El día Thursday, July 12, 2012 a las 09:01:50PM -0500, Robert Bonomi escribió:
> > > req.ai_flags = AI_ADDRCONFIG|AI_NUMERICHOST;
> > > req.ai_family = AF_INET6;/* Same as AF_INET6. */
>
> Isn't the setting of 'req.ai_family', above, going to guarantee that
> something that "looks lik
> From: Doug Hardie
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:21:38 -0700
> Subject: Re: IPv6 && getaddrinfo(3C)
>
> On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can'
On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
> getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
> accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the IPv6 form:
>
> $ ./a.out ::1
> ho
On 03/04/2012 18:40, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After installing a new machine under FreeBSD9 I discovered that the
> IPv6-configuration I had in place with FreeBSD8 does no longer work.
>
> Here's what I've got in /etc/rc.conf:
> ipv6_enable="YES"
> ipv6_ifconfig_em0="2001:76c:2218:2009::11/
Oh also if you would like to relay smtp mail give me a shout right now it's
restricted to the IPv6 64 blog that the machine manages - heck if you want an
IPv6 address I could give you one and it SHOULD work anywhere you are connected
as long as your IP can deal with IPv6
RB
On Jan 27, 2012, at
IPv6 fully operational - named/bind9 resolving all dns and works fine for IPv6
only hosts…. ipcloud.ws is IPv6 only to the external internet and works fine
via www, ssh, smtp mail, etc as long as you are on another IPv6 capable host.
Pretty nice. I am glad you brought this up. If you need a data
On 2012.01.26 16:03, Robert Boyer wrote:
I can probably arrange for a tunneled v6 address - should be the same thing at
the end of the day…. how much time/mem you need?
Thanks Robert,
As far as time/mem, I'm not all too sure as it has been some time since
I've run anything virtualized, so an
I can probably arrange for a tunneled v6 address - should be the same thing at
the end of the day…. how much time/mem you need?
RB
On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've been away for some time, but I'm now getting back into the full swing of
> things.
>
> I'm
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that
you must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines because according to the manpage
ipv6_enable
On 15/01/2012 21:41, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that
you must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that you
must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines because according to the manpage
ipv6_enabl
On 14/01/2012 18:07, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6 doesn't seem to work correctly
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, the wise Yuri Pankov wrote:
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6 doesn't seem to work correctly
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 06:07:01PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
> worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
> ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some error
> messages at boot time, and i
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Robert Simmons wrote:
I have begun receiving ipv6 spam from this mailing list, and I was
> wondering how to determine who the owner of a particular ipv6 address
> is.
A whois may tell you who the block has been given too (ISP wise) ... that
may start you in the
On 3.2.2011 17:53, Thomas Sandford wrote:
On 01/02/2011 07:29, pepe wrote:
I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working.
Ifconfig should be ok:
backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6
rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64
Looks a bi
On 01/02/2011 07:29, pepe wrote:
I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working.
Ifconfig should be ok:
backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6
rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64
Looks a bit odd - I would expect t
Not specifically related but I just worked around an issue with a Dell
laptop with the xl0 interface which has problems with 8.1.
I was experimenting with a IPv6 setup and used an old PC (big and
noisy) with the smallest install of 8.1. It worked fine as the tunnel
server and ipv6 gateway (
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
> Carl Johnson writes:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> Now if I could just figure out why gnus doesn't work right under emacs
>> I could finish migrating from Linux to FreeBSD.
>
> I use same .gnus in both GNU/Linux and FreeBSD and keep the mailboxen on the
> $HOME of b
Carl Johnson writes:
[...]
> Now if I could just figure out why gnus doesn't work right under emacs
> I could finish migrating from Linux to FreeBSD.
I use same .gnus in both GNU/Linux and FreeBSD and keep the mailboxen on the
$HOME of both boxen sync-ed with each other, and works great for me.
