On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Loren M. Lang writes:
>
> > Do you mean install a 1440k floppy image onto a disk or just copy a file
> > smaller than 1440k onto the msdos fs of an already formatted floppy.
>
> Specifically, I was trying to generate an installa
Loren M. Lang writes:
> If you were using one of the pre-fabbed floppy images provided by
> freebsd like kern.flp then you would want to write it raw to disk, not
> mount it, and this is forbidden at securelevel 3.
I was trying to do it with dd. I tried the same on my other system (the
one on wh
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:41:10PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski typed:
> Loren M. Lang writes:
> > I don't know why this is, it should still be possible, especially since
> > you can mount cdroms. /dev/fd0 is read/write by root right? And the
> > disk already had a formatted filesystem on it before
Ruben de Groot writes:
> 1 Secure mode - the system immutable and system append-only flags may
>not be turned off; disks for mounted file systems, /dev/mem,
>/dev/kmem and /dev/io (if your platform has it) may not be opened
>for writing; kernel modules (see kld(4)) may
hey
i didn't realize all my users had full access to my homedir!
that kinda sucks, me who thought i had everything private and locked down
what chmod should i set my homedir to then?
and how do i set my system to chmod all new homedirs to that chmod?
t
er, I
will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a
means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build
a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to
root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and
to control the Fr
ertainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a
means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build
a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to
root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and
to control the FreeBSD c
> Matthew,
> Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I
> will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a
> means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build
> a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and t
can't ssh to the box I get the error below
Could not chdir to home directory /home/reports: Permission denied
/usr/local/bin/bash: Permission denied
/home lives in /usr/home so it is able that you overwrote permissions
for that, strangely enough you aren't even allowed to access bash, so
o home directory /home/reports: Permission denied
> > /usr/local/bin/bash: Permission denied
>
> /home lives in /usr/home so it is able that you overwrote permissions
> for that, strangely enough you aren't even allowed to access bash, so it
> seems to me that more happened
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:41:26 +0100
Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1/ What's the best way to partition my second 20MB hard disk?
you mean 20 Gb or something else, no ?
> 2/ Should I dedicate the whole thing to one mount point, say
> called /extra?
yes
> 3/ Do I also need swap space on
On November 22, 2005 09:41 am, Kiffin Gish wrote:
> I installed freeBSD 5.4 on a system with two hard disks, which I plan to
> use as a dedicated fileserver, and following the default sysinstall
> setup I have this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted
>
> I installed freeBSD 5.4 on a system with two hard disks, which I plan to
> use as a dedicated fileserver, and following the default sysinstall
> setup I have this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s1a248M 35M193M1
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:57 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >
> > I installed freeBSD 5.4 on a system with two hard disks, which I plan to
> > use as a dedicated fileserver, and following the default sysinstall
> > setup I have this:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] df -h
> > Filesystem SizeUse
On November 22, 2005 10:05 am, Kiffin Gish wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:57 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > > I installed freeBSD 5.4 on a system with two hard disks, which I plan
> > > to use as a dedicated fileserver, and following the default sysinstall
> > > setup I have this:
> > >
> >
>
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:57 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > >
> > > I installed freeBSD 5.4 on a system with two hard disks, which I plan to
> > > use as a dedicated fileserver, and following the default sysinstall
> > > setup I have this:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] df -h
> > > Filesys
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:05:55 +0100
Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, if it is really only a 20MB drive, I certainly wouldn't
> > break it up at all.
> > But, if it is really 20GB or something like that - your ad0 looks
> > like it is a nominal 36GB or maybe a 40 GB - then it really
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 10:14 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:57 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I installed freeBSD 5.4 on a system with two hard disks, which I plan to
> > > > use as a dedicated fileserver, and following the default sysinstall
> > >
Thanks to an unfortunate turn of events, we are hosting a website for a client
that should have been hosted externally. Now he wants FTP access to a
directory on the server. I don't want to install an FTP program, and we
don't use password authentication for SSH, so I'm going
y, June 02, 2004 11:51 AM
To: Luke Kearney
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Access Windows share from FreeBSD
Thanks, that worked. Guess I can login as root, mount, then log in as a
normal user.
Thanks!
