On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 26, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am not having any problems whith other users,
Then my suspicion grows stronger that something in your own particular pine
configuration is putting your mail in a place where imapd can't see it.
On Apr 26, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am not having any problems whith other users,
Then my suspicion grows stronger that something in your own particular
pine configuration is putting your mail in a place where imapd can't
see it. So in addition to what I've suggested, have
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I think that pine is corrupting my inbox, so that it is unreadable by
UW-IMAPD. When using squirrelmail after using pine I see the headers, but
squirrelmail is unable to open the e-mails.
When
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I think that pine is corrupting my inbox, so that it is unreadable
by UW-IMAPD. When using squirrelmail after using pine I see the
headers, but squirrelmail is unable to open the e-mails.
When you read your mail with (al)pine with it pickin
I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for
years without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine
moves mail to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap
clients. Has something changed so that I cannot use pine as a local
client? It looks like I mig
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:39:26 -0700
Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for
> years without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine
> moves mail to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap
> clients. Has s
Chris Maness wrote:
> I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for years
> without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine moves mail
> to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap clients. Has
> something changed so that I cannot use pine as a local cl
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:36:48 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 at 18:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> confabulated:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:38:59 + (UTC)
> > Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Periodically I get duplicated messages in e
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 at 18:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:38:59 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Periodically I get duplicated messages in email folders I have
defined and have rules set up for.
...
If I remove ALL rules from Pine, I have abso
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:38:59 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Periodically I get duplicated messages in email folders I have
> defined and have rules set up for.
> ...
> If I remove ALL rules from Pine, I have absolutely no issues with
> duplicate messages.
Are they perhaps
* Igor Robul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051215 10:50]:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:19PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > The first thing you can do is go out and shoo the crackers
> > off the telephone pole who are tapped into your phone line
> > and sniffing your passwords.
> By the way, is there
* caleb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051215 01:39]:
>Thanks Gwen and Ted for your feedback. I am using an ADSL
> modem, basically a POTS network terminal. I am thinkng of
You're welcome, and good luck. I run my own mail server myself,
for very similar reasons.
> P.S - as for hollywood mov
ecember 14, 2005 10:44 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: gwen; RW; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; caleb
>Subject: RE: pine
>
>
>Hi everyone,
>Thanks Gwen and Ted for your feedback. I am using an ADSL
>modem, basically a POTS network terminal. I am thinkng of
>switching
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:19PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> The first thing you can do is go out and shoo the crackers
> off the telephone pole who are tapped into your phone line
> and sniffing your passwords.
By the way, is there any relative cheap solution to do this?
I mean we can recor
On 2005-12-15 17:44, caleb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am thinkng of switching ISP's, registering a domain and setting up
> my own mail server.
[...]
> The ISP I am using (according to thier 'technical support') does not
> use any encryption with the POP server and I am able to te
On 2005-12-14 18:37, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On December 14, 2005 12:35 PM, gwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Have you ever seen the output of tcpdump? You see anything on the
>> same network as you. So any of the following *likely* situations
>> leaves your non-encrypted pa
Hi everyone,
Thanks Gwen and Ted for your feedback. I am using an ADSL
modem, basically a POTS network terminal. I am thinkng of
switching ISP's, registering a domain and setting up my own mail server.
The ISP I am using (according to thier 'technical support') does not use
any encry
>-Original Message-
>From: gwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:35 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: RW; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; caleb
>Subject: Re: pine
>
>
>* Ted Mittelstaedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051214 15:22]:
&
* Ted Mittelstaedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051214 15:22]:
>
>
> >> 'Can't do secure authentication with this server'
> >
> >If the server supports neither ssl, nor any form secure
> >authentication, there
> >nothing you can do to protect your password.
>
> Garbage.
>
> The first thing you can do
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RW
>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 6:08 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Cc: caleb
>Subject: Re: pine
>
>
>> 'Can't do secure authentication with this se
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:12:38PM +1100, caleb wrote:
> Would IPSEC be an option for securing my login
> details or kerberos?
Nope. Unless the ISP's mail server supports some form of encryption,
there's nothing you can do.
On the other hand, your desktop machine is probably only about two
hops
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, RW wrote:
If the server supports neither ssl, nor any form secure authentication, there
nothing you can do to protect your password.
