Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Iantcho Vassilev
That`s preatty interesting.. I read the article and the idea is good. But i would like to know what MTA are you using..In the paper you said that at first the email is strored in Mailbox format. Isn`t that a bottleneck. WHat are the loads of the machines. Thanks On 2/9/06, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
I read the article and the idea is good. But i would like to know what MTA are you using..In the paper you said that at first the email is strored in Mailbox format. Isn`t that a bottleneck. WHat are the loads of the machines= Considering we have only 200 users and 3000 messages per day,

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I read the article and the idea is good. But i would like to know what MTA are you using..In the paper you said that at first the email is strored in Mailbox format. Isn`t that a bottleneck. WHat are the loads of the machines= Considering we have

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Rafi Jacoby
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I read the article and the idea is good. But i would like to know what MTA are you using..In the paper you said that at first the email is strored in Mailbox format. Isn`t that a bottleneck. WHat are the loads of the machines= Considering we

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Considering we have only 200 users and 3000 messages per day, whatever would do. MTA is sendmail/milter. I plan to change that mailbox thing when I get budget for a new machine to play with (I don't want to take the risk to break the working configuration). Mailbox format might

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
Mailbox format might not be a bottleneck in this application. It's fairly efficient at appending new messages, and that is the only common operation being performed on these backup mail spools. The application is using maildir (that's the normal email server that is using mailbox). Maildir

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
I just have a second disk on the server that I rsync everything to on an hourly basis. That would not solve the oops I deleted that VERY IMPORTANT email, where I can get it back? question. My goal is not high availability, but offering the user a way to undelete emails. I use Matt Simerson's

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
Since every mail is stored in its own file (versus concatenation in Mbox), it's much cheaper to backup. Just copy all the new/touched files, not all your mail. Yes, that's a good point. Because these files are *already* backups, I assumed that they wouldn't be backed up themselves, but

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Rafi Jacoby
On Feb 9, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote: I just have a second disk on the server that I rsync everything to on an hourly basis. That would not solve the oops I deleted that VERY IMPORTANT email, where I can get it back? question. My goal is not high availability, but offering the

Re: Mail back-up system

2006-02-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
I guess if they had deleted it before the next rsync, you could just copy the individual mails back to the main, or have a script/trigger to do that. What if they deleted the email before it got a chance to get synched? However, in this case, it sounds like error exists between keyboard