Hi,
How do I accomplish atacontrol reinit in 9.0 with ATA_CAM enabled? Plugged
drives don't show up without a reboot and camcontrol reset or rescan does not
help.
Pete
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:47 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm wondering why you would
> prefere atacontrol?
I think everyone's been looking for an "official" solution.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@fre
El día Tuesday, March 01, 2011 a las 09:15:01AM +, Bruce Cran escribió:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:21 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
>
> > But I can still hear the noise every 10 seconds, I think atacontrol does
> > not totally close the APM feature of the device.
>
&g
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:21 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
> But I can still hear the noise every 10 seconds, I think atacontrol does
> not totally close the APM feature of the device.
atacontrol's spindown setting doesn't change anything in the disk
itself: it just controls a t
Hello,
I don't like to hear the spin down from my hard drive, it does it every
10 seconds approximately. I used ataidle -P 0 /dev/ad0 to disable it and
it works.
When I saw there was a atacontrol command for this, I tried it, so I
removed ataidle and I tried :
markand@Melon ~ $
On 29/4/09 14:18, Alexander Popov wrote:
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> This is the output:
>
> Checking setuid files and devices:
>
> Checking for uids of 0:
> root 0
> toor 0
>
> Checking for passwordless accounts:
>
> Checking login.conf permissions:
>
> ***.home kernel log messages:
> +++ /tmp/security.G4Qu
On 4/29/09, Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> All FreeBSD system partitions are on a disk that I never try to spin down.
> It is weird that something in periodic daily tries to read from my data
> disks...
Than disable one by one until problem got fixed(easy to say than
done), if not than it is ata
bug.
All FreeBSD system partitions are on a disk that I never try to spin down. It
is weird that something in periodic daily tries to read from my data disks...
Alexander.
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> From: Paul B. Mahol
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
> To: aopo...@
d, 4/29/09, Daniel C. Dowse wrote:
> From: Daniel C. Dowse
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 3:07 PM
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
> Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi, Daniel
lock keeps local time, as opposed to
> # UTC time. See adjkerntz(8) for details.
> 1,310-5 * * * rootadjkerntz -a
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/29/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>
>> From: Paul B. Mahol
>> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
>> To: aopo...@yahoo.c
nthly
#
# Adjust the time zone if the CMOS clock keeps local time, as opposed to
# UTC time. See adjkerntz(8) for details.
1,310-5 * * * rootadjkerntz -a
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> From: Paul B. Mahol
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> It must be periodic(8), but I have trouble identifying what exactly could be
> the trigger. If I look at /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, it has
> daily_clean_disks_enable="NO".
> With respect to daily checks, I j
On 4/29/09, Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> It must be periodic(8), but I have trouble identifying what exactly could be
> the trigger. If I look at /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, it has
> daily_clean_disks_enable="NO".
> With respect to daily checks, I just have the default setup, nothin
any other configuration options that I should look at?
Thanks,
Alexander.
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Daniel C. Dowse wrote:
> From: Daniel C. Dowse
> Subject: Re: atacontrol spindown
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 1:50 PM
> On Wed, 29 Apr
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With FreeBSD 7.1 I've started using atacontrol spindown for my secondary
> disks (i.e. disks that are accessed very infrequently). Everything seemed to
> work nice until I noticed in my &qu
Hi,
With FreeBSD 7.1 I've started using atacontrol spindown for my secondary disks
(i.e. disks that are accessed very infrequently). Everything seemed to work
nice until I noticed in my "daily security run output" list of kernel messages
that suggests that disks get awaken ever
--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Gabe wrote:
> From: Gabe
> Subject: atacontrol + highpoint raid & hot-swappable bays = reboot?
