-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chuck Swiger
Sent: Sat 9/10/2005 11:48 AM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: Re: Postfix->Cyrus-imap connection problem
Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
> there waiting for a timewhen when a LMTP delivery attempt i
Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
there waiting for a timewhen when a LMTP delivery attempt is made?
^
"timeout when"
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
Paul Schmehl wrote:
[ ... ]
relay=/var/imap/socket/lmtp[/var/imap/socket/lmtp], delay=1457,
status=deferred (conversation with
/var/imap/socket/lmtp[/var/imap/socket/lmtp] timed out while sending end
of data -- message may be sent more than once)
[ ... ]
If anyone has a clue where to go from h
[Please keep the mailing list in the loop, for the archives.]
"dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks, i'll give that a go. Does ssmtp do sasl authentication? My main
> server does that.
No, it does certificate authentication, which works just as well, if not
better.
--
Bill Moran
"dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> I've got a central mailserver, and four machines acting as nullclients.
> Their only job is to send the central server emails of cron output. This
> isn't working, logs on the clients show nothing, the message just
> disappears, it's like it doesn'
Someone broke the silence:
> Hello,
> I've got a central mailserver, and four machines acting
> as nullclients.
> Their only job is to send the central server emails of cron
> output. This
> isn't working, logs on the clients show nothing, the message just
> disappears, it's like it doesn't e
"dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a central mailserver, and four machines acting as nullclients.
> Their only job is to send the central server emails of cron output. This
> isn't working, logs on the clients show nothing, the message just
> disappears, it's like it doesn't
> Why not just put a .forward (containing the dest. address)
> file in the users home?
Works perfectly - thanks !
>2) Is it possible to have a copy of all in / out mail sent to
> the boss's email box ?
Incoming is easy with always_bbc = bossacount in main.cf
Thanks for help !
__
Graham Bentley wrote:
Hi All,
There are a couple of things that I would like to achieve with my
running Fetchmail / Postfix combo ;
1) When a mail comes in for a specific local user it is immediately
forwarded to another external address.
This is for when some staff work from home occasionall
--On August 19, 2005 6:44:46 PM -0400 dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a new mailserver, config below, on a freebsd 5.4
box. I'm using chroot for the postfix processes and am going to introduce
postfix-style virtual domains when i get sasl/tls working. Currently, i
"Devin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings Everyone,
>
> I have recently been experimenting with FreeBSD 5.4 RELEASE to setup an
> email server following the directions listed here:
> http://postfixwiki.org/index.php?title=Virtual_Users_and_Domains_with_Courie
> r-IMAP_and_MySQL
>
>
> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: postfix vs. qmail?
> >
> >
> >On 6/29/2005 at 8:48 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >|For one who wants to host email accounts for multiple domains, which
> >is
> >|better? I've started instal
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MikeM
>Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 6:13 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: postfix vs. qmail?
>
>
>On 6/29/2005 at 8:48 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
On June 29, 2005 08:48 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For one who wants to host email accounts for multiple domains, which is
> better? I've started installing and configuring qmail according to the
> tutorial on qmailrocks.org but i'm wondering if i should stop and consider
> postfix before pressi
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:48:11 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For one who wants to host email accounts for multiple domains, which
> is better? I've started installing and configuring qmail according to
> the tutorial on qmailrocks.org but i'm wondering if i should stop and
> consider postfix befo
On 29/06/2005 11:13 PM, MikeM wrote:
On 6/29/2005 at 8:48 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|For one who wants to host email accounts for multiple domains, which
is
|better? I've started installing and configuring qmail according to the
|tutorial on qmailrocks.org but i'm wondering if i should stop an
On 6/29/2005 at 8:48 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|For one who wants to host email accounts for multiple domains, which
is
|better? I've started installing and configuring qmail according to the
|tutorial on qmailrocks.org but i'm wondering if i should stop and
consider
|postfix before pressing on.
I prefer postfix as it supports smtp auth, unlike qmail which doesn't.