Carl Johnson writes:
> I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
> 8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
> system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it is running
> rtadvd to act as the gatway for my network. On the 8.1 sy
Vincent Hoffman writes:
> On 30/07/2010 18:48, Carl Johnson wrote:
>> I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
>> 8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
>> system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it is running
>> rtadvd t
On 30/07/2010 18:48, Carl Johnson wrote:
> I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
> 8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
> system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it is running
> rtadvd to act as the gatway for my netwo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/03/2010 09:17:30, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> I am updating a system:
>
> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64
>
> and failing to understand the (practical) consequences of
> UPDATING entries 20090926 and 20091202
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Brian Conway wrote:
I recently set up an HE.net tunnel using the following guides:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html
http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipv6.php
FreeBSD 7.2-p5 is used for the router and the host, and it works beautifully,
except that the host
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
> On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
>> How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
>>
>> This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
>> 2003:16c8:dc1e::2
>>
>> and I use this in rc.conf:
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes="2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2"
Do it li
$witch writes:
> have done a "best effort" to avoid useless question, am posting after
> various faq-research and tests.
>
> having an IPv6-ONLY (FreeBSD 7.0) host that needs to perform a "portsnap
> fetch" there is NO LIST of portsnap-IPv6-capable servers.
>
> maybe they don't exists or i am "to
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 17:56 +1000, Brett Wiggins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to rent a FreeBSD server that has access to an IPv6
> address. I have previously rented a FreeBSD server from theplanet.com
> but they only offer IPv4 and I would like my server to be on the IPv6
> network. Does anyo
> Reinhard Haller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to add ipv6 aliases for my jails (7.1) in rc.conf.
>>
>> ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 192.168.64.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>> ifconfig_lo0_alias1="inet 192.168.64.2 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>> ipv6_ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet6 fd08:2548:a3e8:40::1 prefixle
Reinhard Haller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to add ipv6 aliases for my jails (7.1) in rc.conf.
>
> ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 192.168.64.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> ifconfig_lo0_alias1="inet 192.168.64.2 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> ipv6_ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet6 fd08:2548:a3e8:40::1 prefixlen 48"
>
rand wrote:
> From: Steve Bertrand
> Subject: Re: ipv6 and freebsd
> To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "freebsd general questions"
> Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:20 AM
> gahn wrote:
> > Thanks Steve:
> >
> > the router that sending RA is juniper and
gahn wrote:
> What shall I do to accomplish this on FreeBSD?
For clarification and completeness, here is exactly what I did:
First, config the router (Cisco):
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
ipv6 address 2607:F118:A::1/64
ipv6 address F
gahn wrote:
> Thanks Steve:
>
> We use fec0::... as global unique IPv6 address in the lab environment. the
> IPv6 routers in our lab uses fec0:0:5::/64 with eui-64 addressing scheme (for
> testing).
>
>>From the host "lab" (freebsd) machine, it clearly sees two link-local
>>addresses for two I
6 routers via RA messages. the IP routers also sent But
>why not the host "lab" configure itself with global unique address with prefix
>fec0:0:5:0::/64 (provided by the routers)?
What shall I do to accomplish this on FreeBSD?
--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> From:
gahn wrote:
> Thanks Steve:
>
> the router that sending RA is juniper and the protocol router-advertisement
> has been activated:
>
> g...@lab_1> show interfaces fe-0/0/3
> ...
>
> Logical interface fe-0/0/3.170 (Index 70) (SNMP ifIndex 59)
> ...
> Addresses, Flags: Is-Preferred
>
17:55:44.027565 IP6 fe80::214:f600:aa2c:3c03 > ff02::1: ICMP6, router
advertisement, length 24
18:02:46.283353 IP6 fe80::214:f600:aa2c:d403 > ff02::1: ICMP6, router
advertisement, length 24
--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> From: Steve Bertrand
> Subject: Re: ipv6 and
gahn wrote:
> Thanks for the tips.
>
> But i still only see the fe80::..., link-local address, not the fec0:...
> something as I expected.
Provide the output to:
# sysctl -a net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv
# ndp -i fxp0
# ifconfig fxp0
...and, run a tcpdump on fxp0 capturing only IPv6 packets. Even
Thanks for the tips.
But i still only see the fe80::..., link-local address, not the fec0:...
something as I expected.
--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> From: Steve Bertrand
> Subject: Re: ipv6 and freebsd
> To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
> Cc: "freebsd general questions&
gahn wrote:
> Ok, i meant the configuration of "ipv6_network_interface="fxp0"" alone
> doesn't seem to be working:
[...]
> how could I enable IPv6 only on the interface fxp0 instead of every interface?
