On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:43:21 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> I am having great difficulty running a very simple assembler program
> on FreeBSD on x86 in my efforts to learn some assembly programming on
> FreeBSD. I have tried to compile the following with nasm, however i
> get nothing in response w
Charlie Kester wrote:
On Wed 11 Nov 2009 at 17:32:41 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
One more thing:
Notice that the system call number (or any other dword) should also be
pushed onto the stack before the int 80h.
The reason for this is given at the top of the page:
although the kernel is acce
Mihai Don??u wrote:
> I don't think the kernel is the one that initializes the
> 0, 1 and 2 file descriptors (stdin, stdout and stderr).
Correct so far.
> I think you have to open them yourself ...
No, the shell does it. That's how it is able to set up
pipes and redirection.
__
On Wed 11 Nov 2009 at 17:32:41 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
One more thing:
Notice that the system call number (or any other dword) should also be
pushed onto the stack before the int 80h.
The reason for this is given at the top of the page:
although the kernel is accessed using int 80h, it
On Wed 11 Nov 2009 at 11:43:21 PST David Jackson wrote:
I am having great difficulty running a very simple assembler program
on FreeBSD on x86 in my efforts to learn some assembly programming on
FreeBSD. I have tried to compile the following with nasm, however i
get nothing in response when I
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 21:43:21 David Jackson wrote:
> I am having great difficulty running a very simple assembler program on
> FreeBSD on x86 in my efforts to learn some assembly programming on
> FreeBSD. I have tried to compile the following with nasm, however i get
> nothing in response
I am having great difficulty running a very simple assembler program on
FreeBSD on x86 in my efforts to learn some assembly programming on
FreeBSD. I have tried to compile the following with nasm, however i get
nothing in response when I attempt to run this program:
section .data
I am having great difficulty running a very simple assembler program on
FreeBSD on x86 in my efforts to learn some assembly programming on
FreeBSD. I have tried to compile the following with nasm, however i get
nothing in response when I attempt to run this program:
section .data
d=2740699
-Original Message-
From: Miguel [mailto:luis.hen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:53 PM
To: Ben Fallon
Cc: freebsd-mob...@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with FreeBSD installation
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Ben Fallon wrote:
> What mod
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ben Fallon wrote:
> Might want to take a look at this page as it may provide a bit more insight.
> The problem isn't with the Machine specifically but with the ATI Sata
> Controller/Chipset. Not sure if this has been fixed yet.
>
> http://www.mavetju.org/mail/view
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Mel
Flynn wrote:
> Your best bet is to poll the mobile list (CC'd) to see if anyone was able to
> get FreeBSD working on this laptop (or even to know whether this is a lost
> cause till somebody makes some patches for this laptop). Since 7.2 also does
> not work and
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 13:01:30 Miguel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to install FreeBSD in my laptop, but without success. I
> started with 7.2, but during installation i got the error:
>
> "No disk found! Please verify that your disk controller..."
>
> Looking at the logs, everything
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Yes, I understand -- just realised that BETA2 is more recent than the
>> snapshot I
>> tried. Most probably, I'll just wait until 8.0 is actually released. My
>> problem with trying BETA2 is th
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Yes, I understand -- just realised that BETA2 is more recent than the
>> snapshot I
>> tried. Most probably, I'll just wait until 8.0 is actually released. My
>> problem with trying BETA2 is th
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Miguel wrote:
> Yes, I understand -- just realised that BETA2 is more recent than the
> snapshot I
> tried. Most probably, I'll just wait until 8.0 is actually released. My
> problem with trying BETA2 is that it will take long time to get it (slow
> connection her
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> I have not tried 8.0-BETA (as someone on the IRC channel suggested) but not
>> sure
>> if it will make any difference. As far as I understand, the snapshot I
>> tried is
>> more recent than 8.0-BETA2. Or am I wrong? Is it worth downloading
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Miguel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
>>> Hi Glen,
>>>
Can you try booting with ACPI disabled? It should be option 2 from
the loader menu.
>>>
>>> Yes, I tried that already
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Hi Glen,
>>
>>>
>>> Can you try booting with ACPI disabled? It should be option 2 from
>>> the loader menu.
>>
>> Yes, I tried that already with same results.
