On 9/16/11 1:37 PM, David Demelier wrote:
For me, I have tested a lot of client mails and I was always able to
write text under the last message. And even microsoft outlook.
Though your current client does appear to keep you from trimming.
--
--Jon Radel
j...@radel.com
: Please secure your FTP access
On 15/09/2011 23:46, Allen wrote:
Sorry for top posting
I have never understood why people apologise when they top post. Is your
client
mail so bad that you can't move your cursor selector under the last
message?
Preamble: Not making excuses for others' actions
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:03:40 -0700
Devin Teske articulated:
Between Top/Bottom and in-line posting, this thread is getting harder
to read by the minute.
I am not at my Windows machine at the moment; however, I know from past
experience that I CAN enter text, plain or HTML, after the last entry
. wrote:
H! there,
I have seen your site and also got ftp access..
Please secure your ftp acces otherwise anyone can delete your data
Why anyone? even I am also interested in it.. please move your ass
otherwise it will cost you.
If you are not going to fix this problem then I
to be stupid
and no longer allow direct access, instantly making Mutt and Fetchmail
impossible to use anymore, I have to use something else. I miss Mutt and
Fetchmail, but my ISP is acting stupid. So now, I use Thunderbird
sometimes, Opera's Mail client a lot more, and Kamil, and others,
whenever
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
Also many smartphone and tablet mailers automatically top-post, and make
it significantly harder to move the cursor around inside the text with any
accuracy.
This is why I don't deal with email on my Android smartphone. The mail
On Sep 16, 2011, at 17:27, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
Also many smartphone and tablet mailers automatically top-post, and make
it significantly harder to move the cursor around inside the text with any
accuracy.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 06:55:05PM -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 17:27, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:14:42PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
Also many smartphone and tablet mailers automatically top-post, and make
it significantly harder
, highlighted ALL of the text
with a Mouse, and threatened to hit the Delete button on the Keyboard...
This reminds me of that quite a bit lol.
On 9/14/2011 5:57 AM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 21:43 13/09/2011, Sarang. wrote:
H! there,
I have seen your site and also got ftp access..
Please
From: Sarang. sarang.ch...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 3:43 PM
Subject: Please secure your FTP access
Oooh! This big bad but ethical hacker is going to erase all the FTP files
I'm shaking in my boots. Please Mr. Big Bad, don't
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:46:35PM -0400, Allen wrote:
Sorry for top posting but can anyone send this to Computer Stupidities
? It seems to good to waste like this. Anyone who thinks they're a
Hacker yet doesn't know how FTP works is not only funny, it's
entertainment. And also, the web site
On 15 September 2011 21:05, Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:46:35PM -0400, Allen wrote:
Sorry for top posting but can anyone send this to Computer Stupidities
? It seems to good to waste like this. Anyone who thinks they're a
Hacker yet doesn't know how FTP
At 21:43 13/09/2011, Sarang. wrote:
H! there,
I have seen your site and also got ftp access..
Please secure your ftp acces otherwise anyone can delete your data
Why anyone? even I am also interested in it.. please move your ass
otherwise it will cost you.
If you are not going
H! there,
I have seen your site and also got ftp access..
Please secure your ftp acces otherwise anyone can delete your data
Why anyone? even I am also interested in it.. please move your ass
otherwise it will cost you.
If you are not going to fix this problem then I will delete all
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 05), Antonio Olivares said:
Dear folks,
sorry to bother you guys, but I am encountering a problem updating I
need 4 ports only, but can't get past the error above:
Building new INDEX files...
not found, no access)
= Attempting to fetch
ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz
fetch:
ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss
In the last episode (Sep 05), Antonio Olivares said:
Dear folks,
sorry to bother you guys, but I am encountering a problem updating I
need 4 ports only, but can't get past the error above:
Building new INDEX files... done.
=== New version available: ca_root_nss-3.12.11_1
Paul Beard paulbe...@gmail.com wrote:
After some more head scratching, it sounds like what I want is a
bridge. Reading if_bridge(4), the first example looks a lot like
what I am trying to do.
...
Did I misread this? Does sending packets between two physical
interfaces require a bridge?
It
On 08/27/2011 11:08 PM, Paul Beard wrote:
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:48 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
tcpdump(1) is your friend; it seems cryptic and obtuse at first glance,
but it will help immensely
I wasn't sure there was any reason to use that yet: I can't even ping it from
another host.
