On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:33:49PM -0500, taxman wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
At the risk of being accused of a complainer.
I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have
left me without a useable X system.
Guess it is back to the
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:47:51PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:37 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:33:49PM -0500, taxman wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
At the risk of being accused of a complainer.
I will
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:24:21PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
portupgrade -puf portupgrade
portupgrade -pufr png
portupgrade -pufr fontconfig
portupgrade -pufr libxml2
portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu
Interesting. I
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:24 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
portupgrade -puf portupgrade
portupgrade -pufr png
portupgrade -pufr fontconfig
portupgrade -pufr libxml2
portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu
Interesting. I almost
At 2003-03-03T00:28:21Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The -rR bothers me because it is making a lot of ports that don't need to
be updated.
It was my understand that if `-rR' would upgrade a port, then that port
needs to be upgraded. For a non-FreeBSD perspective, look at Debian:
At 2003-03-02T23:36:45Z, Stijn Hoop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I've succesfully survived XFree, gnumeric, and mozilla upgrades
this way.
Good to know!
I do religiously add any port build options to pkgtools.conf though, so
that I never have to do any 'interactive' portbuild.
I'm a
On Sunday 02 March 2003 05:25 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-03T00:28:21Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The -rR bothers me because it is making a lot of ports that don't
need to be updated.
It was my understand that if `-rR' would upgrade a port, then that
port needs to be
At 2003-03-03T02:19:38Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are basically doing the same thing. A portversion -c would have shown
x, y, and z. When I check the versions, I would have seen that y depended
on x and z. I would specify x and z on the -ruf. This is what I called
an
On Sunday 02 March 2003 07:20 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-03T02:19:38Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are basically doing the same thing. A portversion -c would have
shown x, y, and z. When I check the versions, I would have seen
that y depended on x and z. I would
At 05:15 AM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote:
snip
What portupgrade options are you using? When you do -r, you have to
force -f.
Very interesting. Where is that documented? I just did a quick read through
the portupgrade man page and don't see anything about it. I believe you,
and I'm going to try it
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:55 pm, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 05:15 AM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote:
snip
What portupgrade options are you using? When you do -r, you have
to force -f.
Very interesting. Where is that documented? I just did a quick read
through the portupgrade man page and don't
* Kirk Strauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 2003-03-03T02:19:38Z, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are basically doing the same thing. A portversion -c would have shown
x, y, and z. When I check the versions, I would have seen that y depended
on x and z. I would specify x and
On Saturday 01 March 2003 06:53 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Ok,
I give in.
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:310:in `deorigin': failed to
convert nil into String (Pkg DB::DBError)
After most of two days trying to understand portupgrade, RTFM, and advice
given on this list, I give
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:35:39AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:12:14PM +, Daniel Bye wrote:
Hi all,
I am having problems with portupgrade and related tools on 5.0-RELEASE
on Sparc64. I can't find anything relevant in the archives, nor on
Google, so I
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:12:14PM +, Daniel Bye wrote:
Hi all,
I am having problems with portupgrade and related tools on 5.0-RELEASE
on Sparc64. I can't find anything relevant in the archives, nor on
Google, so I turn to you ;-)
This question has been asked a couple of times on
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:06:33PM -0600, Mike Dean wrote:
I would like to know if there is a way to have portupgrade update all
ports, except a select few that I want to remain frozen
(OpenOffice.org, simply because I no longer have the free space to
rebuild it). It looks like I may be able
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 07:06 pm, Mike Dean wrote:
I would like to know if there is a way to have portupgrade update all
ports, except a select few that I want to remain frozen
(OpenOffice.org, simply because I no longer have the free space to
rebuild it). It looks like I may be able to do
In 1043015655.51041.505.camel@localhost, Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
typed:
Hello,
After a fresh cvsup of my ports tree, I tried to update
jasper-1.500.4 using portupgrade, but it fails with errors below.
The proper way to deal with port build failures is to first make sure
you've
Hello,
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:59, Mike Meyer wrote:
In 1043015655.51041.505.camel@localhost, Stacey Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hello,
After a fresh cvsup of my ports tree, I tried to update
jasper-1.500.4 using portupgrade, but it fails with errors below.
The proper way to
In 1043094762.13652.9.camel@localhost, Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
typed:
Hello,
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:59, Mike Meyer wrote:
In 1043015655.51041.505.camel@localhost, Stacey Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hello,
After a fresh cvsup of my ports tree, I tried to update
There is actually a typo in the patch file for the jasper port. I've
already email the maintainer about it (Don't know if he's emailed me
back, as I've been having email issues since).
Edit
ports/graphics/jasper/files/patch-src-libjasper-include-jasper-jas_types.h
and change:
+typedef log long
I've fixed it 10 hours ago. Thanks for pointing out, BTW.
-Maxim
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:46:26PM -0700, BSD wrote:
There is actually a typo in the patch file for the jasper port. I've
already email the maintainer about it (Don't know if he's emailed me
back, as I've been having email
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 17:15, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Hello,
I've just cvsup'd ports tree and attempted to update
pilot-link-0.11.4 via portupgrade, which fails.
Here's what I've managed to capture off the screen at the end.
Any pointers as to where I could look to fix?