>>
>
> Can you try the installation
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Miguel wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
>>
>> Can you try booting with ACPI disabled? It should be option 2 from
>> the loader menu.
>
> Yes, I tried that already with same results.
>
Can you try the installation media on another machine (to rule out a
bad CD or bad burn)?
Als
Hi Glen,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Miguel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to install FreeBSD in my laptop, but without success. I
>> started with 7.2, but during installation i got the error:
>>
>> "No disk found! Please verify th
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Miguel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to install FreeBSD in my laptop, but without success. I
> started with 7.2, but during installation i got the error:
>
> "No disk found! Please verify that your disk controller..."
>
> Looking at the logs, everything seems
Hi,
I've been trying to install FreeBSD in my laptop, but without success. I
started with 7.2, but during installation i got the error:
"No disk found! Please verify that your disk controller..."
Looking at the logs, everything seems fine to me (although its my first time on
the FreeBSD worl
hi...
I've managed to compile and setup a paravirtualized domU with FreeBSD 8
(SVN snapshot from 'head').
Currently I'm running into two mayor problems:
- The system time is not behaving as expected.
Example:
I fired the domain up at 01:43 in the morning and watch
YSSS!!!
It's work! With the -C option work fine! :-)
Now, what I need to do to use it without -C? Do I need to change some
option?
The ssh was executed on Linux:
Linux (ssh -C host) -> ASA <- Internet -> FreeBSD
Thanks!
2008/11/4 Brian Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gior
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:10:25 -0200, "J MPZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Paul,
When my connections freeze, I open the tcpdump in other terminal. If I type
something, type "Enter", on the terminal frozen, the tcpdump show packets,
like that:
11:18:45.526256 IP (tos 0
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:10:25 -0200, "J MPZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> When my connections freeze, I open the tcpdump in other terminal. If I type
> something, type "Enter", on the terminal frozen, the tcpdump show packets,
> like that:
>
> 11:18:45.526256 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 51, id 651
Jeremy,
2008/11/4, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:11:15AM -0200, J MPZ wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > I tried without none rules on ipfw FreeBSD (just "allow ip from any to
> any")
> > and error continues occurring.
>
> Then I have no idea.
>
> > How I can disab
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:11:15AM -0200, J MPZ wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I tried without none rules on ipfw FreeBSD (just "allow ip from any to any")
> and error continues occurring.
Then I have no idea.
> How I can disable the TCP extensions?
>
> I tried to set this value on this sysctl (sysctl
Hi Jeremy,
I tried without none rules on ipfw FreeBSD (just "allow ip from any to any")
and error continues occurring.
How I can disable the TCP extensions?
I tried to set this value on this sysctl (sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0) but
not work.
2008/11/3, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Hi Paul,
When my connections freeze, I open the tcpdump in other terminal. If I type
something, type "Enter", on the terminal frozen, the tcpdump show packets,
like that:
11:18:45.526256 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 51, id 651, offset 0, flags [DF], proto:
TCP (6), length: 112) 189.21.230.195.20787 > 201.57
> I have some problem with my FreeBSD server. I have this:
>
> #### #
> # Linux1 # -> ASA -> Internet -> # FreeBSD # -> # Linux2 #
> #### #
>
> If I run a ssh for
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:43:52PM -0200, J MPZ wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have some problem with my FreeBSD server. I have this:
>
> #### #
> # Linux1 # -> ASA -> Internet -> # FreeBSD # -> # Linux2 #
> #
J MPZ wrote:
Hi guys,
I have some problem with my FreeBSD server. I have this:
#### #
# Linux1 # -> ASA -> Internet -> # FreeBSD # -> # Linux2 #
#### #
If I r
Hi guys,
I have some problem with my FreeBSD server. I have this:
#### #
# Linux1 # -> ASA -> Internet -> # FreeBSD # -> # Linux2 #
#### #
If I run a ssh for Li
Hi.
I was trying to install FreeBSD 7.0 on an old Sun
Blade 100 computer (from 2002) which has an UltraSPARC
IIe 500MHz RISC CPU in it. But I can't get the
graphics to come up (I've only got text-console right
now on the OS.). How can I fix this?
