Hi
cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/local/etc/cvsup/cvsup-ports.conf
I have next conf for cvsup
cat cvsup-ports.conf
*default host=cvsup6.jp.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs date=2008.10.15.00.00.00
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress
ports-databases date=
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:34:19 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Simon Gao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow.
> > If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Gao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow.
> If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to
> have '"src-all"?
>
>
> *default host=cvsup9.freebsd.org *default base=/usr *default
> pr
Hi,
I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow. If I
just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to have
'"src-all"?
*default host=cvsup9.freebsd.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_11
*default delete use-rel-suffix c
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
>> I have always found the mergemaster process confusing.
>
> Mergemaster is very useful tool for updating those files.
>
Updating: yes, but I never managed to merge two files successfully and
always end up making
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hopefullly!
>
> I have been told in the past that I can skip the mergemaster steps.
Can skip? Sometimes.
Ought to skip? No.
>
> Considering I am just going from 6.1 to 6.2 is this still true?
>
> I have always found the mergemaste
Hopefullly!
I have been told in the past that I can skip the mergemaster steps.
Considering I am just going from 6.1 to 6.2 is this still true?
I have always found the mergemaster process confusing.
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:56:31 -0400
"Jim Stapleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
> get it working.
>
> I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
> the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:56:31 Jim Stapleton wrote:
> I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
> get it working.
>
> I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
> the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
> 0.9.36 bac
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
get it working.
I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these
command
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then
may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such
things as stable or current ports?
You got the right answer the first time. You will get the appropriat
Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD,
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there
is no such things as stable or current ports?
Simon
Joe Holden wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1
Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD,
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is
no such things as stable or current ports?
Simon
Joe Holden wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD,
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is
no such things as stable or current ports?
Simon
Joe Holden wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports
to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD
(tag=.).
HTH,
Joe
___
freebsd-q
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports
to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Simon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscr
php5-cgi hasn't been a separate port for some time. Try "make config" in
lang/php5.
~BAS
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Charlie McElfresh wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
ports-all
in my cvs_supfile
After the upda
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:20:03AM -0800, Charlie McElfresh wrote:
> After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
> before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.
Check out Freshports: http://www.freshports.org/commits.php
This gives you an overview of recently chan
> Hi,
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
>
> In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
>
> ports-all
>
> in my cvs_supfile
>
> After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
> before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.
>
> I'd apprecia
"Charlie McElfresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
>
> In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
>
> ports-all
>
> in my cvs_supfile
>
> After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
> before, notably
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
ports-all
in my cvs_supfile
After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.
I'd appreciate being pointed in t
At 04:25 AM 2/12/2006, Joel Hatton wrote:
Hi,
I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm
wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile?
Something like:
*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default rele
Hi,
I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm
wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile?
Something like:
*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3
*default release=cvs
Vasile C wrote:
Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ?
Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ?
Not without modifying the source code to cvsup.
What I recommend you do is add the '-1' flag to your cvsup command line
-- so cvsup will try once to pul
Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ?
Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ?
On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:54, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM
> Vasile C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: cvsup que
On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM
Vasile C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cvsup question
Wrote these words of wisdom:
> I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I
> want
> to change the reconnect time ..
>
>
> On Sunday 11 De
Vasile C wrote:
>> A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
>> server...
> I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I
> want
> to change the reconnect time ..
I hope this is a testbed and is not a production system.
Automaticly ru
I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want
to change the reconnect time ..
On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Vasile C wrote:
> > How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
>
> A more useful approach would be to switch to
Vasile C wrote:
> How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
server...
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
--
Regards , Vasile C
pgpwwFwjDujVT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 23 July 2004 08:54 am, Steve wrote:
> am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
> questions for those who used it.
>
> is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
> also is this configuration decent, in your opinion
>
> *default host=cvsup5.F
Steve wrote:
am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
questions for those who used it.
is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
Depends on whether you want to update the OS as
well as the 3rd party software ("ports").
also is this configuration
Steve wrote:
am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
questions for those who used it.
is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
also is this configuration decent, in your opinion
*default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org
*default tag=.
