On 27 May 2010 12:12, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> The hardest job I've had an OpenBSD firewall do is actually as a
> mid-level firewall between a DMZ full of web servers and a back-end
> database layer. The thing to watch out for is running out of states in
> PF. It's trivial to change that in the
On 28 May 2010 07:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
> This is possibly the wrong place to be saying this, but isn't OpenBSD
> usually recommended for
> routers? I believe the version of pf, for example, is normally kept more
> up-to-date than than
> in FreeBSD. The major downside I know of is that it's not
hu, 6/17/10, Bernt Hansson wrote:
From: Bernt Hansson
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router (IPFW-based): how to block an URL (all
IPs of an A-like HOSTNAME)
To: "Valerian Galeru"
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 11:47 PM
Valerian Galeru said the following on 201
: Re: FreeBSD router (IPFW-based): how to block an URL (all IPs of an
A-like HOSTNAME)
To: "'valerian...@yahoo.com'" ,
"'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'"
Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 12:08 AM
What about an entry in your local DNS (what your hosts use)
nst it due to overhead.
As pointed out, Squid or other light weight white/blacklist thingy might be in
order.
- Original Message -
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu Jun 17 15:56:23 2010
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router (IPFW-based): how to bl
shell script, that analyzes all requests [have no idea how to
execute a shell script LIVE!!!, any idea on this topic?].
--- On Thu, 6/17/10, Bernt Hansson wrote:
From: Bernt Hansson
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router (IPFW-based): how to block an URL (all IPs of an
A-like HOSTNAME)
To: "Val
Valerian Galeru said the following on 2010-06-17 22:01:
Hello,
Does anyone have any ideas how to block all requests using an IPFW-based router
> (FreeBSD 6.4) to and from a HOSTNAME (which has more DNS A entries)
or better, from any *.HOSTNAME.COM
Do a whois hostname.com taking note of t
On Jun 17, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Valerian Galeru wrote:
> Does anyone have any ideas how to block all requests using an IPFW-based
> router (FreeBSD 6.4) to and from a HOSTNAME (which has more DNS A entries) or
> better, from any *.HOSTNAME.COM
Start by blocking all traffic, add permit rules to
I don't know how to do it with IPFW, but I like using null / bogus routes to
blackhole bad hosts - assuming of course the host in question isn't using
dynamic IP's.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Val
Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote:
> Actually, I'd find an answer from the FreeBSD Networking gurus useful as
well. My trusted Cisco 3640 is getting old (had it's
ten-years-of-service birthday a little while ago), so I guess I must be
prepared to replace it with something new. Preferrably so
On 28.05.2010 13:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
*snip!*
>
> This is possibly the wrong place to be saying this, but isn't OpenBSD
> usually recommended for
> routers? I believe the version of pf, for example, is normally kept more
> up-to-date than than
> in FreeBSD. The major downside I know of is that i
On 28/05/2010 12:31, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote:
On 27.05.2010 17:00, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
Hello everyone.
We're in the very early stages of considering [Free|Open]BSD on
commodity hardware to handle NAT *and* firewall duties for (what I
consider to be) a sizable deployment. Overa
On 27.05.2010 17:00, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> We're in the very early stages of considering [Free|Open]BSD on
> commodity hardware to handle NAT *and* firewall duties for (what I
> consider to be) a sizable deployment. Overall bandwidth is low, only a
> gigabit connection, but we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/05/2010 16:00:12, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> We're in the very early stages of considering [Free|Open]BSD on
> commodity hardware to handle NAT *and* firewall duties for (what I
> consider to be) a sizable deployment. Overall band
On 10:47:37 Nov 19, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Essentially, I simply need a method to redirect layer 3/4 traffic
> destined for anything:80 from the router to the appliance.
>
> I've got a few options now, so I'll be testing all of them in the coming
> days.
>
Including this one?
rdr all port 80
>> I am familiar with IPFW, but I'd like to know all options in order to
>> choose the best one.
>>
>> I would very much prefer to do this in a way without having to have
>> Squid running on the box, but will if I have to.
>
> If filtering is all you want, you don't have to set up squid as a
> cac
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:10:43AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
> > ipfw forwarding is a very easy way to redirect traffic without
> > changing it. PF has similar functionality. It all depends on what
> > the appliance supports. If wccp is the only way it can eat
> > packets, try playing with gr
> ipfw forwarding is a very easy way to redirect traffic without
> changing it. PF has similar functionality. It all depends on what
> the appliance supports. If wccp is the only way it can eat
> packets, try playing with gre(4). But maybe it'll consume just
> plain packets with "wrong" IP destina
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 08:58:34AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> >> Does anyone know of a way to configure WCCP redirect support into a
> >> FreeBSD based router without having to install squid?