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Luke Kearney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wedne
- Original Message -
From: "Dustin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:17 PM
Subject: RE: Access Windows share from FreeBSD (Cannot write)
> I'm able to read from the smb share but I cannot write to it.
My network seems to be fine, yet I can't access distfiles. Anyone
have any ideas?
thanks
___
Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!"
Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson
PGP.sig
Descrip
ening. I have a FreeBSD server that is running Samba. When users
> access directories that store lots of files (3k or so), access to the
> files is very slow. I'm guessing that it is a file system issue. I'd
> like to troubleshoot the problem but I don't know where t
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:13:43 -0800
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Do you have UFS_DIRHASH in your kernel? If you don't, or if you added
> it after the disk was already populated, you'll see the benefits if
> you dump, wipe and restore the disk.
Could you elaborate on that? My im
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:34:25PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:13:43 -0800
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Do you have UFS_DIRHASH in your kernel? If you don't, or if you added
> > it after the disk was already populated, you'll see the benefits
have a FreeBSD server that is running Samba. When users
access directories that store lots of files (3k or so), access to the
files is very slow. I'm guessing that it is a file system issue. I'd
like to troubleshoot the problem but I don't know where to start. (In
the mean time
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:49:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:34:25PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:13:43 -0800
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Do you have UFS_DIRHASH in your kernel? If you don't, or if yo
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:32:10AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:49:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:34:25PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:13:43 -0800
> > > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
MB> pflog0: flags=0<> mtu 33208
MB> Thank you for all!!!
MB> Mauricio
MB> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:22:33 +0100, Hexren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Hi to all!
>>
>> >I can´t access to a box from the internet, using ssh.
>>
>> ---
MB> Hexren:
MB> The pocess of PID 212 is ppp:
MB> server:~ $ ps auxw|grep 212
MB> root212 0.0 0.8 3240 2112 ?? Ss5:53PM 0:00.43 ppp
MB> -ddial default
MB> mauro 687 0.0 0.4 1472 892 p0 S+6:48PM 0:00.00 grep 212
MB> serv
outer_enable="NO" in rc.conf, i cant access my box from outside, and
MB> this time is not a dyndns related issue. I don´t have idea that what
MB> could be the cause of this situation. Does it seems familiar to you???
MB> Thank you for all your help!!!
MB> Mauricio.
---
I have noted success stories from some who have installed FreeBSD on Compaq
Laptops similar to mine: Compaq Armada 7400, 6.2 gig drive, 128 mb RAM.
I purchased the 5.3 (2) CD, (1) DVD set and have tried multiple times to
use CD 1
to install. All attempts fail after providing these message:
Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
How could I afford that i can get always access to my remote server even
in the case of a breakin by some script kiddie/hack? I thought about
setting a key in ssh so i can log using it even the root password is
changed, but this is simple to stop and it'
with Apache that I would recommend that
you read the Apache manual. I would go so far as setting an IP alias
on the interface and limiting the networks that can access the script.
Or just lock the shell access correctly.
Erik
On 7/5/05, Matt Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
Matt Juszczak wrote:
We're an ISP, and we are currently looking for a way for our tech
support guys to access customer's email without having shell access to
the server, or knowing the customer's password.
We'd like to install a custom webmail client on our private int
On 7/5/05, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Juszczak wrote:
> > We're an ISP, and we are currently looking for a way for our tech
> > support guys to access customer's email without having shell access to
> > the server, or knowing the cust
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Juszczak
>Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:57 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Remote access to a user's mail spool
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>We're an
Disk access problem with 5.3 install from CD
John.Dutcher at excellus.com John.Dutcher at excellus.com
Thu Feb 3 07:37:03 PST 2005
* Previous message: questions about extra logging
* Next message: /dev/ttyd0 as an Input Device Works on some
Systems but not others
Hi All,
I was browsing through my log files and noticed that
someone (or many people) is trying to gain illegal
access to my server (see snippet from log files
below).
The below log file clearly indicates someone trying to
hackaway at my personal server.
I performed the following steps:
nmap
What can be done to access a file system that seems to have the boot
sector screwed up?
The /usr files should be ok but how to access?
I get errors that the file system is full and I have no idea of how to
deal with the boot up - the help message is no help!