When I try to do a "startx", the screen just goes
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, RJ45 wrote:
hello
I have 2 servers with FreeBSD 6.2 rebuilt from sources.
when I use freebsd-update it fetchs updates and install them.
AFter rebooting I always have the old kernel booting.
what's wrong ?
thanks
Rick
Did you compile your kernel?
Building the world f
hello
I have 2 servers with FreeBSD 6.2 rebuilt from sources.
when I use freebsd-update it fetchs updates and install them.
AFter rebooting I always have the old kernel booting.
what's wrong ?
thanks
Rick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
athieu CHATEAU; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x
>
>
>Danial Thom a écrit :
>
>>It seems unlikely that he'd get good throughput
>>in one direction if the link was hosed. One
>>dropped packets and you're shot
On Sunday 26 February 2006 08:10, ptitoliv wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I made lots of searches on the Internet and I found something about
> the option
>
> net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable.
>
> If I set this value to 0, my bandwitdh problems are resolved.
>
> Does anybody knows something about this o
Hello Everybody,
I made lots of searches on the Internet and I found something about the
option
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable.
If I set this value to 0, my bandwitdh problems are resolved.
Does anybody knows something about this options and why can it be the
origin of this problem ?
Regards,
Pt
Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
>I guess you're right to say there's a misunderstanding.
>
Ok I understand. I would want to say on this post that I made tests from
the BSD box to a Debian box, both located on the 100 Mbits/s network.
And I made others tests between the same BSD box (still located on
On Saturday 25 February 2006 18:00, ptitoliv wrote:
> Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
> >Maybe, but not to the internet on an 1.5Mb/s connection. Your aDSL
> > line is only good for at most 1.5M and that's not guaranteed to
> > happen all the time. There are a lot of things that go on to
> > throttle
Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
>Maybe, but not to the internet on an 1.5Mb/s connection. Your aDSL line
>is only good for at most 1.5M and that's not guaranteed to happen all
>the time. There are a lot of things that go on to throttle that. At
>home I can connect between computers at 100 Mb/s, so
On Saturday 25 February 2006 16:30, ptitoliv wrote:
> Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
> >Not hardly. I'll bet that 950kB/s for the Debian box was the peak
> >download speed and it didn't maintain it through the entire
> > download.
> >
> >Don
>
> The Debian Box is capable to make a 5 MB/s stable connec
fbsd_user a écrit :
On one side there is a Debian Sarge 3.0 box
On the other side there is a FreeBSD 5.3.
I made the same tests on another network (same architecture but on a
different hosting service network)
On one side there is a Debian Sarge 3.1
On the other side there is a FreeBSD 5.4
>>D
Danial Thom a écrit :
>It seems unlikely that he'd get good throughput
>in one direction if the link was hosed. One
>dropped packets and you're shot. The easy way to
>test this is to eliminate the switch..hook the
>Freebsd box directly to the linux box.
>
>
>
Impossible to do that because the b
Donald J. O'Neill a écrit :
>Not hardly. I'll bet that 950kB/s for the Debian box was the peak
>download speed and it didn't maintain it through the entire download.
>
>Don
>
The Debian Box is capable to make a 5 MB/s stable connection easily.
Regards,
Ptitoliv
Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>Are the debian & freebsd on the same segment ?
>if so, are they using the same router/gateway ?
>
>
No, there is the same CISCO Router between the two boxes.
>did you customize/set up things, like ipfw or set specific things via
>sysctl ?
>
>
I tried to modify the t
If you are testing it through your home this test is irrelevant as there
is a lot that could cause it to slow down if you test it from the freebsd
box to another freebsd box on the same switch i bet it would be faster
then the shity debian box the internet is a weird place one momment its
quick ano
On Sunday 19 February 2006 11:54, ptitoliv wrote:
> Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
> >try this:
> >ping -c 1000 -s 1500 IP_TO_PING
> >
> >wait for the 1000 ping to go trough. You should not have more than
> >0,5% of loss (is the servers aren't overload). If it's more or equal
> >than 0,5%, it comes from
nt: Sunday, February 19, 2006 12:55 PM
To: Mathieu CHATEAU; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x
Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>try this:
>ping -c 1000 -s 1500 IP_TO_PING
>
>wait for the 1000 ping to go trough. You should not have more than
>0,5
ptitoliv a écrit :
>Are the debian & freebsd on the same segment ?