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 2:40 AM
> Hello list,
>
> I've come upon a problem I've googled the da
Hello list,
I've come upon a problem I've googled the daylights out of, further I've read
atacontrol(8) up and down without success. My goal is simple, I have a
supermicro 1U with hot-swappable drive bays which hold 2 SATA drives that are
connected to a PCI highpoint rocket ra
Hello list,
I've come upon a problem I've googled the daylights out of, further I've read
atacontrol(8) up and down without success. My goal is simple, I have a
supermicro 1U with hot-swappable drive bays which hold 2 SATA drives that are
connected to a PCI highpoint rocket ra
ar RAID devices are almost always software/BIOS RAID. In this case
intel matrix raid is software RAID provided by the system BIOS. The
it's always better to use gmirror. not mentioning more flexibility (you do
not have to mirror whole drives)
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
> How can I detect if system has Software or hardware raid? Since in manual
> page:
>
> The atacontrol command can also be used to create purely software RAID
> arrays in systems that do NOT have a "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
> How can I detect if system has Software or hardware raid? Since in manual
> page:
>
> The atacontrol command can also be used to create purely software RAID
> arrays in systems that do NOT have a "
How can I detect if system has Software or hardware raid? Since in manual page:
The atacontrol command can also be used to create purely software RAID
arrays in systems that do NOT have a "real" hardware RAID card such as a
Highpoint or Promise card. A common scenario is a
I need help with this. I'm trying to create a software RAID1. I followed
the instructions in man page
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=atacontrol&sektion=8&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.1-RELEASE
atacontrol(8)
atacontrol(8) wrote:
>
> [snip]
> A quick and
Here's mine:
--
#!/bin/sh
echo
echo 'Setting controllers to DMA mode'
atacontrol mode acd1 udma33
--
I had to do that because my DVD-ROM would autodetect UDMA66 or higher and
hang.
--
Kirk Strauser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello Philip,
Monday, March 10, 2008, 8:46:46 AM, you wrote:
> $ atacontrol mode ad2 PIO4
> current mode = PIO4
> My problem is how do I get this to persist across reboot ?
putting it into /etc/rc.conf.local should work...
--
Best regards,
Danielmail
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Have a look at man 4 ata
Your answer is probably:
hw.ata.ata_dma=0
This sets it for all controllers I only want to set it for ata1 which
contains ad2. Thanks for the tip though.
ata0: on atapci0
ata0: [ITHREAD]
ata1: on atapci0
ata1: [ITHREAD]
ad0: 19092MB at ata0-
: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711964
ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=0
10-30 minutes later, it finally gets through the boot.
/etc/fstab:
/dev/ad2s1 /X ufs rw 2 2
the problem here is the device needs to be PIO4
$ atacontrol mode ad2 PIO4
current mode = PIO4
My problem is how do I
=58711964
ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=0
10-30 minutes later, it finally gets through the boot.
/etc/fstab:
/dev/ad2s1 /X ufs rw 2 2
the problem here is the device needs to be PIO4
$ atacontrol mode ad2 PIO4
current mode = PIO4
My problem is how do I get this to persist across
ould guess
the inside of that server is pretty filthy about now.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin Sullivan
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 6:16 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: atacontrol rebuild on non-identical disks
We have a (very) remote FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE system running on Asus RS120
hardware and historically configured with 2 identical SATA drives using
atacontrol RAID1 and the system installed on ar0.
One of the drives has died, however no identical replacement drive could
be easily sourced at the
When copying from another machine by NFS/SMBFS more than one file at
the same time (or when using the disk, like during a filesystem check
in the background) often crashes (and the disk light indicator turns
off). Running "atacontrol ad0 mode UDMA100" when it was UDMA133 crashed
the s
needed to do
with atacontrol to make FreeBSD recognize the array?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
At 05:57 PM 05/03/2006, Francisco Reyes wrote:
How does one do "atacontrol status" for a 3ware card in FreeBSD 6?
Why not use the cli tool that you can download from the 3ware website?
That is the next step, but I was wondering if it was possible to get
basic status info from
Mike Tancsa writes:
Sorry for the delay.. ever since my HD crashed last weekend.. have been
having problems with my home courier-imap setup. :-(
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:40:32 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
How does one do "atacontrol status" for a 3wa
what does 3ware tech support say?
Ted
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Francisco Reyes
>Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:41 PM
>To: Free BSD Questions list
>Subject: atacontrol status for 3ware?
>
>
>How doe
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:40:32 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>How does one do "atacontrol status" for a 3ware card in FreeBSD 6?