It is possible to completely disable IPv6 on an interface, but man (8)
ndp recommends against
Ok, i meant the configuration of "ipv6_network_interface="fxp0"" alone doesn't
seem to be working:
for /etc/rc.conf:
#ipv6_enable="YES"
ipv6_network_interface="fxp0"
u...@lab:~:$ ifconfig fxp0
fxp0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b
ether 00:06:5b:f0:7d:21
inet 10
>
> Excuse me for jumping in on this thread, I'm only just starting to look
> into IPv6 for myself.
>
> My ISP has informed me that it doesn't support IPv6 yet, and won't for
> some time. I have a DNS server and sites on IPv4, but I'd like to be
> able to support IPv6- does the fact that my ISP d
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 08:25 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Da Rock wrote:
>
> > Excuse me for jumping in on this thread, I'm only just starting to look
> > into IPv6 for myself.
> >
> > My ISP has informed me that it doesn't support IPv6 yet, and won't for
> > some time. I have a DNS server and
Da Rock wrote:
> Excuse me for jumping in on this thread, I'm only just starting to look
> into IPv6 for myself.
>
> My ISP has informed me that it doesn't support IPv6 yet, and won't for
> some time. I have a DNS server and sites on IPv4, but I'd like to be
> able to support IPv6- does the fact
Da Rock wrote:
My ISP has informed me that it doesn't support IPv6 yet, and won't for
some time. I have a DNS server and sites on IPv4, but I'd like to be
able to support IPv6- does the fact that my ISP doesn't support it stop
me from serving on IPv6? I'd think it does, but some clarity from
expe
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 09:18 +, beni wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2008 23:13:33 David Horn wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:35 AM, beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a question about IPv6.
> > > I installed /net/freenet6 and edited the /usr/local/etc/gw6c.con
On Saturday 20 September 2008 23:13:33 David Horn wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:35 AM, beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question about IPv6.
> > I installed /net/freenet6 and edited the /usr/local/etc/gw6c.conf file
> > with the login and password given by Go6.net.
> >
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:35 AM, beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about IPv6.
> I installed /net/freenet6 and edited the /usr/local/etc/gw6c.conf file with
> the login and password given by Go6.net.
> I added freenet6_enable="YES", ipv6_enable="YES" and
> ipv6_network_in
Chuck Swiger writes:
> On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:10 PM, R Dicaire wrote:
>> Hi folks, I searched google and this mailing list and could find no
>> specific mention of ipv6 support for portsnap. I also checked for
>> records for the three portsnap mirrors portsnap1, 2, and
>> 4.freebsd.org, no AAA
On Aug 17, 2008, at 11:10 PM, R Dicaire wrote:
Hi folks, I searched google and this mailing list and could find no
specific mention of ipv6 support for portsnap. I also checked for
records for the three portsnap mirrors portsnap1, 2, and
4.freebsd.org, no .
I have an ipv6 only install, a
On Jul 11, 2008, at 05:47, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
Mac OS-X does a form of auto discovery on IPv6 where the machines
on a local network add the machine name to the ndp table when they
see activity from that machine.
...FreeBSD does this as well (Neighbor Discovery).
pear
Doug Hardie wrote:
Mac OS-X does a form of auto discovery on IPv6 where the machines on a
local network add the machine name to the ndp table when they see
activity from that machine.
...FreeBSD does this as well (Neighbor Discovery).
pearl# ndp -a
NeighborLinklayer Address
attached working patch against this:
FreeBSD wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Jun
10 10:49:47 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr2/src/sys/i386/compile/p234 i386
(cvsup'em <2 weeks ago, should work for present date)
jailpatch.gz
Description: Binary data
__
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Tuesday, June 3, 2008, 8:27:56 PM, you wrote:
does patch exist for it?
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/jail.html
Trying to apply the aforementioned patches, I ran into this during
buildkernel. I'll remove src, re csup and rebuild and try again. If
there is a more a
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
exist in FreeBSD 6.*, everything else patched
we will see after compiling.
Did it work? Did it work? Did it work?
(Or is the absence of a giant WOOOHOOO! the indicator that it didn't
work at all?)
unfortunately not with 6.*, i was unable to complete patching by hand.
exist in FreeBSD 6.*, everything else patched
we will see after compiling.
Did it work? Did it work? Did it work?
(Or is the absence of a giant WOOOHOOO! the indicator that it didn't
work at all?)
unfortunately not with 6.*, i was unable to complete patching by hand.
but it works in 7.*
___
> well it applied almost clean to FreeBSD 6.3!