(Qmail requires a hack to do so)
On 6/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> For one who wants to host email accounts for multiple domains, which is
> better? I've started installing and configuring qmail ac
On 2005-06-28 09:25, John Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a lan with freebsd 4.11 server and one client connected with a
> crossover cable and two nic cards. I want to be able to send a form to
> my server and display it in email.Someone gave me a recipe for the
> main.cf file but I lost
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:51:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:05:16 -0700
> Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > from the posting it's not so clear to me that the poster is running
> > > postfix on FreeBSD and/or ubuntu ?
> > >
> > > if the latter only, then
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:05:16 -0700
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > from the posting it's not so clear to me that the poster is running
> > postfix on FreeBSD and/or ubuntu ?
> >
> > if the latter only, then i'd like to add that in ubuntu warty (not
> > sure about hoary), the postfix mas
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 09:22:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:14:51 +1200
> Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:45:09AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > >
> > > People,
> > >
> > > This is one reason that I don't want to switch
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:14:51AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:45:09AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > People,
> >
> > This is one reason that I don't want to switch to postfix
> > (or any other "more secure" MTA). So far I have figured
> > out mos
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:14:51 +1200
Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:45:09AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > People,
> >
> > This is one reason that I don't want to switch to postfix
> > (or any other "more secure" MTA). So far I have figured
>
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:45:09AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> People,
>
> This is one reason that I don't want to switch to postfix
> (or any other "more secure" MTA). So far I have figured
> out most things on ubuntu linux--(Debian based). I can get
> mail *o
On 6/18/2005 at 7:58 PM Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
|Kirk Strauser wrote:
|
|>My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and
|>isn't hampered by bizarre licensing and enormous egos.
|>
|>
|Active development has to be the killer argument. Who wants to
|rely on software that no-one ca
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 07:58:56PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> >Furthermore, Qmail seems to have earned its reputation for security the
> >standard DJB way: by implementing only the easy parts of the standard and
> >complaining loudly about the hard parts ("those are insecure!") until
> >every
Kirk Strauser wrote:
My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and isn't hampered
by bizarre licensing and enormous egos.
Active development has to be the killer argument. Who wants to rely on
software that no-one cares enough about to develop properly?
Furthermore, Qmail
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 15:21, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> Luciano Musacchio wrote:
> qmail documentation is, as far as I can tell, just "Life with Qmail"
> (google should do it). It has some interesting tricks (an email address
> like "user" can automatically have aliases like "user-*) that I haven't
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:21 am, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> It has some interesting tricks (an email address like "user" can
> automatically have aliases like "user-*)
In Postfix's main.cf:
recipient_delimiter (default: empty)
The separator between user names and address extensions (u
On Saturday 18 June 2005 06:24 am, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
> I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :)
My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and isn't hampered
by bizarre licensing and enormous egos.
Furthermore, Qmail seems to have earned its reputation for security th
Luciano Musacchio wrote:
hi,
I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :), I've a fair review for both from
some linux admins, now, I want to know fbsd's community opinion :). The mail
server (now running sendmail) serves ~300 accounts.
From limited experience, Postfix is much better docume
Hi Luciano,
I've a simple question, postfix or qmail?
the simple answer: both are good.
If you're using sendmail right now, the change to postfix should be easier.