> >
> >
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a way to configure WCCP redirect support into a
>> FreeBSD based router without having to install squid?
>
> I've only used FreeBSD as a WCCPv1/v2 sink (receiver), but you
> can try se
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:48:52PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to configure WCCP redirect support into a
> FreeBSD based router without having to install squid?
I've only used FreeBSD as a WCCPv1/v2 sink (receiver), but you
can try sending out packets out of gre(4). Th
Ben, CIO
- Original Message -
From: "Marwan Sultan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 6:09 AM
Subject: RE: FreeBSD router
Hello Richard,
I have been using FreeBSD since 1998 and never had to use cisco,
Freebsd has a
Hello Richard,
I have been using FreeBSD since 1998 and never had to use cisco,
Freebsd has a great builtin features,
I'm Using Freebsd for a hotspotlogin, with no external servers from
anykind,
Its my radius, router, ipfw, internetspot login, NAT and port directions.
Also i have 2 additi
The answer is yes it can be done. Which one is better depends on which cisco
model you compare with and what hardware you are going to use to run FreeBSD
with what features. As well as your knowledge of FreeBSD admin/network
config. As mentioned before you may be expected to compile a custom kernel
Depends on what through-put you need, are you good at compiling custom
kernels with the extra stuff removed,
How good are you at *IOS*??
Do you need a firewall with that router o just straight routing. Does the
router need RIP, BGP etc...
Perfectly possible, but depending on your requirements/t
On 8/30/06, rithy4u- CEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
I want to know, between Cisco Router and a compiled of FreeBSD Router which
one is better? Is it posible to build a Router Appliance on FreeBSD instead of
using ISO of Cisco?
Richard Ben, CIO
I think to best answer your ques
Yance Kowara wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to figure out if *BSD can achieve this:
I have two DSL connections to play with, and I would
like to configure a *BSD router that can combine the
two DSLs together.
There is a howto at
http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000173.php
But it conce
>-Original Message-
>From: Loren M. Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 6:31 PM
>To: Danial Thom
>Cc: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt; Yance Kowara;
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
&g
l Thom
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM
> > >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt
> > >Cc: Yance Kowara;
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL
> > connections
> &g
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:55:37AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
>
>
> --- "Loren M. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0800, Ted
> > Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > >
> > > If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is
> > easy, run
> > > PPP on them and setup multilin
Quoting Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> --- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Does it meet the test I already outlined?
> > >
> > > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a
> > > remote server
Quoting Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> --- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Does it meet the test I already outlined?
> >
> > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a
> > remote server,
> > with both lines connected. Time it.
> >
> > Disconnect 1 line, the
26, 2005 7:50 AM
> > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba
> > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL
> > connections
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >As stated, eve
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Does it meet the test I already outlined?
> >
> > Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a
> > remote server,
> > with both lines connected. Time it.
> >
> > Disconnect 1 line,
--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Does it meet the test I already outlined?
>
> Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a
> remote server,
> with both lines connected. Time it.
>
> Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If
> the time to
> download and upload when both
gt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL
> connections
> >
> >
> >
> >As stated, even by Ted, you have to register
> ALL
> >of your addresses with ALL of your ISPs, so
> you
> >can send your packets to ANYONE you want,
;freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>ted, danial, and the rest,
>
>i'm learning a lot in this thread.
>
>i have a pfsense (freebsd) router that has two connections to
>the same ISP
>and one connection to a linux squid
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:58 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang
>Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>
>You'
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:50 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>
&
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:48 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang
>Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>
>
>--- T
: Danial Thom
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM
> > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang
> > >Cc: Yance Kowara;
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > >Subject: RE: FreeBSD rou
;>
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: Danial Thom
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM
> >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt
> >> >Cc: Yance Kowara;
> >> freebs
];
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL
> connections
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
>
>http://www.edimax.com/htm
;>
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: Danial Thom
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM
> >> >To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt
> >> >Cc: Yance Kowara;
> >> freebs
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:59 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
&
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danial Thom
>Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:48 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yance Kowara
>Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 6:09 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>> Ted, you have to think ou
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang
>Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>Ted the incom
--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
http://www.edimax.com/html/english/products/PRI582.htm
>
> "...Performs Outbound load balancing by
> session, weight round robin or
> traffic..."
>
> Note that they say by SESSION not by PACKET.
>
> It's marketingspeak. They are simply usi
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Yance Kowara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > Ted, you have to think outside the box.