I sent Joe this
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:01:43PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
That upgrade is a doozie. Been there, done that!
rm -fr qt2 is (I think) the correct thing to do (someone else on the
list will correct me).
Then port kde3.
qt2 and qt3 will NOT live comfortably together. So delete qt2 and
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:01:43PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out
of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway,
portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably,
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 07:41 am, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year
out of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-(
Anyway, portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except
for (unsurprisingly)
Brian Astill wrote:
Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I've just spent a fun day upgrading ~180 ports that were about a year out
of date, which will teach me not to be so lazy in future :-( Anyway,
portupgrade coped with most of this mess admirably, except for
(unsurprisingly) the KDE2 -- KDE3
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:28:17PM +0100, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
Hi !
I 'portupgrade -a' my system and figured out that it is
recompiling every new port.
It's taking a vry long time to do so.
Is there a way to specify to portupgrade to get the
compiled package instead of compiling
From the man page:
-P
--use-packages Use packages instead of ports whenever
available.
portupgrade searches the local directories
listed
in PKG_PATH for each package to install or
upgrade
the
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:32:05AM -0800,
paul beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have some perl modules I installed with cpan and portupgrade
| always kicks back these errors: I'm not clear on how to fix the
| missing origin stuff. Anyone got the clue-by-four for me?
|
| !
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I've read somewhere that after a cvsup of my /usr/ports is is wise to
run portsdb -Uu, maybe even followed by a pkgdb -F
Is this really true? Especially portsdb takes quit some time to run, so
if it's ok not to run.. ;-))
There isn't any reason to run pkgdb -F but
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Dick Hoogendijk thusly...
I've read somewhere that after a cvsup of my /usr/ports is is wise to
run portsdb -Uu, maybe even followed by a pkgdb -F
Is this really true? Especially portsdb takes quit some time to run, so
if it's ok not to run.. ;-))
what
Seems that your error is that you just don't have the second tarball of
X source. Try going to ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.2.0/source/
and downloading the second tarball (think it's X420src-2.tgz) and
putting it manually in /usr/ports/distfiles. From what i see, it should
solve the
In an older episode (Friday 18 October 2002 01:32), Andy Knapp wrote:
Seems that your error is that you just don't have the second tarball of
X source. Try going to ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.2.0/source/
and downloading the second tarball (think it's X420src-2.tgz) and
putting it
That worked great, thanks. Can you give me some explanation on why (and
how) this happens, and in what way it messes up?
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 07:35, Adam Weinberger wrote:
try portsdb -fu. the switches are easy enough to remember ::P.
portupgrade dies from time to time, and that command can
From: Tom Carrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Oct 2002 12:56:36 +0100
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That worked great, thanks. Can you give me some explanation on why (and
how) this happens, and in what way it messes up?
When portupgrade is editing/modifying the ports database (not the
package
From: Chip Wiegand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07 Oct 2002 16:01:35 -0700
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to use portupgrade to upgrade freetype2 but am getting this
error:
chip# portupgrade freetype2
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 214
packages found (-0
From: Rahim Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On a whim I used portupgrade today, just to see how it worked and
everything
(this is on a box used mostly for testing) and got the following
errors...
dhcp-849-11# portupgrade -a
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/devel/ruby-fnmatch
cd: can't cd to
Hello Yann Golanski,
Monday, September 23, 2002, 12:39:17 PM, you wrote:
YG I'm running portupgrade to keep all my ports up to date but have come to
YG the following issue.
YG I want to run the latest cvs version of XFree86 -- need it to get the
YG Vaio to have X11 -- but this is not a port.
Rahim Anderson wrote:
On a whim I used portupgrade today, just to see how it worked and everything
(this is on a box used mostly for testing) and got the following errors...
dhcp-849-11# portupgrade -a
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/devel/ruby-fnmatch
cd: can't cd to
On Sep 20 at 17:21, Hanspeter Roth spoke:
Then there's a claim
=== XFree86-libraries-4.2.0_3 depends on shared library: freetype.9 - not found
===Verifying install for freetype.9 in /usr/ports/print/freetype2
I had commented out ports-print from the ports-supfile. Thus the new
S -
pkg_tarup was removed from the ports tree.
pkg_deinstall -f pkg_tarup-1.2_3 portupgrade -f portupgrade-20020920
if you're worried about the functionality of it, note the commit message
given when the port got removed:
Retire pkg_tarup. pkg_create(1) has the feature (-b pkgname)
Thanks for the reply, Adam.
I'll give the procedure a try in a bit, but there's one thing that
perhaps you might be able to explain..,
I'm just curious as to how I was able to portupgrade -R
portupgrade-x.x.x just last night without hitting this issue..,
Thanks again Adam (and to Kevin
At Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:47:19 -0700,
Adam Weinberger wrote:
pkg_tarup was removed from the ports tree.
Correct.
pkg_deinstall -f pkg_tarup-1.2_3 portupgrade -f portupgrade-20020920
But this could be wrong since that version of portupgrade still relies
on pkg_tarup. Simply upgrade
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 14:26, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Hello,
Portupgrade of gnomepilot-0.1.65 fails after cvsup'ing a few
minutes ago. I've included last of the failed upgrade below.
This is fixed now. Please cvsup and try again.
Joe
Here's the uname info:
# uname -a
FreeBSD snip
901 - 945 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
