On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Justin V. v...@yeaguy.com wrote:
Everything goes fine until its time to start amavisd-new.
It just doesnt start and I do not see anything in the logs to
indicate a problem.
Have you checked /var/log/maillog ?
--
Bruce Cran
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Justin V. v...@yeaguy.com wrote:
Everything goes fine until its time to start amavisd-new.
It just doesnt start and I do not see anything in the logs to
indicate a problem.
Have you checked /var/log/maillog ?
On Oct 27, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Justin V. wrote:
[ ... ]
But at least I have an idea now of whats going on..
[ ... ]
Oct 27 10:43:39 hbca amavis[71922]: (!!)TROUBLE in pre_loop_hook: config: no
rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
Oct 27 10:43:39 hbca amavis[71922]: (!)_DIE:
* Hans F. Nordhaug hans.f.nordh...@himolde.no [2010-04-29]:
* Hans F. Nordhaug hans.f.nordh...@himolde.no [2010-04-29]:
Hi!
I have been happily running Postfix with amavisd-new (and Clamav
and SpamAssassin) on FreeBSD 7 with Perl 5.8 for a long time.
Recently, I upgraded to FreeBSD 8
* Hans F. Nordhaug hans.f.nordh...@himolde.no [2010-04-29]:
Hi!
I have been happily running Postfix with amavisd-new (and Clamav
and SpamAssassin) on FreeBSD 7 with Perl 5.8 for a long time.
Recently, I upgraded to FreeBSD 8 and rebuilt all ports (after
updating). Suddenly I saw many
Ok,
After digging a little bit more into the code, It seems that It was
due to rar decompile which is a 32bit ports;
I uncommented the rar options for this port and It went ok.
I would still be interested in a more detailed answer to my own
question regarding 32/64 bit compatibility.
On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Olaf Greve wrote:
The question(s):
I'd like to tune Spam Assassin such that it filters out much more
spam, whilst letting (almost) all proper messages through.
Thunderbird's spam controls are pretty good at filtering out spam,
and I was hoping perhaps Spam
From the tutorial I uderstood that by installing amavisd-new will
install spamassasin too ?
and razor also coming with this .?
If you install amavisd-new from the ports, does it have an option for
installin spamassassin?
If there is no option, SA is NOT installed.
Razor is NOT
/200309/postfix-spamassassin.html
From: Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amavisd-new spamcontroll problem
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:41:42 +0700 (ICT)
From the tutorial I uderstood that by installing amavisd-new
Still not working :-( installing to //etc/rc.d still.
---snip---
This port has installed the following startup scripts which may cause
these network services to be started at boot time.
//etc/rc.d/amavisd
//etc/rc.d/amavis-milter
---snip---
___
Matt Juszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Still not working :-( installing to //etc/rc.d still.
|
|
| ---snip---
| This port has installed the following startup scripts which may cause these
network services
| to be started at boot time.
|
| //etc/rc.d/amavisd
that's right.
|
| //etc/rc.d/amavisd
that's right.
Why is it doing double slash and why is it installing to /etc/rc.d? Why
not /usr/local/etc/rc.d where other apps and ports reside? I know it has
to start first, but it could have named it something like 0amavisd.sh. I
dont really like ports putting
Interesting... smtp still works fine.
Good morning,
I am installing amavis-new on my mail server. I ran amavisd in debug
mode and I cannot see anything wrong. It also detected clamav which
seems to be running fine. However; when I add
MODIFY_MAILER_FLAGS(`LOCAL',`-r')dnl
All I have in my hostname.mc is:
dnl Amavisd Stuff
define(`MILTER', 1)
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`milter-amavis',
`S=local:/var/amavis/amavis-milter.sock, F=T, T=S:10m;R:10m;E:10m')
And it works perfectly.
Regards,
Gary Hayers
Charles Lamb wrote:
Good morning,
I am installing amavis-new on my mail
] On Behalf Of Gary Hayers
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:15 AM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amavisd
All I have in my hostname.mc is:
dnl Amavisd Stuff
define(`MILTER', 1)
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`milter-amavis',
`S=local:/var/amavis/amavis-milter.sock, F=T, T=S:10m;R
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Hayers
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:15 AM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amavisd
All I have in my hostname.mc is:
dnl Amavisd Stuff
define(`MILTER', 1)
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`milter-amavis',
`S=local:/var/amavis/amavis
sendmail-8.13.1
-Original Message-
From: Gary Hayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:25 AM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amavisd
Charles Lamb wrote:
Does it automatically generate amavis-milter.sock?
I am getting
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Hayers
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:15 AM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amavisd
All I have in my hostname.mc is:
dnl Amavisd Stuff
define(`MILTER', 1)
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`milter-amavis',
`S=local:/var/amavis
Charles Lamb wrote:
sendmail-8.13.1
-Original Message-
From: Gary Hayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:25 AM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amavisd
Charles Lamb wrote:
Does it automatically generate amavis-milter.sock?
I am
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 06:22:00PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Tim Schutt wrote:
On Jul 30, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
If you're going to send notification, there is only one _proper_ way
to do it: analyze the Received: headers and find out where the virus
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:42:00 -0400, Tim Schutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got postfix/amavisd/clamav configured on my mailserver, but I am
having trouble getting the notification emails to format properly.
Virus and spam notifications are a bad idea. Both types of email
forge the sender
Logan Ashby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:42:00 -0400, Tim Schutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got postfix/amavisd/clamav configured on my mailserver, but I am
having trouble getting the notification emails to format properly.