Boot says it cannot find a kernel
,
in your opinion, is the preferred way to do things in order to set up
an internal network which can access the outside internet directly.
If so, can someone give me a really minimal yet secure packet filter
rule set that would do the job? (I'm prepared to read the pf docs,
which will take me a
I was brave enough to find out that logging on hostapd was going to
/var/log/messages. I see this there after trying to start hostapd
using the /etc/rc.d/ script:
Sep 6 17:39:12 speedy kernel: ieee80211_load_module: load the
wlan_xauth module by hand for now.
Sep 6 17:39:12 speedy hostapd: ath0
I added this to /boot/loader.conf:
wlan_xauth_load="YES"
After a complete reboot of my system I get this line in /var/log/messages:
Sep 6 17:46:47 speedy kernel: ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset
channel 6 (2437 Mhz, flags 0x490 hal flags 0x150), hal status 12
Not sure if this is something t
Hi,
0) Always mention OS version, bonus points for uname -a.
On Monday 07 September 2009 02:27:04 Nerius Landys wrote:
> I am following the Handbook instructions for setting up a FreeBSD
> wireless host access point:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-wireless.h
> 0) Always mention OS version, bonus points for uname -a.
nlan...@speedy# uname -a
FreeBSD speedy.i 7.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p7 #0: Thu Aug 6
06:05:47 PDT 2009 r...@speedy.i:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>> r...@speedy# dmesg | grep ath
>> ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, A
How full are the disks?
Jin Guojun wrote:
A 6-7 years old Xeon dual 2.4MHz CPU machine runs FreeBSD 6.4-Release
suddenly becomes
slow on some tasks requiring disk access. Typical things like ls,
objdump etc. Be more specific, a couple of minutes objdump became a
several hours job.
A several
My logs show a dictionary attack of invalid user names against port 22. I
obtained an ab...@* email address using 'whois' and reported the beginning
and ending date/times and the originating IP address.
Is there any other information I need to send?
i don't think so.
anyway - if all password a
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Andrew Gould wrote:
What information should I send to an ab...@* address when reporting a
break-in attempt?
My logs show a dictionary attack of invalid user names against port
22.
So source of these is almost always some other compromised Unix-like
system.
ire log with the data that pertained to the user in question;
however, that just proved a waste of time.
If you are using 'passwords' to access your account, you might want to consider
using certificates instead. That is far safer than using a password that
eventually can be crack
ns that you might want to install that can help.
> Personally, I have found reporting the abuse virtually useless. I use to
> just include the entire log with the data that pertained to the user in
> question; however, that just proved a waste of time.
>
> If you are using 'passwo
blocking huge netblocks with your firewall (possibly causing
a denial of service on legitimate hosts), it's easier and more resource
friendly to create access rules that deny by default in ANY case. (Those
who provide transit or hosting services can obviously ig
DAve wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today. We
have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to have a
unique login to the same apache site root.
That would be a unique FTP login, again, my mind is toast today.
DAve
I
DAve wrote:
> Good afternoon all,
>
> I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today. We
> have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to have a
> unique login to the same apache site root.
>
> I am not even certain that is possible. Anyone have any ideas? This i
DAve wrote:
> DAve wrote:
> > Good afternoon all,
> >
> > I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today.
> > We have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to
> > have a unique login to the same apache site root.
>
> That would be a unique FTP login, again, m
Maciej Suszko wrote:
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I have a strange request and mind is just not up to the task today.
We have a client who wants each web developer (there are four) to
have a unique login to the same apache site root.
That would be a unique FTP login, again, my
> I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
> I get brute force ssh attacks.
>
> HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
>
> # Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
> # need to do it, here's how
> #sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : d
David Southwell wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny
Why is it
On 1/11/10, David Southwell wrote:
>> I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
>> I get brute force ssh attacks.
>>
>> HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
>>
>> # Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if yo
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:18:04AM -0700, Tim Judd wrote:
> On 1/11/10, David Southwell wrote:
> >> I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
> >> I get brute force ssh attacks.
> >>
> >> HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
> >>
>
Tim Judd wrote:
I've been meaning to check this out. My firewall ssh rules are very
strict, in fact, if the remote IP is "unknown" meaning, I don't know
where the heck it's coming from, it's blocked. It's easier to say it
this way: I allow ssh connections from IPs I know, preferably static
IP
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny
Why i
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:25:04PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
> > I get brute force ssh attacks.
