>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Svein Halvor
>Halvorsen
>Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 5:30 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ulf Magnusson; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: Seagate HD
* Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-05-29 10:28 -0700]
> According to the UDMA/66/100/133 standard [...]
:
> So yes, there is something wrong with a primary master and a secondary
> slave. Just because it works on a lot of motherboards, and just
> because it worked in the past on old incorrectly manuf
* Erik Trulsson [2005-05-29 14:09 +0200]
> Although it is theoretically fine to have just a slave device on an IDE
> channel without a master device, that configuration fails to work in
> many cases. If it fails to work it is probably a bug in some component
> of the system, but that doesn't
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ulf Magnusson
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:58 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: RE: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
>
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Svein Halvor
> Halvorsen
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 4:49 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Ulf Magnusson; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Seagate HD not detected
On Sunday 29 May 2005 09:51, the author Vizion contributed to the dialogue
on-
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>On Sunday 29 May 2005 09:51, the author donald szatkowski contributed to
> the dialogue on-
>
> Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>>Did Vizi
On Sunday 29 May 2005 09:51, the author donald szatkowski contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>Did Vizion (Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) solve the "TOP POSTING" on
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] or has this been the new area of operation? Thi
Did Vizion (Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) solve the "TOP POSTING" on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or has this been the new area of operation? This
individual has been hitting the lists HEAVY! Little problem solving, much
posturing.
As for the hard drive. I have found the Seagate drives to be MOST sensitve t
On Saturday 28 May 2005 20:18, the author Josh Paetzel contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>On Saturday 28 May 2005 20:11, Vizion wrote:
>> OK your drive is recognized as at1
>>
>> David
>
>Where on earth did you pull at1 out of?
On Saturday 28 May 2005 20:11, Vizion wrote:
>
> OK your drive is recognized as at1
> David
Where on earth did you pull at1 out of? FreeBSD is not seeing his
drive at all...if it's on the secondary controller as a slave it
should show up as /dev/ad3
--
Thanks,
Josh Paetzel
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
>
> * Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-05-29 00:05 -0700]
> > Wrong. Each IDE cable can have 2 devices a master and a slave. So if
> > you have 2 IDE controllers you can have master, slave, master, slave
> > for a total of 4 driv
On Sun, 29 May 2005 13:49:21 +0200 (CEST)
Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
>
> * Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-05-29 00:05 -0700]
> > Wrong. Each IDE cable can have 2 devices a master and a slave. So
> > if you have 2 IDE controllers you can have master, slave, master,
> > slave for a total of 4 dri
* Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-05-29 00:05 -0700]
> Wrong. Each IDE cable can have 2 devices a master and a slave. So if
> you have 2 IDE controllers you can have master, slave, master, slave
> for a total of 4 drives.
>
> It is not master on ide cable 1, slave on ide cable 2.
There's nothin
- Original Message -
From: Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 9:05 am
Subject: RE: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ulf Magnusson
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 4:48 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
>
>
> I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD.
On Saturday 28 May 2005 21:09, the author Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
contributed to the dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>On May 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote (quote Dave):
>>> OK your drive is recognized as at1
>>> Here is the page
On May 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Ulf Magnusson wrote (quote Dave):
OK your drive is recognized as at1
Here is the page from the handbook on www.freebsd.org - if you
follow the
instructions you should be OK:
---
16.
On Saturday 28 May 2005 06:31 pm, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:11 am
> Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
>
> > On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08, the author Ulf Magnu
- Original Message -
From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, May 29, 2005 3:11 am
Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD
> On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08, the author Ulf Magnusson
> contributed to the
> dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
On Saturday 28 May 2005 18:08, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the
dialogue on Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson
>> contributed to the
>>
>> di
From: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson
> contributed to the
> dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
> >I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've
> >attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it
On Saturday 28 May 2005 16:48, the author Ulf Magnusson contributed to the
dialogue on Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD:
>I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've
>attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slave
>device. It is correctly detected
22 matches
Mail list logo
