Jay Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am attempting to compile Perl 5.8.8 on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. I make
> it through the configuration just fine, but when I attempt to run the
> make command, I receive the following error message. I am creating a
> custom install. The o
I am attempting to compile Perl 5.8.8 on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. I make it
through the configuration just fine, but when I attempt to run the make
command, I receive the following error message. I am creating a custom
install. The only parameter I am changing is the installation location
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:11:00 -0600
Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On February 24, 2008 3:30:18 PM -0800 Gary Kline
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Do we have the following perl modules in ports?
> >
> > Tk
--On February 24, 2008 3:30:18 PM -0800 Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Do we have the following perl modules in ports?
Tk
Encode
Encode::Unicode (Not sure if this is seprate from the Encode
module) Encode::Guess
HTML::Parser
Do we have the following perl modules in ports?
Tk
Encode
Encode::Unicode (Not sure if this is seprate from the Encode module)
Encode::Guess
HTML::Parser
LWP::Simple
I'm trying to understand how gtk20 and other graphic
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8: Undefined symbol
> "PL_exit_flags"
You may consider updating every Perl modules after you have upgraded
Perl 5.8.8.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
always appreciated.
Have fun!
All the best,
Kyrre
- Original Message -
From: Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 8:49 am
Subject: Perl error running lint on spamassassin?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
> I know I've been noisy of late, but that should slow
lint from mailwatch
provides a clue, perhaps:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8: Undefined symbol
"PL_exit_flags"
I've removed and reinstalled perl5.8 from ports, double checked everything
with the perl-after-upgrade script, ensured that I've handled the
use.perlports th
On Thursday 24 January 2008 06:02:25 am Gerard wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100
>
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gerard wrote:
> > > I have not been able to find any information in regards to the
> > > latest version of Per
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
It's not going to happen.
I completely agree -- but I'm talking about it being the default perl
version. There shouldn't be much of anything stopping lang/perl5.10
from appearing. I'm not saying it needs to be shipped wi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
It's not going to happen.
I completely agree -- but I'm talking about it being the default perl
version. There shouldn't be much of anything stopping lang/perl5.10
from appearing. I'm not saying it needs to be ship
Gerard wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gerard wrote:
I have not been able to find any information in regards to the
latest version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December.
1) When will this version be available in the ports
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gerard wrote:
> > I have not been able to find any information in regards to the
> > latest version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December.
> >
> > 1) When will this version
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 21:19, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of
pain because of all the old perl code that stops working.
I haven't used perl 5.10 yet, but looking at the changes (available at
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 21:19, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of
> pain because of all the old perl code that stops working.
I haven't used perl 5.10 yet, but looking at the changes (available at
<http://search.cpa
Gerard wrote:
I have not been able to find any information in regards to the latest
version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December.
1) When will this version be available in the ports system?
After 7.0 is released.
2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version?
Not as it
Gerard writes:
> 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version?
>
> It seems rather silly to use the older version as the default in
> FBSD-7.0 since a newer version is available.
I don't speak for the Release Engineering team, but: almost
certainly not
I have not been able to find any information in regards to the latest
version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December.
1) When will this version be available in the ports system?
2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version?
It seems rather silly to use the older version as
ly by
changing the C equivalent of ARGV[0} which in perl is $0.
Run the following and ps shows "rubbish (perl)" and not "foo.prl (perl)"
foo.prl
---
#!/usr/bin/env perl
$0="rubbish";
sleep 120;
$ chmod +x foo.prl
$ ./foo.prl &
$ ps
7274 p1 S 0:00.00
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 01:04:38AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> If a simple 'locate sploger' shows nothing(run `periodic weekly` which
> will update your locate database assuming you're keeping things
> relatively stock), then in all likelihood you've got an intruder. If
> some of the other tips
5 PM, Jack Raats wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HI
Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
30668 ?? R168:56.54 sploger (p
>> Looks sort of like a Perl script running.
>> That, of course, doesn't say what it is doing.
>
> The stangest thing is that I cann't find sploger on my system. After a
> reboot sploger doesn't appear anymore, which makes it more stranger.