>
> almost means i have to skip 2 patches to sctp_* files, as sctp doesn't
> exist in FreeBSD 6.*, everything else patched
>
> we will see after compiling.
Did it work? Did it work? Did it work?
(Or is the absence of a giant WOOOHOOO! the indicato
well it applied almost clean to FreeBSD 6.3!
almost means i have to skip 2 patches to sctp_* files, as sctp doesn't
exist in FreeBSD 6.*, everything else patched
we will see after compiling.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello Wojciech,
Tuesday, June 3, 2008, 8:27:56 PM, you wro
Hello Wojciech,
Tuesday, June 3, 2008, 8:27:56 PM, you wrote:
> does patch exist for it?
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/jail.html
--
Best regards,
Danielmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> Ofloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> When using 6to4 extensively the system crashes I've never had this with
>> gif
>> tunnels though every since I've started using 6to4 and stf interface this
>> happens especially when the v6 gateway is unreachable for short time,
Ofloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When using 6to4 extensively the system crashes I've never had this with gif
> tunnels though every since I've started using 6to4 and stf interface this
> happens especially when the v6 gateway is unreachable for short time, ..
>
> I haven't seen the error yet bu
Is this behavior exists from the beginning of KAME integration or available
in latest freebsd code? Because I was using a box which derives its ipv6
code from KAME project and the behavior was different from this. Also, in a
host which uses Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4),
In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via
ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the
interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is
this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed from
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 6.2 in a totally IPV6-only aware environment. I
> want to set up an NTP server by pointing to an IPV6 stratum 1
> address. Can I just add an IPV6 address in the NTP.conf file just as
> I would do fo
Wojciech,
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 09:03 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK, IPv6 setup is much more difficult than IPv4 setup. Still i don't
>
> i don't think so. it is no more difficult, or even easier.
>
> more difficult is to put rev-dns entries but still not a problem
You won! Becaus
AFAIK, IPv6 setup is much more difficult than IPv4 setup. Still i don't
i don't think so. it is no more difficult, or even easier.
more difficult is to put rev-dns entries but still not a problem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On 11/5/07, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
> the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
>
> 1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'ed firewall
> how do I relia
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 03:16 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I want to set my machine up to be on both IPv4 and IPv6. I have read
> the stuff on 6over4 and such and still a little confused on a few things:
>
> 1. The machine I want to do the tunneling on is behind a NAT'ed firewall
> how d
Have you tried using -W on netstat? "In certain displays, avoid
truncating addresses even if this causes some fields to overflow." I
tested it on my own IPv6 server after establishing a connection and
reproduced your behavior with the truncated IPv6 addresses; however,
once I added the -W flag, i
On Aug 1, 2007, at 4:41 PMAug 1, 2007, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, August 1, 2007 16:12, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an
IPv6
tunnel to the
On Wed, August 1, 2007 16:12, Christopher Hilton wrote:
> Javier Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
>>> Hey list,
>>>
>>> While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
>>> tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routi
>
> I second that recommendation. The ISP in question is Hurricane Electric
> and the process is 100% web driven. It took me less than a day to get a
> gif tunnel up and an ipv6 /64 assignment.
>
>
They are FAIRLY response to service issues (I had problems getting
to FTP1.FREEBSD.ORG fo
Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
majo
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
> tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
> problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
> majority of the IPv
Sure I was:
"[T]here seems to be a large number of routing problems upstream from
them that prevent us from accessing the majority of the IPv6 net."
Eric
On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:06 AMAug 1, 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
http://ipv6tb.he.net/index.php
You aren't clear on the problems at th
Mike Tancsa writes:
> >+TCP: [::1]:49478 to [::1]:4080 tcpflags 0x2; tcp_input: Connection
> attempt to closed port
>
> Does
> sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain=0
> get rid of them ?
Thank you - this led me down a different path and I now know
what needs to happen.
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:00:05 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>
>Hello:
> I've recently started getting these in the system log:
>
>+TCP: [::1]:49478 to [::1]:4080 tcpflags 0x2; tcp_input: Connection
>attempt to closed port
>
> The program affected works anyway, but
On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:23 PMJun 22, 2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
Hello all,
I've been toying with getting IPv6 installed and running for a
while, and I've got only one hurdle remaining.