On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:04 AM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
It is especially useful when you cannot ping, as it can tell you if the
packets are even arriving.
The no route to host result makes me think the packets aren't going far ;-)
The new device and the wired interface are at adjacent numeric
On Aug 28, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Bill Tillman wrote:
I did this to have the experience with it and to have a backup to my Netgear
wireless router. The trouble was the Netgear wireless AP device works so well
and is plenty fast, unlike what I was getting with my FreeBSD server. The
Netgear
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Paul Beard wrote:
One thing that has seemed opaque to me is that both ath0 and wlan0
display when I run ifconfig and look very similar: makes me think they
might be stepping on each other. Or it's just one more thing I don't
understand :-(
In 8.x, a virtual wlan0 device
as an access point, no?
--
Paul Beard
Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
From: Paul Beard paulbe...@gmail.com
To:
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: wireless access point in FreeBSD 8.2p2
On Aug 28, 2011, at 7:04 AM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
It is especially useful when you cannot
to be a wired interface for it to
actually work as an access point, no?
I can only speculate why that's not shown, and I'd guess it's feared
that it would further confuse the reader.
IMO, the wireless section is already so stuffed full of detail that it
obscures the basics. In fairness, it's
On Aug 28, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Warren Block wrote:
IMO, the wireless section is already so stuffed full of detail that it
obscures the basics. In fairness, it's a complicated topic. But I'd much
rather see a simple setup for the 80% use case followed by another section
with all the grimy
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Aug 28 20:41:41 2011
From: Paul Beard paulbe...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:39:41 -0700
To: Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: wireless access point in FreeBSD
I seem to be missing something, possibly from reading too many HOWTOs. What I
am trying to do is get a system with a wireless card to stand in as a wireless
AP should my aging LinkSys base station develop a tragic smoke leak.
It's an ath0-based card and the following steps suggest it should
On 08/28/11 02:21, Paul Beard wrote:
I seem to be missing something, possibly from reading too many HOWTOs. What I
am trying to do is get a system with a wireless card to stand in as a
wireless AP should my aging LinkSys base station develop a tragic smoke leak.
It's an ath0-based card and
mode 11g hostap
status: running
ssid lower channel 8 (2447 MHz 11g) bssid 00:0d:88:93:21:3a
regdomain FCC indoor ecm authmode AUTO privacy OFF txpower 27
scanvalid 60 protmode CTS wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs
This looks correct so far, for an unsecured wireless access point
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:48 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
tcpdump(1) is your friend; it seems cryptic and obtuse at first glance,
but it will help immensely
I wasn't sure there was any reason to use that yet: I can't even ping it from
another host.
wlan0 itself will not assign v4 addresses to
to
other domains.
I don't want to allow a ssh out of a jail to the local node, as that
could allow a compromised jail to jump to the host server - even if only
theoretically.
Both jails need to access the named that runs chrooted on the host
server but may not access remote DNS services
show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-marcel-freebsd...
Cannot access memory at address 0x252d1
(kgdb)
(kgdb)
For all the vmcore files I am getting this output.. Cannot access memory
at address 0x252d1, how can I proceed from here,
How to debug what
show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-marcel-freebsd...
Cannot access memory at address 0x252d1
(kgdb)
(kgdb)
For
all the vmcore files I am getting this output.. Cannot access
memory at address 0x252d1, how can I proceed from here,
How
to debug what is happening
I have a question concerning SSH op a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE server.
Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
I want t o restrict a user to his own home directory.
So that if he connects to the server with SSH he only can go to his own home
dir.
Also the same for sftp...
Thanks for your time
Jack
On 04/05/2011 10:08, Jack Raats wrote:
I have a question concerning SSH op a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE server.
Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
I want t o restrict a user to his own home directory.
So that if he connects to the server with SSH he only can go to his own home
dir.
Also
On 4 May 2011 13:35, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 04/05/2011 10:08, Jack Raats wrote:
I have a question concerning SSH op a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE server.
Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
I want t o restrict a user to his own home directory.
So that if he
Jack Raats j...@jarasoft.net writes:
Hello,
I have a question concerning SSH op a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE server.