Virus and spam notifications are a bad
I completely understand where you are coming from, and I am only
intending on notifying the intended recipient of the email, not the
sender for the very reason that you note. If it was just me, I would
can the message and be done with it. However, I am in the midst of
marketing this service to
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:33 -0400, Tim Schutt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lame reason, maybe... but there is reasonable logic behind me wanting
to do this.
That's understandable, but it may well backfire on you. I would be
just as irritated at receiving hundreds, possibly thousands of notices
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Tim Schutt wrote:
On Jul 30, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
If you're going to send notification, there is only one _proper_ way
to do it: analyze the Received: headers and find out where the virus
_really_ originated, then contact the abuse@ address for that domain
Logan Ashby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus
scanners failed, considering backups
Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need
type:name form instead of: #
Jun
Hello,
Alright, i am still having this issue, and now another has cropped up. I
am getting an error: server dropped connection before sending the initial
smtp greeting.
The only thing i can think of is i changed some setting trying to get
this working. However like before that is the only
dave wrote:
Hello,
Alright, i am still having this issue, and now another has cropped up. I
am getting an error: server dropped connection before sending the initial
smtp greeting.
The only thing i can think of is i changed some setting trying to get
this working. However like before that
Hello,
Thanks, i did that. The adding of the -v option isn't giving me any
additional information, it's just saying what it said before, smtpd is dying
with exit status 1, and now the error server did not send an smtp greeting.
I think my next move is to try a complete reinstall. I didn't
dave wrote:
Hi,
I've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box running postfix 2.1, spamassassin 2.63,
amavisd-new-20030616.p9, dcc-dccd-1.2.48, and razor-agents-2.40 all
installed via ports. I'm having issues with dcc-dccd and razor-agents not
working, but i believe that's due to my firewall, anyone know what
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've
got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something
strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix
forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter line, it
dave wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've
got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something
strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix
forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the
dave wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've
got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something
strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix
forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter
Hello,
My thanks to everyone who has so far offered help. Unfortunately i'm not
any closer to fixing this. I had to enable amavisd to log through syslog and
set it to mail so it would put output in maillog, then i added -v to the end
of the postfix smtpd line in master.cf. I then enabled
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus
scanners failed, considering backups
Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need
type:name form instead of: #
Jun 28 21:35:02
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I thought of a misplaced comment in postfix, but
two things lead me away from that. Firstly, this only occurs when i bring
amavisd in to the picture. And secondly, postfix check does not report any
syntax errors.
I'm getting tempted to post these files somewhere,
Yes, apparently P8 is not compatible with early versions of perl.
On Mar 22, 2004, at 2:35 AM, Leo Lapousterle wrote:
On 21/03/04 22:09 -0500, Jeff Maxwell wrote :
The same thing just happened to me.
amavisd-new, the newest version will not run with perl 5.005 that
comes
with 4.9. You have
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 11:43, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
When a message is sent to amavisd for scanning I get the following message:
WARN: all primary virus scanners failed, considering backups
Have you tested clamav to see if all works fine, run 'clamdscan
/path/to/a/file'. Also, check the
The same thing just happened to me.
amavisd-new, the newest version will not run with perl 5.005 that comes
with 4.9. You have upgrade to perl 5.6 or better. I upgrading to 5.8
with the port /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/
Follow the directions to change you default perl installation after you
On 21/03/04 22:09 -0500, Jeff Maxwell wrote :
The same thing just happened to me.
amavisd-new, the newest version will not run with perl 5.005 that comes
with 4.9. You have upgrade to perl 5.6 or better. I upgrading to 5.8 with
the port /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/
Errr, I upgraded to
I can't seem to find where in the config file (amavisd.conf) it is
specified. I've set the $mydomain variable and my notification reports in
Have you restarted amavisd since you updated the config file?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
In the last episode (Mar 11), Gareth Bailey said:
I've got the following message appearing in my maillog over and over:
maillog:4050:Mar 11 16:54:04 server postfix/smtp[7103]: D892D434C: to=[EMAIL
PROTECTED], relay=none, delay=255114, status=deferred (connect to
example.com[192.0.34.166]:
I am running Postfix 2.0.16 on FreeBSD 5.2.1 and used the FreeBSD port
collection to install amavisd-new. I have this entry recurring in my
amavisd log:
WARN: all primary virus scanners failed, considering backups
I looked on the clamav web site and found this statement:
clamscan is
Hi!
WARN: all primary virus scanners failed, considering backups
I looked on the clamav web site and found this statement:
clamscan is enabled automatically if clamscan binary is found at
amavisd-new starup time. clamd is activated by uncommenting its entry in
the @av_scanners list,
Gareth Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have recently installed postfix, amavisd-new, clamd.
I have amavisd.sh, clamav-clamd.sh and clamav-freshcalm.sh in my /usr/local/etc/rc.d
directory.
Neither clamd nor amavisd seem to start on boot.
Please let me know what i am doing wrong?
At least for clamav, you need to have 'clamav_clamd_enable=YES' in
your /etc/rc.conf file. There might be a similar requirement for
amavisd.
Bryan
On 03/04/04 at 07:02, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Gareth Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have recently installed postfix, amavisd-new, clamd.
I
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:16:38AM +0200, Gareth Bailey wrote:
I have recently installed postfix, amavisd-new, clamd.
I have amavisd.sh, clamav-clamd.sh and clamav-freshcalm.sh in my /usr/local/etc/rc.d
directory.
Neither clamd nor amavisd seem to start on boot.
Please let me know what
47 matches
Mail list logo