>
>Tried
>atacontrol status 0 (like in previous versions)
>atacontrol status twe0
>atacontrol status twed0
Hi,
Why n
How does one do "atacontrol status" for a 3ware card in FreeBSD 6?
Tried
atacontrol status 0 (like in previous versions)
atacontrol status twe0
atacontrol status twed0
I rebuild an array and saw the controller display messages at the start of
the rebuild and it showed "twe0&
>> So hw.ata.wc thinks that the disk write cache is off,
>> but atacontrol cap thinks the disk write cache is on?
> I remember this is working but there was a reporting problem
> in atacontrol.
Looks like "atacontrol cap" reports the state of the disk *before*
hw.ata.
Dieter wrote on Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:05:40PM +:
> I'm trying to turn off the evil data corrupting on-disk write cache.
>
> I added hw.ata.wc=0 to /boot/loader.conf and rebooted.
>
> # sysctl hw.ata.wc
> hw.ata.wc: 0
>
> So far so good. But! atacontr
I'm trying to turn off the evil data corrupting on-disk write cache.
I added hw.ata.wc=0 to /boot/loader.conf and rebooted.
# sysctl hw.ata.wc
hw.ata.wc: 0
So far so good. But! atacontrol cap ad4 says:
Feature Support EnableValue Vendor
write
Hi all,
I've been trying to build a 2 disk mirror with atacontrol on a standard
IDE controller (testing in vmware), from an already running 4.11 system.
ad0 has the system, ad3 is the new drive. I thought I should be able to
mimic the gmirror trick of making a 1 disk degraded mirror o
gb
> of disk. That's a loss of 19gb, i can live with that.
>
> After login I do a "atacontrol create JBOD ad5 ad6". It now creates ar0
> device with 223gb of space. That's nearly a 100gb of disk loss!
> If and how can i prevent the huge 100gb of storage loss?
I&#x
-slave UDMA133
ad6: 114440MB [232514/16/63] at ata3-master
UDMA100
ar0: 228880MB [29178/255/63] status: READY subdisks:
---Originalmeddelande---
Från: Glenn Dawson
Datum: 09/08/05 20:57:45
Till: Göran Nilsson ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Ämne: Re: atacontrol
At 11:54 AM 9/8/2005
i can live with that.
After login I do a "atacontrol create JBOD ad5 ad6". It now creates ar0
device with 223gb of space. That's nearly a 100gb of disk loss!
If and how can i prevent the huge 100gb of storage loss?
If all you're going to do is use "JBOD", why ev
do a "atacontrol create JBOD ad5 ad6". It now creates ar0
device with 223gb of space. That's nearly a 100gb of disk loss!
If and how can i prevent the huge 100gb of storage loss?
/Regards dukka
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 8/16/05, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a simple question. Some time ago I was told always to use the
> same type of harddisk transfers. Now I have i.e.:
>
> Master = UDMA100
> Slave = UDMA66
>
> Does this mean the first disk really works on UDMA100 or is is delayed
> by
I have a simple question. Some time ago I was told always to use the
same type of harddisk transfers. Now I have i.e.:
Master = UDMA100
Slave = UDMA66
Does this mean the first disk really works on UDMA100 or is is delayed
by the second one (as I was told some time ago).
Or is the fbsd ata cont
drops the drive for
some reason. I usually end up re-mirroring the array on the old "dead" drive
and the system will continue on its merry way (last one is over 1 year old
since last resync)...hence you see why I am curious if I could just use
atacontrol instead of taking the unit offli
Am Montag, 4. April 2005 23:29 schrieb Edgar Martinez:
> All,
>
>
>
> I have a failed member in a RAID1 array and using atacontrol can see that
> the status is degraded. I am curious if I can use atacontrol to rebuild the
> array if the original array was built using the Promi
All,
I have a failed member in a RAID1 array and using atacontrol can see that
the status is degraded. I am curious if I can use atacontrol to rebuild the
array if the original array was built using the Promise BIOS utility. If I
tell atacontrol to rebuild.will it corrupt my data or catch fire
I have an ICH6 SATA RAID controller that I have set up with atacontrol to
behave as a RAID1 array. The array (ar0) consists of ad4 and ad6. Last
night I started a dump like so:
# dump -0Luaf /dev/da0s1 /
to *hopefully* dump my root filesystem (ar0s1a) to a usb storage device.