Don't know sshd version in 7.4-STABLE, but if higher or equal to 4.8,
the following link could help :
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/590
Regards
Éric Masson
--
C'est
On 4 May 2011 12:47, Balázs Mátéffy repcs...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2011 13:35, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 04/05/2011 10:08, Jack Raats wrote:
I have a question concerning SSH op a FreeBSD 7.4-STABLE server.
Is it possible to limit the SSH access
server.
Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
I want t o restrict a user to his own home directory.
So that if he connects to the server with SSH he only can go to his
own
home dir.
Also the same for sftp...
I believe you will need to install a version of OpenSSH
Wake me up when September ends, freebsd-questions!
2011/05/04 16:47:33 +0100 Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com = To krad :
CR Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
CR Regarding ssh login, I usually use rbash from the ports, that
CR restricts
CR Or you could have a special /bin-restricted
2011/5/4 Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org:
Wake me up when September ends, freebsd-questions!
2011/05/04 16:47:33 +0100 Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com = To krad :
CR Is it possible to limit the SSH access?
CR Regarding ssh login, I usually use rbash from the ports, that
CR restricts
Good morning,
I have installed FreeBSD in a multiboot way on my PC but till now I can't
access my extended partition. Indeed, on my PC I have 4 primary partitions that
I organized like this:
Primary partition 1 : WinRE of windows vista
Primary partition 2 : windows Vista
Primary
Good morning,
I have installed FreeBSD in a multiboot way on my PC but till now I can't
access my extended partition. Indeed, on my PC I have 4 primary partitions that
I organized like this:
Primary partition 1 : WinRE of windows vista
Primary partition 2 : windows Vista
Primary
sofiane chabane wrote:
Good morning,
I have installed FreeBSD in a multiboot way on my PC but till now I can't
access my extended partition. Indeed, on my PC I have 4 primary partitions
that I organized like this:
Primary partition 1 : WinRE of windows vista
Primary partition 2
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:35:10 -0400, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
sofiane chabane wrote:
Good morning,
I have installed FreeBSD in a multiboot way on my PC but till now I can't
access my extended partition. Indeed, on my PC I have 4 primary partitions
that I organized
If you use NAT network setting in vmware or virtualbox or something else in
your win 7. It cannot be access to the virtual server from your host
throught network. You must use bridge network setting in your software.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:37 PM, afiddler10 afiddle...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, I
(a Juniper router). I have
found that after building the base operating system that I cannot remotely
access the virtual Freebsd server. I have tried using both Qemu and VMware
with the same result. It looks to me as though the server has a default
setting that allows it to contact other
operating system that I cannot
remotely access the virtual Freebsd server. I have tried using both Qemu
and VMware with the same result. It looks to me as though the server has
a default setting that allows it to contact other devices (e.g., I can
ping, ftp, telnet, etc., other devices from my
Hi, I am new to the Linux environment. I am trying to build a virtual Freebsd
server to run another virtual device (a Juniper router). I have found that
after building the base operating system that I cannot remotely access the
virtual Freebsd server. I have tried using both Qemu and VMware
remotely access the
virtual Freebsd server. I have tried using both Qemu and VMware with the same
result. It looks to me as though the server has a default setting that allows
it to contact other devices (e.g., I can ping, ftp, telnet, etc., other devices
from my Freebsd server) but I cannot ping
the base operating system that I cannot remotely access the
virtual Freebsd server. I have tried using both Qemu and VMware with the same
result. It looks to me as though the server has a default setting that allows
it to contact other devices (e.g., I can ping, ftp, telnet, etc., other devices
On 13/04/2011 16:37, afiddler10 wrote:
Hi, I am new to the Linux environment. I am trying to build a
virtual Freebsd server to run another virtual device (a Juniper
router). I have found that after building the base operating system
that I cannot remotely access the virtual Freebsd server
remotely access the virtual Freebsd
server. I have tried using both Qemu and VMware with the same result.
It looks to me as though the server has a default setting that allows
it to contact other devices (e.g., I can ping, ftp, telnet, etc.,
other devices from my Freebsd server) but I cannot ping
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:40, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 13/04/2011 16:37, afiddler10 wrote:
snip problem description and sage advice
Edit the file /etc/rc.conf and add the line:
sshd_enable=YES
Then run this command as root:
# /etc/rc.d/sshd start
(you
2011/4/13 afiddler10 afiddle...@yahoo.com
Thank you very much. What I did was set up two interfaces on the VMware
server, one bridged and one routed. I was able to access the routed
interface from my Windows 7 host. Thanks for your help!