*default base=/usr/lo
am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
questions for those who used it.
is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
also is this configuration decent, in your opinion
*default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org
*default tag=.
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvs
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:21:22 -0800
Joshua Lokken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Darryl Hoar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 08:27]:
> > Greetings,
> > I installed 5.1-release on a box. I installed cvsup from ports.
> > I then copied /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-sup /etc.
> >
> > I change
* Darryl Hoar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-12 08:27]:
> Greetings,
> I installed 5.1-release on a box. I installed cvsup from ports.
> I then copied /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-sup /etc.
>
> I changed the file to point to a CVS server near me. The notes
> I was reading were specific to
Greetings,
I installed 5.1-release on a box. I installed cvsup from ports.
I then copied /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-sup /etc.
I changed the file to point to a CVS server near me. The notes
I was reading were specific to Freebsd 4.6. Since I had
5.1 installed I guessed I needed to cho
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:57:59 -0500, "Bob Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
> updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
> RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
> are not already
Selon Bob Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
> updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
> RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
> are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this poi
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:57:59AM -0500, Bob Collins wrote:
> I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
> updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
> RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
> are not already noted in the ha
I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not
updated the system since install
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 01:01:15 -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running Freebsd 5.1 and I noticed in the Freebsd ftp website, current has
> some new port versions. I modified my cvs-supfile based on what I read in the
> handbook:
>
> src-all
> ports-all
> cvs-root all
>
> *def
Hi all,
I'm running Freebsd 5.1 and I noticed in the Freebsd ftp website, current has
some new port versions. I modified my cvs-supfile based on what I read in the
handbook:
src-all
ports-all
cvs-root all
*default tag=.
*default host=cvsup16.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/home/
Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to upgrade a 4.5 box to RELENG_4, but it doesn't appear
> that I am getting all of the required info. Here's my command, and
> supfile:
>
> # cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile
>
> *default tag=RELENG_4
> *default host=cvsup2.freebsd.org
> *defaul
I am trying to upgrade a 4.5 box to RELENG_4, but it doesn't appear that
I am getting all of the required info. Here's my command, and supfile:
# cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile
*default tag=RELENG_4
*default host=cvsup2.freebsd.org
*default release=cvs
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
*default pr
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 10:34 am, Daniel Schrock wrote:
> This is more of a minor annoyance, but I can't seem to fix it.
> I'm tired of portsdb -Uu spitting out errors regarding not finding
> japanese ports.
>
Try
cd /usr/ports
make index
portsdb -u
I have incorporated this sequence in m
This is more of a minor annoyance, but I can't seem to fix it.
I'm tired of portsdb -Uu spitting out errors regarding not finding
japanese ports.
I initially had all of the non-english ports in my refuse file, since i
have zero use for them, but i've removed these entries with the thinking
that
> On 8 Dec 2002, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
>> mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine
>> labs, to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is
>> this. If i add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that
>
On 8 Dec 2002, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs,
> > to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i
> > add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets m
mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs,
> to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i
> add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at
> night and everything does its job
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, mike wrote:
> Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs,
> to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i
> add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at
> night and everything does its job a
mike wrote:
Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs,
to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i
add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at
night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if
Hello. i use cvsup to backup certain critical folders on the machine labs,
to the machine labs2 automatically every night. My question is this. If i
add new stuff to say, /home/mike (or wherever) then that gets mirrored at
night and everything does its job as i want it to. However, if i DELETE
some
work from my system at work, but it works just fine at home. I'm wondering
>if it's a blocked port. If that's the case is it possible to get it to use a
>different port?
>
> Anthony
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe f
What port does CVSUP use when syncing up? I'm behind a firewall and can not get CVSUP
to work from my system at work, but it works just fine at home. I'm wondering if it's
a blocked port. If that's the case is it possible to get it to use a different port?
Anthony
To Unsubscribe: send mail
55 matches
Mail list logo