On Saturday 05 March 2005 01:25 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >
> > xorg is only on 5.3. My remaining OS is 4.10.
>
> It is possible to build xorg on FreeBSD 4.X. I wanted to
> eliminate that as a possibility.
>
> Ted
I don't _think_ xorg was an option with 4.10 release, but I know
for a f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Kline
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:12 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Gary Kline; FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: Re: any ideas why these xorg hassles???
>
>
>
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:10:23 -0800
From: "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: any ideas why
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:03:34PM -0500, Chris Shenton wrote:
> Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Another couple things. With XFree, I set the DefaultDepth'
> > to 8; now, on both computers it is maxed out at 16. If I
> > do set the default depth to 8, xdm fails. (It "tr
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:38:28AM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2005 01:52 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[[ ]]
>
> I have to add one thing, the meta port if installed for the old X
> version needs to be manually removed first.
>
I'm pretty sure I fo
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:52:01AM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2005 01:34 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> >
> > I'm running portmanager on a test system to see if it is able to
> > switch between XFree86 and xorg, if it is all you need due is make
> > the change in make.conf
On Friday 04 March 2005 02:38 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2005 01:52 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2005 01:34 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 March 2005 12:55 am, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > Here's the s
On Friday 04 March 2005 01:52 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2005 01:34 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2005 12:55 am, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > Here's the story XFree-4 vs xorg. I have 4 platforms on
> > > a KVM so every machine uses th
On Friday 04 March 2005 01:34 am, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2005 12:55 am, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > Here's the story XFree-4 vs xorg. I have 4 platforms on
> > a KVM so every machine uses the same tube. With XFree,
> > my 3 FBSD systems had a flawles
On Friday 04 March 2005 12:55 am, Gary Kline wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Here's the story XFree-4 vs xorg. I have 4 platforms on
> a KVM so every machine uses the same tube. With XFree,
> my 3 FBSD systems had a flawless 1280x1024 display. With
> xorg, on my E-machines (ATI-
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:01:08AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> What version FreeBSD we talking here? And if it's 4.X, why on
> earth did you change it?
>
xorg is only on 5.3. My remaining OS is 4.10.
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Pu
What version FreeBSD we talking here? And if it's 4.X, why on
earth did you change it?
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Kline
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:55 AM
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subje
Guys,
Here's the story XFree-4 vs xorg. I have 4 platforms on
a KVM so every machine uses the same tube. With XFree,
my 3 FBSD systems had a flawless 1280x1024 display. With
xorg, on my E-machines (ATI-Rage- 4M Video) the screen
quivers. On my HP
13 matches
Mail list logo
