas Quintero wrote:
> PF is wonderful for this. I manage a router with 3 DSL Circuits and
> have PF setup to round-robin between them. The configuration is fairly
> simple, and I can provide my pf.conf if you'd like for some
> clarification on how to go a
On 5/12/05, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomas Quintero wrote:
>
> >PF is wonderful for this. I manage a router with 3 DSL Circuits and
> >have PF setup to round-robin between them. The configuration is fairly
> >simple, and I can provide my pf.conf if you'd like for some
> >clarifica
PF is wonderful for this. I manage a router with 3 DSL Circuits and
have PF setup to round-robin between them. The configuration is fairly
simple, and I can provide my pf.conf if you'd like for some
clarification on how to go about doing it.
Actually, I for one would be quite interested in seeing
At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote:
I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want
to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in
it, one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How
can I bind the connections together without any
Multihoming two wan links can be accomplisheed by using zebra or just ipfw
and natd.
- Original Message -
From: "Muhammad Reza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT
> At 11:06 AM 5
next ip same subnet and connect it using
a xover to the second card
All nics have external ip address's I don't want to use nat
Why I'm using the xover is a complicated story.
So the simple question is there an easy way to set this up using the current
hardware without natd.
Cheers
I have a box with both an external and internal NIC. The external NIC is
connected to an ADSL adapter serving a block of globally routable static
IP addresses while the internal NIC is connected to a hub served by a
NAT/DHCP server. The idea here is that this way the box can offer
different servic
us out on that.
Sounds fun either way..
M;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Grant Peel
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2 networks, six NICs, 3 Servers, 1 switch.
Hi all,
I am about to move our 2
101 - 200 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