Post output of:
--On Wednesday, October 17, 2007 23:51:39 +0200 Peo Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I scanned my FreeBSD 6.2-Release (ports up to date) with
Avira Antivir personal ed, some days ago. The scanner returned
this:
...
checking drive/path (cwd): /
/usr/ports/security/p5-openxpki-client-html-mason
't appear anymore, which makes it more stranger.
> >
> > So you have done a:
> >
> > find / -name sploger -type f
> >
> > And nothing comes up? If that's the case, it sounds like it was a perl
> > script that was run, then subsequently removed
e f
And nothing comes up? If that's the case, it sounds like it was a perl
script that was run, then subsequently removed from the file system.
Which sounds rather nefarious to me. You might want to check for
rootkits, etc.
If you google for "sploger+perl", all you get is stuff t
Jack Raats wrote:
>>> HI
>>>
>>> Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
>>>
>>> 21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
>>> 29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
>>> 29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 22:05 +0200, Jack Raats wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >> HI
> >>
> >> Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
> >>
> >> 21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> >>
> The stangest thing is that I cann't find sploger on my system. After a
> reboot sploger doesn't appear anymore, which makes it more stranger.
So you have done a:
find / -name sploger -type f
And nothing comes up? If that's the case, it sounds like it was a perl
scri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HI
Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
30668 ?? R168:56.54 sploger (perl5.8.8)
What is
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:14:07AM +0200, Jack Raats wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> HI
>
> Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
>
> 21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/07, Jack Raats wrote:
>
> What is sploger?
>
IIRC, you can also do something like:
# pkg_info -p `which sploger`
That'll tell you what port owns that file at least.
- --
Andy Harrison
public key: 0x67518262
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Jack Raats wrote:
> HI
>
> Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
>
> 21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 30668 ?? R168:56.54 sploger (perl5.8
On Wed, October 17, 2007 08:44, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Jack Raats said:
>
>
>>
>> What is sploger?
>>
>>
>> Jack
>>
>
> I believe that's part of qmail.
>
>
No, that's splogger.
Peter
--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-q
On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Jack Raats said:
> HI
>
> Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
>
> 21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 30668 ?? R168:
>
> Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
>
>
> 21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
> 30668 ?? R168:56.54 sploger (perl5.8.8)
>
>
> What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HI
Can anyone explain this after ps -ax | grep perl
21893 ?? I 1:02.37 sploger (perl5.8.8)
29536 ?? R184:14.94 sploger (perl5.8.8)
29538 ?? R184:36.44 sploger (perl5.8.8)
30668 ?? R168:56.54 sploger (perl5.8.8)
What is
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 16:49:04 Andrew Falanga wrote:
> One question I have for the maintainers of these ports and the ports
> infrastructure, why are these all listed in different places?
>
> /usr/ports/devel/php5-pcre/
> /usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/
> /usr/ports/www/php5-session/
>
> Not
your system, and PHP will suddenly grok
things like XML, SQL, and Perl-compatible regular expressions
(or at least whatever you enabled).
One of the irritating things, but also very practical, about Google mail
is that messages I send to this list do not show up in my inbox until
someone
orts will be added to your system, and PHP will suddenly grok
> things like XML, SQL, and Perl-compatible regular expressions
> (or at least whatever you enabled).
>
>
One of the irritating things, but also very practical, about Google mail is
that messages I send to this list do not show up in
ction preg_match() in *
/usr/local/www/apache22/data/phpwebsite_1_3_1/setup/index.php* on line *136"
*. I've found from the php.net web site that this is the PERL compatible
regular expression stuff. Since it's not there, how would I get it?
This is a build-time option with php, a
get, "*Fatal error*: Call
> to undefined function preg_match() in *
> /usr/local/www/apache22/data/phpwebsite_1_3_1/setup/index.php* on
> line *136" *. I've found from the php.net web site that this is the
> PERL compatible regular expression stuff. Since it's not
unction preg_match() in *
>/usr/local/www/apache22/data/phpwebsite_1_3_1/setup/index.php* on line *136"
>*. I've found from the php.net web site that this is the PERL compatible
>regular expression stuff. Since it's not there, how would I get it?
This is a build-time option w
setup/index.php* on line *136"
*. I've found from the php.net web site that this is the PERL compatible
regular expression stuff. Since it's not there, how would I get it?
