Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance
Kris,
thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for
performance, I
catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB.
Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to
FreeBSD because of better performance
I was not really honest: I did compiled the kernel without -g option.
Nothing different. The only thing that looks like help was compile
without PREEMPTIVE option. I'm sorry very much for FreeBSD that I like
many years. I do not think that racing for issuing the new RELEASE (so
called in this
Kris,
thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I
catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB.
Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to
FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I work in X.
About the port
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:30:39AM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Kris,
thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance, I
catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB.
Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched to
FreeBSD
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:23:26AM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
I was not really honest: I did compiled the kernel without -g option.
Nothing different. The only thing that looks like help was compile
without PREEMPTIVE option. I'm sorry very much for FreeBSD that I like
many years. I do
Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Kris,
thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance,
I catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB.
Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but siwtched
to FreeBSD because of better performance especially when I
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:23:34PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Kris,
thanks for reply. I did not provide any special tests for performance,
I catch it just working on my workstation - P-4, 3 GHz, 512 MB.
Long time ago (several monthes) I've used Gentoo Linux, but
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Hello,
Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much
slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases.
It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements
that led you to conclude this.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:32:12PM +, Dmytro Surovtsev wrote:
Hello,
Maybe it's my own opinion but I've discovered that 6.0 kernel is much
slower than 5.4, I mean GENERIC in both cases.
It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements
It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements
that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than
FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem
performance.
exactly same conclusion here! without even any precise benchmarking, just
as i
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:37:52PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote:
The stock Generic Kernel for 6.0-Release has debugging features which
according to the kernel developement team where left in during release.
Try to recompile the Generic Kernel with the option debug -g commented
out and see if
11 matches
Mail list logo
