+++ stan [freebsd] [30-01-04 14:31 -0500]:
| On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
| There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9
port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
| -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9)
What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind 8. I have made
the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow delete the existing
bind8, right?
I see the entry in /etc/defaults/mak.conf that instructs the buld process
to not build it, but I already did a make world before
stan writes:
What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind 8. I
have made the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow
delete the existing bind8, right?
Look in /etc/rc.conf - there are variables for the bind program
and command line flags.
You will
January 2004 15:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8
stan writes:
What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind
8. I have
made the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow delete
the existing bind8, right
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9
port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
-DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of differences in
command line arguments.
On Friday 30 January 2004 20:31, stan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install
the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
-DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9)
