On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
Seems that neither core and core2 are fully supported. Which
CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
omitted without problems?
I've used core successfully for years. Did you clean any potential
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 04:38:39AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
Seems that neither core and core2 are fully supported. Which
CPUTYPE should be used for Intel
BROOKTREE_SYSTEM_DEFAULT=BROOKTREE_PAL
options BKTR_USE_PLL
options BKTR_GPIO_ACCESS
options BKTR_USE_FREEBSD_SMBUS
I also have the dependencies (smbus) for this device added.
Is there a known problem with this (admittedly oldfashioned)
hardware on 8-STABLE/amd64 I should know
On 6/18/2011 9:38 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytroponfree...@edvax.de wrote:
Seems that neither core and core2 are fully supported. Which
CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
Le Tue, 10 May 2011 19:41:35 +0200,
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org a écrit :
Well if I still have crash, I will try with a 32 bits version.
For the record, the box was not stable at all running amd64 and works
perfectly in i386. I don't know why
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:02:47PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
Does anyone know why the x11/nvidia-driver port has not been updated?
Frequent ENOTIME on my side to perform all required testing. :-(
The latest version is 270.41.06 according to the nVidia page:
I've updated the port few minutes ago.
On all of my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes LibreOffice 3.3.X crashes
after starting and dumping core with signal 8. The boxes are all FreeBSD
9.0-CURRENT/amd64, the most recent version. The ports are up to date, I
also tried to recompile every necessary port without success.
On all FreeBSD
on 18/05/2011 12:10 O. Hartmann said the following:
---
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
On Tue, 10 May 2011 20:19:06 -0500, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
You should try the devel version.
I'll consider it, but I rarely use Firefox and furthermore Chromium and
Opera don't use nspluginwrapper and have the same issue. This makes me
think it has nothing to do with
On Wed, 11 May 2011 10:14:47 -0500
Mark Felder f...@feld.me articulated:
On Tue, 10 May 2011 20:19:06 -0500, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br
wrote:
You should try the devel version.
I'll consider it, but I rarely use Firefox and furthermore Chromium
and Opera don't use nspluginwrapper and
Hi,
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator + nvidia
driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box freeze (no
panic).
Are there some known problems with this kind of configuration on
amd64? (Works fine on my old laptop using 8.2/i386)
I don't know where
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:31:53 -0500, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator + nvidia
driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box freeze (no
panic).
I've previously reported this to freebsd-emul
Le Tue, 10 May 2011 11:55:06 -0500,
Mark Felder f...@feld.me a écrit :
Hello,
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator +
nvidia driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box
freeze (no panic).
I've previously reported this to freebsd-emul and probably
В Tue, 10 May 2011 17:31:53 +0200
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org пишет:
Hi,
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator +
nvidia driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box
freeze (no panic).
Are there some known problems with this kind
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote:
В Tue, 10 May 2011 17:31:53 +0200
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org пишет:
Hi,
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator +
nvidia driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 15:21:07 Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote:
В Tue, 10 May 2011 17:31:53 +0200
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org пишет:
Hi,
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator
:
Hi,
I've got a new box running 8.2-stable with amd64 + linuxulator +
nvidia driver. Quite often when watching video on youtube the box
freeze (no panic).
Are there some known problems with this kind of configuration on
amd64? (Works fine on my old laptop using 8.2
On Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:39 -0500, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
Are you guys using nspluginwrapper-devel?
Hi Mario,
It happens to me with Opera, Chromium (from chromium.hybridsource.org),
and with Firefox via regular nspluginwrapper.
Regards,
Mark
On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:30:04 -0400
Pierre-Luc Drouin pldro...@gmail.com articulated:
I am using the non-devel version of nspluginwrapper. On my system,
flash causes firefox to hang for maybe 10-20 seconds sometimes, but
this resolves by itself... I think the problem that was originally
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 20:09:37 Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:39 -0500, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
Are you guys using nspluginwrapper-devel?
Hi Mario,
It happens to me with Opera, Chromium (from chromium.hybridsource.org),
and with Firefox via regular
On 4/16/11, Ricardo Gomez ricardo.gomez...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attempting to run freebsd on a macbook 5, 1. I installed using dvd1 and
everithing went fine. The only problem is that my
builtin wireless is a bcm432b which is PITA to make work in any
non-propietary system.I know for other
I am attempting to run freebsd on a macbook 5, 1. I installed using dvd1 and
everithing went fine. The only problem is that my
builtin wireless is a bcm432b which is PITA to make work in any
non-propietary system.I know for other bcm43xx cards there
is the bwi driver, but mine isn't supported.
