Hi,
On Thursday 16 February 2012 17:20:23 krad wrote:
> On 14 February 2012 20:28, Frank Shute wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:47:08PM -0500, Mike Dockery wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> >
> > Aloha,
> >
> > >
> > > I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
>
On 14 February 2012 20:28, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:47:08PM -0500, Mike Dockery wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
>
> Aloha,
>
> >
> > I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
> > seem to be getting away from freedom... which is why I chose it in the
>
If you do choose 32 bit, you can compile the PAE kernel which will
allow access to all of your memory, but you'll still be limited to
under 4 GB per process memory.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:47:08 -0500 Mike Dockery wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
> seem to be getting away from freedom... which is why I chose it in
> the first place. They seem intent on forcing things that do not work
> well (like p
On 14/02/2012 21:28, Nerius Landys wrote:
> If you do choose 32 bit, you can compile the PAE kernel which will
> allow access to all of your memory, but you'll still be limited to
> under 4 GB per process memory.
Better pray all your devices have PAE compatible drivers then.
PAE is an obsolete bo
On 14/02/2012 19:47, Mike Dockery wrote:
> My question is: Should I try the amd64 version of FreeBSD with my Intel
> Core i7-2600 processor or should I use the i386?
Choose amd64 by default, unless you have a specific application that
requires an i386 system. Even if you have less than 4GiB RAM.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mike Dockery
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Processor question
Greetings,
I have been a user of Linux since 1994
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:47:08PM -0500, Mike Dockery wrote:
>
> Greetings,
Aloha,
>
> I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
> seem to be getting away from freedom... which is why I chose it in the
> first place. They seem intent on forcing things that do not
AMD As this just means 64 bit
On Feb 14, 2012 8:02 PM, "Mike Dockery" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros seem
> to be getting away from freedom... which is why I chose it in the first
> place. They seem intent on forcing things that do n
Greetings,
I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
seem to be getting away from freedom... which is why I chose it in the
first place. They seem intent on forcing things that do not work well
(like pulseaudio and nouveau) on everyone. Freedom of choice is always
10 matches
Mail list logo