> Life
> > is
> > > more than one connection. While you can't
> > > increase the throughput of a single
> > connection,
> > > you can increase the thr
--- Yance Kowara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ted, you have to think outside the box. Life
> is
> > more than one connection. While you can't
> > increase the throughput of a single
> connection,
> > you can increase the throughput of your
> network,
> > which is usually the point. "Throughput
> Ted, you have to think outside the box. Life is
> more than one connection. While you can't
> increase the throughput of a single connection,
> you can increase the throughput of your network,
> which is usually the point. "Throughput" in this
> context is "capacity". Throughput is not only
> wha
Thursday, December 22, 2005 11:30 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>I wonder if these routers are using freebsd
>
>http://www.edimax.com/html/english/products/list-router.ht
--- Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Loren M. Lang
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:47 AM
> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> >Cc: Yance Kowara;
> freebsd-question
g; Ted Mittelstaedt
> >Cc: Yance Kowara;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL
> connections
> >
> >
> >All upstream ISPs are
> >connected to everyone on the internet, so it
> >doesn't matter which you send your pa
wrote:
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:09 AM
> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: RE: FreeBSD route
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:09 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>> Which is not redun
> If you have read this thread you will have already seen that
> you cannot get increased throughput this way.
>
> As I asked before, explain how a DSL line to SpiritOne
> running at 1MBit/sec and a Comcast cable connection running
> at 1MBit/sec will allow you to download the FreeBSD release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is not redundant.
Considering the OP asked for specifics on how to do this and your
response as been a bunch of theoretical gobbdleygook that is flat out
wrong network theory, you haven't done anything to help the poor bastard.
Hi,
This
> Which is not redundant.
> Considering the OP asked for specifics on how to do this and your
> response as been a bunch of theoretical gobbdleygook that is flat out
> wrong network theory, you haven't done anything to help the poor bastard.
Hi,
This is a pretty firey debate.
I
>-Original Message-
>From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM
>To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>All upst
>-Original Message-
>From: Loren M. Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:47 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Yance Kowara; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>On Sun, Dec 11, 20
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- "Loren M. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0800, Ted
> > Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > >
> > > If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is
> > easy, run
> > > PPP on them and setup multilink PPP. The
> I
--- "Loren M. Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0800, Ted
> Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >
> > If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is
> easy, run
> > PPP on them and setup multilink PPP. The ISP
> has to
> > do so also.
> >
> > If they are going to different
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is easy, run
> PPP on them and setup multilink PPP. The ISP has to
> do so also.
>
> If they are going to different ISP's then you cannot
> do it with any operating system or device save
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gayn Winters
>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:49 AM
>To: 'Ted Mittelstaedt'; 'Winelfred G. Pasamba'; 'Yance Kowara'
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
onday, December 12, 2005 8:26 AM
> >To: Yance Kowara
> >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
> >
> >i use pfSense (www.pfsense.com)
> >
> Sigh.
>
> THIS IS NOT LOAD BALANCING PLEASE QUIT BEING SLOP
Of Winelfred G.
> >Pasamba
> >Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:26 AM
> >To: Yance Kowara
> >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
> >
> >
> >i use pfSense (www.pfsense.com)
> >
> >
> >pfSe
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yance Kowara
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 6:47 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>
>> >>Hmm, wh
>-Original Message-
>From: Nathan Vidican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 11:08 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>You could, i
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Winelfred G.
>Pasamba
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:26 AM
>To: Yance Kowara
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
&
This is for an internet cafe, right? Not a mission-critical system?
Yes, I realize your mission is providing internet, but
Buy two DSL feeds, and two WAPs. Put one WAP on each feed.
Set them to different SSIDs and different RF channels.
Then the wi-fi clients will associate with one or the
> >>Hmm, what about putting zebra into the picture
> ...
> >>a solution or chaos?
> >
> > What feature in Zebra exactly do you think will
help in this scenario?
> >
> > Ted
> > ___
I am just crawling in the dark here...
If the upstream packets ca
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yance Kowara
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 4:33 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
--- Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yance Kowara
>Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 4:33 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>
>
>--- Eric F Crist <[EMA
i use pfSense (www.pfsense.com)
pfSense is a open source firewall derived from the m0n0wall operating system
platform with radically different goals such as using Packet Filter, FreeBSD
6.X (or DragonFly BSD when ALTQ and CARP is finished) ALTQ for excellent
packet queueing and finally an integra
>-Original Message-
>From: Yance Kowara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:57 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL connections
>
>
>Ted,
>
>Thanks for the advice.