Hi List,
I have been using FreeBSD for a number of years and love it. I have a
friend who is competent it linux and wanted me to help him get started
with BSD.
He has an amd64 opteron dual core 2GHz w/ 4G memory. Not realising we
installed the i386 version of freebsd 8.0 and upgraded to 8.2
Could you provide us this message?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:08 AM, David Collins davidcollins...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi List,
I have been using FreeBSD for a number of years and love it. I have a
friend who is competent it linux and wanted me to help him get started
with BSD.
He has an amd64
Hi, Alan Cox
Thanks for your reply. I want to know why the NKPT set to 32 in
revision187465,
is it possible that set NKPT less or lager than 32? What's the limitation if
set NKPT to 32?
I also guess the KPTphys[] not used in kernel initialization on amd64 in
revision187465. And
I notice
Hi, Alan
I'm study the Revision 187465 : Prepare for a larger kernel virtual
address space. After read some relative source code, I have an question
about the macro NKPT on amd64: why 32 is enough for the kernel page table
pages? Do it means that the range (KERNBASE, virtual_avail) should
On 03/30/2011 01:47, fuzhli wrote:
Hi, Alan
I'm study the Revision 187465 : Prepare for a larger kernel virtual
address space. After read some relative source code, I have an
question about the macro NKPT on amd64: why 32 is enough for the
kernel page table pages? Do it means that the range
Hi,
I have looked at archives but with no output.
I am running freebsd7.2 amd64 as a virtual machine(VM) in vmware ESX
server. I have configured remote gdb to debug the kernel modules. My
problem is that whenever the breakpoint is hit and the I issue next or
step kernel panics with double
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Jim Trigg jtr...@spamcop.net wrote:
I do an installation from DVD on AMD64, and when I reboot it hangs
before displaying anything from the standard boot loader. How can I
debug this?
I found my problem by accident -- I had a badly formatted USB stick
connected
I do an installation from DVD on AMD64, and when I reboot it hangs
before displaying anything from the standard boot loader. How can I
debug this?
Thanks,
Jim Trigg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Feb 6, 2011, at 2:14 AM, kellyremo wrote:
http://devcentral.f5.com/weblogs/macvittie/archive/2011/01/31/dispelling-the-new-ssl-myth.aspx
according to the SSL Performance table it says that the transactions per
second is 2-3 times better using 64bit kernels opposite to 32bit kernels?
is
http://devcentral.f5.com/weblogs/macvittie/archive/2011/01/31/dispelling-the-new-ssl-myth.aspx
according to the SSL Performance table it says that the transactions per
second is 2-3 times better using 64bit kernels opposite to 32bit kernels?
is this true, or i am just misunderstanding
The wiki page seems to say that wine is a 32-bit port, and 32-bit
ports do not work well on amd64. This would imply that 32-bit Windows
programs would not run on 32-bit wine on a FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 system.
Is this a correct interpretation?
Does anyone know if there are any plans to get 32 or 64
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:02:58AM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote:
The wiki page seems to say that wine is a 32-bit port, and 32-bit
ports do not work well on amd64. This would imply that 32-bit Windows
programs would not run on 32-bit wine on a FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 system.
Is this a correct
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Xn Nooby xno...@gmail.com wrote:
The wiki page seems to say that wine is a 32-bit port, and 32-bit
ports do not work well on amd64. This would imply that 32-bit Windows
programs would not run on 32-bit wine on a FreeBSD 8.1 amd64 system.
Is this a correct
On 12/16/2010 06:42 PM, Matej Šerc wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all the
years of using different versions of FreeBSD.
Maybe you are experiencing this:
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-10:02.sched_ule.asc
I'm not sure however if
On 16 December 2010 17:42, Matej Šerc matej.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all the
years of using different versions of FreeBSD.
One of our servers, which was running without any issues until yesterday,
stopped responding for
On 17 December 2010 13:47, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 December 2010 17:42, Matej Šerc matej.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all the
years of using different versions of FreeBSD.
One of our servers, which was running
Hi,
thank you very much for all the answers and ideas. We have found out that
after the server was moved to different switch in the co-location centre the
network interface and the switch auto-negotiated at the 10 Mbit Full Duplex
mode. After setting it to GBit manually, everything seems to be
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all the
years of using different versions of FreeBSD.