Now here is where
On 01/03/05 14:28:02, Hexren wrote:
I need to change the mode of ata channel 1 to UDMA33. When the system
is up I use "atacontrol mode 1 UDMA33 UDMA33" for that. How can I do
this during boot, before mounting HDDs (The reason for all this is,
that one of my HDDs only likes UDMA33)?
Tha
I need to change the mode of ata channel 1 to UDMA33. When the system
is up I use "atacontrol mode 1 UDMA33 UDMA33" for that. How can I do
this during boot, before mounting HDDs (The reason for all this is,
that one of my HDDs only likes UDMA33)?
Tha
atacontrol addspare ar0 ad6 should do the trick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giovanni P.
Tirloni
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: atacontrol and SATA RAID
Giovanni P
Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
Hi,
I've a Intel SE7210TP1 motherboard with Adaptec HostRAID and I've
created a RAID1 array with 2 SATA disks using the following command:
atacontrol create RAID1 ad4 ad6
The system installed on /dev/ar0 just fine and I played a bit with
atacontrol det
Hi,
I've a Intel SE7210TP1 motherboard with Adaptec HostRAID and I've
created a RAID1 array with 2 SATA disks using the following command:
atacontrol create RAID1 ad4 ad6
The system installed on /dev/ar0 just fine and I played a bit with
atacontrol detaching and attaching
Hi all,
how do I rebuild a degraded RADI1 in -stable? I have a HighPoint 372
Controller and yesterday had one drive failed (wich it does regularly and
comes back fine after reboot).
"atacontrol status ar0" reported only one disk (ad4) and degraded (of course).
In -current with a
nnel 2:
Master: ad4 ATA/ATAPI rev 7
Slave: no device present
ATA channel 3:
Master: ad6 ATA/ATAPI rev 7
Slave: no device present
arc# atacontrol status ar0
ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: READY
I've installed *BSD successfully without any flaws, rebooted, and
Hello,
Trying to help a friend set up a system for raid. He's got two 4 gb drives
he'd like to mirror. And we were thinking atacontrol, googled for a site on
this, and didn't find anything. Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.
___
[
From: Gabriel Ambuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Gabriel Ambuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: atacontrol weirdness: RAID 1 array is shown to be degraded but
bothdisks are up
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:30:29 +0100
The 4.9 box has got onboard
The 4.9 box has got onboard Promise RAID which so far has worked just
fine.
However, today I got a report about a degraded disk array so I went to
check and found something rather odd:
$ atacontrol list
ATA channel 0:
Master: no device present
Slave: no device present
ATA
Hello.
It just does not seem to work. How do I fix that?
cnst# whoami
root
cnst# atacontrol enclosure 0 0
atacontrol: ioctl(ATAENCSTAT): Device not configured
cnst# uname -r
4.8-RELEASE
Cheers,
Constantine.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
At 2003-10-15T04:28:58Z, Constantine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why to this file and not to /etc/sysctl.conf? I have no monitor on that
> box, so I want to make sure it is more likely to work after the
> reboot. :-)
That's a read-only sysctl knob, so you can't adjust it once the system has
boo
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 01:46 am, Mike Maltese wrote:
> > acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA66
>
> I stand corrected, although I maintain that no optical drive is
> capable of that kind of throughput. =) I was kinda wondering if he'd
> been duped on the specs of the drive.
>
Neither are the HD
> acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA66
I stand corrected, although I maintain that no optical drive is capable of
that kind of throughput. =) I was kinda wondering if he'd been duped on the
specs of the drive.
Thanks, Mike
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 10:04 pm, Mike Maltese wrote:
> > Why to this file and not to /etc/sysctl.conf? I have no monitor on
> > that box, so I want to make sure it is more likely to work after
> > the reboot.
> >
> :-)
>
> I can't remember exactly why, but trust me, it will work.