You are welcome.
Regards
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider mod_security (/usr/ports/www/mod_security) which
can be set up to ban hosts based on behaviour or characteristics.
Or fail2ban (/usr/ports/security/py-fail2ban) is really great, too, in
that it scans whatever logs
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Be careful of automated responses. What if someone spoofs IP's of legit
users / customers / whatever and your automated response blocks them? Not
good.
Fortunately this is a relatively low risk with fail2ban, because to
Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Gibson
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:58 PM
To: Jorge Biquez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider mod_security (/usr/ports/www/mod_security) which
can be set up to ban hosts based on behaviour or characteristics.
Or fail2ban (/usr/ports/security/py-fail2ban) is really great, too, in
that it scans
-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Gibson
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:58 PM
To: Jorge Biquez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider mod_security (/usr/ports/www
as .htaccess does not work but for now
teh thing is simple, to block a class C, those guys are stupiod and
programmed bad an application (I guess) and are pointing to one of my
domains... since 4 weeks ago I am receiving this kind of access:
189.254.19.93 - - [04/Mar/2011:19:43:48 -0600] OPTIONS
: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
I wonder why nobodies mentioned a quite simple method with tcpwrappers and
hosts.allow / hosts.deny also
Hello.
I guess something simple could work For some reason, don ask me
why becasue I did not find why, the:
Order Deny, Allow
Deny IP
Allow all
To: Jorge Biquez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider mod_security (/usr/ports/www/mod_security) which
can be set up to ban hosts based on behaviour or characteristics.
Or fail2ban (/usr/ports/security/py-fail2ban
Hello all.
I am sorry in advance if this question sounds too stupid.
I have a small server for personal use of webpages running:
7.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-PRERELEASE #0
it is working fine , no problem very stable.
I just need to block some IP class C address that are always trying
to
]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:59 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
Hello all.
I am sorry in advance if this question sounds too stupid.
I have a small server for personal use of webpages running:
7.3
Since you currently have NO firewall, then I would say the simplest method
would be to turn one on, and create an open ruleset allowing all traffic,
then add a filter rule to just block out what you do not want. However,
having said this is the simplest way - it is not the best or even a really
Install a wins server to stop netbios requests and a dhcp server or denying the
dhcp requests won't stop them. Use natd to forward them.
Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
Hello all.
I am sorry in advance if this question sounds too stupid.
I have a small server for personal use of
Ps what log are you reading? Lol
Michael J. Kearney mkear...@nvita.org wrote:
Install a wins server to stop netbios requests and a dhcp server or denying the
dhcp requests won't stop them. Use natd to forward them.
Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
Hello all.
I am sorry in
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:59:59AM -0600, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I am sorry in advance if this question sounds too stupid.
I have a small server for personal use of webpages running:
7.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-PRERELEASE #0
it is working fine , no problem very stable.
I
You might consider mod_security (/usr/ports/www/mod_security) which
can be set up to ban hosts based on behaviour or characteristics.
Or fail2ban (/usr/ports/security/py-fail2ban) is really great, too, in
that it scans whatever logs you want, and can trigger a block in your
firewall if enough
: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Gibson
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:58 PM
To: Jorge Biquez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider mod_security (/usr/ports/www
...
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Gibson
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:58 PM
To: Jorge Biquez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simplest way to deny access to a class C
You might consider
I just can find any solution...
Please help!
thanks..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
(4) in conjunction with the separate IP address, like
tap(4) or lo(4) whic can be aliased.
Then you can provide any kind of internet access for your wine-drunk jail
environment ;-)
Oh, and... you can use the / as a root for your jail. You need to restrict the
access of the application(s) to your
.
--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
I answered this with a To: ports@ + BCC: questions@, to avoid a
double post thread, split the topic, leaving hdd access on
questions, seconding the issue of Non Maintenance of chromium to ports@.