One of our servers, which was running without any issues until yesterday,
stopped responding for two times now - yesterday and today. About three days
ago another process
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:26:56PM -0600, Steve Randall wrote:
2010/12/5 jo...@jodocus.org:
Hi
I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads
(I'm
using a custom kernel, so
All watchpoints are software.
How can I troubleshoot?
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
2010/12/5 jo...@jodocus.org:
Hi
I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads
(I'm
using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded
manually)
It then claims it can't mount
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:53 +0100
jo...@jodocus.org wrote:
2010/12/5 jo...@jodocus.org:
Hi
I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads
(I'm
using a custom kernel, so at this point
On 06.12.2010 3:11, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and
utility that rolls up support for many partitioning formats
(MBR, BSD, GPT etc.) into a single code base.
...
NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kernel
Hi
I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads (I'm
using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded
manually)
It then claims it can't mount /
One thing that's odd is that instead
2010/12/5 jo...@jodocus.org:
Hi
I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads (I'm
using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded
manually)
It then claims it can't mount
David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Here : http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html
GEOM_PART becomes the default slicer
Status: Committed to -CURRENT
Will appear in 8.0: sure
Author: Marcel Moolenaar others
Web: commit message
GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM
Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru wrote:
NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the
kernel doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes.
In other words, bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART.
Does this mean that, in 8.1-RELEASE, bsdlabel/disklabel will
On 06.12.2010 10:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Thanks, that's what I had hoped (but had noticed a few things lately
that had me wondering whether they might perhaps not be working
entirely _correctly_ -- I need to do some more experimentation).
The next question then is, when _does_ the
On 30 November 2010 01:48, Leon Meßner l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.dewrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare
minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers
I set a wrong cc . Please look over to -stable.
Sorry for that,
Leon
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:10:18PM +, krad wrote:
On 30 November 2010 01:48, Leon Meßner l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.dewrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
I've been running
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:06:54PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
I've been running dovecot 1.1 on FreeBSD 7.x for a while with a bare
minimum of NFS problems, but it got worse with 8.x. I have 2-4 servers
(usually just 2) accessing mail on a Netapp over NFSv3 via imapd.
delivery is via
I got three FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64 servers running acting as OpenLDAP
servers and clients. On one box every cleint out of the
openldap-sasl-client suite crashes as well as slapd itself. On all three
boxes we use identical installations, the OS is mostly identical (most
recent FreeBSD 8.1
# uname -a
FreeBSD fbsdam3.my.domain 8.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 #1: Sat Oct 16
21:23:09 EDT 2010 r...@fbsdam3.my.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AM3 amd64
fbsdam3# which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
fbsdam3# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation
looked at questions back to the beginning of august.
on aug_09 i found a thread that suggests the following questions.
i have, since, examined subject_lines back to the beginning of june.
i have researched other places, also.
You might want to just use i386 and amd64 instead of making up your
,
am i restricted to 8 32_bit registers and 32_bit pointers,
notwithstanding its installation on an intel_64 platform ?
next, from what i have been reading,
those releases whose names contain amd64 not only are for amd cpus, but,
also,
are for the intel_64 variant [ no doubt
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, spellberg_robert email...@emailrob.com wrote:
q: if i install an amd64 version on an intel_64 platform,
am i restricted to 16 64_bit registers and 48_bit pointers or
can i compile for both cpu_models
[ perhaps, with nothing more
hmmm ..., you did not answer the question that i asked.
per your statement, on i386, amd64 or both ?
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, spellberg_robert email...@emailrob.com wrote:
q:if i install an amd64 version on an intel_64 platform,
am i restricted
that i asked.
per your statement, on i386, amd64 or both ?
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM, spellberg_robert email...@emailrob.com
wrote:
q: if i install an amd64 version on an intel_64 platform,
am i restricted to 16 64_bit registers and 48_bit pointers
the processor has 64 bit
capability. The restriction you are asking about here would be as a result
of using a 32 bit OS and not because of processor capabilities.
next, from what i have been reading,
those releases whose names contain amd64 not only are for amd cpus,
but, also
In the last episode (Oct 04), David Brodbeck said:
On a 64-bit system, if you build a binary with the -m32 flag, it
should run on both i386 and x86-64 systems. A binary built with -m64
will only run on x86-64. Does that help?
Actually, -m32 on amd64 won't generate usable binaries, since
/usr
aha !
this relates to what i found in machine/types.h,
on my existing i386 version of freebsd on my intel_64 hardware platform.
i will look into the questions archive.
meanwhile, back at the ranch,
does this mean that i need the amd64 version of freebsd to get the right
headers ?