>
> > But why
>> Add the following to /boot/loader.conf:
>> hw.ata.atapi_dma="1"
> Why to this file and not to /etc/sysctl.conf? I have no monitor on that
> box, so I want to make sure it is more likely to work after the reboot.
loader.conf(5) is the system bootstrap configuration file (third step)
and is read
> Why to this file and not to /etc/sysctl.conf? I have no monitor on that
> box, so I want to make sure it is more likely to work after the reboot.
:-)
I can't remember exactly why, but trust me, it will work.
> But why does it sets it to UDMA33, but not to UDMA66?
Have you actually tried it ye
On 2003-10-15 00:20, Mike Maltese wrote:
Second, where do I have to indicate that my DVD-ROM supports UDMA66? I
assume that after saying "atacontrol mode 1 udma66 udma66", the settings
are going to be vanished the next reboot.
Add the following to /boot/loader.conf:
hw.ata.at
> Second, where do I have to indicate that my DVD-ROM supports UDMA66? I
> assume that after saying "atacontrol mode 1 udma66 udma66", the settings
> are going to be vanished the next reboot.
Add the following to /boot/loader.conf:
hw.ata.atapi_dma="1"
Reboot.
Hello,
I have a few questions about atacontrol.
First, why the option 'enclosure' does not seem to work?
<<
cnst# atacontrol enclosure 0 0
atacontrol: ioctl(ATAENCSTAT): Device not configured
>>
Second, where do I have to indicate that my DVD-ROM supports UDMA66? I
as
At 08:35 PM 21/09/2003, Micheal Patterson wrote:
>
> cd /dev
> sh MAKEDEV ata
>
> then try atacontrol.
>
> ---Mike
Tried that as well..
It reports:
ata - no such device name
Do you have
device ata
in your kernel ?
As well do you have
ata)
mknod ata
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tancsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: atacontrol
>
> cd /dev
> sh MAKEDEV ata
>
> the
cd /dev
sh MAKEDEV ata
then try atacontrol.
---Mike
At 11:56 AM 21/09/2003, Micheal Patterson wrote:
Has anyone ever run across this error when trying to run atacontrol?
"$:> atacontrol list
atacontrol: control device not found: No such file or directory"
I can't locat
On Sunday 21 September 2003 01:39 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Wrong error for that to be the problem.
> Maybe /dev/ata is missing?
Well, if run as a non-root user, I get the same error with "permission
denied" appended on the very end of it. I assumed he merely did not
copy the entire line. T
--
Micheal Patterson
Network Administration
Cancer Care Network
405-917-0600
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micheal Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 10:57 AM
Todd Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 21 September 2003 11:56 am, Micheal Patterson wrote:
> > Has anyone ever run across this error when trying to run atacontrol?
> >
> > "$:> atacontrol list
> > atacontrol: control device not found: No su
On Sunday 21 September 2003 11:56 am, Micheal Patterson wrote:
> Has anyone ever run across this error when trying to run atacontrol?
>
> "$:> atacontrol list
> atacontrol: control device not found: No such file or directory"
>
atacontrol has to be run as root.
--
T
Has anyone ever run across this error when trying to run atacontrol?
"$:> atacontrol list
atacontrol: control device not found: No such file or directory"
I can't locate much information on the command itself other than the man
pages and they don't indicate which dev
What is the suggested interleave numbers? how to calculate the best value?
Evren
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi
Does anybody know if it's possible to create a RAID1 array on disks with
data on them without destroying the data on them?
My reason for doing this is that I have to disks that I run in an
existing Promise Fasttrack100 RAID1 array, but I want to use the RAID
controller in another machine. Then
> I think Vinum or RAIDframe would be better if you want software RAID.
> > Both support booting from the RAID.
>
> I don't think RAIDframe is supported in Stable, is it?
>
> Is there a particular advantage to Vinum over the atacontrol stuff?
It's more extensi
think RAIDframe is supported in Stable, is it?
Is there a particular advantage to Vinum over the atacontrol stuff?
g.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
it together from spare parts is.
>
> So, I'm shying away from hardware raids, and even the pseudo-hardware
> raids.
>
> I'd like to just stuff two ata drives in there and use atacontrol to
> set them up.
>
> I gather that I can't just cram a second disk in
aids.