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:12:03AM -0700, snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
> as i do on every other os/platform, i use ONLY "native" cpan/cpanp.
>
> i have dozens of cpan-installed perl-modules. cpan/cpanp manage the
> dependencies just fine.
> the problem is in the case of
On Sunday 02 September 2007 20:12:03 snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
> hi,
>
> > You have perl modules installed, that have no corresponding installed
> > FreeBSD port.
>
> i do not use BSDPAN -- it's sloppy about its dependency mgmt.
>
> as i do on every other os/platf
hi,
> You have perl modules installed, that have no corresponding installed
> FreeBSD port.
i do not use BSDPAN -- it's sloppy about its dependency mgmt.
as i do on every other os/platform, i use ONLY "native" cpan/cpanp.
i have dozens of cpan-installed perl-modules.
* snowcrash+freebsd [2007-09-02 19:11]:
> > It is not supported to mix FreeBSD ports collection perl modules
> > with modules installed from CPAN.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115885
> >
> I'm not "mixing" anything. I h
hers.
>
> It's already been done. I don't know why the port is called
> p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though. Possibly it pre-dates
> the current naming conventions.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
Ah, thanks so very much. It's option D) -
27;t know why the port is called
p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though. Possibly it pre-dates
the current naming conventions.
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
urcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.
p5-perl-ldap is what you want for the Net::LDAP modules.
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninop
ugh I do see
> p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.
>
> Can I:
>
> A) leave the script as-is, and simply install one or the other of
> these ports, and have it work? If so, which one?
>
> Or, must I
>
> B) commit minor surgery on the script wherever I
I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant
I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.
Can I:
A) leave the script as-is, and simply
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:10:15 -0600
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:40:32 -0600
> >
> > (3) Maybe you should consider using another CMS software, there is a
>
On 8/24/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:40:32 -0600
>
> (3) Maybe you should consider using another CMS software, there is a
> lot of choice, including Perl-based if you prefer that. The most
> important thing is that they are trul
On 8/23/07, Foo JH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried simply installed Perl from the packages in the FreeBSD
> install CD?
>
Yes, I installed perl from ports.
Andy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:40:32 -0600
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install WebGUI on a FreeBSD system for my church.
> WebGUI uses PERL for its operation. The program has a test
> environment perl script that it tries to ru
Have you tried simply installed Perl from the packages in the FreeBSD
install CD?
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install WebGUI on a FreeBSD system for my church.
WebGUI uses PERL for its operation. The program has a test
environment perl script that it tries to run to make sur
Hi,
I'm trying to install WebGUI on a FreeBSD system for my church.
WebGUI uses PERL for its operation. The program has a test
environment perl script that it tries to run to make sure the
environment can run WebGUI. On a couple of the perl modules it tries
to install, it bails saying
YOUR KERNEL, PUT C WRAPPER AROUND THIS SCRIPT, OR USE -u AND UNDUMP
speedy_backend[32940]: perl_parse error
speedy[32940]: Cannot spawn backend process
Premature end of script headers: openwebmail.pl
Can anyone explain what is going on.
I've tried recompiling perl (with suidperl enabled an
Hi,
I installed lang/perl5.8 and set it to be threaded. I'm having
problems getting mod_perl working, and I know at one time atleast that
it was because of using threaded perl. How do I portupgrade and tell it
to :
1) Uninstall perl-threaded-5.8.8
2) Install perl 5.8
3) Make su
Hi,
Installed a fresh 5.5-R-p12 (I *NEED* to run 5.5, sorry) with
apache+mod_ssl+mod_deflate-1.3.37+2.8.28
perl-threaded-5.8.8
mod_perl-1.30
When I try to start it I get a segfault. The backtrace is :
(gdb) bt
#0 0x286e9350 in Perl_newSVpvn ()
from /usr/local/lib/perl5
--- Warren Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's in the wrong place. There's a port for
> XML::Parser:
>
> /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser
>
> Install that and see if it solves the problem.
>
> -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
I looked for such a port and couldn't find o
On Fri, 11 May 2007, David LeCount wrote:
--- Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try running "perl -MCPAN -e shell" as root.
