Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Adam Smith
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 01:15:15PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: > > > > o update from cvs > > # cd /usr/src > > # make update > > o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode > > # cd /usr/obj > > # rm -rf * > > # cd /usr/src > > # make buildworld > >

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Adam Smith
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:12:36PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: > > > >So basically: > > > > o update from cvs > > # cd /usr/src > > # make update > > o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode > > # cd /usr/obj > > # rm -rf * > > # cd /usr/src > > # make

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Adam Smith
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:15:02PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: > Maybe you can disregard that. Looking at "The Complete FreeBSD" I see > that you can just use GENERIC, if you want. So, I typed: Oh! I had just answered, too :-) > make buildworld KERNCONF=GENERIC > > and off it went. > > Any re

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Ed Budd
Peter Risdon wrote: Ed Budd wrote: Oops that should have read: make installworld KERNCONF=MYKERNEL This is the second time I've seen this in this thread. Is the KERNCONF argument meaningful with a make installworld? Peter. lol, no. I shouldn't bother responding to posts when I'm busy doing a h

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Risdon
Ed Budd wrote: Oops that should have read: make installworld KERNCONF=MYKERNEL This is the second time I've seen this in this thread. Is the KERNCONF argument meaningful with a make installworld? Peter. -- the circle squared network systems and software http://www.circlesquared.com _

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Ed Budd
Ed Budd wrote: Curtis Vaughan wrote: o update from cvs # cd /usr/src # make update o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode # cd /usr/obj # rm -rf * # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOURKERNEL o install kernel

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Ed Budd
Curtis Vaughan wrote: o update from cvs # cd /usr/src # make update o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode # cd /usr/obj # rm -rf * # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOURKERNEL o install kernel/world in singl

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Curtis Vaughan
o update from cvs # cd /usr/src # make update o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode # cd /usr/obj # rm -rf * # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOURKERNEL o install kernel/world in single user mode # re

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Risdon
Curtis Vaughan wrote: On 18 Nov, 2004, at 12:12, Curtis Vaughan wrote: So basically: o update from cvs # cd /usr/src # make update o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode # cd /usr/obj # rm -rf * # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make bu

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Curtis Vaughan
Maybe you can disregard that. Looking at "The Complete FreeBSD" I see that you can just use GENERIC, if you want. So, I typed: make buildworld KERNCONF=GENERIC and off it went. Any reason why I wouldn't want to use GENERIC? I haven't compiled anything special for my kernel. On 18 Nov, 2004, at

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-18 Thread Curtis Vaughan
So basically: o update from cvs # cd /usr/src # make update o build world/kernel in your normal or single-user mode # cd /usr/obj # rm -rf * # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOURKERNEL Adam! Sorry to bother you again, but I go

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-17 Thread unixadmin99
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:42:18 -0800, Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone help me with this? Where do I go to get the source code to > put in /usr/src ? Run /stand/sysinstall as root; choose Configure, then Distributions, then src, then ALL. Its all in the Handbook ;) -- ~micha

Fwd: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-17 Thread Curtis Vaughan
Begin forwarded message: From: Adam Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17 November, 2004 16:10:29 PST To: Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:50:03PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: Thanks! You say, go to /usr/src a

Fwd: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-15 Thread Curtis Vaughan
On 08 Nov, 2004, at 17:38, Adam Smith wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 04:49:42PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: Just want to be sure that I do the right thing. So, my version at present is 5.3-BETA1 and I want to install 5.3. I supposed I could just install 5.3 over my current version, but wouldn't an

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-09 Thread messmate
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:08:14 +1030 Adam Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 04:49:42PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: >> Just want to be sure that I do the right thing. >> >> So, my version at present is 5.3-BETA1 and I want to install 5.3. >> I supposed I could just install 5.3

Re: Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-08 Thread Adam Smith
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 04:49:42PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan said: > Just want to be sure that I do the right thing. > > So, my version at present is 5.3-BETA1 and I want to install 5.3. > I supposed I could just install 5.3 over my current version, but > wouldn't an upgrade work just as well? > > F

Upgrading 5.3-Beta1 to 5.3-RELEASE

2004-11-08 Thread Curtis Vaughan
Just want to be sure that I do the right thing. So, my version at present is 5.3-BETA1 and I want to install 5.3. I supposed I could just install 5.3 over my current version, but wouldn't an upgrade work just as well? Finally, want to make sure I have the procedure right:     go to: /usr/local/e