>
>A friend of mine has just acqu
--- Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 2:05 AM, Yance Kowara wrote:
>
> > Ted,
> >
> > Thanks for the advice.
> >
> > A friend of mine has just acquired an Internet
> Cafe.
> > The previous owner connected the lan to 2
> different
> > ADSL (two different ISPs) one is
On Dec 12, 2005, at 2:05 AM, Yance Kowara wrote:
Ted,
Thanks for the advice.
A friend of mine has just acquired an Internet Cafe.
The previous owner connected the lan to 2 different
ADSL (two different ISPs) one is a back up he said.
So, two ADSL routers with half the Lan connected to
one rou
Ted,
Thanks for the advice.
A friend of mine has just acquired an Internet Cafe.
The previous owner connected the lan to 2 different
ADSL (two different ISPs) one is a back up he said.
So, two ADSL routers with half the Lan connected to
one router and another half to the other router.
I am just
If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is easy, run
PPP on them and setup multilink PPP. The ISP has to
do so also.
If they are going to different ISP's then you cannot
do it with any operating system or device save BGP - the idea is
completely -stupid- to put it simply. If you think different
> -Original Message-
> From: ann kok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: freebsd router
>
>
> Hello
>
> I am running zebra in freebsd 5.2 as router
>
> Can you teach me how to optimize the box to designate
> router only?
Rob wrote:
I plan to have a FreeBSD (4.9 stable) system serving as a router
between my provider and a set of my home computers connected
via a home network.
My provider does not really like this, but I don't care so much,
as long as s/he cannot detect (too easily) my home network.
[...]
Is it corre
Your assumption is correct. For all practical purposes ISP's can not
determine that an customer is using NAT or not. But like all things
on the internet, with special custom packet interrogation focused on
an particular customer it is possible to technically determine if
that customer is using NAT.
On Apr 9, 2004, at 8:33 AM, Rob wrote:
I plan to have a FreeBSD (4.9 stable) system serving as a router
between my provider and a set of my home computers connected
via a home network.
My provider does not really like this, but I don't care so much,
as long as s/he cannot detect (too easily) my ho
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Rob wrote:
> Is it correct, that the combination of firewall and natd divert
> all requests and thus hide the home network for my provider?
> Are requests from all other networked home PC's done on behalf of
> the router, so that my provider will only see requests from my route
Check out my IPFilter/IPNAT setup script for FreeBSD, it might be just what
you are after
http://www.roq.com/bsd/
- Original Message -
From: "RD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: FreeBSD Router/Firewall Qu
> Hi!
>
> > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, RD wrote:
> >
> > > > How do I connect this? Do I use 2 eithernets 1 to net and 1 to a
hub?
>
> > If your ethernet card has two types of connectors (RJ45 aka UTP and
> > BNC [which is a thing that sticks out of the card]) then you could try
> > to connect the ads
Hi!
> > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, RD wrote:
>
> > > How do I connect this? Do I use 2 eithernets 1 to net and 1 to a hub?
> If your ethernet card has two types of connectors (RJ45 aka UTP and
> BNC [which is a thing that sticks out of the card]) then you could try
> to connect the adsl-modem to the
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, at 17:28 [=GMT-0700], Nick Rogness wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, RD wrote:
> > How do I connect this? Do I use 2 eithernets 1 to net and 1 to a hub? I
> > also have 1 crossover rj45 cable for card to card connection that I
> > haven't tried yet...
>
> Yes, 2 ethernet ca
advantages:
more control with freebsd, those little broadband *magic* boxes are full of
black magic, they are pure evil ;)
unless you have a very cool little black magic box, you probable can't do
vpn, tunneling with GRE, using any routing protocol such as BGP, RIP, OSPF
and so on
bandwidth limitin
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, RD wrote:
> Hi guys, me again :)
> well I've been reading up on compiling a kernel for nat and ipfw.
> I'm running a d-link 704 router now. I want some input here...
>
> I have an extra box (p200 - 128ram) for a router firewall.. I was
> thinking about it being my Gateway/
One advantage is you can keep you current subnet and with the freebsd box
you could run a whole another subnet with it .. or it can be used just to
learn and play.
But with a dlink already in the network Iwould use it as a play thing and
try new things on that box. I like to use p1 and below for sm
> Hi guys, me again :)
> well I've been reading up on compiling a kernel for nat and
> ipfw. I'm running a d-link 704 router now. I want some input here...
>
> I have an extra box (p200 - 128ram) for a router firewall..
> I was thinking about it being my Gateway/Router/Firewall for
> my oth
94 matches
Mail list logo