That should take you to a cpan> prompt from there
type
"install XML::Parser"
If that completes succesfully hit exit and try to
inst
--On May 11, 2007 6:59:57 PM -0700 David LeCount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--- Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try running "perl -MCPAN -e shell" as root.
That should take you to a cpan> prompt from there
type
"install XML::Parser"
If that com
--- Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try running "perl -MCPAN -e shell" as root.
>
> That should take you to a cpan> prompt from there
> type
> "install XML::Parser"
>
> If that completes succesfully hit exit and try to
> in
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Craig Russell wrote:
Try running "perl -MCPAN -e shell" as root.
That should take you to a cpan> prompt from there type
"install XML::Parser"
If that completes succesfully hit exit and try to
install what you were looking for.
Hope this helps
Try running "perl -MCPAN -e shell" as root.
That should take you to a cpan> prompt from there type
"install XML::Parser"
If that completes succesfully hit exit and try to
install what you were looking for.
Hope this helps
Craig Russell
--- David LeCount <[EMAIL
Ahoy. Every time I try to upgrade a program that
depends on Perl, I get this error:
checking for XML::Parser... configure: error:
XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
I've tried a portupgrade -fRra to no avail. I'm not
sure if I'm missing a package (pkgdb -F doesn'
Hi,
Does anyone have any idea how I could do this?
I see that some people are building custom
binaries...are there pre-fabbed ones?
Thx,
J
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote White Hat thusly...
>
> Running Apache on a FreeBSD-6.2 machine, I am attempting to set up
> a web page that changes a specific image on a daily basis. I found
> a Perl script that is supposed to do this, but it seems to fail.
> All that
From: White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FreeBSD Users Questions
Subject: Perl Script in Apache
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
I tried to get an answer to this on the Apache forum,
but unfortunately, I was not successful.
Running Apache on a FreeBSD-6.2 machine, I am
attempt
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Olivier Regnier wrote:
Hello,
I written a small script in perl to send email.
Here is the code:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use warnings;
use MIME::Lite;
my $msg = new MIME::Lite
From =>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
To =>&
On May 6, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Olivier Regnier wrote:
Hello,
I written a small script in perl to send email.
Here is the code:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use warnings;
use MIME::Lite;
my $msg = new MIME::Lite
From =>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
To =>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I written a small script in perl to send email.
Here is the code:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use warnings;
use MIME::Lite;
my $msg = new MIME::Lite
From =>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
To =>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
Subject =>'test',
Type =>'TEXT&#x
I tried to get an answer to this on the Apache forum,
but unfortunately, I was not successful.
Running Apache on a FreeBSD-6.2 machine, I am
attempting to set up a web page that changes a
specific image on a daily basis. I found a Perl script
that is supposed to do this, but it seems to fail. All
Andy Greenwood wrote:
Sent this a while back and never got a response. Any ideas would be
very appreciated!
Because it's too long, I don't know what you're asking and it's also perl/php,
not FreeBSD.
I'm working on getting a script to work (see below). It is a perl
Sent this a while back and never got a response. Any ideas would be
very appreciated!
Thanks!
I'm working on getting a script to work (see below). It is a perl
daemon associated with a bittorent client that I am helping develop.
The daemon uses unix domain sockets to commincate with th
I'm working on getting a script to work (see below). It is a perl
daemon associated with a bittorent client that I am helping develop.
The daemon uses unix domain sockets to commincate with the php pages.
However, anytime a message is sent via php, the script dies with
send: Cannot dete
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Olivier Regnier wrote:
my $retval=0;
my $doc_supfile="/etc/doc-supfile";
# Downloading doc files
print "===> Downloading doc files\n";
system("/usr/bin/csup $doc_supfile
if (! $retval) {
print "abort";
exit;
}
I don't know what happened with retval but that doesn't work corr
ho "abort"
>exit 0
> fi
This script has a minor bug. There is no != test for numeric values in
sh(1) scripts. See below for a slightly larger shell script with some
reusable parts, which works probably better.
> I want to rewritte this code in perl script.
>
> my $retv
On 2007-04-08 00:26, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > Try using Perl only, instead of forking sed(1), like this:
> > [...]
> > | sub supfile_set_default_host($$);
> > | sub supfile_set_default_host($$)
> > | {
[...]