I've heard that postfix is slightly faster when it comes to really
massive number of emails (less disc-writing) but that shoul
On Jun 16, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Ean Kingston wrote:
On June 16, 2005 12:06 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Jun 16, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Ean Kingston wrote:
On June 16, 2005 11:54 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Probably off-topic, but it's a sysadmin question that maybe someone
on
the list could send
On June 16, 2005 12:06 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Ean Kingston wrote:
> > On June 16, 2005 11:54 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> >> Probably off-topic, but it's a sysadmin question that maybe someone on
> >> the list could send a quick blurb answer about :-/
> >>
> >>
On Thu, June 16, 2005 12:06 pm, Bart Silverstrim said:
> On Jun 16, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Ean Kingston wrote:
>> On June 16, 2005 11:54 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>>> body_checks = regexp:/usr/local/etc/postfix/body_checks
>>>
>>> in main.cf. The file contains:
>>>
>>> # Will this stop RR c
On Jun 16, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Ean Kingston wrote:
On June 16, 2005 11:54 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Probably off-topic, but it's a sysadmin question that maybe someone on
the list could send a quick blurb answer about :-/
I'm trying to filter some mail coming into Postfix based on the body
c
On June 16, 2005 11:54 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> Probably off-topic, but it's a sysadmin question that maybe someone on
> the list could send a quick blurb answer about :-/
>
> I'm trying to filter some mail coming into Postfix based on the body
> content. I have the line
>
> body_checks = reg
> Raciel Perez Hernandez wrote:
>> Helo list I have postfix installed and working, it only have a problem,
>> I
>> connect to internet trougth a leased line of 144Kbs but this line
>> sometimes gets unstable and goes down, so if the connection is down and
>> somebody try to send a message, postfi
Raciel Perez Hernandez wrote:
Helo list I have postfix installed and working, it only have a problem, I
connect to internet trougth a leased line of 144Kbs but this line
sometimes gets unstable and goes down, so if the connection is down and
somebody try to send a message, postfix tells me (Serv
--On Monday, April 25, 2005 12:59:35 AM +0200 John Morgan Salomon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's some info on my system:
shiva# pkg_info|grep -i sasl
cyrus-sasl-2.1.20_1 RFC SASL (Simple Authentication and
Security Layer)
cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.20_1 SASL authentication server for cyrus-
Henry wrote:
> Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions...
> What the heck is going on here?
>
> Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=<>, size=2716,
> nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=<>, size=2712,
> nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Apr 12 23:
But how come I can't see what IP the person is connecting from? So I
can block him through my firewall since he is getting annoying :(
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscr
Henry wrote:
Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions...
What the heck is going on here?
Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=<>, size=2716,
nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=<>, size=2712,
nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/q
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:
Well, is there any chance to reduce queue to one mail in active queue ?
The system runs postfix-19991231pl08-29 - I know its very old.
Vladimir,
I know you can do this in qmail, but not obvious way for me to do with
with Postfix. Perhaps you can find the Postfix list and a
Vladimir Dvorak wrote:
Hi *,
I have little, but not annoying problem with Postfix and queuing
management. When two or more big (understand >2 MB) emails are in
active queue, Postfix is trying to deliver them simultaneously. But
moth ago began to apear following message in /var/log/mail :
5BCED8
Matt Rechkemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone else out there running Postfix, seeing this in their syslogs?
> postfix/master[83222]: warning: master_status_event: partial status (4 bytes)
> postfix/master[83222]: warning: master_status_event: partial status (4 bytes)
>
> It seems to occur d
--On Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:53:59 PM -0800 BSD Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Everything running under a different group except "master" it is still
running as root.
How can I fix that ?
Did you read /usr/local/share/doc/postfix-*/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README
Also I need a way to verify that Pos
On Wed, March 9, 2005 3:39 pm, Bart Silverstrim said:
> I saw the errors and googled for it, but it just led to the man pages
> and site web pages for the postfix project (which I read); what was
> throwing me was the fact that it wasn't an open relay before and it
> didn't have the directive previ
On Mar 9, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Jim Trigg wrote:
On Wed, March 9, 2005 10:43 am, Bart Silverstrim said:
In the /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf file, I added the line:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
Then using tail -f /var/log/maillog, I got the
On Mar 9, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:43:05 AM -0500 Bart Silverstrim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I then ran the commands
postmap /usr/local/etc/postfix/access
Should be:
postmap hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
man (1) postmap
I was running the comman
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:45:34 + (UTC), Christopher Nehren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-03-09, Paul Schmehl scribbled these
> curious markings:
> > Should be:
> > postmap hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
>
> Really? I've updated hash files (not access, but canonical and
> transport) wit
On 2005-03-09, Paul Schmehl scribbled these
curious markings:
> Should be:
> postmap hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
Really? I've updated hash files (not access, but canonical and
transport) without the hash: prefix and they've worked fine. Taking a
look at the top of those files even shows the
On Wed, March 9, 2005 10:43 am, Bart Silverstrim said:
> In the /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf file, I added the line:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
> hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
>
> Then using tail -f /var/log/maillog, I got the error:
> Mar 9 10:28:48 myserver po
--On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:43:05 AM -0500 Bart Silverstrim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I then ran the commands
postmap /usr/local/etc/postfix/access
Should be:
postmap hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/access
man (1) postmap
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The
BSD Mail wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:00:57 +0100, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You don't _need_ to separate them from the system password file, just
give them shell /usr/sbin/nologin, set homedir to /nonexistent, they can
still authenticate to fetch mail. Secondly, if users should re
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:00:57 +0100, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BSD Mail wrote:
> > I have a 5.3 Server. I'm planning to install Postfix.