Dan
of freebsd, as well as 32_bit
versions of what i write,
which will run as 32_bit code on either i_386, intel_64 or amd_64 ?
q:is it that the version labeled amd64 contains only 64_bit headers and
source,
which creates the 64_bit version of freebsd, as well as 64_bit
In the last episode (Oct 05), spellberg_robert said:
well, i looked at questions back to the beginning of august.
on aug_09 i found a thread that suggests the following questions.
You might want to just use i386 and amd64 instead of making up your own
terminology (i_386, intel_64, amd_64, etc
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 15:59:29 Gholam Mostafa Faridi wrote:
On 09/15/2010 13:00, Edho P Arief wrote:
sh install.sh
I download all file and go to download directory and run that command ,
for first time I do not see error and do not see messages , but when I
run that sh install.sh
On 09/16/2010 17:57, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 15:59:29 Gholam Mostafa Faridi wrote:
On 09/15/2010 13:00, Edho P Arief wrote:
sh install.sh
I download all file and go to download directory and run that command ,
for first time I do not see error
On 09/16/2010 17:57, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
chflags noschg /usr/lib32/libc.so.7
I do not know what happen , but after I run that command I can install
virtulbox and it work bu when I want run it I see error about
Failed to create a new session.
Callee RC:
NS_ERROR_FACTORY_NOT_REGISTERED
I want install virtualBox on AMD 64 and I use FreeBSD 8.1 and I have SRC
directory , but when I run make install clean I see this error
Requires 32-bit libraries installed under /usr/lib32.
Do: cd /usr/src; make build32 install32; ldconfig -v -m -R /usr/lib32
and I run this command
cd
On 09/15/2010 13:00, Edho P Arief wrote:
sh install.sh
I download all file and go to download directory and run that command ,
for first time I do not see error and do not see messages , but when I
run that sh install.sh again I see this error
mfaridipc# sh install.sh
./usr/lib32/libc.so.7:
disable and remove ccache ,but still I
have that probelm
please help me
I had a similar problem, and removing the contents of /usr/obj and
then rebuilding world (cvsup'ed as of 15/09) with make -DNO_CCACHE
seemed to work. This was on a real AMD64 machine too.
Rob
/jail/speak/proc as I would on
an AMD64 jail.
* I copy over my /etc/hosts file, with an entry added for the teamspeak jail
* I copy over my /etc/resolv.conf file
* I set up the rc.conf file with:
defaultrouter=192.168.1.1
hostname=speak.mydomain
#the following are also set on my web and email
On 04/09/2010 20:35:02, t...@i2bnetworks.com wrote:
I am having a problem with a fresh install onto athat is 9TB in
size. during the initial install, the syste the correct disk size
and partition sizes, but after it has complete d and rebooted it
shows the the large partition as only
Thanks Matthew. I had to do a manual install using gpart in the fixit live cd
to partition the filesystem. Everything looks to be running great.
-Troy
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 04/09/2010 20:35:02,
Hello.
I am having a problem with a fresh install onto a = raid5 file system
that is 9TB in size. during the initial install, the syste= m shows
the correct disk size and partition sizes, but after it has complete d and
rebooted it shows the the large partition as only 1TB. I am
Hello,
I have experience in freebsd but never did such system architecture
migration.
Is it possible to do safely with only SSH access (or IP-KVM)?
I'm planning to upgrade system from 7.2 to 7.3 but it's i386..
Regards,
Elifan
___
AFAIK,basically no
x86 - x86
and
x64 - x64
Non-basically ... yes but it's a real pain in the @$$ and you will
definitely run in all kinds of trouble.
ip you have KVM access, just put a x64 DVD inside and do a clean install (it
will keep your sanity intact)
failed--saving rejects to include/Makefile.rej
Also file sys/amd64/include/_align.h referred from cc-m32-3.diff is
missing on my system.
Maybe your patch isn't up-to-date?
As Tijl mentioned, his patches are for -CURRENT, and you are using
8.0-STABLE, right? STABLE-8, from which 8.0-RELEASE and 8.0
On Saturday 14 August 2010 00:57:43 Yuri wrote:
Should I make a patch, or maybe further discuss on hack...@?
There are patches for CURRENT here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2010-July/010470.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
rejects to include/Makefile.rej
Also file sys/amd64/include/_align.h referred from cc-m32-3.diff is
missing on my system.
Maybe your patch isn't up-to-date?
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
I need to build 32 bit apps the same way as they would be built on i386.