I'd like to just stuff two ata drives in there and use atacontrol to
set them up.
I gather that I can't just cram a second disk into the existing
system, rather I'll have to do dumps to somewhere, set up a raid,
disklabel/newfs, then restore the dumps onto the raid. Is that a
On Saturday, 29 March 2003 at 10:45:43 +, james wrote:
> Hi Greg
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
>> #6 0xc0220332 in dsioctl (dev=0xc1383200, cmd=0x8004646d, data=0xcb307d58 "\001",
>> flags=0x2, sspp=0xc1328568)
>> at ../../kern/subr_diskslice.c:356
>> #7 0xc021fd5b in diskioctl (dev=0x
Hi Greg
Thanks for your response!
> #6 0xc0220332 in dsioctl (dev=0xc1383200, cmd=0x8004646d, data=0xcb307d58 "\001",
> flags=0x2, sspp=0xc1328568)
> at ../../kern/subr_diskslice.c:356
> #7 0xc021fd5b in diskioctl (dev=0xc1383200, cmd=0x8004646d, data=0xcb307d58 "\001",
> fflag=0x2, p=0x
:18:43 +, james wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am trying to configure hotswap-raid and vinum on my machine, and have found I
>>> can cause the kernel to panic at will.
>>>
>>> Ideally I would like to be able to stop a plex, use atacontrol attach/detac
.p1
3, atacontrol detach 1 (drive b)
4, atacontrol attach 1 - this WORKS, doesn't panic like 5.0-STABLE
5, vinum start volume.p1
As before, I have a debug kernel and core dump. I can't seem to configure my
mailer to not wrap lines, so I've posted all relevant information to
http://
gt;
> Ideally I would like to be able to stop a plex, use atacontrol attach/detach to
> replace the disk, and rebuild the plex. Would this work in theory?
Apparently. There was a time when people claimed that ATA drives
couldn't be hot swapped, but that seems to be incorrect nowadays
Hi
I am trying to configure hotswap-raid and vinum on my machine, and have found I
can cause the kernel to panic at will.
Ideally I would like to be able to stop a plex, use atacontrol attach/detach to
replace the disk, and rebuild the plex. Would this work in theory?
I am using atacontrol to
Pete wrote:
[ ... ]
The RAID-1 volume I'm using right now is with two drives attached to
a non-RAID card with a Promise chipset.
Does it work if you move the two drives to another machine without a
Promise, Highpoint, or other RAID controller card or MB chipset...?
Hardware based RAID is likely t
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> The ATA RAID support via atacontrol apparently requires hardware RAID
> controllers like the Promise or Highpoint devices.
I don't think this is right. The RAID-1 volume I'm using right now is
with two drives attached to a non-
On Sunday, 9 March 2003 at 20:15:32 -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Pete wrote:
>
> Generally, one cannot boot from a vinum based-device, unless you are
> only doing RAID-1 mirroring.
You can have a Vinum root file system as long as at least one plex is
concatenated from a single subdisk.
> I'm fam
Pete wrote:
[ ... ]
I thought Vinum was FreeBSD's RAID system. If you wanted to do software
RAID with FreeBSD, you needed to use Vinum. Now I find this out. Does
that ATA subsystem have RAID support built in? (Since atacontrol just
seems to control the ATA devices...) If this is so, w
A couple days ago, I asked on the -hackers list about a problem I was
having with Vinum and my Promise-based controllers. Søren replied with
how to do this by using atacontrol to build the volume. No Vinum seems
to be required.
I thought Vinum was FreeBSD's RAID system. If you wanted
Hello,
I have a machine running atacontrol based software RAID in which one
of the disks recently failed (Maxtor, not IBM for those who want to
know). Now I'm wondering how I should go about fixing this. atacontrol
seems to lack a command to fix broken software only arrays.
I suppose I coul
Hello,
after messing around with atacontrol software RAID a bit I became
quite confident that this can't be any worse than the el cheapo IDE
RAID (Highpoint, Promise, CMD) that we commonly use around here and
figured I could as well ditch the controllers and use the PCI slots
for something
99 matches
Mail list logo
