Re: make buildworld failure

2005-12-13 Thread Andreas Rudisch
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 09:54 -0600, Dan Ross wrote: > I am trying to build a new kernel with smp. I started with make clean > and got no errors. > I then type make buildworld from /usr/src directory > suggestions? 1. You do not need to recompile world if you only want to build a new kernel with

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-18 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 18 August 2003 07:04 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > Hi, > I've done a fresh install, with ports, cvsup'ed the source, ports and > docs. > > I've copied /etc/defaults/make.conf to /etc/make.conf and edited it > according to directions. > > I have no files in /usr/obj to remove. > > I cd to /us

RE: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-18 Thread Charles Howse
> > What have I done wrong? > > > > What did you cvsup and are you running as root when you try > to build it. Here's my /etc/cvsupfile, I ran /usr/local/cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile, and yes, I'm runnig as root. *default host=cvsup11.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *defa

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-18 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 18 August 2003 07:29 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > > What have I done wrong? > > > > What did you cvsup and are you running as root when you try > > to build it. > > Here's my /etc/cvsupfile, I ran /usr/local/cvsup -g -L 2 > /etc/cvsupfile, and yes, I'm runnig as root. > > *default host=c

RE: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-18 Thread Charles Howse
> > *default host=cvsup11.FreeBSD.org > > *default base=/usr > > *default prefix=/usr > > *default release=cvs > > *default tag=RELENG_4_8 > > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > > > src-base > > *default tag=. > > ports-all > > doc-all > > > > If you want to do a buildworld, you will need th

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-18 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 18 August 2003 07:41 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > > *default host=cvsup11.FreeBSD.org > > > *default base=/usr > > > *default prefix=/usr > > > *default release=cvs > > > *default tag=RELENG_4_8 > > > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > > > > > src-base > > > *default tag=. > > > por

RE: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Charles Howse
At 7:00 AM this morning, I began to re-install 4.8-RELEASE. Installed as usual, removed unnecessary drivers, FTP from default site, installed cvsup-without-gui and portupgrade from packages. After installation finished, I configured my /etc/cvsupfile and cvsup'ed src-all, ports, and docs. I copie

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Jonathan Arnold
Charles Howse wrote: cd /usr/src make buildworld (drat, I should have done make -j4 buildworld!) Actually, no, don't do the -j4 - I think that's why it worked. I was fiddling with the -j flag once and ran into a bunch of problems, when it was pointed out that this isn't a "supported" way of doing a

RE: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Charles Howse
> > cd /usr/src > > make buildworld (drat, I should have done make -j4 buildworld!) > > Actually, no, don't do the -j4 - I think that's why it worked. > I was fiddling with the -j flag once and ran into a bunch of > problems, when it was pointed out that this isn't a "supported" > way of doing a m

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Jonathan Arnold
Charles Howse wrote: cd /usr/src make buildworld (drat, I should have done make -j4 buildworld!) Actually, no, don't do the -j4 - I think that's why it worked. I was fiddling with the -j flag once and ran into a bunch of problems, when it was pointed out that this isn't a "supported" way of doing a

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Jud
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:49:38 -0500, Charles Howse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cd /usr/src > make buildworld (drat, I should have done make -j4 buildworld!) Actually, no, don't do the -j4 - I think that's why it worked. I was fiddling with the -j flag once and ran into a bunch of problems, when i

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Tillman Hodgson
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:03:11PM -0400, Jud wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:49:38 -0500, Charles Howse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Very interesting. > > On page 490 of "FreeBSD Unleashed" it references the -j4 parameter as a > > way to speed up the make buildworld process by spawning multip

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-19 Thread Jud
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:35:26 -0700, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 18 August 2003 07:29 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > What have I done wrong? > > What did you cvsup and are you running as root when you try > to build it. Here's my /etc/cvsupfile, I ran /usr/local/cvsup -g -L 2 /e

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-20 Thread Kent Stewart
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 09:10 pm, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:03:11PM -0400, Jud wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:49:38 -0500, Charles Howse > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > Very interesting. > > > On page 490 of "FreeBSD Unleashed" it references the -j4 > > >

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-20 Thread Lucas Holt
I have /, /usr/src, and /usr/obj on 3 different HDs/controllers and using -j? is still 10-20% slower than not using it.. On my systems, it only speeded things up when I had more than 1 cpu. Kent -j flag should speed things up on a multi-processor system quite a bit. It allows the work to be dis

Re: Make buildworld failure

2003-08-20 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm diving in late here, always a chancy thing, but what's the reason > for both "*default tag=RELENG_4_8" and "*default tag=." in one > supfile? The former is for src-base, and the latter is for the docs and ports. Neither of those have a RELENG_4_8 tag. _

Re: make buildworld failure...

2003-02-18 Thread IAccounts
> I went to my kernel to look at line 76 and this is where it put me > (using vi): > > (Cursor here)#Floppy Drives > device fdc0at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 > device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 > device fd1 at fdc0 drive 1 > > I can't figure this out. As there is

Re: make buildworld failure...

2003-02-18 Thread Asenchi
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 15:58, IAccounts wrote: > > I went to my kernel to look at line 76 and this is where it put me > > (using vi): > > > > (Cursor here)#Floppy Drives > > device fdc0at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 > > device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 > > device fd1

Re: make buildworld failure...

2003-02-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:42:45PM -0500, Asenchi wrote: > I get this error: > mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys > cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf; > >PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin > config -d /usr/obj/usr/

RE: make buildworld failure...

2003-02-18 Thread Asenchi
February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > To: Asenchi > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: make buildworld failure... > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:42:45PM -0500, Asenchi wrote: > > > I get this error: > > mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys > > cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf;

Re: make buildworld failure...

2003-02-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:43:48PM -0500, Asenchi wrote: > I am not quite sure how I did this, considering I put: > > RELENG_4 in my sup file... > > Ok, so let me see if I can fix this, I would appreciate it if you > could correct me if I am wrong. > > So I need to tag=RELENG_4 in my make file.

Re: make buildworld failure...

2003-02-19 Thread Asenchi
Sorry, I should have reported... I just did another update, (with the same file) and used the GENERIC kernel to build it. Then reconfig'd my kern. This fixed it. Thanks for all of your help. Curt Micol On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:16, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:43:48PM -050

Re: Make buildworld failure...no inodes free! Do I have to pay?

2003-07-15 Thread Supote Leelasupphakorn
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > Damn mbworld failed. > I did note that after dropping to su mode fsck -p > did not much more than > reports > /dev/ad0s1a :NO WRITE ACCESS > /dev/ad0s1A :UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY ;RUN FSCK > MANUALLY > > Then the script from makebuild showed up > usr : cre