> > I'm planning to use the Maildir format.
> >
> > I'm going to generate my own SSL certificates for mail
> > and use it for smpts/imaps/pop3s. B
BSD Mail wrote:
I have a 5.3 Server. I'm planning to install Postfix.
I'm planning to use the Maildir format.
I'm going to generate my own SSL certificates for mail
and use it for smpts/imaps/pop3s. But I'm not sure what
to use for authentication. I need to have the mail
users/password seperated
Pat Maddox wrote:
By the way, the problem appears to be solely permissions-based. When
I've got normal-looking permissions on /var/mail, postfix gives that
error, "cannot create file." Courier-IMAP says, "imapd: chdir
javaspot.net/pergesu: No such file or directory" chmod 777 /var/mail
and they
Hi Pat,
Pat Maddox wrote:
By the way, the problem appears to be solely permissions-based. When
I've got normal-looking permissions on /var/mail, postfix gives that
error, "cannot create file." Courier-IMAP says, "imapd: chdir
javaspot.net/pergesu: No such file or directory" chmod 777 /var/mail
a
By the way, the problem appears to be solely permissions-based. When
I've got normal-looking permissions on /var/mail, postfix gives that
error, "cannot create file." Courier-IMAP says, "imapd: chdir
javaspot.net/pergesu: No such file or directory" chmod 777 /var/mail
and they both work fine. B
I got it working, and managed to get courier-imap working as well.
The only problem (big problem?) is that I had to chmod 777 /var/mail
to get it all working together. I'm trying to figure out what
permissions I can give it to ensure that postfix and courier-imap can
work together...but neither o
Hi Pat,
Feb 4 19:57:59 cantona postfix/virtual[579]: CA35333C1D:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=virtual, delay=0, status=deferred
(mailbox /var/mail/vhosts/javaspot.net/pergesu: cannot create file
exclusively: No such file or directory)
Shouldn't PostFix create the vhosts/javaspot.net directory an
On 01/03/05 04:13 PM, artware sat at the `puter and typed:
> Hello,
>
> I seem to be having some issue with saslauthd and postfix on 5.3-R...
> When I try to send mail out, it fails, and puts this in
> /var/log/maillog:
>
> Jan 4 05:56:17 n00330 postfix/smtpd[8103]: warning: SASL
> authenticatio
Might want to send an email to the postfix list on this one... ;)
-Jordan
artware wrote:
Hello,
I seem to be having some issue with saslauthd and postfix on 5.3-R...
When I try to send mail out, it fails, and puts this in
/var/log/maillog:
Jan 4 05:56:17 n00330 postfix/smtpd[8103]: warning: SASL
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
Can anyone tell me whether I have to install/build postfix w/pam support
(if I want it to use pam). Or can I just do a make install of postfix,
as well as of pam_ldap and nss_ldap, edit the appropriate files in
/etc/pam.d/ and it should work?
I have installed map_ldap and
did you also try WITH_MYSQL_VER=4 ?
It's pretty uncommon that one has to include
the minor version if building a port ...
Cristi Tauber schrieb:
Hello people,
I have a little problem setting up postfix with mysql. My ports.cvs
looks like this :
madalina# cat /root/ports.cvs
*default host=c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi freebsd-questions
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Glen Smith wrote:
> Anytime I send email the recipient email looks like this:
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> I'm using a central maildir using NFS and mutt as my email client. If
> I send mail from the server
Hey all. Just following up on the postfix issue.
The startup problem is gone. Works like a charm.