>if so, are they using the same router/gateway ?
>
>
There is a CISCO router between the two boxes.
>did you customize/set up things, like ipfw or set specific things via
>sysctl ?
>
>
I tried to customiser window scaling and
Hello ptitoliv,
Sunday, February 19, 2006, 6:54:33 PM, you wrote:
p> Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>>try this:
>>ping -c 1000 -s 1500 IP_TO_PING
>>
>>wait for the 1000 ping to go trough. You should not have more than
>>0,5% of loss (is the servers aren't overload). If it's more or equal
>>than 0,5%,
Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>try this:
>ping -c 1000 -s 1500 IP_TO_PING
>
>wait for the 1000 ping to go trough. You should not have more than
>0,5% of loss (is the servers aren't overload). If it's more or equal
>than 0,5%, it comes from the network (cables or switches fault).
>Each host would be in
--- ptitoliv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>
> >what about netstat -e on each host ?
> >(looking for errors)
> >
> >
> no errors detected
>
> >are you on swicthes ?
> >Are the switches port on auto or forced ?
> >
> >
> I don't know exactly : the servers are hosted
Saturday, February 18, 2006, 7:47:05 PM, you wrote:
p> Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>>what about netstat -e on each host ?
>>(looking for errors)
>>
>>
p> no errors detected
>>are you on swicthes ?
>>Are the switches port on auto or forced ?
>>
>>
p> I don't know exactly : the servers are host
Danial Thom a écrit :
>--- ptitoliv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hello everybody,
>>
>>I am writing here because I have a problem with
>>network on freebsd 5.3
>>and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100
>>Mbit/s with via rhine network
>>cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge
>>co
Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
>what about netstat -e on each host ?
>(looking for errors)
>
>
no errors detected
>are you on swicthes ?
>Are the switches port on auto or forced ?
>
>
I don't know exactly : the servers are hosted by a company. So I think
they are in autoselect mode.
>when doing a
Saturday, February 18, 2006, 3:42:47 PM, you wrote:
p> Hello everybody,
p> I am writing here because I have a problem with network on freebsd 5.3
p> and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 Mbit/s with via rhine network
p> cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge computer. When I try to
p>
--- ptitoliv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am writing here because I have a problem with
> network on freebsd 5.3
> and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100
> Mbit/s with via rhine network
> cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge
> computer. When I try to
> transf
Glenn Dawson a écrit :
> What are you using to transfer the files? ftp, scp, nfs, something else?
I am using ftp.
Regards,
Ptitoliv
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscrib
At 06:42 AM 2/18/2006, ptitoliv wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am writing here because I have a problem with network on freebsd 5.3
and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 Mbit/s with via rhine network
cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge computer. When I try to
transferts big files beetw
Hello everybody,
I am writing here because I have a problem with network on freebsd 5.3
and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 Mbit/s with via rhine network
cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge computer. When I try to
transferts big files beetween the FreeBSD and the Debian, I see tha
Hello,
I've been having some problems with my computer arising out of an install of
FreeBSD 5.4 which I can't seem to solve.
First of all, I started with an 80 GB HD partitioned as such:
c: 20 GB NTFS
d: 20 GB NTFS
e: 40 GB FAT
I first installed a copy of Ubuntu Linux 4.1 onto the Windows "d:"
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:16:01PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jun 30), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I have been using FreeBSD for about 10 years. I have had the 5.4
> > version for about a month. The only problem I'm having is that
> > there's of lot of files like libutil.so.3
In the last episode (Jun 30), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have been using FreeBSD for about 10 years. I have had the 5.4
> version for about a month. The only problem I'm having is that
> there's of lot of files like libutil.so.3, libreadline.so.4,
> libm.so.2 and libexpat.so.4 that are missing.
I have been using FreeBSD for about 10 years. I have had the 5.4 version for
about a month. The only problem I'm having is that there's of lot of files
like libutil.so.3, libreadline.so.4, libm.so.2 and libexpat.so.4 that are
missing. I have found most off older versions FreeBSD software. Bu
Any good reason to run 5.1 and not 5.2.1 or 5.3? And did this box ever
cvompile and run things perfectly? Any changes in hardware?