BCC alarmed
I wrote
I suggest for follow up:
Issue: List name:
Get Maintainer To Fix Make po...@freebsd.org
Disc Access ? questi...@freebsd.org
---
From owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Mon Jan 17 21:06:00 2011
To: po
hi there,
i noticed chromium is producing a lot of hdd activity. i think it writes every
1kb of new data directly to disk or so. is there a way to increase chromiums
download buffer somehow. firefox or opera seem to have a much larger download
buffer and write bigger chunks to disk. thus they
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:51:43AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
hi there,
i noticed chromium is producing a lot of hdd activity. i think it writes every
1kb of new data directly to disk or so. is there a way to increase chromiums
download buffer somehow. firefox or opera seem to have a much
machine, change it to
bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my
system.
Then in my virtual machine, I add one line:
ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I
could not get network access
on Ubuntu w/ vBox? They worked for me, I set up an Ubuntu VM and in
the VM setup a test VM of vBox to boot fbsd (8.1 in my case).
NOTE: I do not recoomend setting up a VM within a VM, I did it strictly as a
test to boot and get network access. Which it did
the links I provided on setting up a bridging
device on Ubuntu w/ vBox? They worked for me, I set up an Ubuntu VM and in
the VM setup a test VM of vBox to boot fbsd (8.1 in my case).
NOTE: I do not recoomend setting up a VM within a VM, I did it strictly as a
test to boot and get network access
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are
several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I
need to configure a DHCP server myself? If I need a DHCP server?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
Clipped for brevity.
https://help.*ubuntu*.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking
https://wiki.*ubuntu*.com/VirtualBox
On Dec 9, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
I do not configure a DHCP server. When my FreeBSD 6.0 is booting, there are
several DHCPDISCOVERY messages, finally it shows no DHCPOFFER received. Do I
need to configure
On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
Clipped for brevity.
https://help.*ubuntu*.com/community/VirtualBox/Networking
:
ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I could
not get network access.
If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do need
the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my experiment.
Hope
, which is the physical interface of my
system.
Then in my virtual machine, I add one line:
ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I
could not get network access.
ifconfig_em0=DHCP would only work for the intel adapters
virtual machine, I add one line:
ifconfig_em0=DHCP in /etc/rc.conf file.
I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I
could not get network access.
If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do
need the Bridged mode because one of my machine
On 03/12/2010 09:25, Timm Wimmers wrote:
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
Hi Martes,
I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by
FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel
PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT
Hi,
Thank you so much for your advices. I am using NAT mode now. Just as you said,
there is no need to configure DHCP in /etc/rc.conf. I just choose the Intel
PRO/1000 T Server as my virtual network interface. It works well.
Thank you very much. : )
Best,
W.W.
On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:32 AM,
Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang:
Hi Martes,
I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by
FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel
PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
Thank you so much,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Weihang Wang weih...@vt.edu wrote:
Hi Martes,
I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by
FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option Intel
PRO/1000 T Server and in NAT mode, it works now
Thank you so
03.12.2010 04:03, Weihang Wang wrote:
I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now the guest OS does not have network
access. When using ifconfig, the virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST
III) has no IP address. I have
Hi all,
I am running FreeBSD 8.1 in Virtualbox OSE as a guest OS on Ubuntu. Now the
guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual
ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) has
no IP address. I have configured ifconfig_le0/pcn0=DHCP
On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, Weihang Wang wrote:
Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the virtual
ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST III) has
no IP address.
Have you attempted to select different available network interfaces?
I
.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:55 PM, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, Weihang Wang wrote:
Now the guest OS does not have network access. When using ifconfig, the
virtual ethernet card le0 (when using PCI II) or pcn0 (when using PCnet FAST
III) has no IP address.
Have you
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:02 -0500
Nikolai Wendorf nikol...@embarqmail.com articulated:
All,
I was getting exactly this same error following a fresh 8.1 load
Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL
REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 Sep 25 07:51:22 cyborg kernel:
2010-11-30 11:24, Carmel skrev:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:02 -0500
Nikolai Wendorfnikol...@embarqmail.com articulated:
One can not play audio-cd on freebsd without root access.
No matter what you put in devfs* Tried it since freebsd4*
All,
I was getting exactly this same error following
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:24:36 +0100, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.net wrote:
One can not play audio-cd on freebsd without root access.
No matter what you put in devfs* Tried it since freebsd4*
Not fully true. Maybe the statement ist right along with
the mentioning of on modern systems - where
201 - 300 of 1514 matches
Mail list logo