I've come across a new problem though.
Daily & security run mailings aren't getting sent all of a sudden.
They were fine before the startup problems started, but after the
buildworld/installworld
On 11/18/04 08:33 PM, Kjell Midtseter sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Thursday, 18 November 2004 at 10:08:51 -0600, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 November 2004 09:46 am, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > > On 11/18/04 03:31 PM, Kjell Midtseter sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > > When I later
On Thursday, 18 November 2004 at 10:08:51 -0600, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> On Thursday 18 November 2004 09:46 am, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > On 11/18/04 03:31 PM, Kjell Midtseter sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > When I later went through a cvsup/portupgrade sequence, I had to
> > > answer "YES" to t
On Thursday 18 November 2004 09:46 am, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 11/18/04 03:31 PM, Kjell Midtseter sat at the `puter and typed:
> > When I later went through a cvsup/portupgrade sequence, I had to
> > answer "YES" to the question
> > "Would you like to activate Postfix in /etc/mail/mailer.conf [n]
On 11/18/04 03:31 PM, Kjell Midtseter sat at the `puter and typed:
> >
> When I later went through a cvsup/portupgrade sequence, I had to
> answer "YES" to the question
> "Would you like to activate Postfix in /etc/mail/mailer.conf [n]?"
> If you answer "No" you will revert to sendmail.
> Kjekk
AIL PROTECTED]>;
> Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:36:00 -0500 (EST)
> (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> by keyslapper.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAIDa0YY001699
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:36:00 -0500
On 11/17/04 09:47 PM, Andrew L. Gould sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2004 08:36 pm, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > Hey all. I'm having a little trouble with postfix launch at startup
> > in 5.3.
> >
> > At install, I specified postfix as the mta, and had it configured in
> > /et
LeBlanc,
if everything /works as planned/ when you start it as root, I guess you could
add "postfix start" to the /etc/rc.local,
good luck
El Jueves 18 Noviembre 2004 02:36, Louis LeBlanc escribió:
> Hey all. I'm having a little trouble with postfix launch at startup
> in 5.3.
>
> At install, I
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:36:38PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> Hey all. I'm having a little trouble with postfix launch at startup
> in 5.3.
>
> At install, I specified postfix as the mta, and had it configured in
> /etc/mail/mailer.conf. The /stand/sysinstall shell also added the
> following
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 08:36 pm, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> Hey all. I'm having a little trouble with postfix launch at startup
> in 5.3.
>
> At install, I specified postfix as the mta, and had it configured in
> /etc/mail/mailer.conf. The /stand/sysinstall shell also added the
> following to
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:00:35 +0200, Ksenia Marasanova
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need some help with Postfix, but I am asking it here, because I am
> not sure what causes the problem - Postfix or syslog.
Have you tried defining the following (yes, they are the defaults I
know) in
> I may be way off here (probably am) but have you checked the master.cf
> to see if it is running chroot'd.
Nope, no chroot here :(
--
Ksenia
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscrib
> What if you do:
>
> killall -HUP syslogd?
Did it, still the same. I even killend syslogd and started it again,
same result.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> Can you do an ls -all /var/log/maillog and past the output here?
-rw-r- 1 root wheel 58 Nov 12 00:00 /var/log/maillog
--
Ksenia
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, sen
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 07:07 am, Svein Gullby wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
>
> I'm sending you this mail because you've fixed a postfix problem at
> the same stage that I have problems now.
>
>
>
> What ./configure parameters did you use to get Cyrus SASL2 to work
> with MySQL ?
>
>
>
> Mvh
>
> Svein G
Oles Hnatkevych wrote:
Hello all!
There's a FreeBSD box with manually installed postfix-2.1.0.
It works, except that cron can not send execution logs by email.
The "running" user receives a message
This is the Postfix program at host ...
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your mess
--- Volker Kindermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My question is, how to proceed after that ? What
> do I
> > have to do to create the chroot environment. And
> what
> > option I should enclude in the main.cf to make
> postfix
> > start chrooted.