Regards
S.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:15:54 -0600 (MDT), RJ45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> pid 19543 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped)
> pid 20066 (cc1),
pid 19543 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped)
pid 20066 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped)
pid 21680 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped)
hello, suddently on my system happens that any running program
crashes with signal 4 or signal 10 and dumps a core.
This happe
adp wrote:
Anyone get ntop totally working with FreeBSD 4.9? We can run it, but it's
flaky. On one FreeBSD box it runs fine for a while and then just dies. No
syslog messages. It's just gone. On another it won't display anything in the
Web interface (it opens new windows when clicking on some items
I would take this to the ntop mailing list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supply as much info as possible, Burton likes to see plenty of
detail in any bug reports!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ntop problems with FreeBSD?
Anyone get ntop totally working with FreeBSD 4.9? We can run it, but it's
flaky. On one FreeBSD box it runs fine for a while and then just dies. No
syslog messages. It's just gone. On another it won't display anything in th
Anyone get ntop totally working with FreeBSD 4.9? We can run it, but it's
flaky. On one FreeBSD box it runs fine for a while and then just dies. No
syslog messages. It's just gone. On another it won't display anything in the
Web interface (it opens new windows when clicking on some items), and it
a
List,
Would anyone have insight on problems accessing FTP installation
sources for 5.2.1 RC2? I was installing just fine using
ftp5.us.freebsd.org (mit.edu, I believe, one of the sources closer to
me), and began to have the installation return to the menu for
selecting my FTP source. Invaria
Martin Hudec (www.webcom.sk) wrote:
Did you try to burn it using slower speed? This is maybe a long shot..
Cheers,
Martin
Martin actually has a point. I have had problems with the FreeBSD 5.1.2
ISO's - which made me think that for some reason the ISO's I was
downloading were corrupted (ever
Did you try to burn it using slower speed? This is maybe a long shot..
Cheers,
Martin
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 10:27, Chan Fook Sheng wrote:
> hi
>
> yes, i check it wheni burn the 2nd one... to avoid wasting another CD ;)
>
--
:
:. s pozdravom
:.. Martin Hudec
:..
hi
yes, i check it wheni burn the 2nd one... to avoid wasting another CD ;)
Quintin Riis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
...did you check the md5sum ?
Chan Fook Sheng wrote:
| Hi
|
| I think there is some problem with the ISO image for disk1 of
FBSD4.9, I
| burnt two copie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
...did you check the md5sum ?
Chan Fook Sheng wrote:
| Hi
|
| I think there is some problem with the ISO image for disk1 of FBSD4.9, I
| burnt two copies, and they both failed during installation.
|
| Now I'm using FTP to install
|
| fs
|
| ___
Hi
I think there is some problem with the ISO image for disk1 of FBSD4.9, I
burnt two copies, and they both failed during installation.
Now I'm using FTP to install
fs
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, John wrote:
> I get
> Jan 11 18:09:55 pearl /kernel: ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded
>
> I've looked at the sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c code - I wonder if I should
> just arbitarily raise the retry count a bit - what's everyone else
ok, i don't know if this is documented
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:25:25PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, John wrote:
I have an update, additional information...
Instead of getting the device ID line, i.e.
> Jan 11 17:56:56 pearl /kernel: acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave PIO
I get
Jan 11 18:09:55 pearl /kernel: ata0-sla
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, John wrote:
> Despite the fact that the laptop compatibility base has an entry for this
> machine that looks good for FreeBSD 5.0, I'm not having the best luck
> that one might hope.
i've got an Armada M300, which shares a lot of the same underlying
hardware as the M700 and
Despite the fact that the laptop compatibility base has an entry for this
machine that looks good for FreeBSD 5.0, I'm not having the best luck
that one might hope.
I've read through the Release notes and Hardware notes, and Errata
on the web site for this release and on the CD (NFS mounted from
m
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 5.1 box with jails. Some of them are 'builded' (with make world and
make distribution), others I have created 'by hand' by copying files in the jail until
things start to work.
In one such 'handmade' jail I have deployed ftpd, apache with php,ssmtp. Everything
seems to be
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 5.1 box with jails. Some of them are 'builded' (with make world and
make distribution), others I have created 'by hand' by copying files in the jail until
things start to work.