Hi RW,
Thanks for your reply. Would IPSEC be an option for securing my login
details or kerberos?
caleb
--
There is no spoon
_
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 01:01, caleb wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am having some problems setting up pine && .pinerc using
> FreeBSD 6.0 - STABLE. My ISP uses POP and I am using thier SMTP for
> outgoing. I spoke to the helpdesk and the POP server does not support ssl.
>
> I h
Try using Cone.
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 12:25 -0500, Joe Auty wrote:
> If you plan to use the Maildir format, while it's possible for Pine
> to support this, it doesn't natively... Mutt does.
>
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
>
> >
> > * Sean Murphy [2005-08-25 08:4
If you plan to use the Maildir format, while it's possible for Pine
to support this, it doesn't natively... Mutt does.
On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
* Sean Murphy [2005-08-25 08:47 -0700]
We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. We are
in t
We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. We are in the
process of moving to FreeBSD. I installed Pine from an updated ports
collection and received a message about pine not being very secure. Is
anyone using an alternative to pine that can also read pine's folders and
addres
* Sean Murphy [2005-08-25 08:47 -0700]
> We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. We are in the
> process of moving to FreeBSD. I installed Pine from an updated ports
> collection and received a message about pine not being very secure. Is
> anyone using an alternative to p
On Friday 20 May 2005 11:09, the author David Armour contributed to the
dialogue on Re: Pine (Tony Shadwick) & giving in to temptation(s):
& hello,
&
& > I'm getting more and more tempted to start up a wiki for newbies on good
& > package management practices
hello,
> I'm getting more and more tempted to start up a wiki for newbies on good
> package management practices and port management.
get on with that, wouldya?
> The handbook seems to deal well with these things once you know
lots of ways to get yourself into lots of deep water, yes. and
Just a point of curiousity here, how are you trying to fetch pine?
pkg_add -r pine, or pkg_add -r pine4 ?
Only the latter works.
That, and if you'r etrying to retrieve it from the default server, no
shock that it fails. That server gets quite overloaded during the day.
I'm getting more and more
On Thursday 19 May 2005 18:37, Charles Lamb wrote:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
The pine distfile is generic unix source code, if you can't fetch it, it's
probably just a temporary server problem.
2005/5/19, Charles Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
There's Cone (/usr/ports/mail/cone/). I found it similar to Pine. Much
easier to use than Mutt.
___
freebsd-quest
On 2005-05-19 13:37, Charles Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
It certainly is available. Where did you look for it?
gothmog:/root# pkg_info | grep pine
pine-4.62 PINE(tm) -- a Program for Intern
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0400, Charles Lamb wrote:
> > When I try to fetch pine it cannot find it.
>
> If you want help with that, please be more specific.
>
> Kris
P.S. In future, please don't reply to existing messages
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0400, Charles Lamb wrote:
> When I try to fetch pine it cannot find it.
If you want help with that, please be more specific.
Kris
pgpEkq5dmj33L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pine
Hi Charles,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 7:37:52 PM, you contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
pine is still possible tu run under FreeBSD, try /usr/ports/mail
Hi Charles,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 7:37:52 PM, you contributed this to our collective
wisdom:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
pine is still possible tu run under FreeBSD, try /usr/ports/mail/pine4
good alternative is mutt - /usr/port
On 2002-11-26 14:54, Steven Lake wrote:
> I've noticed lately that when doing mail or many other things in
> Pine as of late, it's been very slow. This includes moving between
> screens, into and out of messages, marking and deleting messages,
> closing the program, etc.
>
> Not sure if this is re
> You can cruise over to the freeBSD site and see what the latest port is. The
> version number is in the Makefile, though there's probably some easier way to
> get this information as well.
Yeah, I have 4.44 and I saw that the makefile had 4.44 already so
I wanted to be doubly sure tha
On Saturday 13 July 2002 11:29 pm, Steven Lake wrote:
| Ok, I got a two part question.
|
| 1. I've got pine 4.44 installed. Is there any hot fixes,
| updates, or other upgrades that I need to make or is this the most current
| version?
You can cruise over to the freeBSD site and see what
40 matches
Mail list logo