>
> look at master.cf. There you can determine,
> My question is, how to proceed after that ? What do I
> have to do to create the chroot environment. And what
> option I should enclude in the main.cf to make postfix
> start chrooted.
look at master.cf. There you can determine, which postfix service runs chrooted (not
all of them will run chro
Out: 220 xx ESMTP
In: EHLO yy
Out: 250-xx
Out: 250-PIPELINING
Out: 250-SIZE 102400
Out: 250-VRFY
Out: 250-ETRN
Out: 250 8BITMIME
In: MAIL FROM:http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>> SIZE=13414
Out: 452 Insufficient system storage
In: QUIT
Out: 221 Bye
Okay, so the dis
Andy Smith said:
> Hmm, I run postfix in two jails (both hosted on -STABLE), and have
> never had this problem unless I've really been out of disk..
Interesting. Maybe it's been fixed as of late and we didn't notice. I'll take
another look at it when I get the time but I can say with 100% certain
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:53:15PM -0400, Charles Ulrich wrote:
> In normal operation, Postfix makes a system call to check to see if it can
> create a file of a certain size. Inside a jail, this call will not succeed as
> per the very design of jails. Thus, you must use the following one-line patc
adp said:
> This problem seems to be affecting Postfix in a FreeBSD jail, and I haven't
> seen this problem outside of a jail, so I'm trying questions@ first.
>
> I am running postfix-2.0.18,1 (from ports) in a FreeBSD 4.10 system in a
> jail. Everything was fine until recently I moved NFS service
Hello,
just few moments after my posting, I have solved it by running
saslauthd with -r :). Now I have possible conflict in
password (sent password is crypted maybe and stored is in
md5).
--
Martin Hudec| corwin at aeternal.net
| corwin at web.markiza.sk
htt
WOOHOO!!! That did it. I have been struggling with this solid since
wednesday to get this up color me grinnin'!
The final problem that I had was I was specifying the virtual domain
in the user list instead of the base domain of the system, and not
specifying the domain in the smtp login.
Many
Heya Tim
Tim Schutt wrote:
Hey Remko,
Good catch! You were right that postfix didn't have access to the
database. But this is still bizarre now when I do the login, it
doesn't report that it can't access the database, but states that
there are no users in the database.
:-) good
Jul 18 12:40:55
Hey Remko,
Good catch! You were right that postfix didn't have access to the
database. But this is still bizarre now when I do the login, it
doesn't report that it can't access the database, but states that
there are no users in the database.
Jul 18 12:40:55 www postfix/smtpd[21129]: warning:
Tim Schutt wrote:
logfile snip
Jul 18 10:04:16 www postfix/smtpd[20073]: warning: SASL authentication
failure: Could not open db
Jul 18 10:04:16 www postfix/smtpd[20073]: warning: SASL authentication
failure: Could not open db
Jul 18 10:04:16 www postfix/smtpd[20073]: warning: SASL authen
Thanks so much for the reposes, Josh and Paul.
Josh: great article... if nothing else, the errors changed that I was
getting so I can feel hopeful that progress is being made. I wish I
had found that at the beginning of this whole progress, because it
gave about the most logical "recipie" to foll
--On Saturday, July 17, 2004 7:28 PM -0400 Tim Schutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hey People,
ok... My hair is falling out fast enough without me pulling it, so I'm
looking for some help with this:
I've installed postfix and Cyrus SASL on FreeBSD 5.1 and I am having
the worst time getting any auth
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 07:28:39PM -0400, Tim Schutt wrote:
> Hey People,
> ok... My hair is falling out fast enough without me pulling it, so I'm
> looking for some help with this:
> I've installed postfix and Cyrus SASL on FreeBSD 5.1 and I am having
> the worst time getting any authentication to
You'll get better response if you follow the guidelines here:
http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
Modon Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> Is there anyone who can help me with Postfix configuretion under FreeBSD?
> While running the system its says fine.
>
> /usr/local/sbin/postfix reload
>
dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've got a confusion issue, regarding postfix's postmap and when to use
> it. I've read some documentation that suggests you don't need to run it when
> making regexp or pcre map types such as in header_checks, yet the
> header_checks file supplied with postfix 2.1 s
201 - 300 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