In one such 'handmade' jail I have deployed ftpd, apache with php,ssmtp. Everything
seems to be
On Dec 12, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Walt Haynes wrote:
I've installed FreeBSD 4.4 from the CD-ROM included in my FreeBSD
Unleashed book (I installed 4.4 instead of 5.0 because it's supposedly
more stable; 5.0 is a pre-release snapshot.). When I try to do the X
Server configuration stuff, the serv
I've installed FreeBSD 4.4 from the CD-ROM included in my FreeBSD Unleashed book
(I installed 4.4 instead of 5.0 because it's supposedly more stable; 5.0 is a
pre-release snapshot.). When I try to do the X Server configuration stuff, the server
won't start and, consequently, X-Windows won't
I've been scouring the net looking for someone else that
has a similar problem; but I haven't found anything.
The situation we have is a new HP/UX 11.0 system, which is
doing an NFS mount from a FreeBSD 4.3 system. Even though
we've dropped to NFS V2 and set the rsize/wsize on the HP/UX
client
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Howdy list,
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE. I just bought a generic
> USB 1.1/2.0/firewire external drive enclosure for my 32gb
> Travelstar 12.5mm hard drive.
>
> The device shows up like this:
>
> Nov 18 14:06:16 trevarthan kernel: umass0: Acer Labs USB 2.0 Stora
Howdy list,
I'm running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE. I just bought a generic
USB 1.1/2.0/firewire external drive enclosure for my 32gb
Travelstar 12.5mm hard drive.
The device shows up like this:
Nov 18 14:06:16 trevarthan kernel: umass0: Acer Labs USB 2.0 Storage Device, rev
2.00/1.03, addr 3
Nov 18 1
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > When I telnet to a Cisco device from a FreeBSD machine, I get this
> > error:
> >
> > jazz% telnet somerouterorswitch
> > Password: Kerberos: No default realm defined for Kerberos!
> >
> > Assuming you don't use Kerberos, is there a way to make the telnet
> > client
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:16:50PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
[ Sorry for the lack of proper references / in-reply-to headers; I'm not
subbed to the list, and I didn't get sent a copy ]
> > When I telnet to a Cisco device from a FreeBSD machine, I get this
> > error:
> >
> > jazz% telnet somerout
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:16:50PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> I've asked this before (a long while back), but never got a response.
>
> When I telnet to a Cisco device from a FreeBSD machine, I get this
> error:
>
> jazz% telnet somerouterorswitch
> Password: Kerberos: No default realm defi
I've asked this before (a long while back), but never got a response.
When I telnet to a Cisco device from a FreeBSD machine, I get this
error:
jazz% telnet somerouterorswitch
Password: Kerberos: No default realm defined for Kerberos!
Assuming you don't use Kerberos, is there a way to make t
Dear list,
I have a Sony PCG-GR114EK notebook and I'm trying to get FreeBSD to work on
it with varying degrees of success. I've tried 4.6, 4.7 and 5.0 and I'll
give the errors in that order.
FreeBSD 4.6.
This installs the best and I don't have any problems except when trying to
run XFree86 (Ve
--- "James J. Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:23:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: "James J. Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Revisiting the semirandom bug/issue in
> FreeBSD's ATA querying
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --- "Wojciech S. Czarneck
Quoting "James J. Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- "Gary W. Swearingen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't even guess what the problem might be, but
> > can you (or do you not
> > want to) work around it?
>
> If you read my e-mail again, you should find this:
>
> "In the second setup,
--- "Gary W. Swearingen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't even guess what the problem might be, but
> can you (or do you not
> want to) work around it?
If you read my e-mail again, you should find this:
"In the second setup, I scrounged up an ATA cable that
I knew could handle ATA66. I used
A hard problem you got there. If at least one other OS doesn't have a
problem with your hardware, then I think you're safe in assuming that
there's an OS kernel problem, whether by design or coding bug.
Theoretically, it should be reported in a formal PR where it won't get
lost, especially if you
[The following was originally posted by me to the
FreeBSD bugs list when I was a lot surer that I was
dealing with a FreeBSD bug. Now I'm not sure sure if
this is a software bug, hardware bug, or a consequence
of dubious design decisions. Hence the cross-post to
here.]
I've been doing my best to s
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