> >
> > HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
> >
> > # Wrapping ssh
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
> I'm very grateful for all advice, but I'm still unsure
> why denying ssh access to a particular host via /etc/hosts.allow
> is a bad idea.
As far as I recall, the reason the warning was added to the manual was
that it's fairly heavy on res
Samuel Martín Moro
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:25:04PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
> > > I get brute force
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
> I get brute force ssh attacks.
>
> HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
>
> # Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
> # need to
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
This is a returning topic, search the archives. Anyway, the returning
answer:
- why not let your firewall do the blocking? If your blocking is IP
based that's the plac
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
> > I get brute force ssh attacks.
>
> This is a returning topic, search the archives. Anyway, the returning
> an
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
- why not let your firewall do the blocking? If your blocking is IP
based that's the place to block.
I'm already under the University firewall. Only port 22 is let through.
But even that filles my logs.
What I meant was that if you want to block IPs or ranges of IPs
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:36:11PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> >> - why not let your firewall do the blocking? If your blocking is IP
> >> based that's the place to block.
> >
> > I'm already under the University firewall. Only port 22 is let through.
> > But even
" my disks
"excessively". This might be something like:
dd if=/dev/null of=/some/file bs=1M count=4k
plus
parallel disk accesses by mail and news server.
If I omit all parallel disk access those dd's will run to completion
without reboots, always.
It might well be that
n the handbook wireless section that I saw.
Anyway, I want to run it as an access point, not a client. The ral
driver supports this, but I'm not sure on the rc.conf synax for
creating an access point out of it. Could anyone point to some
access-point-like examples?
Thanks
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:48 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> This looks correct so far, for an unsecured wireless access point. The
> wlan0 device is the interface you will use for communicating; the ath0
> device exists solely as a target for wlan0 creation.
After some more head scrat
Paul Beard wrote:
> After some more head scratching, it sounds like what I want is a
> bridge. Reading if_bridge(4), the first example looks a lot like
> what I am trying to do.
> ...
> Did I misread this? Does sending packets between two physical
> interfaces require a bridge?
It requires eith
If your permissions are set to 644 on the directories, this is the result
of 'ls'. After changing the directories permissions to 755, the
'Permission denied' errors will stop.
>
>
> ezjail-admin console fixit
>
> ...shows the /mx1/maillog* files al
iddaviddaviddavid
2 262080 3861 3147 18:39:30 no-entry 18:39:30
Semaphores:
T ID KEY MODEOWNERGROUPCREATOR CGROUP
NSEMS OTIMECTIME
%
Is this (inability to access IPCS resources properly within
I am using FreeBSD 8.1 / amd64 with Platform Version 4.5.1 (KDE 4.5.1)
if that matters.Before updating my system to FreeBSD 8.1 / amd64, I had
the 7.3 /32 bit version installed. I completely erased the HD prior to
installed the newer version so as to eliminate any accumulated garbage
that might be
Sounds like a bogus error to me. I just downgraded amd64 to i386,
reinstalled a linux program and it claims it can't write to ~ now.
I'm running it, and I have no reason to think it wouldn't run as me.
~ is 775 anyway. Also, running the linux program as su or sudo gives
the same error. Any ideas
Chen Xu wrote:
$cmd 100 divert natd ip from any to any in via $pif
$cmd 101 check-state
You use "in via $pif", I'm not 100% sure but I think you should only use
"via $pif".
# Authorized inbound packets
$cmd 421 allow tcp from any to 192.168.1.10 80 in via $pif setup limit
src-addr 5
Hi Christer,
I followed the example from the handbook. Yes, it is OK to divert in and
out separately. skipto is used to point to the divert out rule number
when it is outbound.
I run into problem only when with natd to redirect from gateway to local
machine. tcpdump shows that packets of both di
I am not even sure that it is related to freebsd, but maybe someone could
point out the problem.