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address,
On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:17 AMJun 23, 2007, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel
On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel
(router doesn't support IPv6 yet, on my end) to 1000:2000:1::5. I
On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:17 AMJun 23, 2007, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 04:36 , Eric Crist wrote:
I have 5 servers on my quaint little network, and my primary
firewall is configured with an IPv6 address, we'll say
1000:2000:1::6 and is connected to my ISP through a gif tunnel
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:24:43AM -0700, Ofloo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to jails, but from what I understand is that a jail allows one
> to have multiple virtual systems on one system, now I was wondering if
> this could be done through IPv6, I would want to setup multiple IPv6
> only systems,
On 3/20/07, Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:01, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
> >
> > On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > E
Eric F Crist schrieb:
[...] I'm performing the configuration as follows:
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel
ifconfig gif0 inet6 alias ::a::a ::b::b prefixlen 126
When I execute the last command, I get:
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument
[...]
Use a prefi
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:01, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
> >
> > On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > Eric F Crist schrieb:
> > > > [...] I'm performing the config
On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Eric F Crist schrieb:
> > [...] I'm performing the configuration as follows:
> >
> > ifconfig gif0 create
> > ifconfig gif0 tunnel
>
"jaroonsak paokeaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> plzplzplz
>
> i want to make my server(freeBSD) to work with ipv6. but i'm new people for
> linux operation ( T T ). Can you have "how to" or handbook for setup my
> server to ipv6( Step-by-step) .
FreeBSD isn't Linux, but assuming
On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gidday folks,
> >
> > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
> >
> > I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
>
On 25 Dec 2005 at 15:05, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
> > > "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Gidday folks,
> >
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:22:20 -0500
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
> > "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Gidday folks,
> > >
> > > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind t
On 25 Dec 2005 at 2:59, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gidday folks,
> >
> > I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
> >
> > I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
>
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:37:56 -0500
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gidday folks,
>
> I have an IPv6 routing problem within my LAN behind the gateway.
>
> I have an IPv6 tunnel supplied by Hurricane Electric. The tunnel is
>
> setup and working. From my gateway I can access various
On 2005-08-15T20:51:05+0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Dear inet6 guys,
>
> I don't know the kind of addresses FreeBSD uses for autoconfigured
> link-local addresses.
> For example: fe80::20e:cff:fe34:2bf8%em0
>
> What the hack is %em0 ??? Interestingly I can use this address, but ping6
> fe80::2
Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 21:24 CEST schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 20:53 CEST schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm quiet new to IPv6 so I'd like to ask some questions:
>
> Here are two more:
>
> How do I use the eui64 option of ifconfig? 'ifconfig fxp0 inet6
> f
Am Samstag, 13. August 2005 10:53 CEST schrieb David Malone:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:53:20PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Now in the 24-16-24 scheme of th interface id part of the IPv6
> > address, the 16 bits were inserted with the value FFFE. And bit 57 was
> > changed to one! Why Wh
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:53:20PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Now in the 24-16-24 scheme of th interface id part of the IPv6 address, the
> 16 bits were inserted with the value FFFE. And bit 57 was changed to one!
> Why What if it is alread one? Or isn't tehre any vendor who can have
> b
Am Samstag, 13. August 2005 00:03 CEST schrieb Michael W. Oliver:
> On 2005-08-12T22:56:19+0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 22:48 CEST schrieb Michael W. Oliver:
> >> ifconfig fxp0 inet6 3ffe:dead:beef:cafe::/64 eui64 alias
> >
> > Hmmm, that doesn't work here (6.0-beta2)
On 2005-08-12T22:56:19+0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 22:48 CEST schrieb Michael W. Oliver:
>> ifconfig fxp0 inet6 3ffe:dead:beef:cafe::/64 eui64 alias
>
> Hmmm, that doesn't work here (6.0-beta2):
>
> ifconfig fxp0 inet6 fec0::/64 eui64 alias
> ifconfig: could not dete
Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 22:48 CEST schrieb Michael W. Oliver:
> On 2005-08-12T21:03:35+0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 20:53 CEST schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm quiet new to IPv6 so I'd like to ask some questions:
> >>
> >> So far I know how to ge
Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 22:48 CEST schrieb Michael W. Oliver:
> On 2005-08-12T21:03:35+0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 20:53 CEST schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm quiet new to IPv6 so I'd like to ask some questions:
> >>
> >> So far I know how to ge
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