>
On 2007-04-08 09:28, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olivier Regnier wrote:
> The file has to exist that you're trying to modify, otherwise it'll give
> up :). Permissions issue?
>
> Better to do that section may be:
>
> my $tmpsupfile;
> my $supfile = "/etc/standard-supfile
On 2007-04-08 11:40, Olivier Regnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas a ?crit :
> >Try using Perl only, instead of forking sed(1), like this:
> >
> >,---
> >|
> >| #
Olivier Regnier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I written a small script in sh :
> # Downloading doc files
> echo "===> Downloading doc files"
> /usr/bin/csup $doc_supfile
> RETVAL=$?
> if [ $RETVAL != 0 ]; then
>echo "abort"
>exit 0
> fi
&
Olivier Regnier wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas a écrit :
>> On 2007-04-07 17:31, Olivier Regnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
>>> example of my code:
>>&
Hello,
I written a small script in sh :
# Downloading doc files
echo "===> Downloading doc files"
/usr/bin/csup $doc_supfile
RETVAL=$?
if [ $RETVAL != 0 ]; then
echo "abort"
exit 0
fi
I want to rewritte this code in perl script.
my $retval=0;
my $doc_su
Giorgos Keramidas a écrit :
On 2007-04-07 17:31, Olivier Regnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
example of my code:
Don't use system("sed ...") in Perl. It's considered poor style,
Interesting. Is that old perl syntax (v4, etc)? Just curious because
most of the documentation and examples switched to:
No, he's using a function prototype. In this particular case, he's
saying the supfile_set_default_host function will take two scalars as
arguments.
For more info
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2007-04-07 17:31, Olivier Regnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
>> example of my code:
>
> Don't use system("sed ...") in Perl. It'
On 2007-04-07 17:31, Olivier Regnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
> example of my code:
Don't use system("sed ...") in Perl. It's considered poor style, since
Perl can do the same
Olivier Regnier wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
example of my code:
# Selecting the fast server
print "Using the server called $server";
system(`/usr/bin/sed 's|\*default host=\(.*\)|\*default
host=${server}|
Warren Block a écrit :
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Olivier Regnier wrote:
I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
example of my code:
# Selecting the fast server
print "Using the server called $server";
system(`/usr/bin/sed 's|\*default host=\(.*\)|
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Olivier Regnier wrote:
I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a example
of my code:
# Selecting the fast server
print "Using the server called $server";
system(`/usr/bin/sed 's|\*default host=\(.*\)|\*default host=${server}|'
Hello,
I have a problem with my perl script with the command sed. Here is a
example of my code:
# Selecting the fast server
print "Using the server called $server";
system(`/usr/bin/sed 's|\*default host=\(.*\)|\*default host=${server}|'
$standard_supfile > $standard_
> Don Munyak wrote:
> >I am having problems installing perl5.8.8 on a up-to-date
> >FreeBSD-6.2. After running...
> >
> >web# cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
> >web# make
> >scripts install perl...
> >
> >web# make test
> >(8) tests fail with
Parv wrote:
I do not think that test would run on perl install unless things have
changes since May 2006 (from build log on May 16 2006) ...
Ah.. good catch :)
Sorry about that, Don...
Best,
--G.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Glenn Sieb thusly...
>
> Don Munyak wrote:
> >I am having problems installing perl5.8.8 on a up-to-date
> >FreeBSD-6.2. After running...
> >
> >web# cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
> >web# make
> >scripts install
Don Munyak wrote:
I am having problems installing perl5.8.8 on a up-to-date FreeBSD-6.2.
After running...
web# cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
web# make
scripts install perl...
web# make test
(8) tests fail with the following message
Hmm.. 'make' by itself only prepares the source to be
I am having problems installing perl5.8.8 on a up-to-date FreeBSD-6.2.
After running...
web# cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
web# make
scripts install perl...
web# make test
(8) tests fail with the following message
...something about you may need to set dynamic library search path,
LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Ian A. Tegebo wrote:
I've found several methods for adding directories to @INC in perl:
The general solution to this is that 'admin's put appropriate lines in
~/. startup files for users that need this or in the /etc/ system-wide
startup files as needed.
That said, I don'
501 - 600 of 1505 matches
Mail list logo