When I run 64-bit gcc I get this:
gcc -m32 -o m m.c
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libgcc.a when searching for
-lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libgcc.a when searching for
-lgcc
/usr/bin/ld:
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes:
I need to build 32 bit apps the same way as they would be built on i386.
When I run 64-bit gcc I get this:
gcc -m32 -o m m.c
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libgcc.a when searching
for -lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libgcc.a when
In the last episode (Aug 13), Yuri said:
I need to build 32 bit apps the same way as they would be built on i386.
When I run 64-bit gcc I get this:
gcc -m32 -o m m.c
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libgcc.a when searching for -lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
On 08/13/2010 09:24, Dan Nelson wrote:
Try adding -B/usr/lib32 to your first gcc line. The specs file should be
modified to add this automatically when you pass -m32, imho.
Thank you Dan, this flag worked.
But I found a strange discrepancy between 32bit and 64bit.
When I compile the
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes:
--- output of 64 bit executable (gcc -o m m.c) ---
match: off=0 so=3 eo=4
match: off=4 so=3 eo=4
--- output of 32 bit executable built on 64 bit system with flags (gcc
-B/usr/lib32 -m32 -o m m.c) ---
match: off=0 so=3 eo=0
I guess machine-dependent headers are
On 08/13/2010 10:58, Anonymous wrote:
I guess machine-dependent headers are involved.
$ cc -m32 -B/usr/lib32 a.c
$ ./a.out
match: off=0 so=3 eo=0
$ ln -s /usr/src/sys/i386/include machine
$ cc -m32 -B/usr/lib32 -isystem. a.c
$ ./a.out
match: off=0 so=3 eo=4
match: off=4
discrepancy. rm_eo field is zero in the match
result which is wrong. I can't think of any explanation for it.
I think Anonymous is right, and that it's due to the /usr/include headers on
amd64 not being 32-bit-mode aware. So you end up with some structure
members being sized for 64-bit machines
On 08/13/2010 14:44, Dan Nelson wrote:
I think Anonymous is right, and that it's due to the /usr/include headers on
amd64 not being 32-bit-mode aware. So you end up with some structure
members being sized for 64-bit machines instead of 32-bit. I bet struct
regex_t on your cross-compiled
I have 8.0-STABLE amd64 machine, and I need to run some 32-bit FreeBSD
process which runs fine on 8.0-STABLE i386.
So I copied all shared libs needed by it from i386 into there respective
locations on amd64, but under lib32/ folder.
libexecinfo.so.1 = /usr/local/lib32/libexecinfo.so.1
I have 8.0-STABLE amd64 machine, and I need to run some 32-bit FreeBSD
process which runs fine on 8.0-STABLE i386.
So I copied all shared libs needed by it from i386 into there respective
locations on amd64, but under lib32/ folder.
libexecinfo.so.1 = /usr/local/lib32/libexecinfo.so.1
I'm trying to build a kernel for a pair of firewalls which will be using
CARP and pfsync for redundancy. Since I'm new to FreeBSD the config is
based on the GENERIC config, thus:
include GENERIC
ident NEW_FIREWALL
device carp
##device pfsync
and issuing the build like this:
# cd
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
I'm trying to build a kernel for a pair of firewalls which will be using
CARP and pfsync for redundancy. Since I'm new to FreeBSD the config is
based on the GENERIC config, thus:
include GENERIC
ident NEW_FIREWALL
On 11Aug2010 01:36, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
| I'm trying to build a kernel for a pair of firewalls which will be using
| CARP and pfsync for redundancy. Since I'm new to FreeBSD the config is
| based
On 11Aug2010 19:30, I wrote:
| On 11Aug2010 01:36, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net wrote:
| | On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
| | I'm trying to build a kernel for a pair of firewalls which will be using
| | CARP and pfsync for redundancy. Since I'm
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:58:49PM -0500, Depo Catcher wrote:
On 8/9/2010 4:14 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Polytropon writes:
I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I
fetch
are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
amd64 too?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:19:31 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
amd64 too?
Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and target platform
is amd64
On Monday 09 of August 2010 23:19:31 Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
amd64 too?
Of cource! When you make them they are compiled using the amd64 libraries
Polytropon writes:
I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
amd64 too?
Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and target platform
is amd64, and so is the resulting binary code
On 8/9/2010 4:14 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Polytropon writes:
I've installed FreeBSD-amd64. It runs very well. The packages I fetch
are amd64 too, but what about the ports I compile myself? Are those
amd64 too?
Yes, as your compiler infrastructure and target platform
301 - 400 of 2012 matches
Mail list logo
