On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:04:44PM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Thursday 2004-06-24 06:35 am, Karel J. Bosschaart wrote:
I'm looking for a commercial X server (for -current with Intel 845G)
but Xi graphics (www.xig.com) no longer has standard FreeBSD support
(only custom/OEM
On Friday 2004-06-25 04:54 am, Karel J. Bosschaart wrote:
In the first place stability, and as a bonus maybe some speed-up. I'm
currently using the XFree86-4 port, and X screws up so often (daily) and
badly (no console, ctrl-alt-backspace useless) that I'd like to try
alternatives.
From
Hi,
I'm looking for a commercial X server (for -current with Intel 845G)
but Xi graphics (www.xig.com) no longer has standard FreeBSD support
(only custom/OEM) and www.metrolink.com seems to be down while I couldn't
find a cached version of the site on Google.
Any tips?
TIA,
Karel
On Thursday 2004-06-24 06:35 am, Karel J. Bosschaart wrote:
I'm looking for a commercial X server (for -current with Intel 845G)
but Xi graphics (www.xig.com) no longer has standard FreeBSD support
(only custom/OEM) and www.metrolink.com seems to be down while I couldn't
find a cached version
I was wondering if anyone is using a commercial x server such as Xig or Metro-X with
4.7 or 5.0 and if so, what are you thought vs Xfree?
Rod
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Rod Person wrote:
I was wondering if anyone is using a commercial x server such as Xig or
Metro-X with 4.7 or 5.0 and if so, what are you thought vs Xfree?
Xig rocks. Works well, effective and is a dream to configure, if you need
all the fancy accelleration on your card
I was wondering if anyone is using a commercial x server such as Xig or
Metro-X with 4.7 or 5.0 and if so, what are you thought vs Xfree?
Rod
Hi
yeah Metro-X and it rocks!!!
like 1000 times faster and more stable than Xfree
Jorge
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