We wanted to upgrade our hosting server from
FreeBSD 6.2, 3ware 8506-4LP SATA RAID, raid 5
to
FreeBSD 7.1 (RC for now), 9550SXU-4LP, raid 10
We have tested the new installation on ASUS P5K WS motherb
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 03:54:00PM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
> Hello,
>I've got a FreeBSD box that i have a user on who needs special console
> access. I've given him access to what is required, but i do not want him to
> be able to log in from the internet via ssh,
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:54:00 -0500
"Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've got a FreeBSD box that i have a user on who needs special
> console access. I've given him access to what is required, but i do
> not want him to be able to log in from t
in this machine ) I am getting an error " refused the connection
The server may be busy Or may have a network connection problem in mY
browser window , but using this browser I can able to access all internet
sites and search engines .
Second thing , I installed Zope29via /usr/
in this machine ) I am getting an error " refused the connection
The server may be busy Or may have a network connection problem in mY
browser window , but using this browser I can able to access all internet
sites and search engines .
Second thing , I installed Zope29via /usr/
in this machine ) I am getting an error " refused the connection
The server may be busy Or may have a network connection problem in mY
browser window , but using this browser I can able to access all internet
sites and search engines .
Second thing , I installed Zope29via /usr/
[partners_stgeorge_logo2.gif]
Unauthorized Access
In the last fews weeks, our Online Banking Security team has
observed multiple logons on your internet banking account, from
different blacklisted IP's, therefore been blocked,to prevent
further unauthorized a
Tino Engel schrieb:
Dear all,
I am currently trying to get my mp3-player to work with freebsd.
FreeBSD freebsdangel.de 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #1: Sun Nov 18
15:40:16 CET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
When attaching the device to an usb-port I receive an
gt;8>8
Is there anyway to access this information from FreeBSD also, hmm... ?
TIA
--
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/
·-- ·- ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
How can I access /stand directory in FreeBSD 6.2 using postinstall
script of the customerized package? I can do that in Freebsd 5.3.
Thanks.
Douglas Song
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Bob wrote:
Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log
records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect
requests and get
requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can
turn on to stop my s
On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Bob wrote:
> Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log
> records. To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect
> requests and get
> requests to other URL's. Is there some configuration option I can
> turn
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Bob wrote:
I all ready have Apache mod_proxy commented out in httpd.conf and
there is
no php stuff installed in system.
Your logfile lines seemed to be oddly truncated, so it's a bit hard
to tell, but it sure seemed like some of the requests you showed were
g
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log
> records.
> To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and get
> requests to other URL's.
>
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:54:47 -0400 "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running FBSD 6.2 + apache 13. In the apache access log I see these log
> records.
> To me it looks like my apache server is servicing connect requests and
get
> requests to other URL's.
>
your apache config it would be easier to figure out what
you allow or not. To make it simpler, the DEFAULT config in apache (with no
mod_proxy) is quite secure wrt access to / .
> You wrote "because I disallow 'no referrer'
> plus 'no browser' ("-" "
e to know how do you disallow 'no referrer' and 'no
browser'? Is this a server configuration
issue? I have not seen mention of this in texts on Apache, nor the
manual. And queries of the
Apache mailing list yielded indistinct results. I am not running a
proxy on the public server.
g a request for "\x04\x01", this is not a valid
> > request in first place.
>
> maybe if you show us your apache config it would be easier to figure out what
> you allow or not. To make it simpler, the DEFAULT config in apache (with no
> mod_proxy) is quite sec
l
Require valid-user
Now the access log shows this
61.228.120.228 - - [17/Jun/2007:22:42:49 -0400] "CONNECT 66.196.97.250:25
HTTP/1.0" 500 602 "-" "-"
And the error.log shows this
[Sun Jun 17 22:42:49 2007] [crit] [client 61.228.120.228] configurati
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 23:14:36 Ross Penner wrote:
> I currently have a FreeBSD machine that acts as a router and
> fileserver for my local home network. I'm hoping to set up a wireless
> access point so I don't have to steal my neighbour's wireless. The PC
> I'
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
hello,
I am Running FreeBSD 7.0, I am trying to gain console access to my
Extreme Networks Switch, the command cu -l /dev/cuad0 -s 9600 , Says
Connected and then does nothing What am I doing Wrong?
I have a Straight through serial cable connected to com1, Does
901 - 1000 of 1466 matches
Mail list logo
