-Original Message-
From: Dan MacMillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:04 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Danny MacMillan
Cc: Nell Weems; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Sapir-Whorfian Advertising Clause (was Advertising
clause in license)
From: Ted
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:50:13PM -0600, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Nell,
Just a request, please do not use the term advertising clause
This is a term that was created by the Linux bigots, specifically
people like RMS who is so bigoted he can't see beyond the tip
of his nose. It has
.
The original term out of the license was not advertising clause. The
original term, right out of the license, was acknowledgement
The GPL crowd found themselves sounding like a bunch of ungrateful
spoiled brats when they originally tried telling people the BSD license
was bad because it had a clause
Hello all,
after typing:
fgrep -r All advertising materials /usr/src/sys
it seems like there are still many files which
contain the advertising clause. has there been any
attempts to contact the copyright authors of these
files and see if it can be removed?
not too much of a deal, i was just
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:35:51PM -0700, Nell Weems wrote:
Hello all,
after typing:
fgrep -r All advertising materials /usr/src/sys
it seems like there are still many files which
contain the advertising clause. has there been any
attempts to contact the copyright authors of these
without, and there is no reason to use
it.
Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nell Weems
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: advertising clause in license
Hello all,
after typing
